{
  "data": {
    "a": {
      "slug": "cli-manager",
      "name": "CLI Manager",
      "vendor": "solhun (Jeong Kyeonghun)",
      "vendorUrl": "https://climanager.solhun.com",
      "kind": "harness",
      "category": "agent-harnesses",
      "summary": "CLI Manager is an open-source macOS desktop app that runs Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI and shells side by side, with Git worktrees as workspaces. An opt-in local REST and MCP API lets another agent open and drive sessions.",
      "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cli-manager",
      "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cli-manager.md",
      "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cli-manager.min.md",
      "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/cli-manager.json",
      "repo": "https://github.com/woorichicken/CLI_manager",
      "license": "MIT",
      "transports": [
        "streamable-http"
      ],
      "packages": [],
      "auth": "api-key",
      "authNotes": "No account. The AI Control API is off until switched on in Settings \u003e Agents, binds to 127.0.0.1 (default port 47821) and needs a bearer token generated by the app, which can be regenerated. The token is also written to `~/.climanager/control-api.json` (mode 600) while the app runs.",
      "pricing": "free",
      "pricingNotes": "Free under MIT with nothing to buy since v1.5.0 (8 April 2026). Versions 1.0 to 1.4 had a paid Pro licence, which the commit of 8 April 2026 removed. The owner pays for each agent CLI's own plan or API key.",
      "priceSummary": "Free · OSS",
      "where": "local",
      "x402": {
        "level": "no",
        "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the source, the README or the website (checked 2026-10-14). The app has no paid tier.",
        "endpoints": []
      },
      "toolCount": 12,
      "popularity": {
        "githubStars": 15,
        "npmWeekly": null,
        "pypiWeekly": null,
        "asOf": "2026-10-14"
      },
      "docsUrl": "https://climanager.solhun.com/docs/ai-control-api",
      "llmsTxt": "https://climanager.solhun.com/llms.txt",
      "capabilities": [
        "agent.multi-agent"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "open-source",
        "local",
        "free",
        "no-card",
        "mit",
        "macos",
        "typescript",
        "mcp",
        "llms-txt",
        "desktop-app"
      ],
      "lastRelease": "2026-10-13",
      "graded": true,
      "anchor": {
        "graded": true,
        "score": 65.8,
        "grade": "B",
        "agentReady": false,
        "rank": 329,
        "ranked": true,
        "rankOf": 1084,
        "categoryRank": 9,
        "methodology": "0.4",
        "run": "2026-10-01",
        "scores": {
          "ergonomics": 63,
          "maintenance": 62,
          "payments": 60,
          "reliability": 68,
          "schema": 87,
          "security": 58,
          "transparency": 54
        },
        "pending": [
          "performance",
          "tasks"
        ],
        "assessment": {
          "confidence": "medium",
          "date": "2026-10-14"
        },
        "negative": 0,
        "verdict": "An agent can open visible terminal sessions, type into them, wait and read the screen through 12 typed MCP tools or a documented REST API, and the user can take any session back. The API reaches every open session once enabled, the app runs only on macOS, and none of the last 35 CI runs on the main branch passed.",
        "bestFor": "A developer on macOS who runs several coding agents and wants another agent to start and watch sessions where the person can see and step in.",
        "strengths": [
          "12 MCP tools with typed JSON Schema inputs and server instructions that say when not to focus or close a session",
          "Off by default, loopback only, bearer token, and Host and Origin checks against DNS rebinding and web pages",
          "Text is refused while a question or permission prompt is on screen, and Disconnect AI ends an agent's hold on a session",
          "No telemetry or analytics calls found in the app source. Outbound traffic is the update check against GitHub Releases",
          "Twelve releases between 17 August and 13 October 2026, each with notes on GitHub"
        ],
        "weaknesses": [
          "Once switched on, the API can read, type into and close every session in the app, including the user's own",
          "macOS only, and the API answers only while the desktop app is running and its window is alive",
          "None of the last 35 CI runs on the main branch passed, and nine Dependabot pull requests were open, the oldest from 18 August 2026",
          "No MCP tool annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint) and no security policy or security.txt",
          "The privacy policy covers the website and another product, not the app"
        ],
        "agentNotes": [
          "Ask the user to switch on Settings \u003e Agents \u003e AI Control API first, then read the URL and token from `~/.climanager/control-api.json`",
          "On `409 awaiting_input`, read the screen and answer with `keys` such as [\"down\",\"enter\"]. Leave folder-trust and permission choices to the user",
          "Stop using a session on `409 disconnected`. The user took it back",
          "Treat `timedOut: true` from `wait` as still running, not as a failure, and wait again",
          "Pass `ephemeral: true` when opening a scratch or worktree folder, and close only sessions you opened"
        ],
        "metrics": {
          "kind": "local",
          "measured": false
        },
        "reviewCount": 0,
        "avgRating": 0,
        "history": [
          {
            "basis": "public evidence",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "grade": "B",
            "methodology": "0.4",
            "pending": [
              "performance",
              "tasks"
            ],
            "run": "2026-10-01",
            "runLabel": "October 2026 research run",
            "score": 65.8
          }
        ],
        "editorialScores": {
          "ergonomics": 63,
          "maintenance": 62,
          "payments": 60,
          "reliability": 68,
          "schema": 87,
          "security": 58,
          "transparency": 57
        },
        "provenanceScore": 50
      },
      "connect": {
        "install": "Download cli-manager-\u003cversion\u003e-arm64.dmg or -x64.dmg from https://github.com/woorichicken/CLI_manager/releases/latest",
        "http": "curl -s -H \"Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN\" http://127.0.0.1:47821/v1/templates",
        "claudeCode": "claude mcp add --scope user --transport http cli-manager http://127.0.0.1:47821/mcp --header \"Authorization: Bearer \u003ctoken\u003e\""
      },
      "letme": {
        "capability": "https://letme.dev/agent.multi-agent",
        "tool": "https://letme.dev/cli-manager"
      },
      "area": "frameworks",
      "provenance": {
        "legalEntity": "solhun (Jeong Kyeonghun)",
        "domain": "solhun.com",
        "domainRegistered": "2025-12-01",
        "endpointOnVendorDomain": null,
        "terms": "https://climanager.solhun.com/terms",
        "privacy": "https://climanager.solhun.com/privacy",
        "statusPage": "",
        "changelog": "https://climanager.solhun.com/changelog",
        "securityTxt": "none",
        "checked": "2026-10-14",
        "notes": [
          "The terms and the privacy policy (both last updated 14 September 2026) name solhun, cover solhun.com, CLI Manager and FAIR Social Ops, and choose the law of the Republic of Korea. The privacy policy describes the website and FAIR Social Ops, not data handled by the app.",
          "solhun.com names its owner as Jeong Kyeonghun (정경훈), a design engineer at LightSoft. The app's build config reads Copyright © 2024 LightSoft, and the licence file reads Copyright (c) 2024 woorichicken. package.json still declares ISC.",
          "RDAP at Verisign gives a registration date of 2025-12-01 for solhun.com. The GitHub repository was created on 22 November 2025 under the account agi040922, which now redirects to woorichicken.",
          "climanager.solhun.com/.well-known/security.txt returned 404 on 14 October 2026. The repository has no SECURITY.md.",
          "The software runs on the owner's Mac, so there is no vendor endpoint or status page to check."
        ],
        "score": 50
      },
      "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cli-manager.json",
      "live": {
        "slug": "cli-manager",
        "versions": [
          {
            "registry": "github",
            "name": "woorichicken/CLI_manager",
            "version": "v1.13.1",
            "released": "2026-10-13",
            "seenAt": "2026-10-14T23:44:32.341639844Z"
          }
        ],
        "githubStars": 16,
        "updatedAt": "2026-10-14T23:44:32.341639844Z"
      }
    },
    "answer": "CLI Manager scores 65.8 (B) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.",
    "b": {
      "slug": "paperclip",
      "name": "Paperclip",
      "vendor": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.",
      "vendorUrl": "https://paperclip.ing",
      "kind": "harness",
      "category": "agent-harnesses",
      "summary": "Paperclip is an open-source, self-hosted server and web interface that organises AI agents into a company with an org chart, tasks, budgets and approvals. It drives Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw and other harnesses through adapters.",
      "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip",
      "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.md",
      "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.min.md",
      "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json",
      "repo": "https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip",
      "license": "MIT",
      "transports": [],
      "packages": [
        {
          "registry": "npm",
          "name": "paperclipai"
        },
        {
          "registry": "npm",
          "name": "@paperclipai/mcp-server"
        },
        {
          "registry": "oci",
          "name": "ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip"
        }
      ],
      "auth": "mixed",
      "authNotes": "No Paperclip account. The default `local_trusted` mode needs no login on loopback. Authenticated mode uses browser sessions for people, board API keys for scripts, and agent API keys or short-lived run JWTs as bearer tokens.",
      "pricing": "free",
      "pricingNotes": "Free and MIT, self-hosted, with nothing to buy. The owner pays each harness's model provider or subscription. Paperclip Cloud is a waitlist with no published price.",
      "priceSummary": "Free · OSS",
      "where": "local",
      "x402": {
        "level": "no",
        "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the docs, the site or the server source (checked 2026-10-08). The only mention in the repository is a link to a third-party skill in a planning note.",
        "endpoints": []
      },
      "toolCount": null,
      "popularity": {
        "githubStars": 98666,
        "npmWeekly": 59684,
        "pypiWeekly": null,
        "asOf": "2026-10-08"
      },
      "docsUrl": "https://docs.paperclip.ing",
      "llmsTxt": "https://paperclip.ing/llms.txt",
      "capabilities": [
        "agent.multi-agent",
        "agent.mcp-client"
      ],
      "tags": [
        "open-source",
        "self-hosted",
        "local",
        "free",
        "no-card",
        "llms-txt",
        "docker",
        "mcp",
        "typescript"
      ],
      "lastRelease": "2026-10-05",
      "graded": true,
      "anchor": {
        "graded": true,
        "score": 59,
        "grade": "C",
        "agentReady": false,
        "rank": 599,
        "ranked": true,
        "rankOf": 1084,
        "categoryRank": 16,
        "methodology": "0.4",
        "run": "2026-10-01",
        "scores": {
          "ergonomics": 70,
          "maintenance": 78,
          "payments": 60,
          "reliability": 66,
          "schema": 81,
          "security": 64,
          "transparency": 65
        },
        "pending": [
          "performance",
          "tasks"
        ],
        "assessment": {
          "confidence": "medium",
          "date": "2026-10-08"
        },
        "negative": -10,
        "negativeNotes": [
          "2026-04-10 to 2026-04-16. Ten advisories published in a week, four of them critical, among them GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7 (CVE-2026-41679, 10.0, unauthenticated remote code execution through an import authorisation bypass) and two cross-tenant agent key flaws rated 9.9. All ten list 2026.416.0 as the fix. Fixed and published, a little under six months old, -5. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories",
          "2026-07-22. GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7 (9.6), drive-by remote code execution against the default `local_trusted` mode through DNS rebinding. The advisory names no patched version. The current source applies the hostname guard to `local_trusted` private deployments, so we read it as fixed without a documented version, -3. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories/GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7",
          "2026-04-16. GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf (8.7), a `codex_local` agent inherited a Gmail connector from the owner's ChatGPT account and sent real email. The advisory names no patched version, and `codex_local` still defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, -2. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories/GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf"
        ],
        "verdict": "Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, and eleven stable versions shipped in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, and twelve security advisories, five of them critical, have been published since April 2026.",
        "bestFor": "Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.",
        "strengths": [
          "One deployment runs agents on Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Pi, Hermes, Grok Build, Kimi Code and OpenClaw through adapters, under one org chart",
          "Board approvals gate agent hires and the CEO agent's strategy, and connection actions can be set to Allowed, Ask first or Off",
          "Budgets by company, agent and project pause an agent at 100 per cent of recorded spend",
          "The running server publishes its REST surface as OpenAPI at `/api/openapi.json`, and the docs site answers every page as Markdown at `.md`",
          "Eleven stable releases between 20 July and 5 October 2026, each with dated notes and an upgrade guide"
        ],
        "weaknesses": [
          "`claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host",
          "Twelve published security advisories since April 2026, five critical, including CVE-2026-41679 (unauthenticated remote code execution, fixed in 2026.416.0)",
          "Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing until an opt-out is set",
          "2,849 open issues on 8 October 2026, 1,396 of them with no comment, and 78 closed in 30 days against 686 opened",
          "Calendar versions with no 1.0, and release 2026.916.0 carried five breaking changes"
        ],
        "agentNotes": [
          "Set `PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` before the first start. Telemetry is on by default",
          "Set `dangerouslySkipPermissions` and `dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox` to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider",
          "Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there",
          "Use `--bind lan` or `--bind tailnet` at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default `local_trusted` mode treats every request as the board admin",
          "Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry"
        ],
        "metrics": {
          "kind": "local",
          "measured": false
        },
        "reviewCount": 0,
        "avgRating": 0,
        "history": [
          {
            "basis": "public evidence",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "grade": "C",
            "methodology": "0.4",
            "pending": [
              "performance",
              "tasks"
            ],
            "run": "2026-10-01",
            "runLabel": "October 2026 research run",
            "score": 59
          }
        ],
        "editorialScores": {
          "ergonomics": 70,
          "maintenance": 78,
          "payments": 60,
          "reliability": 66,
          "schema": 81,
          "security": 64,
          "transparency": 73
        },
        "provenanceScore": 56
      },
      "connect": {
        "install": "npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes   # Node.js 24.11 or newer",
        "http": "curl http://localhost:3100/api/health",
        "headless": {
          "command": "npx paperclipai issue create --title \"$TASK\" --json",
          "env": {
            "PAPERCLIP_API_KEY": "\u003cboard or agent key\u003e",
            "PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED": "1"
          }
        }
      },
      "letme": {
        "capability": "https://letme.dev/agent.multi-agent",
        "tool": "https://letme.dev/paperclip"
      },
      "area": "frameworks",
      "provenance": {
        "legalEntity": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.",
        "domain": "paperclip.ing",
        "domainRegistered": "2026-03-02",
        "endpointOnVendorDomain": null,
        "terms": "https://paperclip.ing/terms/",
        "privacy": "https://paperclip.ing/privacy/",
        "statusPage": "",
        "changelog": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/",
        "securityTxt": "none",
        "checked": "2026-10-08",
        "notes": [
          "The terms (effective 1 April 2026, updated 23 July 2026) and the privacy policy (effective 23 July 2026) name Paperclip Labs, Inc. and Delaware law. The licence file in the repository reads Copyright (c) 2025 Paperclip AI.",
          "RDAP at the .ing registry gives a registration date of 2026-03-02 for paperclip.ing, with Cloudflare as registrar. The GitHub repository was created the same day.",
          "paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt and docs.paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt returned 404 on 8 October 2026. SECURITY.md sends reports to GitHub private advisories.",
          "The software is self-hosted, so there is no vendor endpoint or status page to check. status.paperclip.ing did not answer.",
          "The privacy policy says it governs the hosted services, and that a self-hosted deployment processes data on the owner's infrastructure."
        ],
        "score": 56
      },
      "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.json",
      "live": {
        "slug": "paperclip",
        "versions": [
          {
            "registry": "github",
            "name": "paperclipai/paperclip",
            "version": "v2026.1012.0",
            "released": "2026-10-12",
            "seenAt": "2026-10-15T00:12:39.273350596Z"
          },
          {
            "registry": "npm",
            "name": "@paperclipai/mcp-server",
            "version": "2026.1012.0",
            "seenAt": "2026-10-15T00:12:35.962191062Z"
          },
          {
            "registry": "npm",
            "name": "paperclipai",
            "version": "2026.1012.0",
            "seenAt": "2026-10-15T00:12:35.887161876Z"
          }
        ],
        "githubStars": 102160,
        "npmWeekly": 48653,
        "securityTxt": {
          "url": "https://paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt",
          "state": "none",
          "checkedAt": "2026-10-14T15:47:15.643959127Z"
        },
        "llmsTxt": {
          "url": "https://paperclip.ing/llms.txt",
          "ok": true,
          "status": 200,
          "checkedAt": "2026-10-14T14:14:49.510425529Z"
        },
        "domain": {
          "domain": "paperclip.ing",
          "registered": "2026-03-02",
          "source": "https://pubapi.registry.google/rdap/domain/paperclip.ing",
          "checkedAt": "2026-10-11T13:14:53.975891006Z"
        },
        "pages": [
          {
            "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/",
            "kind": "changelog",
            "status": 304,
            "checkedAt": "2026-10-14T21:04:25.285303377Z",
            "changedAt": "2026-10-13T20:20:35.777028506Z",
            "fingerprint": "874daecee6a2"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://paperclip.ing/privacy/",
            "kind": "privacy",
            "status": 304,
            "checkedAt": "2026-10-14T21:04:27.330571912Z",
            "changedAt": "2026-10-13T20:20:37.971216507Z",
            "fingerprint": "4b2a8faa9979"
          },
          {
            "url": "https://paperclip.ing/terms/",
            "kind": "terms",
            "status": 304,
            "checkedAt": "2026-10-14T21:04:29.316650837Z",
            "changedAt": "2026-10-13T20:20:40.00773926Z",
            "fingerprint": "2076edf48663"
          }
        ],
        "updatedAt": "2026-10-15T00:12:39.273350596Z"
      }
    },
    "facts": [
      {
        "a": "Agent harness",
        "b": "Agent harness",
        "name": "Kind"
      },
      {
        "a": "solhun (Jeong Kyeonghun)",
        "b": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.",
        "name": "Vendor"
      },
      {
        "a": "no (local only)",
        "b": "no (local only)",
        "name": "Hosted endpoint"
      },
      {
        "a": "Streamable HTTP",
        "b": "",
        "name": "Transports"
      },
      {
        "a": "API key",
        "b": "OAuth or key",
        "name": "Auth"
      },
      {
        "a": "Free",
        "b": "Free",
        "name": "Pricing"
      },
      {
        "a": "no",
        "b": "no",
        "name": "x402"
      },
      {
        "a": "MIT",
        "b": "MIT",
        "name": "Licence"
      },
      {
        "a": "12",
        "b": "none",
        "name": "Tools exposed"
      },
      {
        "a": "no",
        "b": "no",
        "name": "Read-only variant documented"
      },
      {
        "a": "yes",
        "b": "yes",
        "name": "llms.txt"
      },
      {
        "a": "2026-10-13",
        "b": "2026-10-05",
        "name": "Last release"
      },
      {
        "a": "2026-09-14",
        "b": "2026-07-23",
        "name": "Terms last updated"
      },
      {
        "a": "2026-09-14",
        "b": "2026-07-23",
        "name": "Privacy policy last updated"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "yes, with an opt-out",
        "name": "Customer content may train models"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Terms restrict automated access"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "not found in the text",
        "name": "Terms or service can change without notice"
      },
      {
        "a": "not found in the text",
        "b": "yes",
        "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver"
      },
      {
        "a": "15 stars",
        "b": "99k stars, 60k npm/wk",
        "name": "Popularity"
      }
    ],
    "faq": [
      {
        "answer": "CLI Manager scores 65.8 (B) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.",
        "question": "Which is better for AI agents, CLI Manager or Paperclip?"
      },
      {
        "answer": "Yes. CLI Manager is open source (MIT). Paperclip is open source (MIT).",
        "question": "Are CLI Manager and Paperclip open source?"
      }
    ],
    "goodFor": [
      {
        "aheadOn": [
          "Schema \u0026 documentation, 87 against 81"
        ],
        "also": [
          "No incidents deducted, where Paperclip loses 10 points for them"
        ],
        "goodFor": "A developer on macOS who runs several coding agents and wants another agent to start and watch sessions where the person can see and step in.",
        "slug": "cli-manager",
        "watchFor": "Once switched on, the API can read, type into and close every session in the app, including the user's own"
      },
      {
        "aheadOn": [
          "Agent ergonomics, 70 against 63",
          "Security \u0026 auth, 64 against 58",
          "Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 62",
          "Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 54"
        ],
        "also": null,
        "goodFor": "Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.",
        "slug": "paperclip",
        "watchFor": "`claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host"
      }
    ],
    "job": {
      "capability": "agent.multi-agent",
      "name": "Multi-agent orchestration"
    },
    "others": [
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-cli-manager.json",
        "title": "Amp vs CLI Manager",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-cli-manager"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Amp vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-cli-manager.json",
        "title": "Antigravity CLI vs CLI Manager",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-cli-manager"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-cli-manager.json",
        "title": "Claude Code vs CLI Manager",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-cli-manager"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Claude Code vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-cline.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs Cline",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-cline"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-devin.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs Devin",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-devin"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-droid-cli.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs Droid CLI",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-droid-cli"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-gemini-cli.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs Gemini CLI",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-gemini-cli"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-github-copilot-cli.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs GitHub Copilot CLI",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-github-copilot-cli"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-goose.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs goose",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-goose"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-kilo-code-cli.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs Kilo Code CLI",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-kilo-code-cli"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-kiro-cli.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs Kiro CLI",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-kiro-cli"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-muse-code.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs Muse Code",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-muse-code"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-opencode.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs OpenCode",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-opencode"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-openhands.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs OpenHands",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-openhands"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-prime-agent.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs Prime Agent",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-prime-agent"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-qwen-code.json",
        "title": "CLI Manager vs Qwen Code",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-qwen-code"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Cline vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Devin vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Droid CLI vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Gemini CLI vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "GitHub Copilot CLI vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "goose vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Kilo Code CLI vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Kiro CLI vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "Muse Code vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "OpenCode vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip.json",
        "title": "OpenHands vs Paperclip",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent.json",
        "title": "Paperclip vs Prime Agent",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent"
      },
      {
        "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code.json",
        "title": "Paperclip vs Qwen Code",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code"
      }
    ],
    "scores": [
      {
        "by": 2,
        "cli-manager": 68,
        "edge": "cli-manager",
        "key": "reliability",
        "name": "Reliability",
        "paperclip": 66,
        "weight": 16
      },
      {
        "key": "performance",
        "name": "Performance",
        "pending": true,
        "weight": 10
      },
      {
        "by": 6,
        "cli-manager": 87,
        "edge": "cli-manager",
        "key": "schema",
        "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation",
        "paperclip": 81,
        "weight": 13
      },
      {
        "by": 7,
        "cli-manager": 63,
        "edge": "paperclip",
        "key": "ergonomics",
        "name": "Agent ergonomics",
        "paperclip": 70,
        "weight": 13
      },
      {
        "by": 6,
        "cli-manager": 58,
        "edge": "paperclip",
        "key": "security",
        "name": "Security \u0026 auth",
        "paperclip": 64,
        "weight": 14
      },
      {
        "by": 0,
        "cli-manager": 60,
        "edge": "",
        "key": "payments",
        "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing",
        "paperclip": 60,
        "weight": 10
      },
      {
        "key": "tasks",
        "name": "Task success",
        "pending": true,
        "weight": 10
      },
      {
        "by": 16,
        "cli-manager": 62,
        "edge": "paperclip",
        "key": "maintenance",
        "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community",
        "paperclip": 78,
        "weight": 7
      },
      {
        "by": 11,
        "cli-manager": 54,
        "edge": "paperclip",
        "key": "transparency",
        "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust",
        "paperclip": 65,
        "weight": 7
      }
    ],
    "summary": "CLI Manager scores 65.8 (B) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do multi-agent orchestration.",
    "verdicts": {
      "cli-manager": "An agent can open visible terminal sessions, type into them, wait and read the screen through 12 typed MCP tools or a documented REST API, and the user can take any session back. The API reaches every open session once enabled, the app runs only on macOS, and none of the last 35 CI runs on the main branch passed.",
      "paperclip": "Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, and eleven stable versions shipped in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, and twelve security advisories, five of them critical, have been published since April 2026."
    }
  },
  "kind": "anchor.page",
  "links": {
    "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json",
    "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip",
    "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.json",
    "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt",
    "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.md",
    "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.min.md"
  },
  "markdown": "CLI Manager scores 65.8 (B) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do multi-agent orchestration.\n\n- CLI Manager: grade B, 65.8/100, rank #329 of 1084. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cli-manager.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/cli-manager.json\n- Paperclip: grade C, 59/100, rank #599 of 1084. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json\n- Best agent harnesses and coding agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/agent-harnesses/index.md\n- All 243 harnesses comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-harnesses/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### CLI Manager (B)\n\nGood for: A developer on macOS who runs several coding agents and wants another agent to start and watch sessions where the person can see and step in.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 87 against 81\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- No incidents deducted, where Paperclip loses 10 points for them\n\nWatch for: Once switched on, the API can read, type into and close every session in the app, including the user's own\n\n### Paperclip (C)\n\nGood for: Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.\n\nAhead on:\n- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 63\n- Security \u0026 auth, 64 against 58\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 62\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 65 against 54\n\nWatch for: `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host\n\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | CLI Manager | Paperclip | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 68 | 66 | CLI Manager +2 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 87 | 81 | CLI Manager +6 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 63 | 70 | Paperclip +7 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 58 | 64 | Paperclip +6 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 60 | even |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 62 | 78 | Paperclip +16 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 54 | 65 | Paperclip +11 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -10 | |\n| **Total** | | **65.8 · B** | **59 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | CLI Manager | Paperclip |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |\n| Vendor | solhun (Jeong Kyeonghun) | Paperclip Labs, Inc. |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | Streamable HTTP |  |\n| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Free | Free |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | MIT | MIT |\n| Tools exposed | 12 | none |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-10-05 |\n| Terms last updated | 2026-09-14 | 2026-07-23 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-14 | 2026-07-23 |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |\n| Popularity | 15 stars | 99k stars, 60k npm/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**CLI Manager.** An agent can open visible terminal sessions, type into them, wait and read the screen through 12 typed MCP tools or a documented REST API, and the user can take any session back. The API reaches every open session once enabled, the app runs only on macOS, and none of the last 35 CI runs on the main branch passed.\n\n**Paperclip.** Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, and eleven stable versions shipped in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, and twelve security advisories, five of them critical, have been published since April 2026.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### CLI Manager\n\n1. Ask the user to switch on Settings \u003e Agents \u003e AI Control API first, then read the URL and token from `~/.climanager/control-api.json`\n2. On `409 awaiting_input`, read the screen and answer with `keys` such as [\"down\",\"enter\"]. Leave folder-trust and permission choices to the user\n3. Stop using a session on `409 disconnected`. The user took it back\n4. Treat `timedOut: true` from `wait` as still running, not as a failure, and wait again\n5. Pass `ephemeral: true` when opening a scratch or worktree folder, and close only sessions you opened\n\n### Paperclip\n\n1. Set `PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` before the first start. Telemetry is on by default\n2. Set `dangerouslySkipPermissions` and `dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox` to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider\n3. Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there\n4. Use `--bind lan` or `--bind tailnet` at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default `local_trusted` mode treats every request as the board admin\n5. Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, CLI Manager or Paperclip?\n\nCLI Manager scores 65.8 (B) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Are CLI Manager and Paperclip open source?\n\nYes. CLI Manager is open source (MIT). Paperclip is open source (MIT).\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"cli-manager\", \"b\": \"paperclip\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare cli-manager paperclip`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/cli-manager.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json\n\n## Other comparisons with CLI Manager or Paperclip\n\n- [Amp vs CLI Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-cli-manager.md)\n- [Amp vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Antigravity CLI vs CLI Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-cli-manager.md)\n- [Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Claude Code vs CLI Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-cli-manager.md)\n- [Claude Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Cline](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-cline.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Devin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-devin.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Droid CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-droid-cli.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Gemini CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-gemini-cli.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs GitHub Copilot CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-github-copilot-cli.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs goose](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-goose.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Kilo Code CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-kilo-code-cli.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Kiro CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-kiro-cli.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Muse Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-muse-code.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs OpenCode](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-opencode.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs OpenHands](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-openhands.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Prime Agent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-prime-agent.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Qwen Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-qwen-code.md)\n- [Cline vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Devin vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Droid CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Gemini CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [GitHub Copilot CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [goose vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kilo Code CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kiro CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Muse Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenCode vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenHands vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Prime Agent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Qwen Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code.md)\n",
  "meta": {
    "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)",
    "attributionRequired": true,
    "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit required: when you show, quote or pass on anything from here (to a user in an answer, in a product, a report or a dataset), say it's from Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link the page or API address you took it from. Reviews also credit their author.",
    "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/",
    "generatedAt": "2026-10-15",
    "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
    "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/",
    "methodology": "0.4",
    "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json",
    "preview": false,
    "run": "2026-10-01",
    "runLabel": "October 2026 research run",
    "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data"
  },
  "page": {
    "breadcrumbs": [
      {
        "name": "Home",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/"
      },
      {
        "name": "Compare",
        "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/"
      },
      {
        "name": "CLI Manager vs Paperclip",
        "url": ""
      }
    ],
    "description": "CLI Manager scores 65.8 (B) to Paperclip's 59 (C) for multi-agent orchestration. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.",
    "facts": [
      "CLI Manager B 65.8",
      "Paperclip C 59",
      "scores"
    ],
    "h1": "CLI Manager vs Paperclip",
    "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/compare-cli-manager-vs-paperclip.png",
    "path": "/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip",
    "published": "2026-10-01",
    "section": "tools",
    "title": "CLI Manager vs Paperclip for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices",
    "toc": null,
    "updated": "2026-10-14",
    "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip"
  },
  "tokens": {
    "markdown": 2600,
    "slim": 630
  },
  "version": 1
}
