# Cartesia Ink vs Groq Speech-to-Text (slim)

> Groq Speech-to-Text scores 71.8 (BB) to Cartesia Ink's 67.9 (B) for speech-to-text. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-groq-speech-to-text.md (~2,850 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-groq-speech-to-text.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cartesia-ink-stt-vs-groq-speech-to-text
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Groq Speech-to-Text scores 71.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Cartesia Ink's 67.9 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cartesia Ink leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do speech-to-text.

- Cartesia Ink: B 67.9, rank #238 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/cartesia-ink-stt.min.md
- Groq Speech-to-Text: BB 71.8, rank #117 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/groq-speech-to-text.min.md
- Cartesia Ink, good for Suited to voice agents that need turn detection and transcription from one model in English, French, Hindi, Japanese or Spanish, and to teams already using Cartesia text-to-speech. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 89 against 58; Maintenance & community, 85 against 68.
- Groq Speech-to-Text, good for Suited to cheap, fast transcription of recorded files in many languages, and to agents that already hold a Groq key or use an OpenAI-compatible client. Ahead on Reliability, 90 against 73; Security & auth, 79 against 52; Payments & pricing, 40 against 35; Transparency & trust, 85 against 67. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Free to start without a card.

| Category | Cartesia Ink | Groq Speech-to-Text |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 73 | 90 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 89 | 58 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 74 | 75 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 52 | 79 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 85 | 68 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 67 | 85 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Cartesia Ink | Groq Speech-to-Text |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Cartesia | Groq |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.cartesia.ai` | `https://api.groq.com/openai/v1` |
| Transports | HTTP, websocket, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under the Cartesia Terms of Service. The Python and JavaScript SDKs are Apache-2.0 | Proprietary hosted service under the Groq Services Agreement. The SDKs are Apache-2.0 and the Whisper weights are published by OpenAI on Hugging Face |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-08-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-06-14 | 2026-06-22 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-06-14 | 2025-11-12 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 134 stars | 621 stars |