# Caddy vs Orbits (slim) > Caddy scores 16.7 (F) to Orbits's 15.6 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/caddy-app-vs-orbits.md (~3,200 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/caddy-app-vs-orbits.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/caddy-app-vs-orbits - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13 Caddy scores 16.7 (F) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Orbits leads on reliability. Both do assistants reached by message. - Caddy: F 16.7, rank #996 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/caddy-app.min.md - Orbits: F 15.6, rank #997 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/orbits.min.md - Caddy, good for People who want a free assistant in iMessage or RCS that watches mail, calendars and work tools and asks before acting. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 30 against 20; Transparency & trust, 52 against 43. - Orbits, good for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email. Ahead on Reliability, 15 against 10. | Category | Caddy | Orbits | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 10 | 15 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 10 | 10 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 | | Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 0 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 20 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 55 | 54 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 52 | 43 | | Fact (where they differ) | Caddy | Orbits | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Caddy Technologies Inc. | Nemus AI, Inc. | | Pricing | Free | Paid | | Licence | Closed service under Caddy's Terms of Service (Caddy Technologies Inc., last updated 27 April 2026). | Closed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.). | | Read-only variant documented | yes | no |