# ComplyCube vs Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) (slim)

> ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) to Entrust Identity Verification's 62.1 (B) for identity verification. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-entrust-identity-verification.md (~3,050 tokens) · this version ~880 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-entrust-identity-verification.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-entrust-identity-verification
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-14

ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido)'s 62.1 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do identity verification.

- ComplyCube: B 63.7, rank #403 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube.min.md
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido): B 62.1, rank #472 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/entrust-identity-verification.min.md
- ComplyCube, good for An agent that creates clients, uploads documents, starts document, identity and AML screening checks and reads results for a regulated business, with low entry cost ($99 a month) and a scripted sandbox. Ahead on Reliability, 84 against 70; Payments & pricing, 27 against 20; Maintenance & community, 74 against 58. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido), good for A company already contracted with Entrust that wants an agent to create applicants, start workflow runs and read reports through typed libraries and a public spec. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 84 against 78; Agent ergonomics, 65 against 60; Security & auth, 58 against 52; Transparency & trust, 70 against 63.

| Category | ComplyCube | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 84 | 70 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 78 | 84 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 60 | 65 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 52 | 58 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 27 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 74 | 58 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 70 |

| Fact (where they differ) | ComplyCube | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | ComplyCube (Teemo Technology Ltd) | Onfido Ltd (Entrust) |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.complycube.com` | no (local only) |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| Licence | Proprietary service under ComplyCube's terms of service. The PHP library and the web, iOS and Android SDK repositories are MIT, and `@complycube/api` on npm is MIT | Proprietary service under Entrust's terms. The OpenAPI spec and the server libraries (onfido-java, onfido-node, onfido-php, onfido-python, onfido-ruby) are MIT |
| Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given |  |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 6.2k npm/wk, 292 PyPI/wk | 59k npm/wk, 27k PyPI/wk |