# Brea vs Orbits (slim)

> Orbits scores 15.6 (F) to Brea's 12.9 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brea-vs-orbits.md (~3,150 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brea-vs-orbits.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brea-vs-orbits
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13

Orbits scores 15.6 (F) on agent readiness against Brea's 12.9 (F), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. Brea leads on security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do assistants reached by message.

- Brea: F 12.9, rank #1001 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/brea.min.md
- Orbits: F 15.6, rank #997 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/orbits.min.md
- Brea, good for An iPhone user who wants an assistant across many apps and websites with per-action approval. Ahead on Security & auth, 7 against 0; Transparency & trust, 48 against 43. Also Free to start without a card.
- Orbits, good for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email. Ahead on Maintenance & community, 54 against 4.

| Category | Brea | Orbits |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 15 | 15 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 10 | 10 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 7 | 0 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 4 | 54 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 48 | 43 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Brea | Orbits |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Brea AI LLC | Nemus AI, Inc. |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Licence | Closed service under Brea's terms (Brea AI LLC, last updated 2 July 2026). | Closed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.). |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-13 |