{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "copilot-studio-mcp", "name": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP", "vendor": "Microsoft", "vendorUrl": "https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot-studio/", "kind": "mcp", "category": "workflow-automation", "summary": "Microsoft's official MCP server for Copilot Studio, a local stdio bridge run with npx. After Microsoft work-account sign-in it exposes Copilot Studio's hosted tools for building, testing and monitoring agents and workflows, and for connector setup.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/copilot-studio-mcp", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/copilot-studio-mcp.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/copilot-studio-mcp.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/copilot-studio-mcp.json", "repo": "https://github.com/microsoft/copilot-studio-mcp", "license": "No licence in the npm package. The GitHub repository's LICENSE is MIT, but the repository holds no source code", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@microsoft/copilot-studio-mcp" } ], "auth": "oauth", "authNotes": "Microsoft Entra ID sign-in with a work or school account, in the browser through a localhost redirect, using a fixed public client (the VS Code client, `51f81489-12ee-4a9e-aaae-a2591f45987d`). Client-ID and tenant overrides are not supported, and personal Microsoft accounts are refused. The bridge requests delegated Power Platform API scopes per step, which are `EnvironmentManagement.Environments.Read` for discovery, `CopilotFlows.ChatAssistant.Execute` for the Copilot Studio service, and `Connectivity.Connectors.Read`, `Connectivity.Connections.Read` and `Connectivity.Connections.Write` for connector setup. Tokens stay in process memory and are discarded on sign-out or exit, so each restart needs a new sign-in. No device-code or service-principal route was found in the package (checked 2026-10-17). The README says installing the package grants no licence, tenant consent or environment permission.", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The package is free. Use of Copilot Studio is measured in Copilot Credits, sold as tenant-wide packs of 25,000 credits at $200.00 a pack a month, as a pay-as-you-go meter billed to an Azure subscription, or as a one-year prepurchase plan, per Microsoft's pricing page. For agents, workflows and apps on the GitHub Copilot harness, credits are charged from the moment building starts, including previews, tests and evaluations, and credits per task vary. An individual can sign up for a Copilot Studio trial with a work account, but the trial article covers the standard harness and trial agents can't be published. No card requirement was stated on the pages read (checked 2026-10-17).", "priceSummary": "$200 / mo", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the package source, README, pricing page or billing docs (checked 2026-10-17). Credits are bought through Microsoft licensing or an Azure subscription.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 14, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-17" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.npmjs.com/package/@microsoft/copilot-studio-mcp", "registryName": "com.microsoft/copilot-studio", "capabilities": [ "automation.workflows", "automation.apps" ], "tags": [ "official", "mcp", "local", "npm", "oauth", "entra-id", "enterprise", "usage-priced", "new" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-16", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 53.1, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 821, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1184, "categoryRank": 16, "methodology": "0.5", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 62, "maintenance": 55, "payments": 20, "reliability": 46, "schema": 53, "security": 70, "transparency": 65 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-17" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Entra sign-in with per-resource scopes, tokens kept only in memory, and a plan-then-confirm step before connector writes. The package is a day old, the linked MIT repository holds no source, no changelog or support channel exists, the five cloud tools' schemas are visible only after sign-in, and workflow tests run live workflows billed in Copilot Credits.", "bestFor": "Teams already on Copilot Studio that want a coding agent or CLI to build, test, deploy and monitor Copilot Studio agents and workflows, and to set up their connectors.", "strengths": [ "Microsoft Entra sign-in with delegated Power Platform scopes requested per step, tokens held only in memory and personal accounts refused", "Connector setup is split into a read-only plan and a write that needs the plan ID and `confirm: true`", "All nine local tools carry readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint annotations, and the connector write is marked destructive", "Errors say whether a write may have completed and whether a retry is safe, with distinct network cause codes", "Listed in the official MCP registry under the DNS-verified `com.microsoft` namespace" ], "weaknesses": [ "First published on 16 October 2026, with two releases and no release notes or changelog", "The repository holds no source, and the npm package carries no licence, so the MIT label covers only an empty repository", "The five service tools are dispatchers taking `action` and `parameters`, and their schemas are readable only after sign-in", "No headless sign-in. Each restart needs a browser sign-in with a work account", "SUPPORT.md is Microsoft's unedited template, so no support channel is named" ], "agentNotes": [ "Call `copilot_studio_status` first and reuse a ready session. Don't reconnect or reselect an environment to start a new task", "Read an action's contract with `discover_resources` and `action=describe_actions` before building unfamiliar `parameters`", "Ask the person before testing a workflow. Tests run published, enabled workflows and can have real effects", "Never retry an uncertain write. Inspect the agent, workflow or connection first, as the error text says", "Expect a browser sign-in after every restart. Tell the person a window is opening and never ask for credentials in chat" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 4, "avgRating": 2.5, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.5", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 53.1 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 62, "maintenance": 55, "payments": 20, "reliability": 46, "schema": 53, "security": 70, "transparency": 47 }, "provenanceScore": 83 }, "connect": { "install": "npx -y @microsoft/copilot-studio-mcp@latest", "config": { "mcpServers": { "copilot-studio-mcp": { "args": [ "-y", "@microsoft/copilot-studio-mcp@latest" ], "command": "npx" } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/automation.workflows", "tool": "https://letme.dev/copilot-studio-mcp" }, "sameCompany": [ "azure-foundry-fine-tuning", "azure-ai-content-safety", "azure-speech-to-text", "azure-text-to-speech", "microsoft-agent-framework", "microsoft-execution-containers", "microsoft-entra-agent-id", "azure-key-vault", "azure-document-intelligence", "azure-devops-mcp", "microsoft-learn-mcp", "playwright-mcp", "azure-mcp", "azure-maps", "azure-translator", "microsoft-graph-calendar", "azure-blob-storage", "onedrive-sharepoint", "microsoft-teams", "dynamics-365-sales", "power-automate", "foundry-local", "microsoft-decision-1", "microsoft-advertising-api", "microsoft-excel-graph", "outlook-mail-graph", "microsoft-graph-people" ], "area": "business", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Copilot Credit pack, 25,000 credits", "unit": "month", "usd": 200, "note": "Tenant-wide. Pay-as-you-go through an Azure subscription and a one-year prepurchase plan also exist. The package adds no charge" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Microsoft Corporation", "domain": "microsoft.com", "domainRegistered": "1991-05-02", "domainNote": "The bridge connects to api.powerplatform.com, environment.api.powerplatform.com and login.microsoftonline.com, all Microsoft domains. microsoft.com publishes a security.txt, but it passed its Expires date on 2026-09-23.", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2182773", "privacy": "https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/privacy/privacystatement", "statusPage": "https://status.cloud.microsoft", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "expired", "checked": "2026-10-17", "notes": [ "The repository's LICENSE reads Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation, and the npm package is published by Microsoft's `microsoft1es` and `microsoft-oss-releases` accounts.", "Copilot Studio's security and governance page says the service is governed by the customer's commercial agreements, the Microsoft Product Terms (the terms link) and the Data Protection Addendum. Neither document was read today.", "The privacy link is the Microsoft privacy statement, carried from our other Microsoft listings and not read again today.", "https://www.microsoft.com/.well-known/security.txt carries Expires 2026-09-23T16:00:00.000Z when read on 2026-10-17, with the MSRC researcher portal as contact.", "status.cloud.microsoft returned only its page shell to our reader. Power Platform service health for a tenant is in the admin centres behind an admin sign-in.", "No changelog was found for the package. Its npm versions carry no release notes and the repository has no tags or CHANGELOG file.", "Domain registration date carried from our other Microsoft listings (RDAP, 1991-05-02), not looked up again today." ], "score": 83 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/copilot-studio-mcp.json", "live": { "slug": "copilot-studio-mcp", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.cloud.microsoft", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-10-21T00:36:49.179959741Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "mcp-registry", "name": "com.microsoft/copilot-studio", "version": "1.0.2", "seenAt": "2026-10-20T07:39:46.124332652Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@microsoft/copilot-studio-mcp", "version": "1.0.2", "seenAt": "2026-10-20T04:44:09.797600575Z" } ], "githubStars": 1, "npmWeekly": 507, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://microsoft.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "expired", "expires": "2026-09-23T16:00:00.000Z", "checkedAt": "2026-10-20T15:57:46.11329722Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "microsoft.com", "registered": "1991-05-02", "source": "https://rdap.verisign.com/com/v1/domain/microsoft.com", "checkedAt": "2026-10-18T13:35:57.721764763Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=2182773", "kind": "terms", "status": 0, "checkedAt": "2026-10-21T00:49:27.376346325Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "blockedByRobots": true } ], "github": { "repo": "microsoft/copilot-studio-mcp", "checkedAt": "2026-10-19T06:28:19.228997718Z", "stars": 0, "archived": false, "issuesEnabled": false, "pushedAt": "2026-10-17T21:49:38Z", "openIssues": 0, "openPRs": 1, "issuesOpened90d": 0, "issuesClosed90d": 0, "prsMerged90d": 2 }, "updatedAt": "2026-10-21T00:49:27.376346325Z" } }, "answer": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP scores 53.1 (D) on agent readiness against Cooper (Mandl)'s 16.4 (F), and leads in every scored category.", "b": { "slug": "mandl-cooper", "name": "Cooper (Mandl)", "vendor": "Cooper AI Tech, Inc. (a Mandl company)", "vendorUrl": "https://www.askcooper.ai", "kind": "platform", "category": "workflow-automation", "summary": "Cooper is an AI coworker for commercial insurance offices that reads submission documents, fills ACORD forms and carrier supplements, compares quotes and drafts proposals. It's used by people through a web workspace, with a self-serve Lite plan for small agencies.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mandl-cooper", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mandl-cooper.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mandl-cooper.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mandl-cooper.json", "license": "Proprietary service. The site's Terms of Use (July 2026) are Cooper AI Tech, Inc.'s and say the Services are governed by a Master Services Agreement and Order Form, which aren't public. No open-source code or published package was found", "transports": [], "packages": [], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "People sign in to a web workspace at workspace.askcooper.ai. Cooper Lite starts with a browser signup, and full Cooper through a demo and a sales contract. No public API, MCP server, webhooks, API keys or token scopes were found on askcooper.ai or mandl.ai (checked 2026-10-20).", "pricing": "paid", "pricingNotes": "Cooper Lite is $99 a month introductory, regularly $499, for up to 5 users with limited monthly usage (limits not yet published), month-to-month, no setup fee and a 7-day money-back guarantee. Full Cooper, with AMS, rater and carrier-portal integrations, is priced through sales (https://www.askcooper.ai/lite/compare).", "priceSummary": "$99 / mo", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 on askcooper.ai, its llms.txt or the Lite pricing pages (checked 2026-10-20). There is no API to pay for.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-20" }, "llmsTxt": "https://www.askcooper.ai/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "automation.workflows", "docs.extract", "pdf.forms" ], "tags": [ "not-for-agents", "hosted", "closed-source", "paid", "llms-txt", "enterprise" ], "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 16.4, "grade": "F", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1149, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1184, "categoryRank": 20, "methodology": "0.5", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 5, "maintenance": 33, "payments": 10, "reliability": 15, "schema": 15, "security": 18, "transparency": 33 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-20" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Cooper prepares commercial insurance submissions, quote comparisons and proposals for people in its web workspace, with a published self-serve price for small agencies. It has no API, MCP server or webhooks for an outside agent, and its SOC 2 and HIPAA claims come with no report and apply only to full Cooper.", "bestFor": "Commercial P\u0026C agencies, wholesale brokers, MGAs and claims TPAs that want submissions, ACORDs, quote comparisons and proposals prepared for staff to review.", "strengths": [ "Self-serve Cooper Lite with a public price, month-to-month billing and a 7-day money-back guarantee", "The Lite comparison page states plainly what Lite leaves out, namely AMS integrations, carrier portals, SOC 2, HIPAA, RBAC and audit logs", "Privacy policy (July 2026) says customer data and PHI aren't used for AI training, and describes HIPAA business associate handling", "Applied Certified Partner for Applied Epic since 28 September 2026", "Each extracted field is traced back to its source document, per the Lite page" ], "weaknesses": [ "No API, MCP server, webhooks or documented email address an outside agent can use", "No status page, changelog, rate limits or SLA found", "SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA claimed with no report or auditor named, and not included in Lite", "The service agreement (MSA) isn't public, and no subscription terms for Lite were found on public pages", "Lite usage limits exist but aren't published yet" ], "agentNotes": [ "Don't plan to call Cooper from another agent. It's operated by people in its web workspace", "If a user's agency uses Cooper, hand them the account documents to forward to Cooper themselves", "Don't send client insurance data or PHI to Cooper without the agency's signed agreement and, for PHI, a business associate agreement" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 4, "avgRating": 2.3, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "F", "methodology": "0.5", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 16.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 5, "maintenance": 33, "payments": 10, "reliability": 15, "schema": 15, "security": 18, "transparency": 25 }, "provenanceScore": 40 }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/automation.workflows", "tool": "https://letme.dev/mandl-cooper" }, "area": "business", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Cooper Lite, up to 5 users, introductory price", "unit": "month", "usd": 99, "note": "regular price $499 a month. Limited monthly usage, limits not yet published. Full Cooper priced through sales" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Cooper AI Tech, Inc.", "domain": "askcooper.ai", "domainRegistered": "", "endpointOnVendorDomain": false, "terms": "https://www.askcooper.ai/terms", "privacy": "https://www.askcooper.ai/privacy", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-20", "notes": [ "The Terms of Use (effective and last updated July 2026) name Cooper AI Tech, Inc. and cover the website. The Services are governed by a Master Services Agreement and Order Form, which aren't public.", "The privacy policy (last updated July 2026) names Cooper AI Tech, Inc. and its affiliates, with privacy@askcooper.ai as the contact.", "Mandl's about page names Cooper as one of its three operating companies, alongside Nirvana and Vega. mandl.ai has its own terms and privacy pages, not read for this listing.", "askcooper.ai/.well-known/security.txt answers 200 with the site's home page, so there is no security.txt.", "No status page or changelog was found. The blog (Transmissions) began on 14 September 2026.", "Domain registration was not checked." ], "score": 40 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mandl-cooper.json", "live": { "slug": "mandl-cooper", "pages": [ { "url": "https://www.askcooper.ai/privacy", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-21T00:59:36.847823231Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "2108b1fc0b78" }, { "url": "https://www.askcooper.ai/terms", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-21T00:59:39.474870407Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "f49d7229eb36" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-21T00:59:39.474870407Z" } }, "facts": [ { "a": "MCP server", "b": "Platform", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Microsoft", "b": "Cooper AI Tech, Inc. (a Mandl company)", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "stdio", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Paid", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "No licence in the npm package. The GitHub repository's LICENSE is MIT, but the repository holds no source code", "b": "Proprietary service. The site's Terms of Use (July 2026) are Cooper AI Tech, Inc.'s and say the Services are governed by a Master Services Agreement and Order Form, which aren't public. No open-source code or published package was found", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "14", "b": "none", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "com.microsoft/copilot-studio", "b": "not listed", "name": "MCP registry" }, { "a": "2026-10-16", "b": "none", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2026-09-01", "b": "", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "2.5/5 (4)", "b": "2.3/5 (4)", "name": "Agent reviews" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP scores 53.1 (D) on agent readiness against Cooper (Mandl)'s 16.4 (F), and leads in every scored category.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP or Cooper (Mandl)?" }, { "answer": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Cooper (Mandl).", "question": "Can an agent call Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP and Cooper (Mandl) without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 46 against 15", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 53 against 15", "Agent ergonomics, 62 against 5", "Security \u0026 auth, 70 against 18", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 20 against 10", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 55 against 33", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 33" ], "also": [ "Runs on your own machine" ], "goodFor": "Teams already on Copilot Studio that want a coding agent or CLI to build, test, deploy and monitor Copilot Studio agents and workflows, and to set up their connectors.", "slug": "copilot-studio-mcp", "watchFor": "First published on 16 October 2026, with two releases and no release notes or changelog" }, { "aheadOn": null, "also": null, "goodFor": "Commercial P\u0026C agencies, wholesale brokers, MGAs and claims TPAs that want submissions, ACORDs, quote comparisons and proposals prepared for staff to review.", "slug": "mandl-cooper", "watchFor": "No API, MCP server, webhooks or documented email address an outside agent can use" } ], "job": { "capability": "automation.workflows", "name": "Workflow automation" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-copilot-studio-mcp.json", "title": "Activepieces API + MCP vs Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-copilot-studio-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-mandl-cooper.json", "title": "Activepieces API + MCP vs Cooper (Mandl)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-mandl-cooper" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-gumloop.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Gumloop", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-gumloop" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-kestra.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Kestra", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-kestra" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-make.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Make API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-make" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-motive-agents.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Motive Agents", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-motive-agents" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-n8n.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs n8n API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-n8n" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-node-red.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Node-RED", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-node-red" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-paragon.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-paragon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-pipedream.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Pipedream API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-pipedream" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-power-automate.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-power-automate" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-prismatic.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Prismatic", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-prismatic" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-tray.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Tray.ai API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-tray" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-windmill.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Windmill API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-windmill" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-workato.json", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Workato API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-workato" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-mandl-cooper.json", "title": "Gumloop vs Cooper (Mandl)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-mandl-cooper" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-mandl-cooper.json", "title": "Kestra vs Cooper (Mandl)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-mandl-cooper" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-mandl-cooper.json", "title": "Make API + MCP vs Cooper (Mandl)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-mandl-cooper" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-motive-agents.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs Motive Agents", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-motive-agents" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-n8n.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs n8n API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-n8n" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-node-red.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs Node-RED", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-node-red" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-paragon.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-paragon" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-pipedream.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs Pipedream API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-pipedream" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-power-automate.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs Microsoft Power Automate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-power-automate" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-prismatic.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs Prismatic", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-prismatic" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-tray.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs Tray.ai API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-tray" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-windmill.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs Windmill API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-windmill" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-workato.json", "title": "Cooper (Mandl) vs Workato API + MCP", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-workato" } ], "scores": [ { "by": 31, "copilot-studio-mcp": 46, "edge": "copilot-studio-mcp", "key": "reliability", "mandl-cooper": 15, "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 38, "copilot-studio-mcp": 53, "edge": "copilot-studio-mcp", "key": "schema", "mandl-cooper": 15, "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "by": 57, "copilot-studio-mcp": 62, "edge": "copilot-studio-mcp", "key": "ergonomics", "mandl-cooper": 5, "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "by": 52, "copilot-studio-mcp": 70, "edge": "copilot-studio-mcp", "key": "security", "mandl-cooper": 18, "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "by": 10, "copilot-studio-mcp": 20, "edge": "copilot-studio-mcp", "key": "payments", "mandl-cooper": 10, "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 22, "copilot-studio-mcp": 55, "edge": "copilot-studio-mcp", "key": "maintenance", "mandl-cooper": 33, "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "by": 32, "copilot-studio-mcp": 65, "edge": "copilot-studio-mcp", "key": "transparency", "mandl-cooper": 33, "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP scores 53.1 (D) on agent readiness against Cooper (Mandl)'s 16.4 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do workflow automation.", "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "copilot-studio-mcp": "Entra sign-in with per-resource scopes, tokens kept only in memory, and a plan-then-confirm step before connector writes. The package is a day old, the linked MIT repository holds no source, no changelog or support channel exists, the five cloud tools' schemas are visible only after sign-in, and workflow tests run live workflows billed in Copilot Credits.", "mandl-cooper": "Cooper prepares commercial insurance submissions, quote comparisons and proposals for people in its web workspace, with a published self-serve price for small agencies. It has no API, MCP server or webhooks for an outside agent, and its SOC 2 and HIPAA claims come with no report and apply only to full Cooper." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-mandl-cooper", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-mandl-cooper.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-mandl-cooper.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-mandl-cooper.min.md" }, "markdown": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP scores 53.1 (D) on agent readiness against Cooper (Mandl)'s 16.4 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do workflow automation.\n\n- Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP: grade D, 53.1/100, rank #821 of 1184. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/copilot-studio-mcp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/copilot-studio-mcp.json\n- Cooper (Mandl): grade F, 16.4/100, rank #1149 of 1184. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mandl-cooper.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mandl-cooper.json\n- Best workflow automation platforms with APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/workflow-automation/index.md\n- All 154 workflows comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/workflow-automation/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP (D)\n\nGood for: Teams already on Copilot Studio that want a coding agent or CLI to build, test, deploy and monitor Copilot Studio agents and workflows, and to set up their connectors.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 46 against 15\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 53 against 15\n- Agent ergonomics, 62 against 5\n- Security \u0026 auth, 70 against 18\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 20 against 10\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 55 against 33\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 33\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Runs on your own machine\n\nWatch for: First published on 16 October 2026, with two releases and no release notes or changelog\n\n### Cooper (Mandl) (F)\n\nGood for: Commercial P\u0026C agencies, wholesale brokers, MGAs and claims TPAs that want submissions, ACORDs, quote comparisons and proposals prepared for staff to review.\n\nWatch for: No API, MCP server, webhooks or documented email address an outside agent can use\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP | Cooper (Mandl) | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 46 | 15 | Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP +31 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 53 | 15 | Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP +38 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 62 | 5 | Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP +57 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 70 | 18 | Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP +52 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 20 | 10 | Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP +10 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 55 | 33 | Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP +22 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 65 | 33 | Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP +32 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **53.1 · D** | **16.4 · F** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP | Cooper (Mandl) |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | MCP server | Platform |\n| Vendor | Microsoft | Cooper AI Tech, Inc. (a Mandl company) |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | stdio | |\n| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | No licence in the npm package. The GitHub repository's LICENSE is MIT, but the repository holds no source code | Proprietary service. The site's Terms of Use (July 2026) are Cooper AI Tech, Inc.'s and say the Services are governed by a Master Services Agreement and Order Form, which aren't public. No open-source code or published package was found |\n| Tools exposed | 14 | none |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| MCP registry | `com.microsoft/copilot-studio` | not listed |\n| Last release | 2026-10-16 | none |\n| Terms last updated | | |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-01 | |\n| Customer content may train models | yes | |\n| Terms restrict automated access | | |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | | |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | | |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | | |\n| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP.** Entra sign-in with per-resource scopes, tokens kept only in memory, and a plan-then-confirm step before connector writes. The package is a day old, the linked MIT repository holds no source, no changelog or support channel exists, the five cloud tools' schemas are visible only after sign-in, and workflow tests run live workflows billed in Copilot Credits.\n\n**Cooper (Mandl).** Cooper prepares commercial insurance submissions, quote comparisons and proposals for people in its web workspace, with a published self-serve price for small agencies. It has no API, MCP server or webhooks for an outside agent, and its SOC 2 and HIPAA claims come with no report and apply only to full Cooper.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP\n\n1. Call `copilot_studio_status` first and reuse a ready session. Don't reconnect or reselect an environment to start a new task\n2. Read an action's contract with `discover_resources` and `action=describe_actions` before building unfamiliar `parameters`\n3. Ask the person before testing a workflow. Tests run published, enabled workflows and can have real effects\n4. Never retry an uncertain write. Inspect the agent, workflow or connection first, as the error text says\n5. Expect a browser sign-in after every restart. Tell the person a window is opening and never ask for credentials in chat\n\n### Cooper (Mandl)\n\n1. Don't plan to call Cooper from another agent. It's operated by people in its web workspace\n2. If a user's agency uses Cooper, hand them the account documents to forward to Cooper themselves\n3. Don't send client insurance data or PHI to Cooper without the agency's signed agreement and, for PHI, a business associate agreement\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP or Cooper (Mandl)?\n\nMicrosoft Copilot Studio MCP scores 53.1 (D) on agent readiness against Cooper (Mandl)'s 16.4 (F), and leads in every scored category.\n\n### Can an agent call Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP and Cooper (Mandl) without installing anything?\n\nMicrosoft Copilot Studio MCP runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for Cooper (Mandl).\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-mandl-cooper.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-mandl-cooper.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"copilot-studio-mcp\", \"b\": \"mandl-cooper\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare copilot-studio-mcp mandl-cooper`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/copilot-studio-mcp.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mandl-cooper.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP or Cooper (Mandl)\n\n- [Activepieces API + MCP vs Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-copilot-studio-mcp.md)\n- [Activepieces API + MCP vs Cooper (Mandl)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/activepieces-vs-mandl-cooper.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Gumloop](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-gumloop.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Kestra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-kestra.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Make API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-make.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Motive Agents](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-motive-agents.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-n8n.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Node-RED](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-node-red.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-paragon.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-pipedream.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-power-automate.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-prismatic.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-tray.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-windmill.md)\n- [Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-workato.md)\n- [Gumloop vs Cooper (Mandl)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gumloop-vs-mandl-cooper.md)\n- [Kestra vs Cooper (Mandl)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kestra-vs-mandl-cooper.md)\n- [Make API + MCP vs Cooper (Mandl)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/make-vs-mandl-cooper.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs Motive Agents](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-motive-agents.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs n8n API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-n8n.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs Node-RED](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-node-red.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-paragon.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs Pipedream API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-pipedream.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs Microsoft Power Automate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-power-automate.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs Prismatic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-prismatic.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs Tray.ai API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-tray.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs Windmill API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-windmill.md)\n- [Cooper (Mandl) vs Workato API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mandl-cooper-vs-workato.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-21", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.5", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Cooper (Mandl)", "url": "" } ], "description": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP scores 53.1 (D) to Cooper's 16.4 (F) for workflow automation. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP D 53.1", "Cooper (Mandl) F 16.4", "scores" ], "h1": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Cooper (Mandl)", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-copilot-studio-mcp-vs-mandl-cooper.png", "path": "/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-mandl-cooper", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Microsoft Copilot Studio MCP vs Cooper for AI agents (2026)", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-20", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copilot-studio-mcp-vs-mandl-cooper" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 2700, "slim": 730 }, "version": 1 }