# Cherami vs Robotomail (slim)

> Robotomail scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against Cherami's 57.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cherami leads on agent ergonomics. Both do email inbox. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cherami-vs-robotomail.md (~1,950 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cherami-vs-robotomail.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cherami-vs-robotomail
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

Robotomail scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against Cherami's 57.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cherami leads on agent ergonomics. Both do email inbox.

- Cherami: C 57.6, rank #467 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cherami.min.md
- Robotomail: B 69.8, rank #148 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/robotomail.min.md
- Cherami, good for A single developer or small team giving an agent a free, separate address for low-volume recurring correspondence such as supplier replies, project updates and agent-to-agent handoffs. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 80 against 72.
- Robotomail, good for A developer who wants one mailbox per agent with replies as events, on a small fixed monthly price. Ahead on Reliability, 73 against 40; Schema & documentation, 90 against 85; Security & auth, 65 against 46; Maintenance & community, 77 against 64; Transparency & trust, 73 against 54.

| Category | Cherami | Robotomail |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 40 | 73 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 85 | 90 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 80 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 46 | 65 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 64 | 77 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 54 | 73 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Cherami | Robotomail |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Cherami | Tiny Bot Labs Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://cherami.to/mcp` | `https://api.robotomail.com/v1` |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Cherami's terms of use. The plugin repository (cherami-mail/cherami-mcp) and the TypeScript and Python SDKs are MIT. The MCP server's own source isn't public | Proprietary service under Robotomail's terms of service. The five SDKs on GitHub are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 39 | 6 |
| MCP registry | `io.github.cherami-mail/cherami-mcp` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-04 | 2026-09-25 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-07 | 2026-09-01 |
| Popularity | 119 npm/wk, 130 PyPI/wk | 20 npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | none |