# Carbon-X vs occamy-1.0 (slim)

> Carbon-X and occamy-1.0 score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/carbon-x-vs-occamy-1-0.md (~5,750 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/carbon-x-vs-occamy-1-0.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/carbon-x-vs-occamy-1-0
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-23
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Carbon-X and occamy-1.0 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). occamy-1.0 leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Carbon-X: C 61, rank #38 of 107 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/carbon-x.min.md
- occamy-1.0: C 61, rank #54 of 107 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/occamy-1-0.min.md
- Carbon-X, good for Agents that need a second opinion on DNA variants and regulatory regions on a 16 to 24 GB machine, without sending sequences to a hosted model. Ahead on Reach, 90 against 85; Risk, 65 against 55.
- occamy-1.0, good for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac. Ahead on Agent interface, 70 against 35.

| Category | Carbon-X | occamy-1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 65 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 35 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 77 | 74 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Carbon-X | occamy-1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Hugging Face (HuggingFaceBio) | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Last release | 2026-10-22 | 2026-10-02 |