# Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Mistral Moderation API (slim) > Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Mistral Moderation API's 58.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Mistral Moderation API leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do… - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-mistral-moderation.md (~2,950 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-mistral-moderation.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-mistral-moderation - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09 Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Mistral Moderation API's 58.4 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Mistral Moderation API leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do guard moderation. - Cisco AI Defense Inspection API: C 61.3, rank #429 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.min.md - Mistral Moderation API: C 58.4, rank #522 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mistral-moderation.min.md - Cisco AI Defense Inspection API, good for A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 40; Security & auth, 81 against 54; Maintenance & community, 80 against 33. - Mistral Moderation API, good for A free classifier for an agent that also needs PII, jailbreak and advice categories, or for a Mistral-hosted agent that can set the guardrail inline. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 85 against 59; Agent ergonomics, 75 against 67; Payments & pricing, 40 against 0; Transparency & trust, 81 against 76. Also No incidents deducted, where Cisco AI Defense Inspection API loses 3 points for them. | Category | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Mistral Moderation API | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 80 | 40 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 59 | 85 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 67 | 75 | | Security & auth (14%) | 81 | 54 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 0 | 40 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 33 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 81 | | Fact (where they differ) | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Mistral Moderation API | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Mistral AI | | Hosted endpoint | `https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat` | `https://api.mistral.ai/v1/moderations` | | Pricing | Paid | Free | | Licence | Proprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0 | none | | llms.txt | no | yes | | Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-03-01 | | Terms last updated | | 2026-09-25 | | Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-09-03 | | Customer content may train models | | yes, with an opt-out | | Terms restrict automated access | | not found in the text | | Terms restrict benchmarking | | yes | | Terms or service can change without notice | | yes | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | | not found in the text | | Popularity | 35 stars, 4k PyPI/wk | 769 stars, 8.4M npm/wk, 3.7M PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |