# BrowserAct vs Jina Reader (slim)

> Jina Reader scores 51.9 (D) to BrowserAct's 44.4 (E) for scraping. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browseract-vs-jina-reader.md (~5,100 tokens) · this version ~2,480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browseract-vs-jina-reader.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browseract-vs-jina-reader
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-07
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Jina Reader scores 51.9 (D) on agent readiness against BrowserAct's 44.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. BrowserAct leads on security & auth and maintenance & community. Both do scraping.

- BrowserAct: E 44.4, rank #1204 of 1486 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/browseract.min.md
- Jina Reader: D 51.9, rank #999 of 1486 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/jina-reader.min.md
- BrowserAct, good for Teams that want no-code, prompt-built scrapers an agent can rerun on a schedule. Ahead on Security & auth, 41 against 32; Maintenance & community, 61 against 45. Also No incidents deducted, where Jina Reader loses 7 points for them.
- Jina Reader, good for Agents that read the web a page at a time and want to bound the tokens. Ahead on Reliability, 70 against 23; Agent ergonomics, 80 against 49; Payments & pricing, 35 against 25; Transparency & trust, 62 against 44. Also Open source.

| Category | BrowserAct | Jina Reader |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 23 | 70 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 76 | 77 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 49 | 80 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 41 | 32 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 25 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 61 | 45 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 44 | 62 |

| Fact (where they differ) | BrowserAct | Jina Reader |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Hongkong Ziniao Technology Co., Limited | Jina AI (Elastic) |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.browseract.com/mcp/` | `https://r.jina.ai/` |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| Licence | none | Apache-2.0 |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-05 | 2026-10-23 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-05-15 | 2026-05-04 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-05-15 | 2026-09-07 |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 12k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (2) |

Why the edge:
- Reliability, Jina Reader +47: BrowserAct 23 (Hosted reading. No status page found (0) and no readable incident history (5). The docs say there are no rate limits, and give concurrency by plan (2 free, up to 20 for paid API users) and a 7-hour task cap (8). No 429 or retry guidance, and no idempotency keys on task creation (0). No SLA (0). No beta label on the API or MCP server (10). 0 + 5 + 8 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 23.); Jina Reader 70 (Atlassian Statuspage at status.jina.ai with automated incidents per service (per the 1 October check, not re-read on 5 November because Jina's terms bar automated extraction from its website) (20). On 1 October the feed reached back only to 15 September 2026. In that window r.jina.ai had no incidents and s.jina.ai had eight five-minute ones. Minor only, less 5 for the short window. The rest of the 90 days couldn't be read, so the recorded award is carried (15 of 30). Rate limits published, Reader 20 a minute without a key, 500 with a key and 5,000 premium, Search 100 and 1,000, and the API reference repeats the keyed figures (15). Jina's merged OpenAPI file (docs.jina.ai/openapi.json), published on 14 October 2026 and linked from the API reference, read from the jina-ai/meta-prompt repository that builds the docs, types the 429 answer for Reader as `RateLimitTriggeredError` with `retryAfter` seconds and a `retryAfterDate`. No backoff guidance, and Reader takes no writes (10). No SLA found (0). GA (10).)
- Agent ergonomics, Jina Reader +31: BrowserAct 49 (Graded on the API, since the MCP tool list isn't published. Task results come back whole, with no field selection found (10). Lists of bots, templates and tasks are paginated (15). Errors carry numeric codes with documented meanings for a few cases (12). No idempotency key on task creation; webhooks and a status endpoint avoid polling loops (5). No official SDK in two languages; the CLI is Python (7). 10 + 15 + 12 + 5 + 7 = 49.); Jina Reader 80 (`x-max-tokens` truncates and `x-token-budget` rejects oversized pages, `x-target-selector` returns one element, and images, links and media can be dropped or reduced to text (25). Semantic chunking, link and image summaries and presets for agent, research and index use (20). The OpenAPI file gives each status a typed error body with an application status code and a readable message, and the 429 body carries `retryAfter`. No per-error recovery guidance (12 of 20). Reads are GETs and safe to retry, with a cache and `x-no-cache` to bypass it. The MCP tools carry no readOnly or destructive hints (13 of 20). No required options beyond the URL, but no official SDK, only HTTP and the MCP server (10 of 15).)
- Transparency & trust, Jina Reader +18: BrowserAct 44 (Closed service with published terms naming the operating company and governing law (15). The privacy policy of 15 May 2025 states retention by category and that crawled data is kept per plan and deletable by the user (15). No deprecation policy or notices found (0). No sub-processors or data locations named (3). 15 + 15 + 0 + 3 = 33.); Jina Reader 62 (The Reader repository is the Apache-2.0 open-source branch of the code behind r.jina.ai and s.jina.ai, minus the storage layer (25 of 30). The Reader page says requests are never used for training, and the terms say Jina doesn't store input or output, per the 1 October check, not re-read on 5 November because Jina's terms bar automated extraction from its website. The README gives a 3,600-second cache lifetime against the page's 5 minutes, and the privacy statement is Elastic's generic one (15 of 30). A dated notice for the Elastic licence change on 10 August 2026, but nine MCP tools went in one release with no notice (5 of 20). The API reference says eu.r.jina.ai and eu.s.jina.ai keep all processing inside the EU. No subprocessor list or default data location found (5 of 20).)
- Maintenance & community, BrowserAct +16: BrowserAct 61 (browser-act-cli 1.6.2 on 5 November 2026, read from PyPI's release feed (30). Six CLI releases from 15 October to 5 November (20). A closed service with a support address, but no public changelog or issue tracker found (8). No official SDKs and no entry in the official MCP registry (0). The CLI package carries no licence or repository in its metadata (3). 30 + 20 + 8 + 0 + 3 = 61.); Jina Reader 45 (The API reference Jina builds in the jina-ai/meta-prompt repository records dated changes to Reader's published interface since it first appeared on 14 October, with /echo paths added on 21 October and the `webBotAuth` parameter and Web Bot Auth paths on 23 October 2026, the newest dated API change. The MCP server's last version, 1.10.0, is dated 18 September (30). The MCP versions 1.5.0 to 1.10.0 between 11 August and 18 September are untagged bumps in package.json with no changelog, and the 14 and 15 October MCP commits carry no version, so none count as releases. The reference changes carry no version or changelog entry either (0). 22 open Reader issues on 1 October, including the two SSRF reports from June and a token-usage spike from April, with no fix in the repository, not re-read because the issue pages refuse us (5 of 25). No official SDK, the MCP server is the maintained client (5 of 15). Reader has CI workflows, the MCP repository has none (5 of 10).)
- Payments & pricing, Jina Reader +10: BrowserAct 25 (No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices and credit costs per bot build, run and workflow step are public, but there is no direct per-call price (15). A free plan with 200 credits; whether it needs a card isn't stated (10). A person signs up and creates the key in the dashboard (0). 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 25.); Jina Reader 35 (No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Billed in tokens with no price in any currency on the Reader page, which points to a separate table, per the 1 October check, not re-read on 5 November because Jina's terms bar automated extraction from its website (0). Reader works without a key and a new key comes with 10 million free tokens, no card (20). An agent can read pages with no signup at 20 a minute, but Search needs a key (15 of 20).)
- Security & auth, BrowserAct +9: BrowserAct 41 (One account-wide API key type, revocable and listed with last-used time, but without scopes or expiry (18). Confirmation Required mode holds purchases and asset creation or deletion for approval in the BrowserAct page (14). Scraped pages are untrusted, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (3). Keys show last use and runs keep logs (6). No security page, disclosure policy, certification or bug bounty found (0). 18 + 14 + 3 + 6 + 0 = 41.); Jina Reader 32 (One Bearer key per account, revocable, no scopes, shared with Search, Embeddings and Reranker, and Reader also runs with no key at all (20). No write actions on Reader, and the MCP server filters tools with `include_tags` and `exclude_tools` (12 of 20). Every response is third-party page content and we found no prompt-injection guidance. `x-detach-invisibles` drops hidden elements, but it isn't described as a defence (0 of 15). No per-request log found (0 of 15). No security.txt, the privacy statement is Elastic's, and two SSRF reports (#1252 and #1253, 12 June 2026) sat open as public issues on 1 October with no reply we could see. The Reader repository still has no commit after 22 May 2026, and the issue pages couldn't be re-read (0 of 20).)