# Crush vs Muse Code (slim)

> Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) to Crush's 56.5 (C) for agent harnesses. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-muse-code.md (~3,450 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-muse-code.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-muse-code
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-18
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on

Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Crush leads on reliability, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do agent harnesses.

- Crush: C 56.5, rank #705 of 1146 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/crush.min.md
- Muse Code: C 61.3, rank #521 of 1146 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/muse-code.min.md
- Crush, good for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks. Ahead on Reliability, 54 against 45; Payments & pricing, 55 against 20; Maintenance & community, 82 against 75. Also Free to start without a card.
- Muse Code, good for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 84 against 65; Agent ergonomics, 79 against 52; Security & auth, 67 against 44. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.3 out of 5.

| Category | Crush | Muse Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 54 | 45 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 65 | 84 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 52 | 79 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 44 | 67 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 55 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 75 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 56 | 57 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Crush | Muse Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Charm | Meta |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Licence | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) | Proprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | 2026-10-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk | 63k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |