# Crustdata API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP (slim)

> Enrich Layer API + MCP has a score of 56 (C) against Crustdata API + MCP's 53.5 (D). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 41 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-enrich-layer.md (~1,600 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-enrich-layer.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-enrich-layer
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Enrich Layer API + MCP has a score of 56 (C) against Crustdata API + MCP's 53.5 (D). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 41 points.

- Crustdata API + MCP: D 53.5, rank #331 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/crustdata.min.md
- Enrich Layer API + MCP: C 56, rank #309 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/enrich-layer.min.md
- Pick Crustdata API + MCP for schema & documentation (+13), agent ergonomics (+5), security & auth (+16), maintenance & community (+41). Pick Enrich Layer API + MCP for reliability (+20), payments & pricing (+35), transparency & trust (+5).

| Category | Crustdata API + MCP | Enrich Layer API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 45 | 65 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 89 | 76 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 73 | 68 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 56 | 40 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 5 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 67 | 26 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 56 | 61 |