# Contentstack vs Hygraph > Hygraph scores 69.3 (B) on agent readiness against Contentstack's 64 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Contentstack leads on security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do cms content. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by… - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-hygraph - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-hygraph.md (~2,500 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-hygraph.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-hygraph.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-09 Hygraph scores 69.3 (B) on agent readiness against Contentstack's 64 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Contentstack leads on security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do cms content. - Contentstack: grade B, 64/100, rank #331 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/contentstack.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/contentstack.json - Hygraph: grade B, 69.3/100, rank #182 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hygraph.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hygraph.json ## Which one, for what ### Contentstack (B) Good for: Teams already on Contentstack, or starting on its free plan, who want an agent to draft, localise, release and publish structured content with scoped credentials and an audit trail. Ahead on: - Security & auth, 69 against 63 - Maintenance & community, 82 against 74 - Transparency & trust, 73 against 60 Also in its favour: - Runs on your own machine Watch for: The MCP server's default group loads 78 tools, including nine deletes, with no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations and no read-only switch ### Hygraph (B) Good for: Teams on Hygraph who want an agent to create, localise and publish entries, upload assets or change schema, with delete and unpublish kept out of reach on MCP. Ahead on: - Reliability, 89 against 71 - Agent ergonomics, 72 against 67 - Payments & pricing, 35 against 30 Also in its favour: - No incidents deducted, where Contentstack loses 3 points for them Watch for: GraphQL error bodies carry a message and a `requestId` with no machine-readable code, and only asset transformation 429 responses are documented with `Retry-After` ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Contentstack | Hygraph | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 71 | 89 | Hygraph +18 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 77 | 78 | Hygraph +1 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 67 | 72 | Hygraph +5 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 69 | 63 | Contentstack +6 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 35 | Hygraph +5 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 82 | 74 | Contentstack +8 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 73 | 60 | Contentstack +13 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **64 · B** | **69.3 · B** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Contentstack | Hygraph | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Contentstack Inc. | Hygraph GmbH | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.contentstack.io` | `https://mcp.hygraph.com/mcp` | | Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Proprietary service under Contentstack's Master Agreement and Terms of Service. The OpenAPI files, the management SDKs, the CLI and the @contentstack/mcp package are MIT | Proprietary service under Hygraph GmbH's Terms of Service. The `@hygraph/management-sdk` package is MIT | | Tools exposed | 206 | 17 | | Read-only variant documented | yes | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-30 | | Terms last updated | 2022-08-01 | no date given | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-06-30 | no date given | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes | | Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text | | Popularity | 44k npm/wk, 1.5k PyPI/wk | 52 stars, 8.6k npm/wk | ## Verdicts **Contentstack.** The Content Management API has a public OpenAPI file, OAuth scopes that separate read, write and publish, read-only management tokens and a stack audit log. A free plan needs no card. The MCP server loads 78 tools by default with no annotations or read-only switch, and the `limit=0` behaviour changed on 11 September 2026 without advance notice. **Hygraph.** Tokens are limited by model, stage, locale and action, the GraphQL schema is typed and introspectable, and a hosted MCP server rejects delete and unpublish operations. Error bodies carry a message without a machine code, there are no idempotency keys, audit logs are Enterprise only, and no data processing agreement, sub-processor list or security.txt was found. ## Before you call either ### Contentstack 1. Pick the base URL for the stack's region first. North America on AWS is https://api.contentstack.io, and the other six regions use contentstack.com hosts 2. Send `api_key` and `authorization` headers on every Content Management API call. Ask for a read-only management token when the task only reads 3. Page with `limit` (100 at most), `skip` and `include_count=true`. `limit=0` no longer returns everything 4. Stay under 10 reads and 10 writes a second per organisation, and one bulk request a second. Watch `X-RateLimit-Remaining` and back off on 429 5. Start the MCP server with `--groups cma` only, and add `cma-extended` when the task needs audit logs or version history. Publishing and deleting need no confirmation ### Hygraph 1. Send the Permanent Auth Token as `Authorization: Bearer ` to `https://.hygraph.com/v2//`. Read the schema by introspection first, because every type is generated from the project's models 2. Mutations write to DRAFT. Call `publish` with `to: [PUBLISHED]` as a separate mutation, and pass `locales` to write or publish a localisation 3. Stay under the plan's limit for uncached requests (5 a second on Hobby, 25 on Growth) and its concurrent mutations (5 and 10). Back off exponentially on 429 4. Upload an asset with `createAsset`, then POST the file to the returned pre-signed URL, or pass `uploadUrl` for a remote file. The asset stays `ASSET_CREATE_PENDING` until processed 5. Schema changes go to the Management API through `@hygraph/management-sdk` or the MCP tool `submit_batch_migration`. Version restore has no documented mutation, so read `Version` and write the old values back ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Contentstack or Hygraph? Hygraph scores 69.3 (B) on agent readiness against Contentstack's 64 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Contentstack leads on security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. ### Do Contentstack and Hygraph need an API key? Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call Contentstack and Hygraph without installing anything? Yes. Contentstack has a hosted endpoint at https://api.contentstack.io and Hygraph at https://mcp.hygraph.com/mcp. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-hygraph.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-hygraph.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "contentstack", "b": "hygraph"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare contentstack hygraph` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/contentstack.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hygraph.json ## Other comparisons with Contentstack or Hygraph - [Contentstack vs DatoCMS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-datocms.md) - [Contentstack vs Directus](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-directus.md) - [Contentstack vs Ghost](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-ghost.md) - [Contentstack vs Payload](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-payload.md) - [Contentstack vs Prismic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-prismic.md) - [Contentstack vs Sanity](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-sanity.md) - [Contentstack vs Storyblok](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-storyblok.md) - [Contentstack vs Strapi](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-strapi.md) - [Contentstack vs Webflow](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-webflow.md) - [Contentstack vs WordPress](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/contentstack-vs-wordpress.md) - [DatoCMS vs Hygraph](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datocms-vs-hygraph.md) - [Directus vs Hygraph](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/directus-vs-hygraph.md) - [Ghost vs Hygraph](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ghost-vs-hygraph.md) - [Hygraph vs Payload](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-payload.md) - [Hygraph vs Prismic](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-prismic.md) - [Hygraph vs Sanity](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-sanity.md) - [Hygraph vs Storyblok](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-storyblok.md) - [Hygraph vs Strapi](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-strapi.md) - [Hygraph vs Webflow](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-webflow.md) - [Hygraph vs WordPress](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hygraph-vs-wordpress.md)