# Cursor Agent SDK vs Microsoft Agent Framework (slim)

> Microsoft Agent Framework scores 82.2 (A) to Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B) for agent frameworks. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cursor-agent-sdk-vs-microsoft-agent-framework.md (~2,650 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cursor-agent-sdk-vs-microsoft-agent-framework.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cursor-agent-sdk-vs-microsoft-agent-framework
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-27
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Microsoft Agent Framework scores 82.2 (A) on agent readiness against Cursor Agent SDK's 63.6 (B), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent frameworks.

- Cursor Agent SDK: B 63.6, rank #443 of 1217 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cursor-agent-sdk.min.md
- Microsoft Agent Framework: A 82.2, rank #5 of 1217 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/microsoft-agent-framework.min.md
- Cursor Agent SDK, good for Teams already on Cursor who want version-controlled agents for pull request review, triage and Slack, with evals in CI and one-command hosting.
- Microsoft Agent Framework, good for Teams on Azure or .NET, and for teams moving off AutoGen or Semantic Kernel, that want MCP, approval, checkpointed workflows and OpenTelemetry in one SDK. Ahead on Reliability, 78 against 45; Schema & documentation, 95 against 82; Agent ergonomics, 87 against 80; Security & auth, 93 against 68; Payments & pricing, 60 against 30; Maintenance & community, 91 against 74; Transparency & trust, 83 against 70. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source.

| Category | Cursor Agent SDK | Microsoft Agent Framework |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 45 | 78 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 82 | 95 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 80 | 87 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 68 | 93 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 74 | 91 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 70 | 83 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Cursor Agent SDK | Microsoft Agent Framework |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Cursor | Microsoft |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Your plan | Free |
| Licence | Proprietary. The package's LICENSE.md reads "© Anysphere Inc. All rights reserved", with use subject to Cursor's Terms of Service (updated 3 September 2026). No source repository is published | MIT |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-25 | 2026-10-15 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-03 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-29 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |  |
| Popularity | none | 14k stars, 48k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |