# Brea vs folk (slim)

> folk scores 19.8 (F) to Brea's 12.9 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brea-vs-folk-nozomio.md (~3,150 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brea-vs-folk-nozomio.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/brea-vs-folk-nozomio
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13

folk scores 19.8 (F) on agent readiness against Brea's 12.9 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message.

- Brea: F 12.9, rank #1001 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/brea.min.md
- folk: F 19.8, rank #993 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/folk-nozomio.min.md
- Brea, good for An iPhone user who wants an assistant across many apps and websites with per-action approval.
- folk, good for People who want a texting companion for habits, workouts, study and money goals, with a free tier. Ahead on Reliability, 25 against 15; Payments & pricing, 30 against 20; Maintenance & community, 35 against 4; Transparency & trust, 67 against 48.

| Category | Brea | folk |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 15 | 25 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 10 | 10 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 7 | 3 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 4 | 35 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 48 | 67 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Brea | folk |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Brea AI LLC | Nozomio, Inc. |
| Licence | Closed service under Brea's terms (Brea AI LLC, last updated 2 July 2026). | Closed service under folk's terms (Nozomio, Inc., last updated 8 September 2026). |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-12 |