# Coresignal API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP (slim)

> Coresignal API + MCP has a score of 63.1 (B) against Hunter API + MCP's 56.8 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is security & auth, 25 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-hunter.md (~1,550 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-hunter.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-hunter
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Coresignal API + MCP has a score of 63.1 (B) against Hunter API + MCP's 56.8 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is security & auth, 25 points.

- Coresignal API + MCP: B 63.1, rank #208 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/coresignal.min.md
- Hunter API + MCP: C 56.8, rank #299 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hunter.min.md
- Pick Coresignal API + MCP for reliability (+5), agent ergonomics (+19), security & auth (+25), maintenance & community (+19). Pick Hunter API + MCP for payments & pricing (+20), transparency & trust (+8).

| Category | Coresignal API + MCP | Hunter API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 55 | 50 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 86 | 90 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 73 | 54 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 58 | 33 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 63 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 73 | 81 |