# Crustdata API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP > Enrich Layer API + MCP has a score of 56 (C) against Crustdata API + MCP's 53.5 (D). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 41 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-enrich-layer - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-enrich-layer.md (~1,600 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-enrich-layer.min.md (~380 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-enrich-layer.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-04 Enrich Layer API + MCP has a score of 56 (C) against Crustdata API + MCP's 53.5 (D). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 41 points. - Crustdata API + MCP: grade D, 53.5/100, rank #331 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/crustdata.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/crustdata.json - Enrich Layer API + MCP: grade C, 56/100, rank #309 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/enrich-layer.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/enrich-layer.json ## Which one, for what Pick Crustdata API + MCP for schema & documentation (+13), agent ergonomics (+5), security & auth (+16), maintenance & community (+41). Pick Enrich Layer API + MCP for reliability (+20), payments & pricing (+35), transparency & trust (+5). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Crustdata API + MCP | Enrich Layer API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 45 | 65 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +20 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 89 | 76 | Crustdata API + MCP +13 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 73 | 68 | Crustdata API + MCP +5 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 56 | 40 | Crustdata API + MCP +16 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 5 | 40 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +35 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 67 | 26 | Crustdata API + MCP +41 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 56 | 61 | Enrich Layer API + MCP +5 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **53.5 · D** | **56 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Crustdata API + MCP | Enrich Layer API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Crustdata | Enrich Layer | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.crustdata.com` | `https://enrichlayer.com/api/v2` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio | | Auth | OAuth or key | API key | | Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | none | MIT | | Tools exposed | none | 25 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | not listed | | Last release | none | 2026-06-19 | | Popularity | none | 0 stars, 26 npm/wk | | Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Crustdata API + MCP.** Per-field credit prices, readable per account from `/account/endpoints`, and `X-Credits-Used` on every response. No status page and no SLA. **Enrich Layer API + MCP.** Pay-as-you-go credits from $10, non-expiring unless idle for 18 months. Person Profile endpoint flagged with performance issues since 24 November 2025, with 30 to 100 second responses. ## Before you call either ### Crustdata API + MCP 1. Always send `x-api-version: 2025-11-01`. Unpinned calls get the latest version 2. Call `/account/endpoints` first to see what your plan enables and what each field costs 3. Ask only for the premium field groups you need, since each one bills 4. Poll `GET /batch/{id}` before submitting more batch jobs. Active jobs count against a cap of 5 to 30 5. Read the `crustdata://catalog` resource before calling MCP tools ### Enrich Layer API + MCP 1. Top up once before testing. Trial keys run at 2 requests a minute 2. Set the person profile timeout to at least 100 seconds 3. Ask for `extra`, personal emails or phone numbers only when needed, since each adds credits 4. Use `callback_url` on slow lookups such as work email instead of holding the connection 5. Map old Proxycurl paths with the transition guide rather than guessing ## Other comparisons with Crustdata API + MCP or Enrich Layer API + MCP - [Apollo API + MCP vs Crustdata API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-crustdata.md) - [Apollo API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-enrich-layer.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Crustdata API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-crustdata.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-enrich-layer.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-hunter.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-leadmagic.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-lusha.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-prospeo.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-hunter.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-leadmagic.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-lusha.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-prospeo.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs Dropcontact API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-dropcontact.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-enrich-layer.md)