# Braintrust API + MCP vs LangSmith API + MCP > LangSmith API + MCP has a score of 71.3 (BB) against Braintrust API + MCP's 61.3 (C). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is reliability, 20 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-langsmith - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-langsmith.md (~1,750 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-langsmith.min.md (~330 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-langsmith.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-04 LangSmith API + MCP has a score of 71.3 (BB) against Braintrust API + MCP's 61.3 (C). Both do obs traces. The largest gap is reliability, 20 points. - Braintrust API + MCP: grade C, 61.3/100, rank #229 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/braintrust.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/braintrust.json - LangSmith API + MCP: grade BB, 71.3/100, rank #85 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/langsmith.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/langsmith.json ## Which one, for what Pick Braintrust API + MCP for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more). Pick LangSmith API + MCP for reliability (+20), agent ergonomics (+10), security & auth (+19), transparency & trust (+10). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Braintrust API + MCP | LangSmith API + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 61 | 81 | LangSmith API + MCP +20 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 85 | 86 | LangSmith API + MCP +1 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 66 | 76 | LangSmith API + MCP +10 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 58 | 77 | LangSmith API + MCP +19 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 40 | even | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 85 | 85 | even | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 68 | 78 | LangSmith API + MCP +10 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -4 | | | **Total** | | **61.3 · C** | **71.3 · BB** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Braintrust API + MCP | LangSmith API + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Braintrust | LangChain | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.braintrust.dev/v1` | `https://api.smith.langchain.com` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Apache-2.0 (SDKs only, platform closed source) | MIT (SDK only, platform closed source) | | Tools exposed | 42 | none | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | yes | yes | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | `io.github.braintrustdata/braintrust` | not listed | | Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-30 | | Popularity | 2M npm/wk, 1.7M PyPI/wk | 1.1k stars, 7.6M npm/wk, 17.8M PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Braintrust API + MCP.** OpenAPI 3.0.3 spec with 75 paths, 429 and `Retry-After` declared on 154 operations. Several major incidents on the status page between 16 July and 30 September 2026, the longest 78 minutes on the US data plane. **LangSmith API + MCP.** Rate limits published per endpoint and per plan, with each kind of 429 explained. Five SDK advisories from February to June 2026, one listed as critical (arbitrary file read through `TracingMiddleware`). ## Before you call either ### Braintrust API + MCP 1. Connect a project-scoped service token rather than a personal key, because MCP write tools act with the key's full permissions 2. Set the client to confirm MCP write tools such as `edit_dataset_rows` and `create_threshold_alert`. The server has no read-only mode 3. Cache `sql_query` results. Starter and Pro allow about 20 queries a minute and return 429 4. Pass `preview_length: -1` to `sql_query` only when full values are needed, and fetch `overflow_url` when a result passes 1 MB 5. Upgrade to Python `braintrust` 0.28.0 or TypeScript 3.23.1 or later and rotate any provider keys traced before July 2026 ### LangSmith API + MCP 1. Batch run reads. `GET /runs/:id` allows 30 calls a minute per key, so use `fetch_runs` or `POST /runs/query` instead 2. Pass `trace_id` or `min_start_time` to `fetch_runs` and keep `limit` low. Results page by a 25,000-character budget 3. Don't call `create_dataset` or `run_experiment` over MCP to make changes. They return how-to text, not results 4. Send `X-Api-Key` and point at the regional host (eu., apac. or aws.api.smith.langchain.com) that matches the workspace 5. Move off the v1 runs query and retrieve endpoints before their 31 January 2027 sunset ## Other comparisons with Braintrust API + MCP or LangSmith API + MCP - [Arize Phoenix vs Braintrust API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-braintrust.md) - [Arize Phoenix vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/arize-phoenix-vs-langsmith.md) - [Baserun vs Braintrust API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserun-vs-braintrust.md) - [Baserun vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/baserun-vs-langsmith.md) - [Braintrust API + MCP vs Galileo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-galileo.md) - [Braintrust API + MCP vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-helicone.md) - [Braintrust API + MCP vs HoneyHive](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-honeyhive.md) - [Braintrust API + MCP vs Laminar API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-laminar.md) - [Braintrust API + MCP vs Langfuse API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-langfuse.md) - [Braintrust API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/braintrust-vs-respan.md) - [Galileo API + MCP vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/galileo-vs-langsmith.md) - [Helicone AI Gateway + MCP vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/helicone-vs-langsmith.md) - [HoneyHive vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/honeyhive-vs-langsmith.md) - [Laminar API + MCP vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/laminar-vs-langsmith.md) - [Langfuse API + MCP vs LangSmith API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/langfuse-vs-langsmith.md) - [LangSmith API + MCP vs Respan API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/langsmith-vs-respan.md)