# Chrome DevTools MCP vs Functionize MCP server (slim)

> Chrome DevTools MCP scores 75.4 (BB) to Functionize's 44.7 (E) for browser automation. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/chrome-devtools-mcp-vs-functionize-mcp.md (~2,950 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/chrome-devtools-mcp-vs-functionize-mcp.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/chrome-devtools-mcp-vs-functionize-mcp
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-25
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Chrome DevTools MCP scores 75.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Functionize MCP server's 44.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do browser automation.

- Chrome DevTools MCP: BB 75.4, rank #55 of 1210 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/chrome-devtools-mcp.min.md
- Functionize MCP server: E 44.7, rank #1031 of 1210 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/functionize-mcp.min.md
- Chrome DevTools MCP, good for Coding agents debugging or profiling a web app they're building. Ahead on Reliability, 83 against 50; Schema & documentation, 87 against 29; Agent ergonomics, 73 against 43; Security & auth, 63 against 56; Payments & pricing, 60 against 30; Maintenance & community, 93 against 49; Transparency & trust, 81 against 59. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; No key needed to call it; Runs on your own machine; Open source; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5.
- Functionize MCP server, good for Teams that use Functionize Studio and want a coding agent to request, run and diagnose end-to-end browser tests of web apps without driving a browser itself. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Free to start without a card.

| Category | Chrome DevTools MCP | Functionize MCP server |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 83 | 50 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 87 | 29 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 73 | 43 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 63 | 56 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 93 | 49 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 81 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Chrome DevTools MCP | Functionize MCP server |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Google (Chrome DevTools team) | Functionize, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://mcp.functionize.com/mcp` |
| Transports | stdio | Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | None | OAuth |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary hosted service under Functionize's Terms of Service (version 2.0, effective 10 July 2026). The Claude Code plugin and its two skills are MIT-licensed; the server's source isn't public |
| Tools exposed | 59 | 10 |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | `io.github.ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-08 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 |  |
| Customer content may train models | yes |  |
| Popularity | 49k stars, 1.5M npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | 2.8/5 (4) |