# ComplyCube vs Trulioo (slim)

> ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Trulioo's 58.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Trulioo leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do kyc identity. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-trulioo.md (~2,250 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-trulioo.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-trulioo
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Trulioo's 58.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Trulioo leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do kyc identity.

- ComplyCube: B 63.7, rank #299 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube.min.md
- Trulioo: C 58.2, rank #457 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/trulioo.min.md
- ComplyCube, good for An agent that creates clients, uploads documents, starts document, identity and AML screening checks and reads results for a regulated business, with low entry cost ($99 a month) and a scripted sandbox. Ahead on Reliability, 84 against 19; Payments & pricing, 27 against 18; Transparency & trust, 63 against 56.
- Trulioo, good for An agent doing business due diligence (search, verification, ownership, reports) or person checks across many countries for a company that already has a Trulioo contract, and for teams that want to test verification flows against synthetic data first. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 87 against 78; Agent ergonomics, 78 against 60; Security & auth, 79 against 52.

| Category | ComplyCube | Trulioo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 84 | 19 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 78 | 87 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 60 | 78 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 52 | 79 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 27 | 18 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 74 | 75 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 56 |

| Fact (where they differ) | ComplyCube | Trulioo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | ComplyCube (Teemo Technology Ltd) | Trulioo Information Services Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.complycube.com` | `https://api.trulioo.com` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| Licence | Proprietary service under ComplyCube's terms of service. The PHP library and the web, iOS and Android SDK repositories are MIT, and `@complycube/api` on npm is MIT | Proprietary service under a customer agreement that isn't public. The MCP plugin and the C# and Java REST SDKs on GitHub are Apache-2.0, and the capture SDKs fall under the Trulioo SDK Licence |
| Tools exposed | none | 18 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2025-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | 6.2k npm/wk, 292 PyPI/wk | 0 stars, 131 npm/wk |