# Countly vs Mixpanel (slim) > Mixpanel scores 62 (B) on agent readiness against Countly's 54.8 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Countly leads on agent ergonomics. Both do analytics query. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-mixpanel.md (~2,400 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-mixpanel.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/countly-vs-mixpanel - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09 Mixpanel scores 62 (B) on agent readiness against Countly's 54.8 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Countly leads on agent ergonomics. Both do analytics query. - Countly: C 54.8, rank #607 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/countly.min.md - Mixpanel: B 62, rank #406 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mixpanel.min.md - Countly, good for An agent whose owner runs Countly on its own infrastructure or a dedicated Flex server and wants analytics, crash and remote-config data through MCP with per-category permissions. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 66 against 61. Also Runs on your own machine; Open source; No incidents deducted, where Mixpanel loses 5 points for them. - Mixpanel, good for Teams already tracking in Mixpanel who want an agent to answer funnel, retention and cohort questions or manage Lexicon, experiments and flags. Ahead on Reliability, 65 against 28; Security & auth, 70 against 63; Payments & pricing, 37 against 17; Transparency & trust, 84 against 70. Also Free to start without a card. | Category | Countly | Mixpanel | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 28 | 65 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 75 | 79 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 66 | 61 | | Security & auth (14%) | 63 | 70 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 17 | 37 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 80 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 70 | 84 | | Fact (where they differ) | Countly | Mixpanel | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Countly Ltd | Mixpanel, Inc. | | Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.count.ly/mcp` | `https://mixpanel.com/api` | | Transports | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | API key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Paid | Freemium | | Licence | Countly Lite is AGPL-3.0 with added branding terms under Section 7. Enterprise plugins are proprietary. Flex is a hosted service under Countly's terms. The MCP server is MIT | Proprietary service under Mixpanel's terms of use. The tracking SDKs and the Claude Code plugin on GitHub are Apache-2.0, and Mixpanel Headless is MIT | | Tools exposed | 209 | 64 | | Read-only variant documented | yes | no | | Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-01 | | Terms last updated | 2026-09-25 | no date given | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-25 | no date given | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes | | Popularity | 28k npm/wk | 3.2M npm/wk, 1.5M PyPI/wk |