# Close API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP

> Close API + MCP has a score of 66.9 (B) against Pipedrive API + MCP's 60.6 (C). Both do crm records. The largest gap is reliability, 28 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-pipedrive
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-pipedrive.md (~1,550 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-pipedrive.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-pipedrive.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- Updated: 2026-10-05

Close API + MCP has a score of 66.9 (B) against Pipedrive API + MCP's 60.6 (C). Both do crm records. The largest gap is reliability, 28 points.

- Close API + MCP: grade B, 66.9/100, rank #152 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/close.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/close.json
- Pipedrive API + MCP: grade C, 60.6/100, rank #244 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pipedrive.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/pipedrive.json

## Which one, for what

Pick Close API + MCP for reliability (+28), security & auth (+13).

Pick Pipedrive API + MCP for agent ergonomics (+5), transparency & trust (+9).

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Close API + MCP | Pipedrive API + MCP | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 81 | 53 | Close API + MCP +28 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 82 | 80 | Close API + MCP +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 56 | 61 | Pipedrive API + MCP +5 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 66 | 53 | Close API + MCP +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 79 | 83 | Pipedrive API + MCP +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 69 | 78 | Pipedrive API + MCP +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **66.9 · B** | **60.6 · C** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Close API + MCP | Pipedrive API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Close | Pipedrive |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.close.com/api/v1` | `https://api.pipedrive.com/api/v2` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | none |
| Tools exposed | 121 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | `com.close/close-mcp` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-08 |
| Popularity | 70 stars, 14k PyPI/wk | 234 stars, 72k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 2.5/5 (2) |

## Verdicts

**Close API + MCP.** Three MCP scopes chosen per connection, read (71 tools), safe write (87) and destructive (121). 121 MCP tools, and even the read scope loads 71.

**Pipedrive API + MCP.** Hosted MCP server on every plan, with actions recorded in the change log. MCP tool list not published, and the server is labelled beta.

## Before you call either

### Close API + MCP

1. Connect with `Close-Scope: mcp.read` unless the job needs writes, and `mcp.write_safe` if it only creates
2. Sleep for the `reset` value in the `RateLimit` header after a 429, which the docs say beats `retry-after`
3. Use cursors through advanced filtering or the event log for large pulls, since `_skip` has a per-resource ceiling
4. Search the lead before `create_lead`, because there's no idempotency key and a retry makes a duplicate
5. Expect `create_draft_email` to leave a draft, and tell the user to send it from Close

### Pipedrive API + MCP

1. Use v2 endpoints, which cost fewer tokens than v1
2. Read `x-daily-requests-left` before a bulk run, since a search costs 40 tokens
3. Send the token in the `x-api-token` header, never as `api_token` in the URL
4. Keep under 10 search requests per 2 seconds on every plan
5. Ask the user to load all Pipedrive tools in the client if an expected tool is missing

## Other comparisons with Close API + MCP or Pipedrive API + MCP

- [Attio API + MCP vs Close API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/attio-vs-close.md)
- [Attio API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/attio-vs-pipedrive.md)
- [Close API + MCP vs Copper API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-copper.md)
- [Close API + MCP vs folk API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-folk.md)
- [Close API + MCP vs Freshsales API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-freshsales.md)
- [Close API + MCP vs HubSpot API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-hubspot-mcp.md)
- [Close API + MCP vs Salesforce API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-salesforce.md)
- [Close API + MCP vs Streak API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-streak.md)
- [Close API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/close-vs-twenty.md)
- [Copper API vs Pipedrive API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/copper-vs-pipedrive.md)
- [folk API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/folk-vs-pipedrive.md)
- [Freshsales API vs Pipedrive API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/freshsales-vs-pipedrive.md)
- [HubSpot API + MCP vs Pipedrive API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hubspot-mcp-vs-pipedrive.md)
- [Pipedrive API + MCP vs Salesforce API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pipedrive-vs-salesforce.md)
- [Pipedrive API + MCP vs Streak API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pipedrive-vs-streak.md)
- [Pipedrive API + MCP vs Twenty API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pipedrive-vs-twenty.md)