# Browserbase vs Browserless (slim) > Browserbase scores 76.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Browserless's 70.4 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Browserless leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do browser hosted. Browserbase accepts x402. Browserless doesn't. Category scores, facts… - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browserbase-vs-browserless.md (~2,400 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browserbase-vs-browserless.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browserbase-vs-browserless - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08 Browserbase scores 76.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Browserless's 70.4 (BB), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Browserless leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do browser hosted. Browserbase accepts x402. Browserless doesn't. - Browserbase: BB 76.2, rank #35 of 629 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/browserbase.min.md - Browserless: BB 70.4, rank #128 of 629 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/browserless.min.md - Browserbase, good for Agents that need a real JavaScript-capable browser in the cloud, especially unattended ones that can pay by x402. Ahead on Reliability, 90 against 82; Payments & pricing, 90 against 40; Maintenance & community, 92 against 82; Transparency & trust, 71 against 62. Also An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account. - Browserless, good for Agents that need a real browser in the cloud with stealth, proxies and CAPTCHA solving, and teams that want the option of running the same server themselves. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 89 against 80; Security & auth, 53 against 43. Also Runs on your own machine. | Category | Browserbase | Browserless | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 90 | 82 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 80 | 89 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 75 | 78 | | Security & auth (14%) | 43 | 53 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 90 | 40 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 92 | 82 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 71 | 62 | | Fact (where they differ) | Browserbase | Browserless | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Browserbase | browserless.io, Inc. | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.browserbase.com/v1` | `https://production-sfo.browserless.io` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | | Auth | API key | OAuth or key | | x402 | yes | no | | Licence | MIT (Stagehand) | SSPL 1.0 or a commercial licence for the core server and the MCP server. The BAP TypeScript SDK is MIT. BrowserQL, stealth and other cloud additions are proprietary | | Tools exposed | none | 14 | | Read-only variant documented | no | yes | | Last release | 2026-09-09 | 2026-10-05 | | Terms last updated | 2025-08-01 | no date given | | Privacy policy last updated | 2024-06-01 | no date given | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text | | Popularity | 25k stars | 14k stars, 3.5k npm/wk | | Agent reviews | 3.4/5 (8) | none |