{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "clawboo", "name": "Clawboo", "vendor": "Sanreds", "vendorUrl": "https://www.claw.boo", "kind": "harness", "category": "agent-harnesses", "summary": "Clawboo is an open-source, self-hosted dashboard and server that runs a team of AI agents on one task board. A lead agent, Boo Zero, hands tasks to Claude Code, Codex, Hermes, OpenClaw or Clawboo's own built-in agents.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/clawboo", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/clawboo.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/clawboo.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/clawboo.json", "dns": "clawboo.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/clawboo/clawboo", "license": "MIT", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "clawboo" } ], "auth": "none", "authNotes": "No Clawboo account. On the default loopback bind the API needs no credential. An optional shared token, `STUDIO_ACCESS_TOKEN`, puts every `/api/` route behind a `clawboo_access` cookie, with no users, roles or per-person revocation. Agents Clawboo starts reach its MCP servers through signed attach URLs.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free and MIT, self-hosted, with nothing to buy. The owner pays the model providers or plans each runtime uses, or runs a local Ollama model with no key. No hosted option is offered.", "priceSummary": "Free · OSS", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the documentation (llms-full.txt), the README or the npm package metadata (checked 2026-11-01).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": 100, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-01" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.claw.boo", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.claw.boo/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "agent.multi-agent", "agent.mcp-client" ], "tags": [ "open-source", "self-hosted", "local", "free", "no-card", "llms-txt", "mcp", "typescript" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-21", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 61.4, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 555, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1251, "categoryRank": 15, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 75, "maintenance": 51, "payments": 60, "reliability": 52, "schema": 83, "security": 70, "transparency": 58 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "negative": -4, "negativeNotes": [ "Undated advisory on the security page, read 1 November 2026. On 0.5.0 (21 October 2026) and older, any request from 127.0.0.1 reaches `/api/mcp/` without the access cookie, so a reverse proxy on the same machine exposes the boards, memory, team chat, tools and signed attach URLs for any agent, even with `STUDIO_ACCESS_TOKEN` set. Published by the maintainer with a proxy rule to block it, fixed on main and not released, in a setup that isn't the default, -3. https://docs.claw.boo/operating/security", "Listed under Unreleased in the changelog, read 1 November 2026. On 0.5.0 and older, an access token containing a character outside letters, digits and `.`, `_`, `~`, `-` turned the access check off while the server kept running, leaving a proxied dashboard open. Fixed on main and not released, -1. https://docs.claw.boo/appendices/changelog" ], "verdict": "Tasks, memory, team chat and connectors are shared across five runtimes through four MCP servers, with documentation that states each default and limit. Claude Code, Codex and Hermes run with their sandboxes and approval prompts off and no setting to change it, and a reverse-proxy exposure of the MCP servers is fixed only on the unreleased main branch.", "bestFor": "One person on one computer who wants several coding and general agents on one board, with shared memory and a lead agent that routes work.", "strengths": [ "One board, one team chat and one shared memory across Clawboo Native, Claude Code, Codex, Hermes and OpenClaw agents", "No telemetry per the docs, which list the three requests the server makes itself and the two the dashboard makes", "Loopback bind by default, a same-origin guard against browser and DNS-rebinding attacks, and a refusal to start on a network bind without a token", "About 120 documentation pages, served as Markdown with llms.txt and llms-full.txt, including a known-issues page and every built-in limit with its source line", "npm releases carry SLSA provenance from the repository's publish workflow, with CodeQL and Dependabot in the repository" ], "weaknesses": [ "Claude Code runs in `bypassPermissions`, Codex with `danger-full-access` and Hermes with `--yolo`, with no setting to change it and no sandbox", "On 0.5.0 and older, a same-machine reverse proxy exposes `/api/mcp/` without the access cookie. The fix is on main and unreleased on 1 November 2026", "No access token by default, so any local program can call the API and answer approval cards", "Keys saved under Providers are also written in plain text to `~/.openclaw/.env` and each OpenClaw agent's `auth-profiles.json`", "Version 0.5.0, with two releases in the 90 days to 1 November 2026 and budgets that only warn unless set to a hard cap" ], "agentNotes": [ "Run `npx clawboo@latest`, not a bare `npx clawboo`, which can reuse an older cached build. Node.js 22.12 or newer is required", "On 0.5.0 behind nginx, Caddy or a Cloudflare Tunnel, deny `/api/mcp/` at the proxy and set `STUDIO_ACCESS_TOKEN` from `openssl rand -hex 24`", "Give Claude Code, Codex and Hermes teammates only work you would let run unattended, or run Clawboo under a separate user account or VM", "Create a hard-cap budget in Settings \u003e Insights \u003e Governance before long runs. A fresh install has no budget and new budgets only warn", "Install `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk` globally beside Clawboo for Claude Code teammates. A one-off `npx` run cannot load it" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 61.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 75, "maintenance": 51, "payments": 60, "reliability": 52, "schema": 83, "security": 70, "transparency": 80 }, "provenanceScore": 36, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-01", "maintenance": "2026-11-01", "payments": "2026-11-01", "reliability": "2026-11-01", "schema": "2026-11-01", "security": "2026-11-01", "transparency": "2026-11-01" }, "last": "2026-11-01", "oldest": "2026-11-01", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npx clawboo@latest # Node.js 22.12 or newer", "http": "curl http://localhost:18790/api/health", "headless": { "command": "curl -X POST http://localhost:18790/api/teams/\u003cteam-id\u003e/chat -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{\"message\":\"Plan the launch checklist.\"}'" } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/agent.multi-agent", "tool": "https://letme.dev/clawboo" }, "area": "frameworks", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "claw.boo", "domainRegistered": "", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://docs.claw.boo/appendices/changelog", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-01", "notes": [ "No legal entity is named in the repository, the docs or the npm package. The MIT licence reads Copyright (c) 2026 Sanreds, and the npm package's only maintainer is sanreds.", "www.claw.boo was not read. Its robots.txt disallows Claude-Web in Cloudflare's managed block and later allows ClaudeBot and anthropic-ai, so the site's terms and privacy pages, if any, are unchecked.", "docs.claw.boo/.well-known/security.txt answered 404 on 1 November 2026. SECURITY.md sends reports to GitHub private vulnerability reporting.", "The software is self-hosted, so there is no vendor endpoint or status page to check. The domain registration date was not looked up." ], "score": 36 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/clawboo.json" }, "answer": "Clawboo scores 61.4 (C) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on reliability, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "paperclip", "name": "Paperclip", "vendor": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://paperclip.ing", "kind": "harness", "category": "agent-harnesses", "summary": "Paperclip is an open-source, self-hosted server and web interface that organises AI agents into a company with an org chart, tasks, budgets and approvals. It drives Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw and other harnesses through adapters.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json", "dns": "paperclip.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip", "license": "MIT", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "paperclipai" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@paperclipai/mcp-server" }, { "registry": "oci", "name": "ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "No Paperclip account. The default `local_trusted` mode needs no login on loopback. Authenticated mode uses browser sessions for people, board API keys for scripts, and agent API keys or short-lived run JWTs as bearer tokens.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free and MIT, self-hosted, with nothing to buy. The owner pays each harness's model provider or subscription. Paperclip Cloud is a waitlist with no published price.", "priceSummary": "Free · OSS", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the docs, the site or the server source (checked 2026-10-08). The only mention in the repository is a link to a third-party skill in a planning note.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 98666, "npmWeekly": 59684, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.paperclip.ing", "llmsTxt": "https://paperclip.ing/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "agent.multi-agent", "agent.mcp-client" ], "tags": [ "open-source", "self-hosted", "local", "free", "no-card", "llms-txt", "docker", "mcp", "typescript" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-05", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 59, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 666, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1251, "categoryRank": 25, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 60, "reliability": 66, "schema": 81, "security": 64, "transparency": 66 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-10-08" }, "negative": -10, "negativeNotes": [ "2026-04-10 to 2026-04-16. Ten advisories published in a week, four of them critical, among them GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7 (CVE-2026-41679, 10.0, unauthenticated remote code execution through an import authorisation bypass) and two cross-tenant agent key flaws rated 9.9. All ten list 2026.416.0 as the fix. Fixed and published, a little under six months old, -5. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories", "2026-07-22. GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7 (9.6), drive-by remote code execution against the default `local_trusted` mode through DNS rebinding. The advisory names no patched version. The current source applies the hostname guard to `local_trusted` private deployments, so we read it as fixed without a documented version, -3. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories/GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7", "2026-04-16. GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf (8.7), a `codex_local` agent inherited a Gmail connector from the owner's ChatGPT account and sent real email. The advisory names no patched version, and `codex_local` still defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, -2. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories/GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf" ], "verdict": "Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, and eleven stable versions shipped in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, and twelve security advisories, five of them critical, have been published since April 2026.", "bestFor": "Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.", "strengths": [ "One deployment runs agents on Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Pi, Hermes, Grok Build, Kimi Code and OpenClaw through adapters, under one org chart", "Board approvals gate agent hires and the CEO agent's strategy, and connection actions can be set to Allowed, Ask first or Off", "Budgets by company, agent and project pause an agent at 100 per cent of recorded spend", "The running server publishes its REST surface as OpenAPI at `/api/openapi.json`, and the docs site answers every page as Markdown at `.md`", "Eleven stable releases between 20 July and 5 October 2026, each with dated notes and an upgrade guide" ], "weaknesses": [ "`claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host", "Twelve published security advisories since April 2026, five critical, including CVE-2026-41679 (unauthenticated remote code execution, fixed in 2026.416.0)", "Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing until an opt-out is set", "2,849 open issues on 8 October 2026, 1,396 of them with no comment, and 78 closed in 30 days against 686 opened", "Calendar versions with no 1.0, and release 2026.916.0 carried five breaking changes" ], "agentNotes": [ "Set `PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` before the first start. Telemetry is on by default", "Set `dangerouslySkipPermissions` and `dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox` to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider", "Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there", "Use `--bind lan` or `--bind tailnet` at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default `local_trusted` mode treats every request as the board admin", "Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 59 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 60, "reliability": 66, "schema": 81, "security": 64, "transparency": 73 }, "provenanceScore": 58, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-10-08", "maintenance": "2026-10-08", "payments": "2026-10-08", "reliability": "2026-10-08", "schema": "2026-10-08", "security": "2026-10-08", "transparency": "2026-10-08" }, "last": "2026-10-08", "lastMoved": "2026-10-27", "oldest": "2026-10-08", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes # Node.js 24.11 or newer", "http": "curl http://localhost:3100/api/health", "headless": { "command": "npx paperclipai issue create --title \"$TASK\" --json", "env": { "PAPERCLIP_API_KEY": "\u003cboard or agent key\u003e", "PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED": "1" } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/agent.multi-agent", "tool": "https://letme.dev/paperclip" }, "area": "frameworks", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.", "domain": "paperclip.ing", "domainRegistered": "2026-03-02", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "https://paperclip.ing/terms/", "privacy": "https://paperclip.ing/privacy/", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The terms (effective 1 April 2026, updated 23 July 2026) and the privacy policy (effective 23 July 2026) name Paperclip Labs, Inc. and Delaware law. The licence file in the repository reads Copyright (c) 2025 Paperclip AI.", "RDAP at the .ing registry gives a registration date of 2026-03-02 for paperclip.ing, with Cloudflare as registrar. The GitHub repository was created the same day.", "paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt and docs.paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt returned 404 on 8 October 2026. SECURITY.md sends reports to GitHub private advisories.", "The software is self-hosted, so there is no vendor endpoint or status page to check. status.paperclip.ing did not answer.", "The privacy policy says it governs the hosted services, and that a self-hosted deployment processes data on the owner's infrastructure." ], "score": 58 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.json", "live": { "slug": "paperclip", "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "paperclipai/paperclip", "version": "v2026.1023.0", "released": "2026-10-24", "seenAt": "2026-10-31T16:16:21.060379678Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@paperclipai/mcp-server", "version": "2026.1023.0", "seenAt": "2026-10-31T16:16:18.935767339Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "paperclipai", "version": "2026.1023.0", "seenAt": "2026-10-31T16:16:18.858602822Z" } ], "githubStars": 109287, "npmWeekly": 68862, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T15:41:42.061319597Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T15:11:39.132030944Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "paperclip.ing", "registered": "2026-03-02", "source": "https://pubapi.registry.google/rdap/domain/paperclip.ing", "checkedAt": "2026-10-25T13:55:26.748731314Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/", "kind": "changelog", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T06:17:27.906838296Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-24T02:22:26.710785766Z", "fingerprint": "a227bbb641b7" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1001.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T06:17:30.080048358Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "f4181b1b6b88" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1005.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T06:17:32.102981978Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "802a09c9725b" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1012.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T06:17:34.135103247Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "0afbb1fc6f29" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1023.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T06:17:36.101414562Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "9a8de031b163" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.916.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T06:17:38.095430446Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "1e69b918c7c5" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/privacy/", "kind": "privacy", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T06:17:40.095077121Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-24T02:22:28.926605099Z", "fingerprint": "0f001aba3049" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/terms/", "kind": "terms", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-10-31T06:17:42.083380153Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-24T02:22:30.943098177Z", "fingerprint": "42aee815daee" } ], "github": { "repo": "paperclipai/paperclip", "checkedAt": "2026-10-26T07:54:15.250098629Z", "stars": 107411, "archived": false, "issuesEnabled": true, "pushedAt": "2026-10-26T06:44:43Z", "openIssues": 3338, "openPRs": 3263, "issuesOpened90d": 1715, "issuesClosed90d": 424, "prsMerged90d": 2492, "ci": { "branch": "master", "runs": 50, "success": 39, "failure": 9, "other": 2, "latest": "success", "latestAt": "2026-10-26T05:07:34Z" }, "advisories": [ { "ghsa": "GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-07-22T23:12:15Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-3xx2-mqjm-hg9x", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-16T12:24:49Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-fpw4-p57j-hqmq", "severity": "medium", "published": "2026-04-16T12:24:23Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-p7mm-r948-4q3q", "severity": "medium", "published": "2026-04-16T12:24:03Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-47wq-cj9q-wpmp", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-16T12:23:29Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-vr7g-88fq-vhq3", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-16T12:21:04Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:19:12Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-xfqj-r5qw-8g4j", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:16:47Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-w8hx-hqjv-vjcq", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:16:15Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-265w-rf2w-cjh4", "cve": "CVE-2026-41208", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:15:14Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-3pw3-v88x-xj24", "severity": "medium", "published": "2026-04-16T12:14:14Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7", "cve": "CVE-2026-41679", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-10T16:50:27Z" } ] }, "updatedAt": "2026-10-31T16:16:21.060379678Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 27, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "0.5.0 was published to npm on 21 October 2026 (30). Two releases in the 90 days to 1 November 2026, 0.4.0 on 28 September and 0.5.0, below the three the line asks for (0). github.com was unreachable, so replies to issues, pull requests and Discussions are unchecked. The CI file cites issue #140 as fixed (3). One public npm package, current, with no entry in the official MCP registry for its four servers (10). CI, CodeQL, weekly Dependabot and SLSA provenance on 0.4.0 and 0.5.0, with `@composio/client` pinned to an alpha (8).", "b": "Version 2026.1005.0, dated 5 October 2026 in its notes and published on GitHub and npm on 6 October (30). Eleven stable releases since 20 July 2026 (20). 650 pull requests merged in the last 30 days, but 2,849 issues and 3,338 pull requests are open, 1,396 open issues have no comment, and 309 of the 472 still-open issues from the last two weeks have none (8). `paperclipai` and `@paperclipai/mcp-server` are both at 2026.1005.0 on npm. We did not check the MCP registry (12). CI on master, a lockfile refresh workflow and signed image attestations (8)." }, "scores": { "a": 51, "b": 78 } }, { "by": 14, "category": "reliability", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Read as local software. The official npm package `clawboo` states Node.js 22.12 or newer, and the README says macOS, Linux and Windows are supported (20). `ci.yml` runs lint, typecheck, Vitest and a real-concurrency suite on Linux and platform suites on Windows and macOS, and `publish.yml` reruns build, lint, typecheck, tests and a clean-install boot before it publishes. 0.5.0 carries provenance from that workflow on main, so its checks passed at that commit, but run results on main couldn't be read (15). github.com was unreachable, so open crash and regression issues are unchecked. A known-issues page lists 25 entries with a status each, three of them fixed on main (5). Changesets write a changelog entry per release, and removals and the 0.2.0 database reset are called out, though breaking changes arrive in minor versions before 1.0 (12). Version 0.5.0, and SECURITY.md says pre-1.0 (0).", "b": "Read as local software. Official npm package `paperclipai` (Node.js 24.11 or newer) and a Docker image on GHCR (20). 2,429 test files and 20 workflows. The Actions page for master on 8 October 2026 showed recent runs passing, with two failed Runner Full-Stack E2E runs (681 and 682) before two that passed (22). 2,849 open issues, 125 labelled bug, 1,599 opened before 8 July, and 78 closed in the last 30 days against 686 opened (6). Calendar versions in semver syntax, with a Breaking Changes section and an upgrade guide in release notes, but breaking changes arrive in ordinary releases and 2026.916.0 carried five (10). No 1.0. The npm `latest` tag is called the stable channel and follows a beta soak of at least three days, while the roadmap says the product is still moving quickly, so half credit (8)." }, "scores": { "a": 52, "b": 66 } }, { "by": 8, "category": "transparency", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "MIT, Copyright 2026 Sanreds, with a third-party notices file (30). The docs list every file Clawboo writes, which copies of keys are encrypted and which are plain text, retention for stored tool results (7 days) and pending approvals (24 hours), and that prompts go only to connected providers. There is no privacy statement, and the website wasn't read (22). The 0.1.x line is deprecated on npm with a note in the changelog, and removals are dated in release notes, with no written deprecation policy or notice period (10). No telemetry, with the server's own outbound requests disclosed, though the npm update check has no setting (18).", "b": "MIT (30). The privacy policy of 23 July 2026 separates self-hosted use from the hosted services and names Paperclip Labs, Inc., but keeps data as long as reasonably necessary, lists no subprocessors, and the 90-day telemetry retention appears only in source. The terms grant a broad licence over content sent to the services and allow model training on opt-in detailed telemetry (16). Release notes carry dated Breaking Changes sections and upgrade guides, with no written deprecation policy or notice period (10). The README discloses telemetry, what it excludes and four opt-outs, and the event contract is public in the repository, but it is on by default (17)." }, "scores": { "a": 58, "b": 66 } }, { "by": 6, "category": "security", "leads": "clawboo", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "Harness reading of the framework checklist, as for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. The docs say Clawboo sends no telemetry and list the GitHub catalogue fetch, the npm version check, OpenRouter's public model list, Google Fonts and the GitHub star count, of which only the catalogue address can be changed (27). Clawboo Native shell commands are off by default and asked one at a time, and connector grants are per agent with approval on writes. Claude Code, Codex and Hermes run with their prompts and sandboxes off and no setting to change it, they can read Clawboo's database and key vault, and with no access token by default any local program can answer approval cards (8). Images in agent text don't load on their own, peer posts are marked as evidence, and a run that has read private data and untrusted content asks before any outbound connector call (11). An audit log of budget, breaker, approval, verification, tool-call and install events, with secrets masked (13). SECURITY.md with private reporting, CodeQL, Dependabot and npm provenance. No security.txt or bug bounty, OSV lists no advisory for `clawboo`, and the proxy advisory is on the docs with a workaround while its fix is unreleased (11).", "b": "Harness reading of the framework checklist, as used for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing. The README lists what is excluded and four opt-outs, and Sentry and OpenTelemetry stay off until configured. We found no first-run notice in the CLI source (18). Board approvals for hires and strategy, execution policies and per-action connection permissions, but `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true, `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, local agents run on the host, sandbox providers are optional plugins and the default `local_trusted` mode has no login (10). A documented `low_trust_review` preset contains agents that read untrusted pull requests or tickets. It is opt-in (10). An activity log of mutating actions, run logs, cost events and audited board API keys (14). SECURITY.md with GitHub private reporting and twelve advisories published, two with CVEs. No security.txt, bug bounty or SOC 2 report found (12)." }, "scores": { "a": 70, "b": 64 } }, { "by": 5, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "clawboo", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Harness reading, scored on what an agent or pipeline driving it has to supply. Four MCP servers keep tool lists small (12 Tasks tools, 4 Memory tools, 2 or 3 TeamChat tools, and Tools with four demonstration builtins plus granted connectors), Clawboo Native gets a read-only Tasks subset, and Tools results over 16 KiB are trimmed with a handle to read the rest (22). Circuit breakers stop task-runner runs after more than 30 tool calls or 200,000 tokens a minute, and team chat caps hand-offs at 8 a turn and three levels. Budgets warn only unless set to a hard cap, and a hard cap stops most runs only between runs (14). REST errors use one `{error}` shape, refused MCP calls return `denied:` with a reason prefix, and 429s carry `Retry-After` (16). `claim_task` and `assign_task` are atomic, illegal status changes are refused by name, the board survives restarts and routines resume after failure. No MCP tool annotations are documented (14). One `npx` command and a provider key or a local Ollama, but Claude Code teammates need a global install with the Agent SDK, and there is no client SDK (9).", "b": "Harness reading of the framework line, scored on what an agent or pipeline driving it has to supply. The MCP server lists 44 tools with no toolsets or read-only subset found, offset by compact reads such as `paperclipInboxLite` and the heartbeat context (12). Budgets by company, agent and project with an automatic pause at 100 per cent, though the README says enforcement uses recorded spend and can lag work in flight (16). `onboard --yes`, CLI commands with `--json`, the REST API and routines started by cron, webhook or API (16). Atomic task checkout with a documented 409, `Idempotency-Key` on routine triggers, saved sessions and bounded recovery (17). One command starts a server with embedded PostgreSQL, but it needs Node.js 24.11 and each harness CLI installed and signed in on the host, and we found no client SDK beyond the TypeScript plugin SDK (9)." }, "scores": { "a": 75, "b": 70 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "Agent harness", "b": "Agent harness", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Sanreds", "b": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "None", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Free", "b": "Free", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "MIT", "b": "MIT", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-10-21", "b": "2026-10-05", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "2026-07-23", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "2026-07-23", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "yes, with an opt-out", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "100 npm/wk", "b": "99k stars, 60k npm/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Clawboo scores 61.4 (C) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on reliability, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Clawboo or Paperclip?" }, { "answer": "Yes. Clawboo is open source (MIT). Paperclip is open source (MIT).", "question": "Are Clawboo and Paperclip open source?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Agent ergonomics, 75 against 70", "Security \u0026 auth, 70 against 64" ], "also": [ "No key needed to call it" ], "goodFor": "One person on one computer who wants several coding and general agents on one board, with shared memory and a lead agent that routes work.", "slug": "clawboo", "watchFor": "Claude Code runs in `bypassPermissions`, Codex with `danger-full-access` and Hermes with `--yolo`, with no setting to change it and no sandbox" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 66 against 52", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 51", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 66 against 58" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.", "slug": "paperclip", "watchFor": "`claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host" } ], "history": { "clawboo": null, "paperclip": [ { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-27", "delta": 0, "from": 59, "fromGrade": "C", "to": 59, "toGrade": "C" } ] }, "job": { "capability": "agent.multi-agent", "name": "Multi-agent orchestration" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-clawboo.json", "title": "Amp vs Clawboo", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-clawboo" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Amp vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-clawboo.json", "title": "Antigravity CLI vs Clawboo", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-clawboo" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-clawboo.json", "title": "Auggie CLI vs Clawboo", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-clawboo" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Auggie CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-clawboo.json", "title": "Claude Code vs Clawboo", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-clawboo" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Claude Code vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-cli-manager.json", "title": "Clawboo vs CLI Manager", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-cli-manager" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-cline.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Cline", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-cline" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-crush.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Crush", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-crush" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-deepseek-harness.json", "title": "Clawboo vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-deepseek-harness" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-deepseek-superagent.json", "title": "Clawboo vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-deepseek-superagent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-devin.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Devin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-devin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-droid-cli.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Droid CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-droid-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-gemini-cli.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Gemini CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-gemini-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-github-copilot-cli.json", "title": "Clawboo vs GitHub Copilot CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-github-copilot-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-goose.json", "title": "Clawboo vs goose", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-goose" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-harness-autonomous.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Harness", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-harness-autonomous" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-harnessrouter.json", "title": "Clawboo vs HarnessRouter", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-harnessrouter" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-jules.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Jules", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-jules" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-junie.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Junie CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-junie" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-kilo-code-cli.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Kilo Code CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-kilo-code-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-kimi-code-cli.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Kimi Code CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-kimi-code-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-kiro-cli.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Kiro CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-kiro-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-minimax-code.json", "title": "Clawboo vs MiniMax Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-minimax-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-mistral-vibe-cli.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Mistral Vibe CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-mistral-vibe-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-muse-code.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Muse Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-muse-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-opencode.json", "title": "Clawboo vs OpenCode", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-opencode" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-openhands.json", "title": "Clawboo vs OpenHands", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-openhands" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-openmausbot.json", "title": "Clawboo vs OpenMausBot", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-openmausbot" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-parallax-agents.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Parallax", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-parallax-agents" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-prime-agent.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Prime Agent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-prime-agent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-qoder-cli.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Qoder CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-qoder-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-qwen-code.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Qwen Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-qwen-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-reflection-mirror.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Mirror CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-reflection-mirror" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-rovo-dev-cli.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Rovo Dev CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-rovo-dev-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-unstoppable.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Unstoppable", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-unstoppable" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-vibe-trading.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Vibe-Trading", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-vibe-trading" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-warp.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-warp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "CLI Manager vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Cline vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Crush vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Devin vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Droid CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Gemini CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "GitHub Copilot CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "goose vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Harness vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "HarnessRouter vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Jules vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Junie CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Kilo Code CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Kiro CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "MiniMax Code vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Mistral Vibe CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Muse Code vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "OpenCode vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "OpenHands vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "OpenMausBot vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-parallax-agents.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Parallax", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-parallax-agents" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Prime Agent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qoder-cli.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Qoder CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qoder-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Qwen Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-reflection-mirror.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Mirror CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-reflection-mirror" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-rovo-dev-cli.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-rovo-dev-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-unstoppable.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Unstoppable", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-unstoppable" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-vibe-trading.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Vibe-Trading", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-vibe-trading" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "by": 14, "clawboo": 52, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "paperclip": 66, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 2, "clawboo": 83, "edge": "clawboo", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "paperclip": 81, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 5, "clawboo": 75, "edge": "clawboo", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "paperclip": 70, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 6, "clawboo": 70, "edge": "clawboo", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "paperclip": 64, "weight": 14 }, { "by": 0, "clawboo": 60, "edge": "", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "paperclip": 60, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 27, "clawboo": 51, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "paperclip": 78, "weight": 7 }, { "by": 8, "clawboo": 58, "edge": "paperclip", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "paperclip": 66, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Clawboo scores 61.4 (C) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on reliability, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do multi-agent orchestration.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "clawboo": "Tasks, memory, team chat and connectors are shared across five runtimes through four MCP servers, with documentation that states each default and limit. Claude Code, Codex and Hermes run with their sandboxes and approval prompts off and no setting to change it, and a reverse-proxy exposure of the MCP servers is fixed only on the unreleased main branch.", "paperclip": "Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, and eleven stable versions shipped in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, and twelve security advisories, five of them critical, have been published since April 2026." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip.min.md" }, "markdown": "Clawboo scores 61.4 (C) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on reliability, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do multi-agent orchestration.\n\n- Clawboo: grade C, 61.4/100, rank #555 of 1251. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/clawboo.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/clawboo.json\n- Paperclip: grade C, 59/100, rank #666 of 1251. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json\n- Best agent harnesses and coding agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/agent-harnesses/index.md\n- All 955 harnesses comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-harnesses/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Clawboo (C)\n\nGood for: One person on one computer who wants several coding and general agents on one board, with shared memory and a lead agent that routes work.\n\nAhead on:\n- Agent ergonomics, 75 against 70\n- Security \u0026 auth, 70 against 64\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- No key needed to call it\n\nWatch for: Claude Code runs in `bypassPermissions`, Codex with `danger-full-access` and Hermes with `--yolo`, with no setting to change it and no sandbox\n\n### Paperclip (C)\n\nGood for: Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 66 against 52\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 51\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 66 against 58\n\nWatch for: `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Paperclip +27\n\n- Clawboo (51): 0.5.0 was published to npm on 21 October 2026 (30). Two releases in the 90 days to 1 November 2026, 0.4.0 on 28 September and 0.5.0, below the three the line asks for (0). github.com was unreachable, so replies to issues, pull requests and Discussions are unchecked. The CI file cites issue #140 as fixed (3). One public npm package, current, with no entry in the official MCP registry for its four servers (10). CI, CodeQL, weekly Dependabot and SLSA provenance on 0.4.0 and 0.5.0, with `@composio/client` pinned to an alpha (8).\n- Paperclip (78): Version 2026.1005.0, dated 5 October 2026 in its notes and published on GitHub and npm on 6 October (30). Eleven stable releases since 20 July 2026 (20). 650 pull requests merged in the last 30 days, but 2,849 issues and 3,338 pull requests are open, 1,396 open issues have no comment, and 309 of the 472 still-open issues from the last two weeks have none (8). `paperclipai` and `@paperclipai/mcp-server` are both at 2026.1005.0 on npm. We did not check the MCP registry (12). CI on master, a lockfile refresh workflow and signed image attestations (8).\n\n### Reliability: Paperclip +14\n\n- Clawboo (52): Read as local software. The official npm package `clawboo` states Node.js 22.12 or newer, and the README says macOS, Linux and Windows are supported (20). `ci.yml` runs lint, typecheck, Vitest and a real-concurrency suite on Linux and platform suites on Windows and macOS, and `publish.yml` reruns build, lint, typecheck, tests and a clean-install boot before it publishes. 0.5.0 carries provenance from that workflow on main, so its checks passed at that commit, but run results on main couldn't be read (15). github.com was unreachable, so open crash and regression issues are unchecked. A known-issues page lists 25 entries with a status each, three of them fixed on main (5). Changesets write a changelog entry per release, and removals and the 0.2.0 database reset are called out, though breaking changes arrive in minor versions before 1.0 (12). Version 0.5.0, and SECURITY.md says pre-1.0 (0).\n- Paperclip (66): Read as local software. Official npm package `paperclipai` (Node.js 24.11 or newer) and a Docker image on GHCR (20). 2,429 test files and 20 workflows. The Actions page for master on 8 October 2026 showed recent runs passing, with two failed Runner Full-Stack E2E runs (681 and 682) before two that passed (22). 2,849 open issues, 125 labelled bug, 1,599 opened before 8 July, and 78 closed in the last 30 days against 686 opened (6). Calendar versions in semver syntax, with a Breaking Changes section and an upgrade guide in release notes, but breaking changes arrive in ordinary releases and 2026.916.0 carried five (10). No 1.0. The npm `latest` tag is called the stable channel and follows a beta soak of at least three days, while the roadmap says the product is still moving quickly, so half credit (8).\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Paperclip +8\n\n- Clawboo (58): MIT, Copyright 2026 Sanreds, with a third-party notices file (30). The docs list every file Clawboo writes, which copies of keys are encrypted and which are plain text, retention for stored tool results (7 days) and pending approvals (24 hours), and that prompts go only to connected providers. There is no privacy statement, and the website wasn't read (22). The 0.1.x line is deprecated on npm with a note in the changelog, and removals are dated in release notes, with no written deprecation policy or notice period (10). No telemetry, with the server's own outbound requests disclosed, though the npm update check has no setting (18).\n- Paperclip (66): MIT (30). The privacy policy of 23 July 2026 separates self-hosted use from the hosted services and names Paperclip Labs, Inc., but keeps data as long as reasonably necessary, lists no subprocessors, and the 90-day telemetry retention appears only in source. The terms grant a broad licence over content sent to the services and allow model training on opt-in detailed telemetry (16). Release notes carry dated Breaking Changes sections and upgrade guides, with no written deprecation policy or notice period (10). The README discloses telemetry, what it excludes and four opt-outs, and the event contract is public in the repository, but it is on by default (17).\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: Clawboo +6\n\n- Clawboo (70): Harness reading of the framework checklist, as for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. The docs say Clawboo sends no telemetry and list the GitHub catalogue fetch, the npm version check, OpenRouter's public model list, Google Fonts and the GitHub star count, of which only the catalogue address can be changed (27). Clawboo Native shell commands are off by default and asked one at a time, and connector grants are per agent with approval on writes. Claude Code, Codex and Hermes run with their prompts and sandboxes off and no setting to change it, they can read Clawboo's database and key vault, and with no access token by default any local program can answer approval cards (8). Images in agent text don't load on their own, peer posts are marked as evidence, and a run that has read private data and untrusted content asks before any outbound connector call (11). An audit log of budget, breaker, approval, verification, tool-call and install events, with secrets masked (13). SECURITY.md with private reporting, CodeQL, Dependabot and npm provenance. No security.txt or bug bounty, OSV lists no advisory for `clawboo`, and the proxy advisory is on the docs with a workaround while its fix is unreleased (11).\n- Paperclip (64): Harness reading of the framework checklist, as used for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing. The README lists what is excluded and four opt-outs, and Sentry and OpenTelemetry stay off until configured. We found no first-run notice in the CLI source (18). Board approvals for hires and strategy, execution policies and per-action connection permissions, but `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true, `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, local agents run on the host, sandbox providers are optional plugins and the default `local_trusted` mode has no login (10). A documented `low_trust_review` preset contains agents that read untrusted pull requests or tickets. It is opt-in (10). An activity log of mutating actions, run logs, cost events and audited board API keys (14). SECURITY.md with GitHub private reporting and twelve advisories published, two with CVEs. No security.txt, bug bounty or SOC 2 report found (12).\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Clawboo +5\n\n- Clawboo (75): Harness reading, scored on what an agent or pipeline driving it has to supply. Four MCP servers keep tool lists small (12 Tasks tools, 4 Memory tools, 2 or 3 TeamChat tools, and Tools with four demonstration builtins plus granted connectors), Clawboo Native gets a read-only Tasks subset, and Tools results over 16 KiB are trimmed with a handle to read the rest (22). Circuit breakers stop task-runner runs after more than 30 tool calls or 200,000 tokens a minute, and team chat caps hand-offs at 8 a turn and three levels. Budgets warn only unless set to a hard cap, and a hard cap stops most runs only between runs (14). REST errors use one `{error}` shape, refused MCP calls return `denied:` with a reason prefix, and 429s carry `Retry-After` (16). `claim_task` and `assign_task` are atomic, illegal status changes are refused by name, the board survives restarts and routines resume after failure. No MCP tool annotations are documented (14). One `npx` command and a provider key or a local Ollama, but Claude Code teammates need a global install with the Agent SDK, and there is no client SDK (9).\n- Paperclip (70): Harness reading of the framework line, scored on what an agent or pipeline driving it has to supply. The MCP server lists 44 tools with no toolsets or read-only subset found, offset by compact reads such as `paperclipInboxLite` and the heartbeat context (12). Budgets by company, agent and project with an automatic pause at 100 per cent, though the README says enforcement uses recorded spend and can lag work in flight (16). `onboard --yes`, CLI commands with `--json`, the REST API and routines started by cron, webhook or API (16). Atomic task checkout with a documented 409, `Idempotency-Key` on routine triggers, saved sessions and bounded recovery (17). One command starts a server with embedded PostgreSQL, but it needs Node.js 24.11 and each harness CLI installed and signed in on the host, and we found no client SDK beyond the TypeScript plugin SDK (9).\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Clawboo | Paperclip | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 52 | 66 | Paperclip +14 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 83 | 81 | Clawboo +2 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 75 | 70 | Clawboo +5 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 70 | 64 | Clawboo +6 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 60 | even |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 51 | 78 | Paperclip +27 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 58 | 66 | Paperclip +8 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -10 | |\n| **Total** | | **61.4 · C** | **59 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Clawboo | Paperclip |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |\n| Vendor | Sanreds | Paperclip Labs, Inc. |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | | |\n| Auth | None | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Free | Free |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | MIT | MIT |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-05 |\n| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-07-23 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-07-23 |\n| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes, with an opt-out |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | yes |\n| Popularity | 100 npm/wk | 99k stars, 60k npm/wk |\n\n## How the scores have moved\n\n### Clawboo\n\nNo score change since it was listed.\n\n### Paperclip\n\n- no change on 27 October 2026: checklist\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Clawboo.** Tasks, memory, team chat and connectors are shared across five runtimes through four MCP servers, with documentation that states each default and limit. Claude Code, Codex and Hermes run with their sandboxes and approval prompts off and no setting to change it, and a reverse-proxy exposure of the MCP servers is fixed only on the unreleased main branch.\n\n**Paperclip.** Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, and eleven stable versions shipped in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, and twelve security advisories, five of them critical, have been published since April 2026.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Clawboo\n\n1. Run `npx clawboo@latest`, not a bare `npx clawboo`, which can reuse an older cached build. Node.js 22.12 or newer is required\n2. On 0.5.0 behind nginx, Caddy or a Cloudflare Tunnel, deny `/api/mcp/` at the proxy and set `STUDIO_ACCESS_TOKEN` from `openssl rand -hex 24`\n3. Give Claude Code, Codex and Hermes teammates only work you would let run unattended, or run Clawboo under a separate user account or VM\n4. Create a hard-cap budget in Settings \u003e Insights \u003e Governance before long runs. A fresh install has no budget and new budgets only warn\n5. Install `@anthropic-ai/claude-agent-sdk` globally beside Clawboo for Claude Code teammates. A one-off `npx` run cannot load it\n\n### Paperclip\n\n1. Set `PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` before the first start. Telemetry is on by default\n2. Set `dangerouslySkipPermissions` and `dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox` to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider\n3. Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there\n4. Use `--bind lan` or `--bind tailnet` at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default `local_trusted` mode treats every request as the board admin\n5. Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Clawboo or Paperclip?\n\nClawboo scores 61.4 (C) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 59 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on reliability, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Are Clawboo and Paperclip open source?\n\nYes. Clawboo is open source (MIT). Paperclip is open source (MIT).\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"clawboo\", \"b\": \"paperclip\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare clawboo paperclip`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/clawboo.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Clawboo or Paperclip\n\n- [Amp vs Clawboo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-clawboo.md)\n- [Amp vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Antigravity CLI vs Clawboo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-clawboo.md)\n- [Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Auggie CLI vs Clawboo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-clawboo.md)\n- [Auggie CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Claude Code vs Clawboo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-clawboo.md)\n- [Claude Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Clawboo vs CLI Manager](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-cli-manager.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Cline](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-cline.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Crush](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-crush.md)\n- [Clawboo vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-deepseek-harness.md)\n- [Clawboo vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-deepseek-superagent.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Devin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-devin.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Droid CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-droid-cli.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Gemini CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-gemini-cli.md)\n- [Clawboo vs GitHub Copilot CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-github-copilot-cli.md)\n- [Clawboo vs goose](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-goose.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Harness](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-harness-autonomous.md)\n- [Clawboo vs HarnessRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-harnessrouter.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Jules](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-jules.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Junie CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-junie.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Kilo Code CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-kilo-code-cli.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Kimi Code CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-kimi-code-cli.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Kiro CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-kiro-cli.md)\n- [Clawboo vs MiniMax Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-minimax-code.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Mistral Vibe CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-mistral-vibe-cli.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Muse Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-muse-code.md)\n- [Clawboo vs OpenCode](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-opencode.md)\n- [Clawboo vs OpenHands](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-openhands.md)\n- [Clawboo vs OpenMausBot](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-openmausbot.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Parallax](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-parallax-agents.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Prime Agent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-prime-agent.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Qoder CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-qoder-cli.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Qwen Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-qwen-code.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Mirror CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-reflection-mirror.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Rovo Dev CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Unstoppable](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-unstoppable.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Vibe-Trading](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-vibe-trading.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-warp.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Cline vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Crush vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Devin vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Droid CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Gemini CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [GitHub Copilot CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [goose vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Harness vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [HarnessRouter vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Jules vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Junie CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kilo Code CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kiro CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [MiniMax Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Mistral Vibe CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Muse Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenCode vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenHands vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenMausBot vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Parallax](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-parallax-agents.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Prime Agent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Qoder CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qoder-cli.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Qwen Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Mirror CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-reflection-mirror.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Unstoppable](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-unstoppable.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Vibe-Trading](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-vibe-trading.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-01", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Clawboo vs Paperclip", "url": "" } ], "description": "Clawboo scores 61.4 (C) to Paperclip's 59 (C) for multi-agent orchestration. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Clawboo C 61.4", "Paperclip C 59", "scores" ], "h1": "Clawboo vs Paperclip", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Clawboo vs Paperclip for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-01", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 5800, "slim": 2880 }, "version": 1 }