# Brevo API + MCP vs Postmark API + MCP > Postmark API + MCP has a score of 66.7 (B) against Brevo API + MCP's 45.2 (E). Both do email send. The largest gap is security & auth, 18 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-postmark - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-postmark.md (~1,500 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-postmark.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-postmark.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 Postmark API + MCP has a score of 66.7 (B) against Brevo API + MCP's 45.2 (E). Both do email send. The largest gap is security & auth, 18 points. - Brevo API + MCP: grade E, 45.2/100, rank #403 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/brevo.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/brevo.json - Postmark API + MCP: grade B, 66.7/100, rank #158 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/postmark.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/postmark.json ## Which one, for what Pick Brevo API + MCP for maintenance & community (+18). Pick Postmark API + MCP for reliability (+5), agent ergonomics (+14), security & auth (+18), payments & pricing (+10), transparency & trust (+9). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Brevo API + MCP | Postmark API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 55 | 60 | Postmark API + MCP +5 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 83 | 81 | Brevo API + MCP +2 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 65 | 79 | Postmark API + MCP +14 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 45 | 63 | Postmark API + MCP +18 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 40 | Postmark API + MCP +10 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 83 | 65 | Brevo API + MCP +18 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 71 | 80 | Postmark API + MCP +9 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -15 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **45.2 · E** | **66.7 · B** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Brevo API + MCP | Postmark API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Brevo | Postmark (ActiveCampaign) | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.brevo.com/v3` | `https://api.postmarkapp.com` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio | | Auth | API key | API key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | none | MIT | | Tools exposed | none | 24 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | not listed | | Last release | 2026-08-10 | 2026-08-12 | | Popularity | 122 stars, 410k npm/wk, 65k PyPI/wk | 57 stars, 1.3M npm/wk | | Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Brevo API + MCP.** POST /v3/smtp/email allows 1,000 requests a second on every plan. Eight 'multiple services' full outages on the status page since July. **Postmark API + MCP.** 24 MCP tools, all with readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint, and descriptions that point to alternatives. No OpenAPI spec and no published request-rate limit. ## Before you call either ### Brevo API + MCP 1. Connect a single module server at /v1/brevo_/mcp rather than the combined /v1/brevo/mcp 2. Send with POST /v3/smtp/email and the `api-key` header, not Bearer 3. Use webhooks for delivery events. GET /v3/smtp/emails allows 2 requests a second 4. Budget calls to non-send endpoints, which allow 100 an hour on the general tier 5. Wait for account approval before counting on the free plan's 300 a day ### Postmark API + MCP 1. Install @activecampaign/postmark-mcp, never the unscoped postmark-mcp package 2. Use the token `POSTMARK_API_TEST` to check a payload without sending 3. Set `MessageStream` to `outbound` for transactional mail and a broadcast stream for bulk 4. Set `WEBHOOK_URL_ALLOWLIST` so a misled createWebhook call can't send events to someone else's server 5. Keep `count + offset` under 10,000 on message and bounce searches ## Other comparisons with Brevo API + MCP or Postmark API + MCP - [Amazon SES vs Brevo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-ses-vs-brevo.md) - [Amazon SES vs Postmark API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-ses-vs-postmark.md) - [Brevo API + MCP vs Loops API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-loops.md) - [Brevo API + MCP vs Mailgun API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-mailgun.md) - [Brevo API + MCP vs Mailjet API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-mailjet.md) - [Brevo API + MCP vs Resend API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-resend.md) - [Brevo API + MCP vs Twilio SendGrid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-sendgrid.md) - [Brevo API + MCP vs SMTP2GO API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brevo-vs-smtp2go.md) - [Loops API + MCP vs Postmark API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/loops-vs-postmark.md) - [Mailgun API + MCP vs Postmark API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mailgun-vs-postmark.md) - [Mailjet API + MCP vs Postmark API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mailjet-vs-postmark.md) - [Postmark API + MCP vs Resend API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postmark-vs-resend.md) - [Postmark API + MCP vs Twilio SendGrid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postmark-vs-sendgrid.md) - [Postmark API + MCP vs SMTP2GO API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/postmark-vs-smtp2go.md)