# Cerebrium vs Together GPU Clusters (slim)

> Together GPU Clusters scores 58.1 (C) to Cerebrium's 52.5 (D) for gpu compute. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebrium-vs-together-gpu-clusters.md (~5,250 tokens) · this version ~2,930 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebrium-vs-together-gpu-clusters.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebrium-vs-together-gpu-clusters
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-07
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Together GPU Clusters scores 58.1 (C) on agent readiness against Cerebrium's 52.5 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cerebrium leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do gpu compute.

- Cerebrium: D 52.5, rank #989 of 1510 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cerebrium.min.md
- Together GPU Clusters: C 58.1, rank #768 of 1510 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/together-gpu-clusters.min.md
- Cerebrium, good for Teams serving their own models as real-time endpoints (voice, LLM, image) who want per-second billing, multi-region placement and a scriptable management API. Ahead on Reliability, 48 against 38; Payments & pricing, 30 against 20.
- Together GPU Clusters, good for Training, fine-tuning and batch jobs that need several 8-GPU nodes with InfiniBand, run by a pipeline that creates and deletes clusters. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 92 against 70; Agent ergonomics, 55 against 49; Security & auth, 68 against 60; Maintenance & community, 75 against 65.

| Category | Cerebrium | Together GPU Clusters |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 48 | 38 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 70 | 92 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 49 | 55 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 60 | 68 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 65 | 75 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 64 | 65 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Cerebrium | Together GPU Clusters |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Platform | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Cerebrium Inc. | Together AI |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://rest.cerebrium.ai` | `https://api.together.ai/v1/compute/clusters` |
| Transports | HTTP |  |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Cerebrium's terms of service. The CLI is MIT | Proprietary service under Together's terms of service. The Python SDK and CLI are Apache-2.0 and the OpenAPI document is MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-10-22 |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |

Why the edge:
- Schema & documentation, Together GPU Clusters +22: Cerebrium 70 (Public OpenAPI 3.0 spec for the management API with 94 operations on 73 paths. Deployed endpoints take whatever the owner's function defines (25). llms.txt and a .md twin of every docs page (10). Operation descriptions are one line each. The guides say when to use the protected tier, async runs or a custom runtime (12 of 20). Required fields are marked, but the spec has no enums (valid values such as member and billing sit in prose) and several arrays and objects are untyped (7 of 15). The guides carry many worked examples. The spec has no examples and documents only 400 and 401 errors with a `message` string (8 of 15). Paths are versioned v2, v3 and v4 and CLI releases are dated on GitHub, but the spec version is a fixed 1.0.0 and no platform changelog was found (8 of 15). Docs and spec per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November. 25 + 10 + 12 + 7 + 8 + 8 = 70.); Together GPU Clusters 92 (Public OpenAPI 3.1 for /v1/compute/clusters and shared volumes, MIT, embedded in every reference page (25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page (10). The docs say when to choose Kubernetes or Slurm and each capacity type, and the management page carries instructions for agents on reporting live availability and prices (18). Enums for cluster type, billing type, GPU type and status, required fields marked (13). CLI, Python, TypeScript and console steps on each task, with 402 and 403 cases documented, though no error catalogue for the clusters API (11). Versioned SDKs and a dated changelog with cluster entries (15). 25+10+18+13+11+15 = 92.)
- Reliability, Cerebrium +10: Cerebrium 48 (Graded as a hosted service. Status page at status.cerebrium.ai with 11 components and 90 days of history, per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November (cerebrium.ai's terms bar robots and automatic means) (20). The 8 October reading covered the window to that day. Since 6 August it held degradations of 5 hours 7 minutes on 19 August (US, upstream) and 7 hours 20 minutes on 2 September (EU, provider network), both partial; 9 October to 4 November is unread, so the line keeps its recorded award (10). No request rate limits found. Plans publish concurrency caps of 5 GPUs and 500 containers on Hobby and 30 and 1,000 on Standard (5 of 15). No 429 or backoff guidance for callers found. Webhook forwarding retries failed deliveries and the docs ask for idempotent webhook receivers, partly met, kept (3 of 15). No SLA found. The 99.9 and 99.999 per cent uptime figures on the site are claims without terms (0). Endpoints, the CLI and the REST API are GA, while multi-region deployment and checkpointing are marked beta (10). Docs and status per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November. 20 + 10 + 5 + 3 + 0 + 10 = 48.); Together GPU Clusters 38 (Read with the hosted lines. status.together.ai lists the website, the playground and serverless models with no component for GPU clusters, and a vendor page with no component for the product takes 15 in this run, as for Together's Code Sandbox and fine-tuning listings (15). No incident history for clusters can be read (5). No rate limits for the clusters API found (0). Together's docs give 429 and 503 backoff guidance for its APIs, per the inference listing's 1 November check, and the CLI has `--non-interactive` and `--json` for scripted retries, but creation has no idempotency key (8). No SLA for clusters found; the published 99% commitment covers provisioned inference throughput only (0). Generally available since 9 September 2025 and out of the CLI's beta paths since 22 October 2026, with preemptible nodes in preview (10). 15+5+0+8+0+10 = 38.)
- Payments & pricing, Cerebrium +10: Cerebrium 30 (No machine payment protocol (0). Per-second GPU, CPU and memory prices and the storage price are published without a login (20). The Hobby plan has no fee, but compute is billed from the first second, no free compute allowance is stated and the pricing page does not say whether a card is needed, partly met, kept (10 of 20). Signup and `cerebrium login` are browser flows (0). Pricing per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November. 0 + 20 + 10 + 0 = 30.); Together GPU Clusters 20 (No machine payment protocol (0). Per GPU-hour prices for each capacity type and per GiB-month storage published without a login (20). No free trial, and creation needs credit for the full reservation or a minimum on-demand period (0). Sign-up and credit purchase are browser steps (0). 0+20+0+0 = 20.)
- Maintenance & community, Together GPU Clusters +10: Cerebrium 65 (CLI v2.9.0 tagged on 16 September 2026, 49 days before the check, the newest tag in the repository; commits since (20 and 21 October, licence notices and a Go 1.26.10 upgrade) are untagged (20). Five tagged releases since 6 August 2026 (v2.5.4 on 7 August, v2.6.0, v2.7.0, v2.8.0, v2.9.0) (20). Closed service with a Discord community and Slack or Intercom support by plan. No platform changelog, and we couldn't read the GitHub issue tracker (8 of 25). The CLI ships on PyPI, Homebrew and as binaries. There is no language SDK (10 of 15). The repository has lint and test workflows and now pins Go 1.26.10. CI status wasn't visible in the clone (7 of 10). 20 + 20 + 8 + 10 + 7 = 65.); Together GPU Clusters 75 (Closed service. The newest cluster change is CLI and SDK 3.0 on 22 October 2026, 15 days before this check (30). Dated cluster entries in the 90 days from 8 August include 12, 18, 19, 24, 27 and 28 August, 10 September and 22 October (20). Dated changelog, a support portal and Discord, with responsiveness not tested (8). Python SDK 3.1 and TypeScript SDK 1.0 are current and cover clusters (15). SDK CI and dependencies weren't audited (2). 30+20+8+15+2 = 75.)
- Security & auth, Together GPU Clusters +8: Cerebrium 60 (Service account tokens expire after up to one year (or never, if set to 0), are limited to 1 to 50 named projects and are revoked by deleting the account. Inference API keys are separate and can be deleted. No per-action scopes, and the CLI's SECURITY.md says tokens sit in plaintext in a config file with mode 0644 (20 of 30). Users have owner, member and billing roles, but tokens have no read-only form, and `disable_auth` defaults to true, so deployed endpoints answer without a token unless the owner changes it (5 of 20). Runs the owner's code and returns its output (10). Docs readings per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November. Audit log of 22 actions with actor, IP address and outcome, in the dashboard and over the API, on Standard (7 days) and Enterprise (30 days) only (12 of 15). SOC 2 Type II announced on 8 July 2026, HIPAA BAA on request, a trust centre, and disclosure to security@cerebrium.ai. No security.txt and no bug bounty found (13 of 20). No advisory for cerebrium on OSV on 4 November. 20 + 5 + 10 + 12 + 13 = 60.); Together GPU Clusters 68 (Project-scoped API keys, revocable with optional expiry, read as Together's other listings read the same key model (30). Admin and editor roles with no read-only role. Only admins get the admin kubeconfig, which has cluster-admin rights, and OIDC lets editors use kubectl under RBAC. Deletes run without confirmation when `--non-interactive` is passed (8). The API returns cluster state, not third-party content (10). Invoices itemise reserved, on-demand and storage charges, and no audit log for cluster operations was found (5). security.txt with a HackerOne route, per the 1 November check of the inference listing (15). 30+8+10+5+15 = 68.)
- Agent ergonomics, Together GPU Clusters +6: Cerebrium 49 (No field selection. A `limit` parameter on five list operations, and app and run objects are small (12 of 25). The audit log and runs page with `limit` and `nextToken` and filter by status, status code and time, though other lists use `page`, `pageSize` or `offset` (14 of 20). Errors are a `message` string with 400 or 401. Deployed endpoints return 200, 401, 403, 404 or 5xx, and a function can set its own `status_code` (10 of 20). No idempotency keys. Async calls return a `run_id` that can be listed and cancelled (5 of 20). Defaults are sensible (`min_replicas` 0, `cooldown` 60) and `cerebrium init` writes a working config, but there is a CLI only and no language SDK (8 of 15). Docs per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November; the CLI clone confirms `--output json` on list commands since 10 August. 12 + 14 + 10 + 5 + 8 = 49.); Together GPU Clusters 55 (Cluster objects are compact, and `--json` gives machine-readable output, but list calls take no field selection (15). No pagination or filters on the clusters list (8). 402 and 403 with readable messages such as "Insufficient credits for cluster creation", and troubleshooting for common failures (12). Status polling until Ready is documented and deletes run non-interactively, but there is no idempotency key on creation and a duplicate create bills a second cluster (8). Official Python and TypeScript SDKs and a CLI, though a create takes GPU type, region, driver and CUDA versions, cluster type and billing type (12). 15+8+12+8+12 = 55.)