# Cartesia Ink vs IBM Watson Speech to Text

> Cartesia Ink scores 67 (B) to IBM Watson Speech to Text's 54.5 (C) for speech-to-text. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-ibm-watson-stt
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md (~6,000 tokens)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (the key docs and every listing in one file, at most 16 MB, about 4 million tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (the whole catalogue as tools, no key)
- DNS: dig +short TXT <slug>.grade.anchorterminal.com (the grade as a DNS TXT record, for a sandbox with no HTTP where names still resolve; also top., best.<category>. and <a>.vs.<b>. under the zone, and the same under grade.letme.dev)
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)
- Updated: 2026-11-07

Cartesia Ink scores 67 (B) on agent readiness against IBM Watson Speech to Text's 54.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. IBM Watson Speech to Text leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do speech-to-text.

- Cartesia Ink: grade B, 67/100, rank #341 of 1510. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cartesia-ink-stt.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/cartesia-ink-stt.json
- IBM Watson Speech to Text: grade C, 54.5/100, rank #910 of 1510. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ibm-watson-stt.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ibm-watson-stt.json
- Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/speech-to-text/index.md
- All 320 stt comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/speech-to-text/index.md

## Which one, for what

### Cartesia Ink (B)

Good for: Suited to voice agents that need turn detection and transcription from one model in English, French, Hindi, Japanese or Spanish, and to teams already using Cartesia text-to-speech.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 73 against 40
- Schema & documentation, 89 against 55
- Agent ergonomics, 74 against 66
- Maintenance & community, 84 against 33

Also in its favour:
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for: The terms let Cartesia train models on inputs and outputs unless otherwise agreed. Opting out is a form in the Playground's data controls

### IBM Watson Speech to Text (C)

Good for: Enterprises on IBM Cloud needing custom acoustic models, HIPAA on Premium and many locations.

Ahead on:
- Security & auth, 68 against 47
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
- Transparency & trust, 80 against 68

Watch for: No public OpenAPI file or llms.txt


## Why the edge

### Maintenance & community: Cartesia Ink +51

- Cartesia Ink (84): Read as a model, on the lines deepgram-stt, gladia-stt and cartesia-tts use for hosted speech models (recency 30, dated releases 10, deprecation notice 10, support 15, issues 10, SDKs 15, health 10). The `cartesia-mcp` server, which has a `speech_to_text` tool, released 0.28.1 on 30 October 2026 with a bug fix, after 0.27.0 (20 October) and 0.28.0 (27 October). The model page still dates `ink-2` and `ink-preview` 17 September 2026 (30). In the 90 days from 3 August the SDKs released 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.1.0 and 4.2.0 (14 August to 2 September) and the MCP server several releases, with changelog entries for August and September (10). The deprecations page gives dated sunsets, and Sonic-2, Sonic Turbo and `sonic-3-2025-10-27` were sunset after 20 October 2026, announced in the July changelog. No minimum notice period is stated and no Ink model has been retired, read as cartesia-tts is on the same page (5 of 10). The changelog has speech-to-text entries in May, June, July and September 2026, dated by month only, and no October entry (11 of 15). The Python SDK repository had 4 open issues on 9 October, per that check, not re-read on 1 November since GitHub's pages answered 403 (5 of 10). Official `cartesia` and `@cartesia/cartesia-js` SDKs at 4.2.0 (2 September 2026), generated for API version 2026-08-14 (15). CI workflows, release automation and lock files in both SDK repositories, with dependency updates merged on 23 October (8 of 10). 30 + 10 + 5 + 11 + 5 + 15 + 8 = 84.
- IBM Watson Speech to Text (33): Read as a model. The newest release note is 29 June 2026 (`parameter_set` for large speech models), 130 days ago (10). No dated entries in the 90 days from 8 August (0). Release notes, IBM support and a public docs repository last changed 30 June 2026 (8 of 15). Official SDKs, `ibm-watson` 11.2.0 on PyPI (26 January 2026) and 12.2.0 on npm (January 2026) (10 of 15). CI not read (5 of 10). Total 33.

### Schema & documentation: Cartesia Ink +34

- Cartesia Ink (89): Model reading. The docs index links an OpenAPI file (`latest.yml`) and AsyncAPI files for the WebSocket endpoints, and each reference page embeds its part of them (25). llms.txt with a Markdown twin of every page (10). The comparison page says which of the three endpoints to use and when, and the turn detection guide explains each event and threshold (18 of 20). The AsyncAPI definition has enums for `encoding` and `cartesia_version`, minimum and maximum values on the four turn settings and required fields marked. `model` is a plain string on the auto endpoint (13 of 15). Example scripts for each endpoint in Python and TypeScript and an errors page with nine codes. `model_sunsetted` appears on the deprecations page and not in that table, and the docs say a wrong `encoding` or `sample_rate` might not return an error (11 of 15). Dated API versions through the `Cartesia-Version` header and a changelog grouped by month with no day dates (12 of 15).
- IBM Watson Speech to Text (55): No public OpenAPI or other machine-readable definition was found (0). No llms.txt (0). The reference says which parameters each model family supports and the docs cover each feature (15 of 20). Typed parameters with defaults, ranges and enums (13 of 15). curl and SDK examples on every method, and errors with `error`, `code`, `code_description` and `warnings`, with invalid arguments reported as warnings (12 of 15). Versioned `/v1` paths and dated release notes back to 2015 (15). Total 55.

### Reliability: Cartesia Ink +33

- Cartesia Ink (73): Hosted reading. The status page at status.cartesia.ai (incident.io) lists Speech to Text as its own component in four regions (20). Its RSS feed, re-read on 1 November, now names each incident's components. In the 90 days from 3 August two incidents touch speech-to-text, both partial and read as minor, as this run reads one region or some requests. On 2 September some clients in the US regions saw connection errors that cleared on retry (Text to Speech and Speech to Text, US), and on 7 October customers in the US regions saw higher latency for some API requests, from 12:29 to about 18:23 (partial outage, Text to Speech, Speech to Text and Voice Cloning, US). The 3 September throttling named only Text to Speech in APAC, the 8 October errors only the Playground and Voice Agents, and the 15 October Playground outage says API services were unaffected. The 1 August API-wide incident has left the window. Minor only (20). Concurrency limits are published per plan, 8, 12, 20 and 60 concurrent STT requests, with a 3-minute idle timeout on sockets (15). Exceeding the limit returns 429 with the `concurrency_limited` code, and the SDKs retry 429 and 5xx twice with backoff on HTTP calls. No `Retry-After` header, backoff guidance or reconnection advice for a dropped socket was found (8 of 15). No SLA was found for any plan (0). `ink-2` is marked Stable on the model page re-read on 1 November, with `ink-preview` as the preview line (10). 20 + 20 + 15 + 8 + 0 + 10 = 73.
- IBM Watson Speech to Text (40): IBM Cloud has a status page at cloud.ibm.com/status, but it is drawn by script and showed no components or history to our reader, read as gemini-live's script-shell page was (10 of 20, and 5 for no readable history). Plus allows up to 100 concurrent transcription requests across WebSocket and HTTP (15). No 429 or backoff guidance was found in the API reference or the docs repository (0). No SLA was read for the service (0, unchecked). Next-generation and large speech models are GA, language by language (10). 10 + 5 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 40.

### Security & auth: IBM Watson Speech to Text +21

- Cartesia Ink (47): Model reading. Standard keys (`sk_car_...`) and admin keys are separate types that are not interchangeable, and a server can mint an access token with an `stt` grant that lasts at most one hour. That token travels in the `access_token` query parameter on WebSockets, the API key itself goes in a header, and no key limited to speech-to-text was found. The STT WebSocket definition, re-read on 1 November, lists `access_token` in the query as a security scheme. The checklist takes 10 off for a secret that can travel in a URL query string as a documented option, and this run takes the full 10 for short-lived OAuth tokens in `?access_token=` on every Google API listing, so the earlier 5 is brought into line (26, less 10, 16 of 30). The terms, last revised 14 June 2024, say inputs, outputs and interactions may be used to train models unless otherwise agreed, with an opt-out form in the Playground's data controls (5 of 20). Zero data retention covers STT audio and transcripts and is limited to the Enterprise plan. No retention period for other plans was found, and the DPA gives 180 days for deletion after termination (5 of 15). Credit usage and key metadata are readable through admin endpoints. No audit log was found (7 of 15). security.txt is valid until 3 October 2027 with a contact and a policy link to the trust centre. The docs and pricing page state SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA and PCI-DSS. The trust centre is drawn by script and was not read, and no bug bounty was found (14 of 20). 16 + 5 + 5 + 7 + 14 = 47.
- IBM Watson Speech to Text (68): Model reading of the checklist, with training and retention in place of the least-privilege and injection lines. IAM API keys per instance with Reader, Writer and Manager roles and short-lived bearer tokens (30). The WebSocket interface takes the token as an `access_token` query parameter, so 10 off (20 of 30). Request and response data are logged by default to improve the service, and any account can opt out per account or per request (10 of 20). Async results expire after a week by default (`results_ttl` shortens it), a delete method exists, and `DELETE /v1/user_data` removes data by customer ID (10 of 15). Activity Tracker events record changes to the service's state (10 of 15). Valid security.txt to 6 December 2026, PSIRT and HackerOne, HIPAA readiness on Premium. Certifications weren't read (18 of 20). Total 68.

### Transparency & trust: IBM Watson Speech to Text +12

- Cartesia Ink (68): The service is closed and the SDKs are Apache-2.0. The Terms of Service cover the website, its subdomains and APIs, were last revised on 14 June 2024, describe a platform for synthesised sound and never mention transcription (12 of 30). The terms and privacy policy agree that content may be used for training with an opt-out. The DPA says Cartesia will not retain or use customer personal data beyond performing the services, which sits uneasily with the training licence. No retention period is given outside zero data retention, and the privacy policy says the services are designed for users in the United States only while regional endpoints are sold in four other regions (12 of 30). A deprecations page with dated sunsets and a stated promise to preserve fields for a pinned `Cartesia-Version` (15 of 20). The DPA promises 30 days' notice of sub-processor changes to subscribers and points to a list in the trust centre, which we could not read. Regional deployments are named for Enterprise only (10 of 20).
- IBM Watson Speech to Text (80): Closed service under the IBM Cloud terms (15). The data security page states default logging for improvement with an opt-out, async retention, GDPR deletion by customer ID and plan-level separation, and they agree with each other. The DPA wasn't read (20 of 30). Previous-generation models carried a dated deprecation of 15 March 2022 and removal on 31 July 2023, and release notes say changes are compatible unless noted (18 of 20). Ten locations are named, with sub-processors not read (12 of 20). Total 65.

### Agent ergonomics: Cartesia Ink +8

- Cartesia Ink (74): API reading, as for the other speech-to-text listings. Turn events carry a cumulative transcript that is never revised, so an agent reads one `turn.end` a turn, and word timestamps are opt-in on the manual and batch endpoints (20 of 25). There is nothing to page through. Batch takes a file of any length without client chunking, keyterms steer vocabulary, and there is no diarisation or subtitle output (12 of 20). Errors are structured JSON with `error_code`, `title`, `message`, `request_id` and an optional `doc_url` on API version 2026-03-01 and later (17 of 20). Transcription holds no state to duplicate and the SDKs retry failed HTTP calls. A realtime session cannot be resumed, and nothing on reconnecting was found (12 of 20). Realtime needs `model`, `encoding`, `sample_rate` and the version, turn settings have documented defaults, and there are official Python and TypeScript SDKs. Realtime accepts raw PCM only (13 of 15).
- IBM Watson Speech to Text (66): API reading of the checklist. Timestamps, word confidence, alternatives and speaker labels are opt-in (15 of 25). Async jobs and custom models list, and async results can go to a callback URL (12 of 20). Structured errors and warnings an agent can act on (15 of 20). Async jobs take a `user_token`, results have a TTL, and jobs can be deleted, with no idempotency key (12 of 20). Most parameters are optional. Official SDKs including Python, Node and Swift, though the Python and Node SDKs last released in January 2026 (12 of 15). Total 66.

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Cartesia Ink | IBM Watson Speech to Text | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 73 | 40 | Cartesia Ink +33 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 89 | 55 | Cartesia Ink +34 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 74 | 66 | Cartesia Ink +8 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 47 | 68 | IBM Watson Speech to Text +21 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 35 | 40 | IBM Watson Speech to Text +5 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 84 | 33 | Cartesia Ink +51 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 68 | 80 | IBM Watson Speech to Text +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **67 · B** | **54.5 · C** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Cartesia Ink | IBM Watson Speech to Text |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Model API | Model API |
| Vendor | Cartesia | IBM |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.cartesia.ai` | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, websocket, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, websocket |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Cartesia Terms of Service. The Python and JavaScript SDKs are Apache-2.0 | none |
| Tools exposed | none | 0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-06-29 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-06-14 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-06-14 | 2026-08-25 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 134 stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |

## What the same task costs

| Task | Cartesia Ink | IBM Watson Speech to Text |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Transcribe a one-hour meeting | $0.07 to $0.54 | $0.60 to $1.20 |

## How the scores have moved

### Cartesia Ink

- -1.0 on 1 November 2026: correction
- +0.1 on 27 October 2026: checklist

### IBM Watson Speech to Text

No score change since it was listed.

## Verdicts

**Cartesia Ink.** Ink 2 streams transcripts with turn detection built into the model, documented by an AsyncAPI file with typed ranges and structured errors. The terms, last revised 14 June 2024, let Cartesia train on inputs and outputs unless the customer opts out, and zero data retention is an Enterprise setting. Ink 2 has no batch endpoint and no diarisation.

**IBM Watson Speech to Text.** Watson STT covers sync, async and WebSocket transcription in ten locations, with custom models, $0.02 a minute on Plus and 500 free minutes. There is no machine-readable spec or readable status history, requests are logged for improvement unless opted out, the WebSocket token goes in the URL, and the last release note is from June 2026.

## Before you call either

### Cartesia Ink

1. Use `wss://api.cartesia.ai/stt/turns/websocket` with `model=ink-2`, `encoding`, `sample_rate` and `cartesia_version=2026-08-14`. All four are required.
2. Send raw mono audio in chunks of about 100 ms at the speed it was spoken. Pushing a whole file into the socket can return an internal server error.
3. Read the final text from `turn.end` only. `transcript` is cumulative within a turn, so joining `turn.update` events duplicates text.
4. Send `{"type": "close"}` after the last audio and keep reading until the server closes the socket, or the buffered tail is lost.
5. Check `encoding` and `sample_rate` against the source before sending. The docs say the server might not return an error when they are wrong.

### IBM Watson Speech to Text

1. Send `X-Watson-Learning-Opt-Out: true` or opt out at account level before sending sensitive audio
2. Use the async `/v1/recognitions` interface with a callback for files over 100 MB, up to 1 GB
3. Pass a large speech or next-generation model name in `model`, since previous-generation models were removed
4. Tag requests with `X-Watson-Metadata: customer_id=...` so the data can be deleted later
5. Keep within 100 concurrent requests on Plus across HTTP and WebSocket

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Cartesia Ink or IBM Watson Speech to Text?

Cartesia Ink scores 67 (B) on agent readiness against IBM Watson Speech to Text's 54.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. IBM Watson Speech to Text leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.

### Do Cartesia Ink and IBM Watson Speech to Text need an API key?

Both need an API key.

### Can an agent call Cartesia Ink and IBM Watson Speech to Text without installing anything?

Cartesia Ink has a hosted endpoint at https://api.cartesia.ai. No hosted endpoint is listed for IBM Watson Speech to Text.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-ibm-watson-stt.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-ibm-watson-stt.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "cartesia-ink-stt", "b": "ibm-watson-stt"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare cartesia-ink-stt ibm-watson-stt`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/cartesia-ink-stt.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ibm-watson-stt.json

## Other comparisons with Cartesia Ink or IBM Watson Speech to Text

- [Amazon Transcribe vs Cartesia Ink](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-transcribe-vs-cartesia-ink-stt.md)
- [Amazon Transcribe vs IBM Watson Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-transcribe-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md)
- [AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs Cartesia Ink](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/assemblyai-stt-vs-cartesia-ink-stt.md)
- [AssemblyAI Speech-to-Text (Universal) vs IBM Watson Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/assemblyai-stt-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md)
- [Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs Cartesia Ink](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-speech-to-text-vs-cartesia-ink-stt.md)
- [Azure AI Speech speech-to-text vs IBM Watson Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-speech-to-text-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-deepgram-stt.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-elevenlabs-scribe.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Giggy Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-giggy-stt.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-gladia-stt.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Google Cloud Speech-to-Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-google-speech-to-text.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Groq Speech-to-Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-groq-speech-to-text.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Inworld STT](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-inworld-stt.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs MiniMax Speech-to-Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-minimax-stt.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-mistral-voxtral-transcribe.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs OpenAI Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-openai-speech-to-text.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Rev AI Speech-to-Text API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-rev-ai-stt.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Smallest.ai Pulse STT](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-smallest-pulse-stt.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Soniox Speech-to-Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-soniox-stt.md)
- [Cartesia Ink vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-speechmatics-stt.md)
- [Deepgram Speech-to-Text (Nova-3, Flux) vs IBM Watson Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepgram-stt-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md)
- [ElevenLabs Scribe Speech to Text API vs IBM Watson Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elevenlabs-scribe-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md)
- [Giggy Speech to Text vs IBM Watson Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/giggy-stt-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md)
- [Gladia Speech-to-Text API + MCP vs IBM Watson Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gladia-stt-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md)
- [Google Cloud Speech-to-Text vs IBM Watson Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-speech-to-text-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md)
- [Groq Speech-to-Text vs IBM Watson Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-speech-to-text-vs-ibm-watson-stt.md)
- [IBM Watson Speech to Text vs Inworld STT](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ibm-watson-stt-vs-inworld-stt.md)
- [IBM Watson Speech to Text vs MiniMax Speech-to-Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ibm-watson-stt-vs-minimax-stt.md)
- [IBM Watson Speech to Text vs Mistral Voxtral Transcribe](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ibm-watson-stt-vs-mistral-voxtral-transcribe.md)
- [IBM Watson Speech to Text vs OpenAI Speech to Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ibm-watson-stt-vs-openai-speech-to-text.md)
- [IBM Watson Speech to Text vs Rev AI Speech-to-Text API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ibm-watson-stt-vs-rev-ai-stt.md)
- [IBM Watson Speech to Text vs Smallest.ai Pulse STT](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ibm-watson-stt-vs-smallest-pulse-stt.md)
- [IBM Watson Speech to Text vs Soniox Speech-to-Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ibm-watson-stt-vs-soniox-stt.md)
- [IBM Watson Speech to Text vs Speechmatics Speech-to-Text](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ibm-watson-stt-vs-speechmatics-stt.md)

---

Query this catalogue directly over MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (Streamable HTTP, no key). How: https://www.anchorterminal.com/agents/#mcp
