# Context.dev vs ScrapeAtlas (slim)

> Context.dev scores 78.3 (A) to ScrapeAtlas's 63 (B) for extraction. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/context-dev-vs-scrapeatlas.md (~2,900 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/context-dev-vs-scrapeatlas.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/context-dev-vs-scrapeatlas
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-30
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Context.dev scores 78.3 (A) on agent readiness against ScrapeAtlas's 63 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ScrapeAtlas leads on payments & pricing. Both do extraction.

- Context.dev: A 78.3, rank #19 of 1226 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/context-dev.min.md
- ScrapeAtlas: B 63, rank #481 of 1226 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapeatlas.min.md
- Context.dev, good for Agents that need one call for Markdown, screenshots and schema-shaped JSON from a page, plus batches, monitors and search on the same balance, and teams that also want brand data. Ahead on Reliability, 67 against 42; Schema & documentation, 96 against 88; Agent ergonomics, 90 against 76; Security & auth, 83 against 55; Maintenance & community, 85 against 70; Transparency & trust, 74 against 61. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better.
- ScrapeAtlas, good for Agents that need structured public data from a named social, video, forum, marketplace or prediction-market platform, such as a creator's profile and recent posts, a thread's comments, a product's reviews or a market's order book, paid per successful request without a subscription. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 55 against 50.

| Category | Context.dev | ScrapeAtlas |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 67 | 42 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 96 | 88 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 90 | 76 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 83 | 55 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 55 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 85 | 70 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 74 | 61 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Context.dev | ScrapeAtlas |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Context Dev Inc. | OD. Media & Technology LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.context.dev/v1` | `https://api.scrapeatlas.com` |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| Licence | none | Proprietary service under ScrapeAtlas's Terms of Service. The @scrapeatlas/cli package on npm is MIT with no public source repository |
| Tools exposed | 42 | 373 |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.OnlineDopamine/scrapeatlas` |
| Last release | 2026-10-17 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 |  |
| Customer content may train models | yes |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |  |
| Popularity | 5 stars, 62k npm/wk, 10k PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |