# Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails) (slim)

> Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)'s 59.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails) leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and payments &…

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-lakera-guard.md (~3,050 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-lakera-guard.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-lakera-guard
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Cisco AI Defense Inspection API scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails)'s 59.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails) leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and payments & pricing. Both do guard injection.

- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API: C 61.3, rank #429 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.min.md
- Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails): C 59.6, rank #492 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lakera-guard.min.md
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API, good for A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 65; Security & auth, 81 against 65; Maintenance & community, 80 against 21; Transparency & trust, 76 against 57.
- Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails), good for An agent that wants one hosted call to screen user input, tool calls and tool results for injection in the OpenAI message format. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 86 against 59; Agent ergonomics, 77 against 67; Payments & pricing, 15 against 0. Also Free to start without a card; No incidents deducted, where Cisco AI Defense Inspection API loses 3 points for them.

| Category | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 80 | 65 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 59 | 86 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 67 | 77 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 81 | 65 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 0 | 15 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 21 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 57 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Lakera Guard (Check Point AI Guardrails) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Check Point |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat` | `https://api.lakera.ai/v2/guard` |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0 | none |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-06-08 |
| Terms last updated |  | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-06-01 |
| Customer content may train models |  | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 35 stars, 4k PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |