# Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Llama Guard 4 (slim)

> Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Llama Guard 4's 49.1 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Llama Guard 4 leads on payments & pricing. Both do guard moderation. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-llama-guard.md (~2,950 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-llama-guard.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-llama-guard
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Llama Guard 4's 49.1 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Llama Guard 4 leads on payments & pricing. Both do guard moderation.

- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API: C 61.3, rank #429 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.min.md
- Llama Guard 4: D 49.1, rank #713 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/llama-guard.min.md
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API, good for A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 38; Schema & documentation, 59 against 52; Security & auth, 81 against 53; Maintenance & community, 80 against 28; Transparency & trust, 76 against 55. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.
- Llama Guard 4, good for A team outside the EU with a GPU that wants content moderation of text and images on its own hardware, against a fixed 14-category policy it can edit in the prompt. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 45 against 0. Also No key needed to call it; No incidents deducted, where Cisco AI Defense Inspection API loses 3 points for them.

| Category | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Llama Guard 4 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 80 | 38 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 59 | 52 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 67 | 67 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 81 | 53 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 0 | 45 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 28 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 55 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Llama Guard 4 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | Model API |
| Vendor | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat` | no (local only) |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0 | Llama 4 Community Licence (source-available weights, not an OSI licence), with the Llama 4 acceptable use policy |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2025-04-29 |
| Terms last updated |  | 2025-04-05 |
| Customer content may train models |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 35 stars, 4k PyPI/wk | 4.4k stars |