# Clay vs Coresignal API + MCP > Coresignal scores 62.9 (B) to Clay's 57.7 (C) for lead search. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-coresignal - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-coresignal.md (~2,550 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-coresignal.min.md (~630 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-coresignal.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-14 Coresignal API + MCP scores 62.9 (B) on agent readiness against Clay's 57.7 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Clay leads on payments & pricing. Both do lead search. - Clay: grade C, 57.7/100, rank #633 of 1076. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/clay.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/clay.json - Coresignal API + MCP: grade B, 62.9/100, rank #439 of 1076. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/coresignal.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/coresignal.json - Best lead, contact and company data APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/lead-data/index.md - All 171 leads comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lead-data/index.md ## Which one, for what ### Clay (C) Good for: Agents building prospect lists and enriching contacts or accounts through many providers at once. Ahead on: - Payments & pricing, 30 against 20 Watch for: API keys carry no scopes and act with the user's workspace access ### Coresignal API + MCP (B) Good for: Company and workforce research, headcount history and hiring signals at volume, and for pipelines that want raw records. Ahead on: - Reliability, 55 against 45 - Agent ergonomics, 73 against 66 - Security & auth, 58 against 48 - Maintenance & community, 82 against 75 - Transparency & trust, 71 against 64 Watch for: Real-Time API requests timing out for about six days up to 1 October, per the status page ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Clay | Coresignal API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 45 | 55 | Coresignal API + MCP +10 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 84 | 86 | Coresignal API + MCP +2 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 66 | 73 | Coresignal API + MCP +7 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 48 | 58 | Coresignal API + MCP +10 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 20 | Clay +10 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 75 | 82 | Coresignal API + MCP +7 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 64 | 71 | Coresignal API + MCP +7 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **57.7 · C** | **62.9 · B** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Clay | Coresignal API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Clay Labs Inc. | Coresignal | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.clay.com/public/v0` | `https://api.coresignal.com/cdapi` | | Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Paid | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Proprietary service under the Clay Terms of Service. The agent plugin repository carries no licence file | none | | Tools exposed | none | 5 | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | `com.coresignal/mcp` | | Last release | 2026-10-06 | 2026-08-07 | | Terms last updated | 2024-05-23 | 2022-02-21 | | Privacy policy last updated | 2020-09-11 | 2026-08-25 | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text | | Popularity | none | 2 stars | | Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Clay.** A documented Public API with an OpenAPI spec, llms.txt and plan-capped search, plus a JSON-first CLI released several times a fortnight, give agents Clay's people search and multi-provider enrichment. Keys have no scopes, the Claude Code plugin auto-approves most CLI calls, and the privacy policy dates from 2020. **Coresignal API + MCP.** Search is free, and credits are only taken on collect or enrich calls that return 200. Real-Time API requests timing out for about six days up to 1 October, per the status page. ## Before you call either ### Clay 1. Fetch GET /search/query-mode/reference before writing a search query 2. Poll routine results until a terminal 200, since 202 means still running 3. Expect HTTP 402 when a plan's search cap is hit, and tell the user the reset date 4. Check GET /credits/balance before large batch runs 5. Ask the user before enabling the plugin's auto-approve hook in a shared workspace ### Coresignal API + MCP 1. Search for IDs first (free), then collect only the records you need 2. Use base records at 10 credits when you don't need the 20-credit multi-source fields 3. Use MCP v2 at /mcp/v2. The older /mcp endpoint will be deprecated 4. Treat a 402 as out of credits, not a transient error 5. Expect no work emails for EEA and UK people from the MCP email tool ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Clay or Coresignal API + MCP? Coresignal API + MCP scores 62.9 (B) on agent readiness against Clay's 57.7 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Clay leads on payments & pricing. ### Do Clay and Coresignal API + MCP need an API key? Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call Clay and Coresignal API + MCP without installing anything? Yes. Clay has a hosted endpoint at https://api.clay.com/public/v0 and Coresignal API + MCP at https://api.coresignal.com/cdapi. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-coresignal.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-coresignal.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "clay", "b": "coresignal"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare clay coresignal` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/clay.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/coresignal.json ## Other comparisons with Clay or Coresignal API + MCP - [Apollo API + MCP vs Clay](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-clay.md) - [Apollo API + MCP vs Coresignal API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-coresignal.md) - [Clay vs Crustdata API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-crustdata.md) - [Clay vs Enrich Layer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-enrich-layer.md) - [Clay vs Explorium AgentSource](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-explorium-agentsource.md) - [Clay vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Clay vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Clay vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Clay vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-hunter.md) - [Clay vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-leadmagic.md) - [Clay vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-lusha.md) - [Clay vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Clay vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-prospeo.md) - [Clay vs RocketReach API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-rocketreach.md) - [Clay vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Crustdata API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-crustdata.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-enrich-layer.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Explorium AgentSource](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-explorium-agentsource.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-hunter.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-leadmagic.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-lusha.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-prospeo.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs RocketReach API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-rocketreach.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Clay vs Clearbit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-clearbit.md) - [Clay vs Dropcontact API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-dropcontact.md) - [Clay vs FullContact](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clay-vs-fullcontact.md) - [Clearbit vs Coresignal API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clearbit-vs-coresignal.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Dropcontact API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-dropcontact.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs FullContact](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-fullcontact.md)