# Circle Gateway Nanopayments vs FluxA AI Wallet

> Circle Gateway Nanopayments scores 69.7 (B) to FluxA AI Wallet's 47 (D) for x402 payments. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-fluxa-ai-wallet
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-fluxa-ai-wallet.md (~6,450 tokens)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (the key docs and every listing in one file, at most 16 MB, about 4 million tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (the whole catalogue as tools, no key)
- DNS: dig +short TXT <slug>.grade.anchorterminal.com (the grade as a DNS TXT record, for a sandbox with no HTTP where names still resolve; also top., best.<category>. and <a>.vs.<b>. under the zone, and the same under grade.letme.dev)
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)
- Updated: 2026-11-07

Circle Gateway Nanopayments scores 69.7 (B) on agent readiness against FluxA AI Wallet's 47 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do x402 payments.

- Circle Gateway Nanopayments: grade B, 69.7/100, rank #228 of 1513. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/circle-gateway-nanopayments.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/circle-gateway-nanopayments.json
- FluxA AI Wallet: grade D, 47/100, rank #1164 of 1513. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/fluxa-ai-wallet.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/fluxa-ai-wallet.json
- Best payment and monetisation platforms for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/payment-platforms/index.md
- All 104 platforms comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/payment-platforms/index.md
- Best agent wallets and spending controls: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/agent-wallets/index.md
- All 77 wallets comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-wallets/index.md

## Which one, for what

### Circle Gateway Nanopayments (B)

Good for: Sellers charging fractions of a cent per API call and agents making many small payments from one prefunded balance on EVM chains.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 66 against 20
- Schema & documentation, 80 against 61
- Agent ergonomics, 75 against 60
- Security & auth, 64 against 52
- Payments & pricing, 80 against 45
- Maintenance & community, 77 against 66
- Transparency & trust, 73 against 32

Also in its favour:
- No key needed to call it

Watch for: No rate limit, 429 guidance or SLA was found for the Gateway API in the reviewed documentation

### FluxA AI Wallet (D)

Good for: An agent in a CLI-capable client that needs to pay x402 APIs, send USDC on Base or receive payments through links, inside budgets a person signs.

Also in its favour:
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where Circle Gateway Nanopayments loses 3 points for them

Watch for: The published MCP package is 0.2.0 from 2 March 2026 with 13 tools, while the repository says 0.6.0 with 15


## Why the edge

### Reliability: Circle Gateway Nanopayments +46

- Circle Gateway Nanopayments (66): Graded as a hosted service on gateway-api.circle.com. status.circle.com is a Statuspage with Circle Gateway components for each chain, mainnet and testnet (20). The history pages, read on 1 November 2026, list every incident from June to 31 October. From 3 August none names Gateway or a Gateway component. They cover USDC mints on single chains, CCTP attestations, xReserve, Wallets and testnets, and the two HyperEVM incidents opened name only CCTP and USDC components. The last Gateway incident was testnet only, 29 June to 2 July, outside the window. A clean record (30). No rate limit with numbers was found for the Gateway API, and an unauthenticated call to `/v1/x402/supported` carried no rate-limit headers (0). No 429 or `Retry-After` guidance was found. Each authorisation carries a unique nonce, a repeat returns `nonce_already_used`, and the error reference says to retry `unexpected_error` (6 of 15). No SLA was found, and the developer terms allow changes without prior notice (0). The release notes record the mainnet launch on 29 April 2026 and the pages read carry no beta label (10).
- FluxA AI Wallet (20): Graded with the hosted lines, because signing, mandates and approvals all run on FluxA's wallet API and the CLI and MCP server only wrap it, as kite-agent-passport and kane-cli were read. No status page was found in the repository, the skills or AgentMarket's pages. fluxapay.xyz and the wallet and docs hosts could not be read, so a status page there is unchecked and scored absent (0). With no readable history the record takes the default (5). No rate limit with numbers was found (0). The connection service treats 429 `slow_down` as wait and poll and marks errors `retryable`, the skill says a 503 means retry shortly, payouts require a caller-chosen `payout_id` that returns the existing payout on a repeat, `--biz-id` rejects a duplicate with 409, and card create and recharge resume with `--request-id` instead of paying again. No Retry-After or backoff schedule is documented for the wallet API (10 of 15). No SLA was found (0). No beta label was found on the wallet in what was read, but both packages are at 0.x, agent cards sit behind a waitlist and the wallet site was unread (5 of 10). Total 20.

### Transparency & trust: Circle Gateway Nanopayments +41

- Circle Gateway Nanopayments (73): The SDK is Apache-2.0 on npm and the Gateway contracts are Apache-2.0 on GitHub. The API service and the enclave code are closed, under clear developer terms (22 of 30). The privacy policy of 16 September 2026 lists transaction and blockchain data among what is collected and keeps data as long as necessary, with no periods. The service terms link a DPA dated 2022. Nothing found says what the Gateway API logs about a payment (17 of 30). The developer terms promise reasonable efforts to announce the end of support for a version and also let Circle modify or discontinue Gateway without prior notice. The one breaking change found was noted on the day it took effect (6 of 20). A sub-processor list, last updated 22 December 2025, names each processor with its purpose and country (14 of 20).
- FluxA AI Wallet (32): The CLI and MCP server source is Apache-2.0 per the LICENSE file and both package.json files, while the README's last section says MIT. The hosted wallet is closed, and no terms covering it were found. AgentMarket's terms describe only the marketplace (15 of 30). AgentMarket's privacy policy of 14 January 2026 names Stripe and model providers and gives no retention periods, and it does not mention wallet addresses, KYC profiles, card data or payouts, which the CLI collects or handles. The wallet's own privacy policy was unreachable (5 of 30). The README marks `init` and `link-wallet` as legacy but still supported, and the skill pins a minimum CLI version; no deprecation policy or dated notice was found (3 of 20). Stripe is the only provider named; no card issuer, KYC provider, custody provider or data location is named. The CLI and MCP code send no telemetry (3 of 20). Total 26.

### Payments & pricing: Circle Gateway Nanopayments +35

- Circle Gateway Nanopayments (80): Payment platforms and wallets take the highest step that applies on the 40-point protocol line. 40 for x402, MPP or L402 on all their own endpoints, 30 on part of their own API, 25 when their merchants can accept one, 20 for running a facilitator, 15 for paying as a buyer, 0 for only a protocol of their own. Circle's own API is not paid over x402. Sellers accept x402 through Circle's middleware and facilitator, so the merchant step. An unpaid call to `GET /v1/x402/supported` on 1 November returned 200 with 12 mainnet networks, each x402 version 2, scheme `exact` and `GatewayWalletBatched` (25 of 40). The fee page is public with no login, 0.005% on crosschain withdrawals plus a gas fee by chain, and the docs say a nanopayment costs neither party a fee. No price list states the nanopayment fee as a figure, and the terms say fees are communicated through the API and may change (15 of 20). Testnets run on faucet USDC with no account or card, and mainnet has no subscription (20). An agent holding an EOA key and USDC can deposit and pay with no signup, and a seller needs only an address (20).
- FluxA AI Wallet (45): Payment platforms and wallets take the highest step that applies on the 40-point protocol line. 40 for x402, MPP or L402 on all their own endpoints, 30 on part of their own API, 25 when their merchants can accept one, 20 for running a facilitator, 15 for paying as a buyer, 0 for only a protocol of their own. The wallet pays x402 as a buyer and its payment links can be paid over x402 so another agent pays the holder, as sponge-wallet's payment links were read. FluxA's own wallet API is not paid over x402, so the merchant step (25 of 40). No fee schedule for the wallet, x402 signing, payouts or payment links was found, and card fees appear only through an authenticated command (0 of 20). Registering an Agent ID and creating payment links cost nothing and need no card per the README and the charge-agent guide, but the wallet sign-up at agentwallet.fluxapay.xyz could not be read, so whether opening a funded wallet needs a card is unchecked (10 of 20). `POST https://agentid.fluxapay.xyz/register` returns credentials with no human step, but the CLI marks it legacy, the default connection needs a browser approval, and every spend needs the owner's wallet and a mandate signed in a browser (10 of 20). Total 45.

### Schema & documentation: Circle Gateway Nanopayments +19

- Circle Gateway Nanopayments (80): A public OpenAPI 3.0.3 file covers the five operations. It gives the 400 responses no body schema and attaches its Bearer scheme to no operation (23 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every docs page (10). The docs say when to use this facilitator and when Circle's other one, and to call `settle` without `verify` in production (15 of 20). Transfer status and settle error reasons are enums and required fields are marked. `payload`, `extra` and `extensions` are open objects, and `pageSize` has no maximum (10 of 15). Every SDK method has a typed signature and an example, and 16 API error codes have a cause and a recovery step. The error reference says the validity window must be 3 days where the quickstart, the SDK and the live `minValiditySeconds` of 604800 say 7 (11 of 15). Paths are under `/v1`, the SDK follows semver and the release notes are dated. The npm package ships no changelog (11 of 15).
- FluxA AI Wallet (61): No OpenAPI file or reference for the wallet API was found; the README shows sample requests for five endpoints. The MCP server's 15 tools in the 0.6.0 source carry typed Zod input schemas, and the CLI's flags are documented in prose in the skill files and `--help`. The MCP server is the secondary surface and its npm release is 0.2.0, so 12 of 25. The skill and its 18 Markdown guides are written for agents, and AgentMarket's llms.txt describes the wallet's payment role (10). `connect_wallet`, `init_agent_id` and `create_intent_mandate` say when to use them and when not to, and the skill has a when-to-use table per capability, while the payment-link and status tools have one-line descriptions (12 of 20). Zod enums for validity, runtime, hosting and currency, a regex on payout amounts and strict objects, but the x402 requirement fields are plain strings and `outputSchema` is a free-form record (10 of 15). The README has an example for every MCP tool, the skills give CLI examples and output, and error codes are tabled for mandates, payouts, cards and connections (12 of 15). Semver on npm with 25 CLI versions and a version line in the skill, two git tags and no changelog (5 of 15). Total 61.

### Agent ergonomics: Circle Gateway Nanopayments +15

- Circle Gateway Nanopayments (75): The API is five operations and the buyer path is one `pay(url)` call. Transfer search takes `pageSize` (20 of 25). Cursor pagination with `pageAfter` and `pageBefore`, and filters by sender, recipient, nonce, network, status and date. A status filter needs a second filter since 26 August 2026 (17 of 20). Sixteen error codes with recovery steps, and typed SDK error messages (17 of 20). The nonce stops one authorisation being settled twice and a `completed` or `failed` state tells a caller when to stop. No idempotency key was found, and a failed payment needs a newly signed authorisation (13 of 20). The seller middleware needs one address and a price, and the buyer client a chain and a key. The only official SDK is TypeScript (8 of 15).
- FluxA AI Wallet (60): The MCP server has 15 tools with about 4,700 characters of descriptions, the 11 to 30 band (15). The CLI path loads SKILL.md (26.5 KB) and one of 18 guides per task, about 112 KB in all, with no read-only subset (no add-back, 15 of 25). `card transactions` takes page, limit, type and a time range, refunds take limit and offset, `received-records` and `recent-transactions` take a limit up to 100, and `market search` can be scoped to models or vendors; no cursor (12 of 20). Errors carry a `code`, `retryable`, `reconnect_required` and a `next_command` or `next_tool`, and card errors map to recovery hints, but the CLI exits only 0 or 1 and the MCP payment tools return the wallet API's raw error body without `isError` (14 of 20). A required `payout_id` idempotency key, `--biz-id` dedup and `--request-id` continuation on card operations, and the skill says not to initiate again to retry a payment. No `readOnlyHint` or `destructiveHint` on any MCP tool (12 of 20). Base USDC is the default network and asset, mandates default to 8 hours and the CLI installs in one command, but there is no SDK library and both packages are TypeScript (7 of 15). Total 60.

### Security & auth: Circle Gateway Nanopayments +12

- Circle Gateway Nanopayments (64): No API key. The buyer's EOA private key signs each payment, and each authorisation is bound to one amount, recipient, validity window and nonce. The same key controls the whole wallet, the SDK takes it as a plain config value, and smart contract accounts with their own policies are not supported (18 of 30). Only the deposited Gateway balance can be spent, and a client hook can abort a payment above a limit. No limit is set by default and none is enforced by the service (12 of 20). The amount comes from the seller's 402 response, which is untrusted. The docs show the spending-limit hook and give no other guidance. Circle's Gateway skill file says to ask the user before moving funds on mainnet (8 of 15). Transfers can be searched by address, nonce and date and each carries its batch transaction hash. No separate operator log was found (11 of 15). Audit reports by ChainSecurity and OtterSec are linked, one of them on batching, and a repository security policy names a HackerOne bug bounty programme. security.txt answered 404 and no certification was found on the pages read (15 of 20).
- FluxA AI Wallet (52): The agent holds an Agent ID, a token whose validity the owner picks from 1 hour to 1 year at browser approval, and a short-lived RS256 JWT refreshed from the token; `token_revoked` exists. Credentials sit in a 0600 JSON file or environment variables. The token is not scoped, since limits live in mandates, and legacy `init` tokens are described as not expiring. Agent VCs are audience-bound and rejected by FluxA's own endpoints. No secret travels in a URL (22 of 30). Every x402 payment needs a mandate the owner signs, with a limit, a validity and an optional host allowlist enforced by the wallet API, payouts need per-payout approval unless a mandate covers them, cards need a mandate and KYC, and linked-card mandates are scoped to one merchant. A payout mandate sets no payee allowlist that was documented, and the skill tells agents to request budgets for at least 100 calls by default (16 of 20). The wallet returns little third-party content itself, but the skill sends agents to third-party x402 APIs, ClawPI posts and a remote announcement.md with no guidance on treating them as untrusted, its description steers agents to paid APIs even when a free web search looks enough, and the daily check-in runs `npx -y @fluxa-pay/fluxa-wallet@latest` unpinned twice a day (4 of 15). `mandates` lists limit, spent and remaining, with `recent-transactions`, `received-records` and payout status by CLI, and the MCP server writes a local audit log; the wallet app's logs were not read (10 of 15). No SECURITY.md, disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification was found, and agentmarket.fluxapay.xyz has no security.txt; fluxapay.xyz's is unchecked (0 of 20). Total 52.

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Circle Gateway Nanopayments | FluxA AI Wallet | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 66 | 20 | Circle Gateway Nanopayments +46 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 80 | 61 | Circle Gateway Nanopayments +19 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 75 | 60 | Circle Gateway Nanopayments +15 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 64 | 52 | Circle Gateway Nanopayments +12 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 80 | 45 | Circle Gateway Nanopayments +35 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 77 | 66 | Circle Gateway Nanopayments +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 73 | 32 | Circle Gateway Nanopayments +41 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **69.7 · B** | **47 · D** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Circle Gateway Nanopayments | FluxA AI Wallet |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Circle | FluxA Technology Pte. Ltd. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://gateway-api.circle.com` | `https://walletapi.fluxapay.xyz` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |
| x402 | payer tooling only | payer tooling only |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Circle Developer Terms. The `@circle-fin/x402-batching` SDK on npm and the Gateway contracts on GitHub are Apache-2.0 | The CLI and MCP server source is Apache-2.0 (LICENSE file and both package.json files), though the README's last section says MIT. The hosted wallet service is closed, and no terms covering the wallet were found |
| Tools exposed | none | 15 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-22 | 2026-11-06 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-16 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not read yet |
| Popularity | 17k npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |

## How the scores have moved

### Circle Gateway Nanopayments

- +2.0 on 1 November 2026: new evidence
- +0.1 on 27 October 2026: checklist

### FluxA AI Wallet

No score change since it was listed.

## Verdicts

**Circle Gateway Nanopayments.** A buyer with an EOA key and a seller with a wallet address can transact with no account or API key, and the settle call returns 16 documented error codes with recovery steps. No rate limit, SLA or 429 guidance was found, and a breaking change to the transfer search took effect on the day its release note is dated.

**FluxA AI Wallet.** Every spend runs against a mandate the owner signs in a browser, with a budget, a validity window and an optional host allowlist, and payouts need approval or a mandate. The published MCP package is 0.2.0 from March 2026 against 0.6.0 in the repository, and no status page, fee schedule, wallet terms or custody statement was found.

## Before you call either

### Circle Gateway Nanopayments

1. Deposit on the chain you will pay from. `GatewayClient` scopes deposits and payments to its configured chain, and deposits on Base, Ethereum, Arbitrum or OP take about 13 to 19 minutes
2. Set `validBefore` at least 7 days ahead when signing by hand. The SDK uses 604900 seconds
3. Register `onBeforePaymentCreation` and abort above a cap. `pay(url)` signs whatever amount the seller's 402 response asks for
4. Call `settle` without a prior `verify`. Balance and nonce checks happen only at settle time
5. Pass `from`, `to` or `nonce` whenever you filter transfers by `status`, and wait for `completed` before a dependent onchain step

### FluxA AI Wallet

1. Run `fluxa-wallet status` first. If `configured` and `wallet_linked` are true, skip `connect`; otherwise show the `authorization_url` and wait with `connect-status --wait 100`
2. On `token_expired` or `token_revoked`, reconnect with the same `--agent-id`. Never run `init` to recover, which creates a new identity
3. Pass a unique `--id` on every `payout` and reuse it on retry; a repeat returns the existing payout instead of paying twice
4. Check `fluxa-wallet mandates` for a signed mandate with enough remaining budget before creating one, and size new budgets to the task
5. Install the CLI from npm, not the MCP package, whose npm release 0.2.0 lacks `connect_wallet` and `get_wallet_connection`

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Circle Gateway Nanopayments or FluxA AI Wallet?

Circle Gateway Nanopayments scores 69.7 (B) on agent readiness against FluxA AI Wallet's 47 (D), and leads in every scored category.

### Do Circle Gateway Nanopayments and FluxA AI Wallet need an API key?

Circle Gateway Nanopayments needs no key. FluxA AI Wallet takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

### Can an agent call Circle Gateway Nanopayments and FluxA AI Wallet without installing anything?

Yes. Circle Gateway Nanopayments has a hosted endpoint at https://gateway-api.circle.com and FluxA AI Wallet at https://walletapi.fluxapay.xyz.

### Are Circle Gateway Nanopayments and FluxA AI Wallet open source?

No open-source release is listed for Circle Gateway Nanopayments. FluxA AI Wallet is open source (The CLI and MCP server source is Apache-2.0 (LICENSE file and both package.json files), though the README's last section says MIT. The hosted wallet service is closed, and no terms covering the wallet were found).


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-fluxa-ai-wallet.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-fluxa-ai-wallet.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "circle-gateway-nanopayments", "b": "fluxa-ai-wallet"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare circle-gateway-nanopayments fluxa-ai-wallet`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/circle-gateway-nanopayments.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/fluxa-ai-wallet.json

## Other comparisons with Circle Gateway Nanopayments or FluxA AI Wallet

- [Agentcard vs FluxA AI Wallet](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agentcard-vs-fluxa-ai-wallet.md)
- [ATXP vs Circle Gateway Nanopayments](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atxp-vs-circle-gateway-nanopayments.md)
- [Circle Gateway Nanopayments vs Skyfire API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-skyfire.md)
- [Circle Gateway Nanopayments vs Tempo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-tempo.md)
- [Circle Gateway Nanopayments vs TermiX AACP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-termix.md)
- [Circle Wallets (Agent Wallets, Programmable Wallets) vs FluxA AI Wallet](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-wallets-vs-fluxa-ai-wallet.md)
- [Coinbase Developer Platform (Agentic Wallet, AgentKit, CDP MCP) vs FluxA AI Wallet](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-cdp-agentkit-vs-fluxa-ai-wallet.md)
- [Circle Gateway Nanopayments vs Crossmint API + Docs MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-crossmint.md)
- [Circle Gateway Nanopayments vs FluxA AgentMarket](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-fluxa-agentmarket.md)
- [Circle Gateway Nanopayments vs Nevermined API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-nevermined.md)
- [Circle Gateway Nanopayments vs Payman Genie MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-payman.md)
- [Circle Gateway Nanopayments vs Stripe API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/circle-gateway-nanopayments-vs-stripe-mcp.md)
- [FluxA AgentMarket vs FluxA AI Wallet](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fluxa-agentmarket-vs-fluxa-ai-wallet.md)
- [FluxA AI Wallet vs Kite Agent Passport](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fluxa-ai-wallet-vs-kite-agent-passport.md)
- [FluxA AI Wallet vs Nevermined API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fluxa-ai-wallet-vs-nevermined.md)
- [FluxA AI Wallet vs Openfort](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fluxa-ai-wallet-vs-openfort.md)
- [FluxA AI Wallet vs Payman Genie MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fluxa-ai-wallet-vs-payman.md)
- [FluxA AI Wallet vs Privy Wallets (server wallets, agent wallets, policy engine)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fluxa-ai-wallet-vs-privy.md)
- [FluxA AI Wallet vs Sponge Wallet](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fluxa-ai-wallet-vs-sponge-wallet.md)
- [FluxA AI Wallet vs Turnkey Agentic Wallets](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fluxa-ai-wallet-vs-turnkey-agentic-wallets.md)
- [FluxA AI Wallet vs Agent Vault by Self](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fluxa-ai-wallet-vs-self-agent-vault.md)

---

Query this catalogue directly over MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (Streamable HTTP, no key). How: https://www.anchorterminal.com/agents/#mcp