{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "complyadvantage", "name": "ComplyAdvantage", "vendor": "IVXS UK Limited (trading as ComplyAdvantage)", "vendorUrl": "https://complyadvantage.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "identity-verification", "summary": "ComplyAdvantage screens people and companies against sanctions lists, watchlists, politically exposed person registers and adverse media, with ongoing monitoring and case management. Agents reach its Mesh platform through a REST API with a public OpenAPI spec.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complyadvantage", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complyadvantage.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complyadvantage.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complyadvantage.json", "license": "Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the terms page on complyadvantage.com covers the website only", "transports": [ "http" ], "remoteUrl": "https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com", "packages": [], "auth": "oauth", "authNotes": "The Mesh API uses the OAuth2 client credentials flow. A Mesh admin, or a custom role with the API credential permissions, creates a credential in the web application under Settings, Access Management, API Credentials, choosing its permissions and an optional expiry date. The integration sends the access key and secret to `POST /v3/token` and receives a bearer token valid for 24 hours, with no refresh. A credential can't be edited, its secret is shown once, and deactivating it invalidates tokens already issued. The older username and password flow at `POST /v2/token` remains supported for existing integrations. Accounts are opened by ComplyAdvantage after a Starter Plan purchase or a sales contract, so there is no self-serve key (https://docs.mesh.complyadvantage.com/docs/getting-started, https://support.complyadvantage.com/articles/5045588818-creating-api-credentials, checked 2026-10-08).", "pricing": "paid", "pricingNotes": "The Starter Plan is priced by monitored entities a month. Essentials runs from $119 a month for up to 100 entities to $383 for up to 2,000 on monthly billing ($99 to $319 on annual billing), and the Agentic version from $179 to $575. Entities over the allowance are charged at 1.5 times the unit rate. Enterprise, which adds transaction monitoring and payment screening, is priced on application. No free tier or trial was found. Sandbox and production logins come with a paid account, set up by staff within one working day, and the pricing page says the API is included. ComplyLaunch gives early-stage start-ups free access on application (https://complyadvantage.com/pricing/, https://complyadvantage.com/starter-plan/, checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "$119 / mo", "where": "hosted", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the Mesh API docs, the OpenAPI spec or the pricing pages (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.mesh.complyadvantage.com", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.mesh.complyadvantage.com/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://docs.mesh.complyadvantage.com/openapi/mesh-api.json", "capabilities": [ "kyc.screening", "kyc.cases" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "paid", "sandbox", "oauth", "openapi", "llms-txt", "webhooks", "aml", "sanctions", "audit-log", "iso27001", "soc2" ], "lastRelease": "2026-09-16", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 52.6, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 564, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 722, "categoryRank": 9, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 10, "reliability": 42, "schema": 82, "security": 68, "transparency": 50 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "The Mesh API has a public OpenAPI 3.0.3 spec with 165 described operations, per-credential permissions and audit log endpoints, which suits an agent screening customers and working alerts. No status page, changelog, SDK, service agreement or subprocessor list was found in public, and access starts with a paid plan bought by a person.", "bestFor": "An agent that screens customers and companies against sanctions, politically exposed person and adverse media data, keeps them under monitoring and works the resulting alerts and cases.", "strengths": [ "Public OpenAPI 3.0.3 spec with 165 operations, each with a summary and description, and 124 naming the permission the call needs", "API credentials carry their own permissions and optional expiry, and deactivation invalidates tokens already issued", "Six audit log endpoints cover the account, cases, customers, roles, transactions and users", "Rate limits are published (1,000 requests a minute in production, 300 in Sandbox) with `Ratelimit-Limit`, `Ratelimit-Remaining` and `Ratelimit-Reset` headers", "`llms.txt` on the docs site, and every guide and reference page is served as Markdown" ], "weaknesses": [ "No public status page or incident history was found. `status.complyadvantage.com` does not resolve", "No changelog or release notes were found for the Mesh API", "No service agreement, data processing agreement or subprocessor list is published. The terms page covers the website only", "No free tier or self-serve trial. The Starter Plan starts at $119 a month and accounts are set up by staff within a working day", "No official SDK was found. Access tokens last 24 hours with no refresh", "Screening results carry third-party adverse media text, and no prompt-injection guidance was found" ], "agentNotes": [ "Exchange the access key and secret at `POST /v3/token` for a bearer token. It lasts 24 hours and can't be refreshed, so request a new one before expiry", "Ask for a credential with only the permissions the task needs. Permissions can't be edited later, and each reference page names the ones a call requires", "Create a screening configuration first and keep its `configuration_identifier`. Creating and screening a customer needs it", "Give each customer a unique external identifier. A concurrent request for the same identifier returns 409 with a pointer to the first workflow", "Read `Ratelimit-Remaining` and `Ratelimit-Reset` on every response. A 429 body is only `API rate limit exceeded`" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 52.6 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 67, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 10, "reliability": 42, "schema": 82, "security": 68, "transparency": 40 }, "provenanceScore": 59 }, "connect": { "http": "curl -X POST https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com/v3/token \\\n -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n -d '{\"access_key\": \"\u003cyour access key\u003e\", \"secret\": \"\u003cyour secret\u003e\"}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/kyc.screening", "tool": "https://letme.dev/complyadvantage" }, "area": "domain-data", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Essentials Starter Plan, up to 100 monitored entities", "unit": "month", "usd": 119, "note": "monthly billing; $99 a month on annual billing" }, { "item": "Essentials Starter Plan, up to 1,000 monitored entities", "unit": "month", "usd": 323, "note": "monthly billing; $269 a month on annual billing" }, { "item": "Essentials Starter Plan, up to 2,000 monitored entities", "unit": "month", "usd": 383, "note": "monthly billing; $319 a month on annual billing" }, { "item": "Agentic Starter Plan, up to 100 monitored entities", "unit": "month", "usd": 179, "note": "monthly billing; $149 a month on annual billing" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "IVXS UK Limited (trading as ComplyAdvantage)", "domain": "complyadvantage.com", "domainRegistered": "2014-07-05", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "", "privacy": "https://complyadvantage.com/privacy-notice/", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The privacy notice (last updated 12 June 2026) names IVXS UK Limited, trading as ComplyAdvantage, 86-90 Paul Street, London EC2A 4NE, registered with the UK Information Commissioner under ZA054290, and covers its products and services as well as the website.", "No `terms` is given. https://complyadvantage.com/terms-and-conditions/ is the website's terms of use, and no service agreement, API terms or data processing agreement was found on the site, the docs or the help centre.", "The Mesh API answers at api.mesh.complyadvantage.com and regional hosts under mesh.complyadvantage.com.", "https://complyadvantage.com/.well-known/security.txt and /security.txt return 404.", "status.complyadvantage.com does not resolve, and no status page is linked from the site, the docs or the help centre. docs.mesh.complyadvantage.com/changelog returns 404.", "RDAP for complyadvantage.com gives a registration date of 2014-07-05." ], "score": 59 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complyadvantage.json", "live": { "slug": "complyadvantage", "probe": { "target": "https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com", "method": "get", "lastAt": "2026-10-08T21:53:19.594708384Z", "lastOk": true, "lastStatus": 401, "lastMs": 40, "lastNote": "asks for credentials", "authRequired": true, "uptime24h": 100, "uptime30d": 100, "p50ms24h": 52, "p95ms24h": 91, "samples24h": 28, "samples30d": 28, "days": [ { "date": "2026-10-08", "probes": 28, "ok": 28 } ] }, "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T21:53:19.594708384Z" } }, "answer": "Veriff scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security \u0026 auth.", "b": { "slug": "veriff", "name": "Veriff", "vendor": "Veriff OÜ", "vendorUrl": "https://www.veriff.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "identity-verification", "summary": "Identity verification service from Veriff in Tallinn. It checks an identity document and a selfie, with liveness, database checks and PEP and sanctions screening. Sessions are created and read through the Public API v1, with results sent by webhook.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/veriff.json", "repo": "https://github.com/Veriff/veriff-js-sdk", "license": "Proprietary service. The npm capture SDKs are ISC (@veriff/js-sdk, @veriff/incontext-sdk) and MIT (@veriff/react-native-sdk)", "transports": [ "http" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/incontext-sdk" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/js-sdk" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/react-native-sdk" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "Self-serve. Signing up for a Self-Serve plan creates a Customer Portal account with a test integration, and Enterprise accounts start from a sales form. Each integration has an API key, sent as `X-AUTH-CLIENT`, and up to five shared secret keys used to compute an HMAC-SHA256 `X-HMAC-SIGNATURE` (over the body on POST and PATCH, over the session ID on GET and DELETE). POST /v1/sessions needs only the API key. Secrets are shown once and can be rotated or deleted by an admin. There are no scopes. A live integration unlocks once the account holder passes Veriff's own identity verification.", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Self-Serve is priced per verification with a monthly minimum. Essential is $0.80 ($49 a month minimum), Plus $1.39 ($99) and Premium $1.89 ($209). PEP and sanctions screening adds $0.64, ongoing monitoring $0.09 and two-year retention $0.30. A 15-day trial covers up to 50 sessions with no card, after the account holder completes identity verification. Test integrations are free and unbilled. Enterprise, suggested for 5,000 or more verifications a month, is priced by sales (https://www.veriff.com/plans/self-serve, checked 2026-10-08).", "priceSummary": "$0.80 / tx", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the developer docs index, the API guides or the pricing page (checked 2026-10-08).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 32, "npmWeekly": 109625, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://devdocs.veriff.com", "llmsTxt": "https://devdocs.veriff.com/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://devdocs.veriff.com/apidocs/v1sessions.md", "capabilities": [ "kyc.identity", "kyc.documents", "kyc.screening" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "api-key", "hmac", "webhooks", "openapi", "llms-txt", "free-trial", "sandbox", "status-page", "bug-bounty", "soc2", "iso27001" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-02", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 61.1, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 376, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 722, "categoryRank": 5, "methodology": "0.4", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 43, "maintenance": 74, "payments": 40, "reliability": 62, "schema": 82, "security": 63, "transparency": 67 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Per-verification prices are public from $0.80, with a 15-day trial of 50 sessions and no card. Each endpoint page is Markdown with an OpenAPI 3.0 fragment. There is no server SDK, MCP server or idempotency key, most calls need an HMAC signature, and the status page shows nine incidents between 20 July and 7 October 2026.", "bestFor": "A team that needs document and selfie verification with public per-verification prices and a trial, and that can run a webhook receiver and HMAC signing.", "strengths": [ "Public prices of $0.80, $1.39 and $1.89 a verification, with a 15-day trial of up to 50 sessions and no card", "llms.txt index and Markdown pages, each API endpoint with an OpenAPI 3.0.0 fragment, examples and error schemas", "Up to five shared secret keys per integration, shown once, with documented rotation and deletion", "Test integrations are created at signup, aren't billed, and let the developer force a decision", "ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type II, Cyber Essentials and a bug bounty on Intigriti paying 50 to 6,000 euros" ], "weaknesses": [ "No server-side SDK and no MCP server. Official packages cover only browser and mobile capture", "No idempotency key on POST /v1/sessions, and no Retry-After or backoff guidance for the documented 429", "Nine status-page incidents between 20 July and 7 October 2026, mostly delayed decisions in the US region", "No endpoint lists sessions and no pagination was found. Every read needs a stored session ID", "Session deletion by API is off by default and capped at 10 sessions in 24 hours", "No security.txt, and the sub-processor list sits on a help centre page that needs JavaScript" ], "agentNotes": [ "Take the base URL from the integration's API keys page. Send X-AUTH-CLIENT on every call and store verification.id from POST /v1/sessions", "Sign POST and PATCH bodies, and the session ID on GET and DELETE, with HMAC-SHA256 in X-HMAC-SIGNATURE. POST /v1/sessions needs no signature", "Stay under 30 session creations a minute on Self-Serve, 600 on Enterprise. A 429 carries code 1004", "Don't blindly retry POST /v1/sessions. Each call makes a new session, which is billed on a live integration", "Poll GET /v1/sessions/{id}/decision until `verification` is not null, or accept webhooks within 5 seconds and treat duplicates as normal" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.4", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 61.1 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 43, "maintenance": 74, "payments": 40, "reliability": 62, "schema": 82, "security": 63, "transparency": 48 }, "provenanceScore": 85 }, "connect": { "http": "curl -X POST \"https://\u003cBaseURL\u003e/v1/sessions\" \\\n -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \\\n -H 'X-AUTH-CLIENT: API-KEY' \\\n -d '{\"verification\": {}}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/kyc.identity", "tool": "https://letme.dev/veriff" }, "area": "domain-data", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Verification, Essential plan (automated decision)", "unit": "tx", "usd": 0.8, "note": "$49 a month minimum" }, { "item": "Verification, Plus plan", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1.39, "note": "$99 a month minimum" }, { "item": "Verification, Premium plan", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1.89, "note": "$209 a month minimum" }, { "item": "PEP and sanctions screening add-on, per verification", "unit": "tx", "usd": 0.64, "note": "charged on top of the monthly minimum" }, { "item": "Ongoing monitoring add-on, per verification", "unit": "tx", "usd": 0.09, "note": "charged on top of the monthly minimum" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Veriff OÜ", "domain": "veriff.com", "domainRegistered": "2006-04-12", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.veriff.com/terms-of-service", "privacy": "https://www.veriff.com/privacy-notice", "statusPage": "https://status.veriff.com", "changelog": "https://devdocs.veriff.com/docs/release-notes", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The privacy notice (valid from 30 July 2020, last updated 16 April 2026) names Veriff OÜ and Veriff Brazil Ltda. and gives the Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate as lead supervisory authority.", "www.veriff.com/terms-of-service answers 200 with the title Terms of Service but no terms text in the HTML we fetched, so the terms themselves weren't read.", "www.veriff.com/.well-known/security.txt and /security.txt return 404. Reports go to a bug bounty programme on Intigriti (https://www.veriff.com/bug-bounty).", "The API base URL is per integration and shown in the Customer Portal. Code samples in the docs use https://stationapi.veriff.com.", "RDAP for veriff.com gives a registration date of 2006-04-12, which predates the company.", "The sub-processor list is linked from the privacy notice to help.veriff.com, which returned only a JavaScript shell to our fetch." ], "score": 85 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.json", "live": { "slug": "veriff", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.veriff.com", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T21:58:17.420338928Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "Veriff/veriff-js-sdk", "version": "v2.0.0", "released": "2025-09-09", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:34:12.058479178Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/incontext-sdk", "version": "2.5.0", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:34:07.822049846Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/js-sdk", "version": "2.0.0", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:34:08.944903091Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@veriff/react-native-sdk", "version": "13.2.0", "seenAt": "2026-10-08T16:34:10.073325113Z" } ], "githubStars": 32, "npmWeekly": 109625, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://veriff.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T15:38:34.847122653Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://devdocs.veriff.com/docs/release-notes", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:17:01.404186048Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "26520a9df2cc" }, { "url": "https://www.veriff.com/privacy-notice", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:31:21.093035848Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "024c0d3f9713" }, { "url": "https://www.veriff.com/terms-of-service", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-08T18:31:23.123829782Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "d9e650601ce7" } ], "updatedAt": "2026-10-08T21:58:17.420338928Z" } }, "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "IVXS UK Limited (trading as ComplyAdvantage)", "b": "Veriff OÜ", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "HTTP", "b": "HTTP", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Paid", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "not published", "b": "$0.64 per transaction", "name": "Price for kyc screening" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the terms page on complyadvantage.com covers the website only", "b": "Proprietary service. The npm capture SDKs are ISC (@veriff/js-sdk, @veriff/incontext-sdk) and MIT (@veriff/react-native-sdk)", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-09-16", "b": "2026-10-02", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2026-06-12", "b": "2026-04-16", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "", "b": "yes", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "none", "b": "32 stars, 110k npm/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Veriff scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security \u0026 auth.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, ComplyAdvantage or Veriff?" }, { "answer": "ComplyAdvantage uses an OAuth sign-in. Veriff needs an API key.", "question": "Do ComplyAdvantage and Veriff need an API key?" }, { "answer": "ComplyAdvantage has a hosted endpoint at https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for Veriff.", "question": "Can an agent call ComplyAdvantage and Veriff without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Agent ergonomics, 67 against 43", "Security \u0026 auth, 68 against 63" ], "also": [ "A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install" ], "goodFor": "An agent that screens customers and companies against sanctions, politically exposed person and adverse media data, keeps them under monitoring and works the resulting alerts and cases.", "slug": "complyadvantage", "watchFor": "No public status page or incident history was found. `status.complyadvantage.com` does not resolve" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 62 against 42", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 10", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 74 against 28", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 67 against 50" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "A team that needs document and selfie verification with public per-verification prices and a trial, and that can run a webhook receiver and HMAC signing.", "slug": "veriff", "watchFor": "No server-side SDK and no MCP server. Official packages cover only browser and mobile capture" } ], "job": { "capability": "kyc.screening", "name": "Kyc screening" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff.json", "title": "ComplyCube vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Didit vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jumio-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Jumio vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jumio-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/middesk-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Middesk vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/middesk-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/persona-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Persona vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/persona-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sumsub-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Sumsub vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sumsub-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/trulioo-vs-veriff.json", "title": "Trulioo vs Veriff", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/trulioo-vs-veriff" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.json", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs ComplyCube", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-didit.json", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs Didit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-didit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-jumio.json", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs Jumio", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-jumio" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-middesk.json", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs Middesk", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-middesk" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-persona.json", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs Persona", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-persona" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-sumsub.json", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs Sumsub", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-sumsub" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-trulioo.json", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs Trulioo", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-trulioo" } ], "scores": [ { "by": 20, "complyadvantage": 42, "edge": "veriff", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "veriff": 62, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 0, "complyadvantage": 82, "edge": "", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "veriff": 82, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 24, "complyadvantage": 67, "edge": "complyadvantage", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "veriff": 43, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 5, "complyadvantage": 68, "edge": "complyadvantage", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "veriff": 63, "weight": 14 }, { "by": 30, "complyadvantage": 10, "edge": "veriff", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "veriff": 40, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 46, "complyadvantage": 28, "edge": "veriff", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "veriff": 74, "weight": 7 }, { "by": 17, "complyadvantage": 50, "edge": "veriff", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "veriff": 67, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Veriff scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security \u0026 auth. Both do kyc screening.", "verdicts": { "complyadvantage": "The Mesh API has a public OpenAPI 3.0.3 spec with 165 described operations, per-credential permissions and audit log endpoints, which suits an agent screening customers and working alerts. No status page, changelog, SDK, service agreement or subprocessor list was found in public, and access starts with a paid plan bought by a person.", "veriff": "Per-verification prices are public from $0.80, with a 15-day trial of 50 sessions and no card. Each endpoint page is Markdown with an OpenAPI 3.0 fragment. There is no server SDK, MCP server or idempotency key, most calls need an HMAC signature, and the status page shows nine incidents between 20 July and 7 October 2026." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff.md", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff.min.md" }, "markdown": "Veriff scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security \u0026 auth. Both do kyc screening.\n\n- ComplyAdvantage: grade D, 52.6/100, rank #564 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complyadvantage.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complyadvantage.json\n- Veriff: grade C, 61.1/100, rank #376 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/veriff.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/veriff.json\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### ComplyAdvantage (D)\n\nGood for: An agent that screens customers and companies against sanctions, politically exposed person and adverse media data, keeps them under monitoring and works the resulting alerts and cases.\n\nAhead on:\n- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 43\n- Security \u0026 auth, 68 against 63\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install\n\nWatch for: No public status page or incident history was found. `status.complyadvantage.com` does not resolve\n\n### Veriff (C)\n\nGood for: A team that needs document and selfie verification with public per-verification prices and a trial, and that can run a webhook receiver and HMAC signing.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 62 against 42\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 10\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 74 against 28\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 67 against 50\n\nWatch for: No server-side SDK and no MCP server. Official packages cover only browser and mobile capture\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | ComplyAdvantage | Veriff | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 42 | 62 | Veriff +20 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 82 | 82 | even |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 67 | 43 | ComplyAdvantage +24 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 68 | 63 | ComplyAdvantage +5 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 10 | 40 | Veriff +30 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 28 | 74 | Veriff +46 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 50 | 67 | Veriff +17 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **52.6 · D** | **61.1 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | ComplyAdvantage | Veriff |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | IVXS UK Limited (trading as ComplyAdvantage) | Veriff OÜ |\n| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com` | no (local only) |\n| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |\n| Auth | OAuth | API key |\n| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |\n| Price for kyc screening | not published | $0.64 per transaction |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the terms page on complyadvantage.com covers the website only | Proprietary service. The npm capture SDKs are ISC (@veriff/js-sdk, @veriff/incontext-sdk) and MIT (@veriff/react-native-sdk) |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-10-02 |\n| Terms last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-06-12 | 2026-04-16 |\n| Customer content may train models | | yes |\n| Terms restrict automated access | | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | | couldn't be read |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | | couldn't be read |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | | couldn't be read |\n| Popularity | none | 32 stars, 110k npm/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**ComplyAdvantage.** The Mesh API has a public OpenAPI 3.0.3 spec with 165 described operations, per-credential permissions and audit log endpoints, which suits an agent screening customers and working alerts. No status page, changelog, SDK, service agreement or subprocessor list was found in public, and access starts with a paid plan bought by a person.\n\n**Veriff.** Per-verification prices are public from $0.80, with a 15-day trial of 50 sessions and no card. Each endpoint page is Markdown with an OpenAPI 3.0 fragment. There is no server SDK, MCP server or idempotency key, most calls need an HMAC signature, and the status page shows nine incidents between 20 July and 7 October 2026.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### ComplyAdvantage\n\n1. Exchange the access key and secret at `POST /v3/token` for a bearer token. It lasts 24 hours and can't be refreshed, so request a new one before expiry\n2. Ask for a credential with only the permissions the task needs. Permissions can't be edited later, and each reference page names the ones a call requires\n3. Create a screening configuration first and keep its `configuration_identifier`. Creating and screening a customer needs it\n4. Give each customer a unique external identifier. A concurrent request for the same identifier returns 409 with a pointer to the first workflow\n5. Read `Ratelimit-Remaining` and `Ratelimit-Reset` on every response. A 429 body is only `API rate limit exceeded`\n\n### Veriff\n\n1. Take the base URL from the integration's API keys page. Send X-AUTH-CLIENT on every call and store verification.id from POST /v1/sessions\n2. Sign POST and PATCH bodies, and the session ID on GET and DELETE, with HMAC-SHA256 in X-HMAC-SIGNATURE. POST /v1/sessions needs no signature\n3. Stay under 30 session creations a minute on Self-Serve, 600 on Enterprise. A 429 carries code 1004\n4. Don't blindly retry POST /v1/sessions. Each call makes a new session, which is billed on a live integration\n5. Poll GET /v1/sessions/{id}/decision until `verification` is not null, or accept webhooks within 5 seconds and treat duplicates as normal\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, ComplyAdvantage or Veriff?\n\nVeriff scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security \u0026 auth.\n\n### Do ComplyAdvantage and Veriff need an API key?\n\nComplyAdvantage uses an OAuth sign-in. Veriff needs an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call ComplyAdvantage and Veriff without installing anything?\n\nComplyAdvantage has a hosted endpoint at https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for Veriff.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"complyadvantage\", \"b\": \"veriff\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare complyadvantage veriff`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complyadvantage.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/veriff.json\n\n## Other comparisons with ComplyAdvantage or Veriff\n\n- [ComplyCube vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Didit vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Jumio vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jumio-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Middesk vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/middesk-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Persona vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/persona-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Sumsub vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sumsub-vs-veriff.md)\n- [Trulioo vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/trulioo-vs-veriff.md)\n- [ComplyAdvantage vs ComplyCube](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.md)\n- [ComplyAdvantage vs Didit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-didit.md)\n- [ComplyAdvantage vs Jumio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-jumio.md)\n- [ComplyAdvantage vs Middesk](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-middesk.md)\n- [ComplyAdvantage vs Persona](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-persona.md)\n- [ComplyAdvantage vs Sumsub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-sumsub.md)\n- [ComplyAdvantage vs Trulioo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-trulioo.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-10-08", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.4", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "ComplyAdvantage vs Veriff", "url": "" } ], "description": "Veriff scores 61.1 (C) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security \u0026 auth. Both do kyc screening. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "ComplyAdvantage D 52.6", "Veriff C 61.1", "scores" ], "h1": "ComplyAdvantage vs Veriff", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-complyadvantage-vs-veriff.png", "path": "/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "ComplyAdvantage vs Veriff for AI agents, D 52.6 vs C 61.1", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-10-08", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 2200, "slim": 730 }, "version": 1 }