# ComplyCube vs Shufti (slim)

> ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Shufti's 57.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Shufti leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-shufti.md (~2,250 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-shufti.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-shufti
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Shufti's 57.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Shufti leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity.

- ComplyCube: B 63.7, rank #343 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube.min.md
- Shufti: C 57.8, rank #538 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/shufti.min.md
- ComplyCube, good for An agent that creates clients, uploads documents, starts document, identity and AML screening checks and reads results for a regulated business, with low entry cost ($99 a month) and a scripted sandbox. Ahead on Reliability, 84 against 65; Schema & documentation, 78 against 58; Agent ergonomics, 60 against 47.
- Shufti, good for A team that wants document, face, address, AML and KYB checks behind one endpoint, a free plan for low volume, and an MCP server that hands the person a hosted verification link. Ahead on Security & auth, 62 against 52; Payments & pricing, 35 against 27; Transparency & trust, 71 against 63. Also Free to start without a card.

| Category | ComplyCube | Shufti |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 84 | 65 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 78 | 58 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 60 | 47 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 52 | 62 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 27 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 74 | 72 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 71 |

| Fact (where they differ) | ComplyCube | Shufti |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | ComplyCube (Teemo Technology Ltd) | Shufti Pro Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.complycube.com` | `https://api.shuftipro.com` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| Licence | Proprietary service under ComplyCube's terms of service. The PHP library and the web, iOS and Android SDK repositories are MIT, and `@complycube/api` on npm is MIT | Proprietary service under Shufti's Terms and Conditions. The licences of the mobile capture SDKs were not checked |
| Tools exposed | none | 25 |
| Terms last updated | no date given |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-09-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | 6.2k npm/wk, 292 PyPI/wk | 673 npm/wk |