# Browser Use vs Pomerado (slim)

> Browser Use scores 80.2 (A) to Pomerado's 62.6 (B) for browser automation. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browser-use-vs-pomerado.md (~2,850 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browser-use-vs-pomerado.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/browser-use-vs-pomerado
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-17
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on

Browser Use scores 80.2 (A) on agent readiness against Pomerado's 62.6 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Pomerado leads on agent ergonomics. Both do browser automation. Browser Use accepts x402. Pomerado doesn't.

- Browser Use: A 80.2, rank #7 of 1133 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/browser-use.min.md
- Pomerado: B 62.6, rank #468 of 1133 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pomerado.min.md
- Browser Use, good for An agent that wants to hand a whole browser task to a hosted agent and get a result back, or that needs a low-cost cloud browser over CDP, and for unattended agents that can pay by x402. Ahead on Reliability, 87 against 40; Payments & pricing, 90 against 42; Transparency & trust, 65 against 54. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account; Runs on your own machine.
- Pomerado, good for An agent that repeats the same task on consumer sites or portals, such as flight searches, carts or order history, and wants a typed call instead of driving a browser. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 83 against 78.

| Category | Browser Use | Pomerado |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 87 | 40 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 86 | 86 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 78 | 83 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 69 | 69 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 90 | 42 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 81 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 65 | 54 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Browser Use | Pomerado |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | Browser Use | Pomerado AI, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.browser-use.com/api/v4` | `https://mcp.pomerado.ai/mcp` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | yes | no |
| Licence | MIT for the open-source library and the SDK. Browser Use Cloud is a proprietary service under Browser Use's terms of service | Pomerado Cloud is a proprietary service under Pomerado's terms of service. The minting core in Pomerado/pomerado and the `pomerado` npm package are MIT from version 0.2.0, and versions 0.1.2 and earlier were AGPL-3.0-only |
| Tools exposed | 7 | 14 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| MCP registry | `com.browser-use/browser-use` | `ai.pomerado/pomerado` |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-15 |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given |  |
| Customer content may train models | yes |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |  |
| Popularity | 117k stars, 107k npm/wk, 2.1M PyPI/wk | 37k npm/wk |