# Claude Duet vs NanoClaw (slim)

> NanoClaw scores 68.3 (B) to Claude Duet's 17.9 (F) for proactive personal assistants. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-duet-vs-nanoclaw.md (~4,050 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-duet-vs-nanoclaw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-duet-vs-nanoclaw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-25
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

NanoClaw scores 68.3 (B) on agent readiness against Claude Duet's 17.9 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Claude Duet leads on transparency & trust. Both do proactive personal assistants.

- Claude Duet: F 17.9, rank #1162 of 1210 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/claude-duet.min.md
- NanoClaw: B 68.3, rank #242 of 1210 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/nanoclaw.min.md
- Claude Duet, good for A US Pro or Max subscriber who runs work or a small business through connected apps such as Gmail, Google Calendar, QuickBooks, Stripe, Gusto and HubSpot and wants a morning brief and approved actions. Ahead on Transparency & trust, 72 against 65. Also No incidents deducted, where NanoClaw loses 5 points for them.
- NanoClaw, good for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine, reachable from chat apps, with container isolation and scheduled tasks, and who is willing to keep a fork. Ahead on Reliability, 78 against 15; Schema & documentation, 82 against 10; Agent ergonomics, 70 against 0; Security & auth, 74 against 14; Payments & pricing, 60 against 10; Maintenance & community, 78 against 37. Also No key needed to call it; Free to start without a card; Open source; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5.

| Category | Claude Duet | NanoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 15 | 78 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 10 | 82 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 14 | 74 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 10 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 37 | 78 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 72 | 65 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Claude Duet | NanoClaw |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Anthropic, PBC | NanoCo, Inc. |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Licence | Closed service. No Claude Duet terms were found. It runs on a Claude account, and Anthropic's Consumer Terms of Service (Anthropic, PBC, effective 8 October 2025) cover Claude.ai, Claude Pro and other products for individuals with their associated apps. | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-10-24 | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated |  | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out |  |
| Popularity | none | 31k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |