# ComplyAdvantage vs Socure RiskOS

> Socure RiskOS scores 63.5 (B) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do kyc screening. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-socure-riskos
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-socure-riskos.md (~2,400 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-socure-riskos.min.md (~680 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-socure-riskos.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-09

Socure RiskOS scores 63.5 (B) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do kyc screening.

- ComplyAdvantage: grade D, 52.6/100, rank #653 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complyadvantage.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complyadvantage.json
- Socure RiskOS: grade B, 63.5/100, rank #357 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/socure-riskos.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/socure-riskos.json

## Which one, for what

### ComplyAdvantage (D)

Good for: An agent that screens customers and companies against sanctions, politically exposed person and adverse media data, keeps them under monitoring and works the resulting alerts and cases.

Ahead on:
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 46
- Security & auth, 68 against 60

Watch for: No public status page or incident history was found. `status.complyadvantage.com` does not resolve

### Socure RiskOS (B)

Good for: A company in the United States that wants one decision from combined KYC, document, fraud and watchlist checks through a single evaluation call.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 75 against 42
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 10
- Maintenance & community, 75 against 28
- Transparency & trust, 68 against 50

Watch for: No service agreement or API terms are published. The only terms pages are website terms of use and end-user terms for document capture


## Score by category

| Category | Weight | ComplyAdvantage | Socure RiskOS | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 42 | 75 | Socure RiskOS +33 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 82 | 84 | Socure RiskOS +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 67 | 46 | ComplyAdvantage +21 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 68 | 60 | ComplyAdvantage +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 10 | 35 | Socure RiskOS +25 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 28 | 75 | Socure RiskOS +47 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 50 | 68 | Socure RiskOS +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **52.6 · D** | **63.5 · B** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | ComplyAdvantage | Socure RiskOS |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | IVXS UK Limited (trading as ComplyAdvantage) | Socure Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com` | `https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the terms page on complyadvantage.com covers the website only | Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the OpenAPI file states its licence as Proprietary |
| Tools exposed | none | 9 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-06-12 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models |  | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access |  |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  |  |
| Popularity | none | 35k npm/wk |

## Verdicts

**ComplyAdvantage.** The Mesh API has a public OpenAPI 3.0.3 spec with 165 described operations, per-credential permissions and audit log endpoints, which suits an agent screening customers and working alerts. No status page, changelog, SDK, service agreement or subprocessor list was found in public, and access starts with a paid plan bought by a person.

**Socure RiskOS.** A public OpenAPI file, llms.txt, 15 documented error codes and dated release notes cover a ten-operation REST API, and Socure Launch publishes prices from $0.80 an evaluation with a free sandbox. API keys carry no scopes, no idempotency header is defined, no service terms are published, and production stays at zero requests until Socure activates it.

## Before you call either

### ComplyAdvantage

1. Exchange the access key and secret at `POST /v3/token` for a bearer token. It lasts 24 hours and can't be refreshed, so request a new one before expiry
2. Ask for a credential with only the permissions the task needs. Permissions can't be edited later, and each reference page names the ones a call requires
3. Create a screening configuration first and keep its `configuration_identifier`. Creating and screening a customer needs it
4. Give each customer a unique external identifier. A concurrent request for the same identifier returns 409 with a pointer to the first workflow
5. Read `Ratelimit-Remaining` and `Ratelimit-Reset` on every response. A 429 body is only `API rate limit exceeded`

### Socure RiskOS

1. Send `Authorization: Bearer <key>` to `https://riskos.sandbox.socure.com/api/evaluation` for tests and `https://riskos.socure.com/api/evaluation` for live checks. The two environments use separate keys.
2. Use dummy data only in the sandbox. It returns predefined results, connects to no live data source and expects the documented test values.
3. Store the `eval_id` from every `POST /api/evaluation` response. No list or search endpoint exists to find it later.
4. On 429 wait the seconds given in `X-Retry-After`. Do not blindly resend a failed `POST /api/evaluation`, because no idempotency header is documented and Launch bills each initiated evaluation.
5. The MCP server at `https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox` reads docs, workflows and webhooks with its own MCP Server Key. It cannot run evaluations or read results.

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, ComplyAdvantage or Socure RiskOS?

Socure RiskOS scores 63.5 (B) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth.

### Do ComplyAdvantage and Socure RiskOS need an API key?

ComplyAdvantage uses an OAuth sign-in. Socure RiskOS needs an API key.

### Can an agent call ComplyAdvantage and Socure RiskOS without installing anything?

Yes. ComplyAdvantage has a hosted endpoint at https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com and Socure RiskOS at https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-socure-riskos.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-socure-riskos.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "complyadvantage", "b": "socure-riskos"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare complyadvantage socure-riskos`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complyadvantage.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/socure-riskos.json

## Other comparisons with ComplyAdvantage or Socure RiskOS

- [ComplyCube vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Didit vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Jumio vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jumio-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Persona vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/persona-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Shufti vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/shufti-vs-socure-riskos.md)
- [Socure RiskOS vs Sumsub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/socure-riskos-vs-sumsub.md)
- [Socure RiskOS vs Trulioo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/socure-riskos-vs-trulioo.md)
- [Socure RiskOS vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/socure-riskos-vs-veriff.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs ComplyCube](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Didit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-didit.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Jumio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-jumio.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Middesk](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-middesk.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Persona](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-persona.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Shufti](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-shufti.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Sumsub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-sumsub.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Trulioo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-trulioo.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff.md)
- [Middesk vs Socure RiskOS](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/middesk-vs-socure-riskos.md)