# Clay vs Prospeo API + MCP > Clay scores 57.7 (C) to Prospeo's 50.9 (D) for lead search. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-prospeo - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-prospeo.md (~2,550 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-prospeo.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-prospeo.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-14 Clay scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Prospeo API + MCP's 50.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Prospeo API + MCP leads on agent ergonomics, security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do lead search. - Clay: grade C, 57.7/100, rank #633 of 1076. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/clay.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/clay.json - Prospeo API + MCP: grade D, 50.9/100, rank #814 of 1076. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/prospeo.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/prospeo.json - Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/lead-data/index.md - All 171 leads comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lead-data/index.md ## Which one, for what ### Clay (C) Good for: Agents building prospect lists and enriching contacts or accounts through many providers at once. Ahead on: - Reliability, 45 against 35 - Schema & documentation, 84 against 61 - Maintenance & community, 75 against 34 - Transparency & trust, 64 against 42 Watch for: API keys carry no scopes and act with the user's workspace access ### Prospeo API + MCP (D) Good for: An agent that searches for prospects and then enriches them with verified emails and mobiles in one cheap loop. Ahead on: - Agent ergonomics, 79 against 66 - Security & auth, 54 against 48 - Payments & pricing, 40 against 30 Also in its favour: - Runs on your own machine Watch for: No status page, SLA or changelog ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Clay | Prospeo API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 45 | 35 | Clay +10 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 84 | 61 | Clay +23 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 66 | 79 | Prospeo API + MCP +13 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 48 | 54 | Prospeo API + MCP +6 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 40 | Prospeo API + MCP +10 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 75 | 34 | Clay +41 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 64 | 42 | Clay +22 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **57.7 · C** | **50.9 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Clay | Prospeo API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Clay Labs Inc. | Prospeo | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.clay.com/public/v0` | `https://api.prospeo.io` | | Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Proprietary service under the Clay Terms of Service. The agent plugin repository carries no licence file | MIT | | Tools exposed | none | 8 | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | no | | MCP registry | not listed | `io.prospeo/prospeo-mcp-server` | | Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-06-01 | | Terms last updated | 2024-05-23 | couldn't be read | | Privacy policy last updated | 2020-09-11 | couldn't be read | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read | | Popularity | none | 0 stars, 641 npm/wk | | Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Clay.** A documented Public API with an OpenAPI spec, llms.txt and plan-capped search, plus a JSON-first CLI released several times a fortnight, give agents Clay's people search and multi-provider enrichment. Keys have no scopes, the Claude Code plugin auto-approves most CLI calls, and the privacy policy dates from 2020. **Prospeo API + MCP.** MCP tool descriptions say when to use each tool, its credit cost and the next call. No status page, SLA or changelog. ## Before you call either ### Clay 1. Fetch GET /search/query-mode/reference before writing a search query 2. Poll routine results until a terminal 200, since 202 means still running 3. Expect HTTP 402 when a plan's search cap is hit, and tell the user the reset date 4. Check GET /credits/balance before large batch runs 5. Ask the user before enabling the plugin's auto-approve hook in a shared workspace ### Prospeo API + MCP 1. Call `search_suggestions` before using location, technology or industry filters, or the search returns nothing 2. Pass `person_id` values from search into `bulk_enrich_person`, 25 at a time 3. Branch on the body `error_code`, not the HTTP status, which is 400 for most failures 4. Set `enrich_mobile` only when needed. A mobile costs 10 credits against 1 for an email 5. Use Enrich Person. The old Email Finder endpoint was removed in March 2026 ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Clay or Prospeo API + MCP? Clay scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Prospeo API + MCP's 50.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Prospeo API + MCP leads on agent ergonomics, security & auth and payments & pricing. ### Do Clay and Prospeo API + MCP need an API key? Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call Clay and Prospeo API + MCP without installing anything? Yes. Clay has a hosted endpoint at https://api.clay.com/public/v0 and Prospeo API + MCP at https://api.prospeo.io. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-prospeo.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-prospeo.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "clay", "b": "prospeo"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare clay prospeo` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/clay.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/prospeo.json ## Other comparisons with Clay or Prospeo API + MCP - [Apollo API + MCP vs Clay](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-clay.md) - [Apollo API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-prospeo.md) - [Clay vs Coresignal API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-coresignal.md) - [Clay vs Crustdata API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-crustdata.md) - [Clay vs Enrich Layer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-enrich-layer.md) - [Clay vs Explorium AgentSource](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-explorium-agentsource.md) - [Clay vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Clay vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Clay vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Clay vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-hunter.md) - [Clay vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-leadmagic.md) - [Clay vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-lusha.md) - [Clay vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Clay vs RocketReach API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-rocketreach.md) - [Clay vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-prospeo.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-prospeo.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-prospeo.md) - [Explorium AgentSource vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/explorium-agentsource-vs-prospeo.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-prospeo.md) - [Fuse MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-prospeo.md) - [Gojiberry vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gojiberry-vs-prospeo.md) - [LeadMagic API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/leadmagic-vs-prospeo.md) - [Lusha API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lusha-vs-prospeo.md) - [People Data Labs vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-prospeo.md) - [Prospeo API + MCP vs RocketReach API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prospeo-vs-rocketreach.md) - [Prospeo API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prospeo-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Clay vs Clearbit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-clearbit.md) - [Clay vs Dropcontact API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-dropcontact.md) - [Clay vs FullContact](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fullcontact.md) - [Clearbit vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clearbit-vs-prospeo.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-prospeo.md) - [FullContact vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullcontact-vs-prospeo.md) - [Hunter API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hunter-vs-prospeo.md)