# Cisco AI Defense Inspection API vs Google Cloud Model Armor (slim)

> Google Cloud Model Armor scores 77.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Cisco AI Defense Inspection API's 61.3 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do guard injection. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-google-model-armor.md (~3,050 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-google-model-armor.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cisco-ai-defense-inspection-vs-google-model-armor
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Google Cloud Model Armor scores 77.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Cisco AI Defense Inspection API's 61.3 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do guard injection.

- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API: C 61.3, rank #429 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cisco-ai-defense-inspection.min.md
- Google Cloud Model Armor: BB 77.9, rank #16 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/google-model-armor.min.md
- Cisco AI Defense Inspection API, good for A company already buying Cisco security through Security Cloud Control that wants its own application to decide what to do with each verdict.
- Google Cloud Model Armor, good for Teams already on Google Cloud who want prompt and response screening with real PII detection, document and URL scanning, and audit logs, at the lowest paid rate in the category. Ahead on Reliability, 90 against 80; Schema & documentation, 78 against 59; Agent ergonomics, 75 against 67; Security & auth, 100 against 81; Payments & pricing, 20 against 0; Maintenance & community, 85 against 80; Transparency & trust, 87 against 76. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; No incidents deducted, where Cisco AI Defense Inspection API loses 3 points for them.

| Category | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Google Cloud Model Armor |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 80 | 90 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 59 | 78 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 67 | 75 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 81 | 100 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 0 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 85 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 87 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Cisco AI Defense Inspection API | Google Cloud Model Armor |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Cisco Systems, Inc. | Google Cloud |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://us.api.inspect.aidefense.security.cisco.com/api/v1/inspect/chat` | `https://modelarmor.{location}.rep.googleapis.com/v1/projects/{project}/locations/{location}/templates/{template}:sanitizeUserPrompt` |
| Auth | API key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Cisco's General Terms and the AI Defense Offer Description. The Python SDK is Apache-2.0 | none |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-28 |
| Terms last updated |  | 2026-09-02 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models |  | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access |  | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 35 stars, 4k PyPI/wk | 210k npm/wk, 471k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (8) |