# ComplyAdvantage vs ComplyCube

> ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do kyc screening. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.md (~2,250 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.min.md (~780 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-08

ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth. Both do kyc screening.

- ComplyAdvantage: grade D, 52.6/100, rank #564 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complyadvantage.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complyadvantage.json
- ComplyCube: grade B, 63.7/100, rank #299 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/complycube.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complycube.json

## Which one, for what

### ComplyAdvantage (D)

Good for: An agent that screens customers and companies against sanctions, politically exposed person and adverse media data, keeps them under monitoring and works the resulting alerts and cases.

Ahead on:
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 60
- Security & auth, 68 against 52

Watch for: No public status page or incident history was found. `status.complyadvantage.com` does not resolve

### ComplyCube (B)

Good for: An agent that creates clients, uploads documents, starts document, identity and AML screening checks and reads results for a regulated business, with low entry cost ($99 a month) and a scripted sandbox.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 84 against 42
- Payments & pricing, 27 against 10
- Maintenance & community, 74 against 28
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 50

Watch for: One API key per environment with no scopes. The docs say keys carry many privileges


## Score by category

| Category | Weight | ComplyAdvantage | ComplyCube | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 42 | 84 | ComplyCube +42 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 82 | 78 | ComplyAdvantage +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 67 | 60 | ComplyAdvantage +7 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 68 | 52 | ComplyAdvantage +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 10 | 27 | ComplyCube +17 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 28 | 74 | ComplyCube +46 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 50 | 63 | ComplyCube +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **52.6 · D** | **63.7 · B** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | ComplyAdvantage | ComplyCube |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | IVXS UK Limited (trading as ComplyAdvantage) | ComplyCube (Teemo Technology Ltd) |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com` | `https://api.complycube.com` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |
| Price for kyc screening | not published | $0.50 per transaction |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the terms page on complyadvantage.com covers the website only | Proprietary service under ComplyCube's terms of service. The PHP library and the web, iOS and Android SDK repositories are MIT, and `@complycube/api` on npm is MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-06-12 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 6.2k npm/wk, 292 PyPI/wk |

## Verdicts

**ComplyAdvantage.** The Mesh API has a public OpenAPI 3.0.3 spec with 165 described operations, per-credential permissions and audit log endpoints, which suits an agent screening customers and working alerts. No status page, changelog, SDK, service agreement or subprocessor list was found in public, and access starts with a paid plan bought by a person.

**ComplyCube.** A sandbox with its own key and scripted outcomes, a public OpenAPI spec, Markdown docs and an audit log API suit an agent running verification checks. Each environment has one unscoped key, no idempotency keys were found, and the only published terms are undated and read as website terms.

## Before you call either

### ComplyAdvantage

1. Exchange the access key and secret at `POST /v3/token` for a bearer token. It lasts 24 hours and can't be refreshed, so request a new one before expiry
2. Ask for a credential with only the permissions the task needs. Permissions can't be edited later, and each reference page names the ones a call requires
3. Create a screening configuration first and keep its `configuration_identifier`. Creating and screening a customer needs it
4. Give each customer a unique external identifier. A concurrent request for the same identifier returns 409 with a pointer to the first workflow
5. Read `Ratelimit-Remaining` and `Ratelimit-Reset` on every response. A 429 body is only `API rate limit exceeded`

### ComplyCube

1. Send the key bare in the `Authorization` header, with no Bearer prefix. Keys start `test_` or `live_`
2. Create a client first, then documents or live photos for it, then `POST /v1/checks` with the client and upload IDs
3. Stay under 10 requests a second live and 5 in the sandbox. On 429, back off exponentially with jitter, starting at 30 seconds
4. A badly formed filter returns 200 with no results, so check filter names before trusting an empty list
5. Checks are asynchronous. Subscribe to webhooks, verify the `ComplyCube-Signature` HMAC-SHA256 header, and expect duplicate and out-of-order events

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, ComplyAdvantage or ComplyCube?

ComplyCube scores 63.7 (B) on agent readiness against ComplyAdvantage's 52.6 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ComplyAdvantage leads on agent ergonomics and security & auth.

### Do ComplyAdvantage and ComplyCube need an API key?

ComplyAdvantage uses an OAuth sign-in. ComplyCube needs an API key.

### Can an agent call ComplyAdvantage and ComplyCube without installing anything?

Yes. ComplyAdvantage has a hosted endpoint at https://api.mesh.complyadvantage.com and ComplyCube at https://api.complycube.com.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-complycube.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "complyadvantage", "b": "complycube"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare complyadvantage complycube`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complyadvantage.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/complycube.json

## Other comparisons with ComplyAdvantage or ComplyCube

- [ComplyCube vs Didit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-didit.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Jumio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-jumio.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Middesk](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-middesk.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Persona](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-persona.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Sumsub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-sumsub.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Trulioo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-trulioo.md)
- [ComplyCube vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complycube-vs-veriff.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Didit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-didit.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Jumio](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-jumio.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Middesk](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-middesk.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Persona](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-persona.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Sumsub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-sumsub.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Trulioo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-trulioo.md)
- [ComplyAdvantage vs Veriff](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/complyadvantage-vs-veriff.md)