# Clay vs Fuse MCP > Clay scores 57.7 (C) to Fuse MCP's 47.9 (D) for lead search. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fuse-mcp - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fuse-mcp.md (~2,550 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fuse-mcp.min.md (~580 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fuse-mcp.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-14 Clay scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Fuse MCP's 47.9 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do lead search. - Clay: grade C, 57.7/100, rank #633 of 1076. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/clay.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/clay.json - Fuse MCP: grade D, 47.9/100, rank #883 of 1076. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/fuse-mcp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/fuse-mcp.json - Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/lead-data/index.md - All 171 leads comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lead-data/index.md ## Which one, for what ### Clay (C) Good for: Agents building prospect lists and enriching contacts or accounts through many providers at once. Ahead on: - Reliability, 45 against 40 - Schema & documentation, 84 against 72 - Agent ergonomics, 66 against 57 - Maintenance & community, 75 against 35 - Transparency & trust, 64 against 49 Watch for: API keys carry no scopes and act with the user's workspace access ### Fuse MCP (D) Good for: Suited to a salesperson or founder who wants an assistant to build prospect lists, enrich them and run email and LinkedIn outreach inside one Fuse account. Watch for: The only OAuth scope is `mcp:tools`, so a connection can do everything its user can, including sending email and LinkedIn messages ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Clay | Fuse MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 45 | 40 | Clay +5 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 84 | 72 | Clay +12 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 66 | 57 | Clay +9 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 48 | 45 | Clay +3 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 30 | even | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 75 | 35 | Clay +40 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 64 | 49 | Clay +15 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **57.7 · C** | **47.9 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Clay | Fuse MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | MCP server | | Vendor | Clay Labs Inc. | FuseAI, LLC | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.clay.com/public/v0` | `https://mcp.fuseai.com` | | Transports | HTTP | Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Proprietary service under the Clay Terms of Service. The agent plugin repository carries no licence file | Proprietary hosted service under FuseAI's terms of service. No public source repository found | | Tools exposed | none | 290 | | Read-only variant documented | no | yes | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-10-07 | | Terms last updated | 2024-05-23 | 2026-07-01 | | Privacy policy last updated | 2020-09-11 | 2026-07-01 | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes | ## Verdicts **Clay.** A documented Public API with an OpenAPI spec, llms.txt and plan-capped search, plus a JSON-first CLI released several times a fortnight, give agents Clay's people search and multi-provider enrichment. Keys have no scopes, the Claude Code plugin auto-approves most CLI calls, and the privacy policy dates from 2020. **Fuse MCP.** The server documents 290 tools with read-only and destructive annotations, OAuth with PKCE and dynamic client registration, and published limits of 60 requests a minute. The single `mcp:tools` scope grants everything the user can do, sends happen at once with no undo, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found. ## Before you call either ### Clay 1. Fetch GET /search/query-mode/reference before writing a search query 2. Poll routine results until a terminal 200, since 202 means still running 3. Expect HTTP 402 when a plan's search cap is hit, and tell the user the reset date 4. Check GET /credits/balance before large batch runs 5. Ask the user before enabling the plugin's auto-approve hook in a shared workspace ### Fuse MCP 1. Keep the client's approval prompt on for every tool that is not read-only. Sends, CRM pushes and Slack posts run at once with no undo 2. Launch a campaign only on an explicit request. Creating one makes a draft, and `update_campaign_status_tool` starts real outreach 3. Call `get_credits_balance` and `get_credit_prices` first. Every call needs at least 100 credits, and searches cost 2 credits a result 4. Resolve filter values with `lookup_filter_values` or `get_company_search_enums` before `search_people` or `search_companies` 5. Start long work with `deep_research_start`, then poll `deep_research_status`. A tool call has 60 seconds, and runs take 5 to 20 minutes ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Clay or Fuse MCP? Clay scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Fuse MCP's 47.9 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ### Do Clay and Fuse MCP need an API key? Clay takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Fuse MCP uses an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call Clay and Fuse MCP without installing anything? Yes. Clay has a hosted endpoint at https://api.clay.com/public/v0 and Fuse MCP at https://mcp.fuseai.com. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fuse-mcp.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fuse-mcp.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "clay", "b": "fuse-mcp"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare clay fuse-mcp` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/clay.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/fuse-mcp.json ## Other comparisons with Clay or Fuse MCP - [Apollo API + MCP vs Clay](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-clay.md) - [Apollo API + MCP vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Clay vs Coresignal API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-coresignal.md) - [Clay vs Crustdata API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-crustdata.md) - [Clay vs Enrich Layer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-enrich-layer.md) - [Clay vs Explorium AgentSource](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-explorium-agentsource.md) - [Clay vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Clay vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Clay vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-hunter.md) - [Clay vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-leadmagic.md) - [Clay vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-lusha.md) - [Clay vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Clay vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-prospeo.md) - [Clay vs RocketReach API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-rocketreach.md) - [Clay vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Explorium AgentSource vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/explorium-agentsource-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Fuse MCP vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Fuse MCP vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-hunter.md) - [Fuse MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-leadmagic.md) - [Fuse MCP vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-lusha.md) - [Fuse MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Fuse MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-prospeo.md) - [Fuse MCP vs RocketReach API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-rocketreach.md) - [Fuse MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Clay vs Clearbit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-clearbit.md) - [Clay vs Dropcontact API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-dropcontact.md) - [Clay vs FullContact](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fullcontact.md) - [Clearbit vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clearbit-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [FullContact vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullcontact-vs-fuse-mcp.md)