{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "complycube", "name": "ComplyCube", "vendor": "ComplyCube (Teemo Technology Ltd)", "vendorUrl": "https://www.complycube.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "identity-verification", "summary": "ComplyCube verifies people from identity documents and a liveness check, screens people and companies against sanctions, PEP and adverse media lists, and runs address and bureau checks. Agents reach it through a REST API with separate test and live keys.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complycube.json", "repo": "https://github.com/complycube/complycube-php", "license": "Proprietary service under ComplyCube's terms of service. The PHP library and the web, iOS and Android SDK repositories are MIT, and `@complycube/api` on npm is MIT", "transports": [ "http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://api.complycube.com", "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@complycube/api" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "complycube" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Every request carries an API key in the `Authorization` header, with no Bearer prefix. Each account has a test key (prefix `test_`) and a live key (prefix `live_`), created and rotated on the API keys page of the Web Portal by a signed-in Owner, Administrator or Developer. Keys have no scopes, and the docs say they carry many privileges. The live key opens when the account is activated from Test to Live in the portal. Client-side SDKs use short-lived tokens from `POST /v1/tokens` (https://docs.complycube.com/documentation/api-reference/authentication).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Starter is $99 a month and Core $299, each converted to credits spent per check, with further checks billed at plan rates. On Starter a document check is $1.05, standard AML screening $0.50 and a photo liveness check $0.35. Growth and Enterprise are quoted by sales. Only completed verifications are charged. The sandbox is free with a test key, and a 14-day trial of 50 checks starts on activation to Live (https://www.complycube.com/en/pricing/, checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "$99 / mo", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API reference, the OpenAPI spec or the pricing page (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": 6182, "pypiWeekly": 292, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.complycube.com/documentation", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.complycube.com/documentation/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://2245032618-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FkAhgmUKSf8CFUFVL3GEe%2Fuploads%2FcpxxltxmYAxOotxgEkmP%2Fcomplycube-openapi.yaml?alt=media\u0026token=aa988fe0-8ce8-431c-a69a-6657f5eacf28", "capabilities": [ "kyc.identity", "kyc.documents", "kyc.screening", "kyc.business" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "usage-based", "sandbox", "api-key", "openapi", "llms-txt", "webhooks", "status-page", "python", "typescript", "php", "dotnet", "iso27001", "soc2" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-06", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 63.7, "grade": "B", "agentReady": false, "rank": 299, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 722, "categoryRank": 4, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 60, "maintenance": 74, "payments": 27, "reliability": 84, "schema": 78, "security": 52, "transparency": 63 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "A sandbox with its own key and scripted outcomes, a public OpenAPI spec, Markdown docs and an audit log API suit an agent running verification checks. Each environment has one unscoped key, no idempotency keys were found, and the only published terms are undated and read as website terms.", "bestFor": "An agent that creates clients, uploads documents, starts document, identity and AML screening checks and reads results for a regulated business, with low entry cost ($99 a month) and a scripted sandbox.", "strengths": [ "Test and live environments have separate keys, and sandbox outcomes are set by test data such as a client last name of attention or failed", "Public OpenAPI 3.0.0 spec (version 1.7.3, 52 operations), `llms.txt`, and every docs page served as Markdown", "Audit log API records the team member, trigger, action and a field-level diff of old and new values", "Per-check prices are public for the Starter and Core plans, and failed or incomplete verifications are not charged", "Statuspage lists API, Web Portal and each check type for four regions, with no incident recorded since August 2022" ], "weaknesses": [ "One API key per environment with no scopes. The docs say keys carry many privileges", "No idempotency keys, and no Retry-After header documented for 429 responses", "The only published terms are undated, read as website terms and cite the Data Protection Act 1998. No service agreement or DPA was found on a public page", "No `security.txt`, disclosure policy or bug bounty found, and the trust centre is drawn by script", "Company search, address search and redaction endpoints are in the API reference but not in the OpenAPI spec", "The ComplyCube MCP server serves documentation only and cannot reach account data" ], "agentNotes": [ "Send the key bare in the `Authorization` header, with no Bearer prefix. Keys start `test_` or `live_`", "Create a client first, then documents or live photos for it, then `POST /v1/checks` with the client and upload IDs", "Stay under 10 requests a second live and 5 in the sandbox. On 429, back off exponentially with jitter, starting at 30 seconds", "A badly formed filter returns 200 with no results, so check filter names before trusting an empty list", "Checks are asynchronous. Subscribe to webhooks, verify the `ComplyCube-Signature` HMAC-SHA256 header, and expect duplicate and out-of-order events" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "B", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 63.7 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 60, "maintenance": 74, "payments": 27, "reliability": 84, "schema": 78, "security": 52, "transparency": 43 }, "provenanceScore": 82 }, "connect": { "install": "npm install --save @complycube/api", "http": "curl -X GET https://api.complycube.com/v1/clients \\\n -H 'Authorization: \u003cYOUR_API_KEY\u003e'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/kyc.identity", "tool": "https://letme.dev/complycube" }, "area": "domain-data", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Starter plan", "unit": "month", "usd": 99, "note": "converted to usage credits; 1,000 checks a month quota" }, { "item": "Core plan", "unit": "month", "usd": 299, "note": "converted to usage credits; 8,000 checks a month quota" }, { "item": "Document verification check, Starter", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1.05, "note": "per completed check; $0.75 on Core" }, { "item": "Standard AML screening, Starter", "unit": "tx", "usd": 0.5, "note": "per completed check; $0.35 on Core" }, { "item": "Extensive AML screening, Starter", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1.05, "note": "per completed check; $0.85 on Core" }, { "item": "Liveness and facial similarity check (photo), Starter", "unit": "tx", "usd": 0.35, "note": "per completed check; $0.20 on Core" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Teemo Technology Ltd", "domain": "complycube.com", "domainRegistered": "2018-05-24", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.complycube.com/en/terms-of-service/", "privacy": "https://www.complycube.com/en/privacy-policy/", "statusPage": "https://status.complycube.com", "changelog": "https://docs.complycube.com/documentation/changelog", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The privacy policy gives ComplyCube as the trading name of TEEMO TECHNOLOGY LTD, company number 12392069, Crown House, 27 Old Gloucester Street, London WC1N 3AX. The terms of service name only ComplyCube, registered in England and Wales, at that address.", "The terms of service are the only terms published. They define the Services to include ComplyCube's data and software services, but are written around website use, carry no date and cite the Data Protection Act 1998. No separate service agreement or DPA was found on a public page.", "The privacy policy covers the website and the Service and carries no date.", "The API answers at api.complycube.com, the Web Portal at portal.complycube.com and the docs at docs.complycube.com.", "www.complycube.com/.well-known/security.txt redirects to a 404 page, and api.complycube.com returns 403 for the same path.", "RDAP for complycube.com gives a registration date of 2018-05-24." ], "score": 82 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube.json", "live": { "slug": "complycube", "probe": { "target": "https://api.complycube.com", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-10-08T21:53:19.619695507Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 403, "lastMs": 36, "lastNote": "asks for credentials", "authRequired": true, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 33, "p95ms24h": 67, "samples24h": 28, "samples30d": 28, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-08", "probes": 28, "ok": 28 } ] }, "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.complycube.com", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T21:57:48.052186709Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T21:57:48.052186709Z" } }, "answer": "ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Veriff's 61.1 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Veriff leads on security \u0026 auth and payments \u0026 pricing.", "b": { "slug": "veriff", "name": "Veriff", "vendor": "Veriff OÜ", "vendorUrl": "https://www.veriff.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "identity-verification", "summary": "Identity verification service from Veriff in Tallinn. It checks an identity document and a selfie, with liveness, database checks and PEP and sanctions screening. Sessions are created and read through the Public API v1, with results sent by webhook.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/veriff.json", "repo": "https://github.com/Veriff/veriff-js-sdk", "license": "Proprietary service. The npm capture SDKs are ISC (@veriff/js-sdk, @veriff/incontext-sdk) and MIT (@veriff/react-native-sdk)", "transports": [ "http" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/incontext-sdk" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/js-sdk" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/react-native-sdk" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Self-serve. Signing up for a Self-Serve plan creates a Customer Portal account with a test integration, and Enterprise accounts start from a sales form. Each integration has an API key, sent as `X-AUTH-CLIENT`, and up to five shared secret keys used to compute an HMAC-SHA256 `X-HMAC-SIGNATURE` (over the body on POST and PATCH, over the session ID on GET and DELETE). POST /v1/sessions needs only the API key. Secrets are shown once and can be rotated or deleted by an admin. There are no scopes. A live integration unlocks once the account holder passes Veriff's own identity verification.", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Self-Serve is priced per verification with a monthly minimum. Essential is $0.80 ($49 a month minimum), Plus $1.39 ($99) and Premium $1.89 ($209). PEP and sanctions screening adds $0.64, ongoing monitoring $0.09 and two-year retention $0.30. A 15-day trial covers up to 50 sessions with no card, after the account holder completes identity verification. Test integrations are free and unbilled. Enterprise, suggested for 5,000 or more verifications a month, is priced by sales (https://www.veriff.com/plans/self-serve, checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "$0.80 / tx", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the developer docs index, the API guides or the pricing page (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 32, "npmWeekly": 109625, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://devdocs.veriff.com", "llmsTxt": "https://devdocs.veriff.com/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://devdocs.veriff.com/apidocs/v1sessions.md", "capabilities": [ "kyc.identity", "kyc.documents", "kyc.screening" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "hmac", "webhooks", "openapi", "llms-txt", "free-trial", "sandbox", "status-page", "bug-bounty", "soc2", "iso27001" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-02", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 61.1, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 376, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 722, "categoryRank": 5, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 43, "maintenance": 74, "payments": 40, "reliability": 62, "schema": 82, "security": 63, "transparency": 67 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Per-verification prices are public from $0.80, with a 15-day trial of 50 sessions and no card. Each endpoint page is Markdown with an OpenAPI 3.0 fragment. There is no server SDK, MCP server or idempotency key, most calls need an HMAC signature, and the status page shows nine incidents between 20 July and 7 October 2026.", "bestFor": "A team that needs document and selfie verification with public per-verification prices and a trial, and that can run a webhook receiver and HMAC signing.", "strengths": [ "Public prices of $0.80, $1.39 and $1.89 a verification, with a 15-day trial of up to 50 sessions and no card", "llms.txt index and Markdown pages, each API endpoint with an OpenAPI 3.0.0 fragment, examples and error schemas", "Up to five shared secret keys per integration, shown once, with documented rotation and deletion", "Test integrations are created at signup, aren't billed, and let the developer force a decision", "ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, Cyber Essentials and a bug bounty on Intigriti paying 50 to 6,000 euros" ], "weaknesses": [ "No server-side SDK and no MCP server. Official packages cover only browser and mobile capture", "No idempotency key on POST /v1/sessions, and no Retry-After or backoff guidance for the documented 429", "Nine status-page incidents between 20 July and 7 October 2026, mostly delayed decisions in the US region", "No endpoint lists sessions and no pagination was found. Every read needs a stored session ID", "Session deletion by API is off by default and capped at 10 sessions in 24 hours", "No security.txt, and the sub-processor list sits on a help centre page that needs JavaScript" ], "agentNotes": [ "Take the base URL from the integration's API keys page. Send X-AUTH-CLIENT on every call and store verification.id from POST /v1/sessions", "Sign POST and PATCH bodies, and the session ID on GET and DELETE, with HMAC-SHA256 in X-HMAC-SIGNATURE. POST /v1/sessions needs no signature", "Stay under 30 session creations a minute on Self-Serve, 600 on Enterprise. A 429 carries code 1004", "Don't blindly retry POST /v1/sessions. Each call makes a new session, which is billed on a live integration", "Poll GET /v1/sessions/{id}/decision until `verification` is not null, or accept webhooks within 5 seconds and treat duplicates as normal" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 61.1 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 43, "maintenance": 74, "payments": 40, "reliability": 62, "schema": 82, "security": 63, "transparency": 48 }, "provenanceScore": 85 }, "connect": { "http": "curl -X POST \"https://\u003cBaseURL\u003e/v1/sessions\" \\\n -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n -H 'X-AUTH-CLIENT: API-KEY' \\\n -d '{\"verification\": {}}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/kyc.identity", "tool": "https://letme.dev/veriff" }, "area": "domain-data", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Verification, Essential plan (automated decision)", "unit": "tx", "usd": 0.8, "note": "$49 a month minimum" }, { "item": "Verification, Plus plan", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1.39, "note": "$99 a month minimum" }, { "item": "Verification, Premium plan", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1.89, "note": "$209 a month minimum" }, { "item": "PEP and sanctions screening add-on, per verification", "unit": "tx", "usd": 0.64, "note": "charged on top of the monthly minimum" }, { "item": "Ongoing monitoring add-on, per verification", "unit": "tx", "usd": 0.09, "note": "charged on top of the monthly minimum" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Veriff OÜ", "domain": "veriff.com", "domainRegistered": "2006-04-12", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.veriff.com/terms-of-service", "privacy": "https://www.veriff.com/privacy-notice", "statusPage": "https://status.veriff.com", "changelog": "https://devdocs.veriff.com/docs/release-notes", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The privacy notice (valid from 30 July 2020, last updated 16 April 2026) names Veriff OÜ and Veriff Brazil Ltda. and gives the Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate as lead supervisory authority.", "www.veriff.com/terms-of-service answers 200 with the title Terms of Service but no terms text in the HTML we fetched, so the terms themselves weren't read.", "www.veriff.com/.well-known/security.txt and /security.txt return 404. Reports go to a bug bounty programme on Intigriti (https://www.veriff.com/bug-bounty).", "The API base URL is per integration and shown in the Customer Portal. Code samples in the docs use https://stationapi.veriff.com.", "RDAP for veriff.com gives a registration date of 2006-04-12, which predates the company.", "The sub-processor list is linked from the privacy notice to help.veriff.com, which returned only a JavaScript shell to our fetch." ], "score": 85 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.json", "live": { "slug": "veriff", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.veriff.com", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T21:58:17.420338928Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "Veriff/veriff-js-sdk", "version": "v2.0.0", "released": "2025-09-09", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:34:12.058479178Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/incontext-sdk", "version": "2.5.0", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:34:07.822049846Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/js-sdk", "version": "2.0.0", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:34:08.944903091Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/react-native-sdk", "version": "13.2.0", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:34:10.073325113Z" } ], "githubStars": 32, "npmWeekly": 109625, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://veriff.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T15:38:34.847122653Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://devdocs.veriff.com/docs/release-notes", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:17:01.404186048Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "26520a9df2cc" }, { "url": "https://www.veriff.com/privacy-notice", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:31:21.093035848Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "024c0d3f9713" }, { "url": "https://www.veriff.com/terms-of-service", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:31:23.123829782Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "d9e650601ce7" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T21:58:17.420338928Z" } }, "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "ComplyCube (Teemo Technology Ltd)", "b": "Veriff OÜ", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "https://api.complycube.com", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP", "b": "HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Proprietary service under ComplyCube's terms of service. The PHP library and the web, iOS and Android SDK repositories are MIT, and `@complycube/api` on npm is MIT", "b": "Proprietary service. The npm capture SDKs are ISC (@veriff/js-sdk, @veriff/incontext-sdk) and MIT (@veriff/react-native-sdk)", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-06", "b": "2026-10-02", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no date given", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no date given", "b": "2026-04-16", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "6.2k npm/wk, 292 PyPI/wk", "b": "32 stars, 110k npm/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Veriff's 61.1 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Veriff leads on security \u0026 auth and payments \u0026 pricing.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, ComplyCube or Veriff?" }, { "answer": "Both need an API key.", "question": "Do ComplyCube and Veriff need an API key?" }, { "answer": "ComplyCube has a hosted endpoint at https://api.complycube.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for Veriff.", "question": "Can an agent call ComplyCube and Veriff without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 84 against 62", "Agent ergonomics, 60 against 43" ], "also": [ "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install" ], "goodFor": "An agent that creates clients, uploads documents, starts document, identity and AML screening checks and reads results for a regulated business, with low entry cost ($99 a month) and a scripted sandbox.", "slug": "complycube", "watchFor": "One API key per environment with no scopes. The docs say keys carry many privileges" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Security \u0026 auth, 63 against 52", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 27" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "A team that needs document and selfie verification with public per-verification prices and a trial, and that can run a webhook receiver and HMAC signing.", "slug": "veriff", "watchFor": "No server-side SDK and no MCP server. Official packages cover only browser and mobile capture" } ], "job": { "capability": "kyc.identity", "name": "Kyc identity" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-didit.json", "title": "ComplyCube vs Didit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-didit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-jumio.json", "title": "ComplyCube vs Jumio", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-jumio" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-middesk.json", "title": "ComplyCube vs Middesk", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-middesk" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-persona.json", "title": "ComplyCube vs Persona", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-persona" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-sumsub.json", "title": "ComplyCube vs Sumsub", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-sumsub" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-trulioo.json", "title": "ComplyCube vs Trulioo", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-trulioo" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Didit vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jumio-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Jumio vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jumio-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/middesk-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Middesk vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/middesk-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/persona-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Persona vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/persona-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sumsub-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Sumsub vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sumsub-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/trulioo-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Trulioo vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/trulioo-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.json", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs ComplyCube", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff.json", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff" } ], "scores": [ { "by": 22, "complycube": 84, "edge": "complycube", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "veriff": 62, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 4, "complycube": 78, "edge": "veriff", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "veriff": 82, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 17, "complycube": 60, "edge": "complycube", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "veriff": 43, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 11, "complycube": 52, "edge": "veriff", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "veriff": 63, "weight": 14 }, { "by": 13, "complycube": 27, "edge": "veriff", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "veriff": 40, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 0, "complycube": 74, "edge": "", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "veriff": 74, "weight": 7 }, { "by": 4, "complycube": 63, "edge": "veriff", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "veriff": 67, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Veriff's 61.1 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Veriff leads on security \u0026 auth and payments \u0026 pricing. Both do kyc identity.", "verdicts": { "complycube": "A sandbox with its own key and scripted outcomes, a public OpenAPI spec, Markdown docs and an audit log API suit an agent running verification checks. Each environment has one unscoped key, no idempotency keys were found, and the only published terms are undated and read as website terms.", "veriff": "Per-verification prices are public from $0.80, with a 15-day trial of 50 sessions and no card. Each endpoint page is Markdown with an OpenAPI 3.0 fragment. There is no server SDK, MCP server or idempotency key, most calls need an HMAC signature, and the status page shows nine incidents between 20 July and 7 October 2026." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff.md", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff.min.md" }, "markdown": "ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Veriff's 61.1 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Veriff leads on security \u0026 auth and payments \u0026 pricing. Both do kyc identity.\n\n- ComplyCube: grade B, 63.7/100, rank #299 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complycube.json\n- Veriff: grade C, 61.1/100, rank #376 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/veriff.json\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### ComplyCube (B)\n\nGood for: An agent that creates clients, uploads documents, starts document, identity and AML screening checks and reads results for a regulated business, with low entry cost ($99 a month) and a scripted sandbox.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 84 against 62\n- Agent ergonomics, 60 against 43\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n\nWatch for: One API key per environment with no scopes. The docs say keys carry many privileges\n\n### Veriff (C)\n\nGood for: A team that needs document and selfie verification with public per-verification prices and a trial, and that can run a webhook receiver and HMAC signing.\n\nAhead on:\n- Security \u0026 auth, 63 against 52\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 27\n\nWatch for: No server-side SDK and no MCP server. Official packages cover only browser and mobile capture\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | ComplyCube | Veriff | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 84 | 62 | ComplyCube +22 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 78 | 82 | Veriff +4 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 60 | 43 | ComplyCube +17 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 52 | 63 | Veriff +11 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 27 | 40 | Veriff +13 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 74 | 74 | even |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 63 | 67 | Veriff +4 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **63.7 · B** | **61.1 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | ComplyCube | Veriff |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | ComplyCube (Teemo Technology Ltd) | Veriff OÜ |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.complycube.com` | no (local only) |\n| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |\n| Auth | API key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary service under ComplyCube's terms of service. The PHP library and the web, iOS and Android SDK repositories are MIT, and `@complycube/api` on npm is MIT | Proprietary service. The npm capture SDKs are ISC (@veriff/js-sdk, @veriff/incontext-sdk) and MIT (@veriff/react-native-sdk) |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-02 |\n| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-04-16 |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |\n| Popularity | 6.2k npm/wk, 292 PyPI/wk | 32 stars, 110k npm/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**ComplyCube.** A sandbox with its own key and scripted outcomes, a public OpenAPI spec, Markdown docs and an audit log API suit an agent running verification checks. Each environment has one unscoped key, no idempotency keys were found, and the only published terms are undated and read as website terms.\n\n**Veriff.** Per-verification prices are public from $0.80, with a 15-day trial of 50 sessions and no card. Each endpoint page is Markdown with an OpenAPI 3.0 fragment. There is no server SDK, MCP server or idempotency key, most calls need an HMAC signature, and the status page shows nine incidents between 20 July and 7 October 2026.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### ComplyCube\n\n1. Send the key bare in the `Authorization` header, with no Bearer prefix. Keys start `test_` or `live_`\n2. Create a client first, then documents or live photos for it, then `POST /v1/checks` with the client and upload IDs\n3. Stay under 10 requests a second live and 5 in the sandbox. On 429, back off exponentially with jitter, starting at 30 seconds\n4. A badly formed filter returns 200 with no results, so check filter names before trusting an empty list\n5. Checks are asynchronous. Subscribe to webhooks, verify the `ComplyCube-Signature` HMAC-SHA256 header, and expect duplicate and out-of-order events\n\n### Veriff\n\n1. Take the base URL from the integration's API keys page. Send X-AUTH-CLIENT on every call and store verification.id from POST /v1/sessions\n2. Sign POST and PATCH bodies, and the session ID on GET and DELETE, with HMAC-SHA256 in X-HMAC-SIGNATURE. POST /v1/sessions needs no signature\n3. Stay under 30 session creations a minute on Self-Serve, 600 on Enterprise. A 429 carries code 1004\n4. Don't blindly retry POST /v1/sessions. Each call makes a new session, which is billed on a live integration\n5. Poll GET /v1/sessions/{id}/decision until `verification` is not null, or accept webhooks within 5 seconds and treat duplicates as normal\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, ComplyCube or Veriff?\n\nComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Veriff's 61.1 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Veriff leads on security \u0026 auth and payments \u0026 pricing.\n\n### Do ComplyCube and Veriff need an API key?\n\nBoth need an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call ComplyCube and Veriff without installing anything?\n\nComplyCube has a hosted endpoint at https://api.complycube.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for Veriff.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"complycube\", \"b\": \"veriff\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare complycube veriff`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complycube.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/veriff.json\n\n## Other comparisons with ComplyCube or Veriff\n\n- [ComplyCube vs Didit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-didit.md)\n- [ComplyCube vs Jumio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-jumio.md)\n- [ComplyCube vs Middesk](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-middesk.md)\n- [ComplyCube vs Persona](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-persona.md)\n- [ComplyCube vs Sumsub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-sumsub.md)\n- [ComplyCube vs Trulioo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-trulioo.md)\n- [Didit vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Jumio vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jumio-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Middesk vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/middesk-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Persona vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/persona-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Sumsub vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sumsub-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Trulioo vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/trulioo-vs-veriff.md)\n- [ComplyAdvantage vs ComplyCube](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.md)\n- [ComplyAdvantage vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-08", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.4", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "ComplyCube vs Veriff", "url": "" } ], "description": "ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Veriff's 61.1 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Veriff leads on security \u0026 auth and payments \u0026 pricing. Both do kyc identity. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "ComplyCube B 63.7", "Veriff C 61.1", "scores" ], "h1": "ComplyCube vs Veriff", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-complycube-vs-veriff.png", "path": "/compare/complycube-vs-veriff", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "ComplyCube vs Veriff for AI agents, B 63.7 vs C 61.1 | Anchor Terminal", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-08", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 2150, "slim": 730 }, "version": 1 }