# Booking.com Demand API vs LetsFG > LetsFG has a score of 64.2 (B) against Booking.com Demand API's 38.1 (E). Both do travel stays. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 60 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/booking-demand-api-vs-letsfg - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/booking-demand-api-vs-letsfg.md (~1,500 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/booking-demand-api-vs-letsfg.min.md (~380 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/booking-demand-api-vs-letsfg.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-05 LetsFG has a score of 64.2 (B) against Booking.com Demand API's 38.1 (E). Both do travel stays. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 60 points. - Booking.com Demand API: grade E, 38.1/100, rank #431 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/booking-demand-api.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/booking-demand-api.json - LetsFG: grade B, 64.2/100, rank #189 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/letsfg.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/letsfg.json ## Which one, for what Pick Booking.com Demand API for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more). Pick LetsFG for reliability (+22), schema & documentation (+26), agent ergonomics (+30), security & auth (+30), payments & pricing (+60), maintenance & community (+60), transparency & trust (+18). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Booking.com Demand API | LetsFG | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 33 | 55 | LetsFG +22 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 57 | 83 | LetsFG +26 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 53 | 83 | LetsFG +30 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 36 | 66 | LetsFG +30 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 5 | 65 | LetsFG +60 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 28 | 88 | LetsFG +60 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 49 | 67 | LetsFG +18 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -7 | | | **Total** | | **38.1 · E** | **64.2 · B** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Booking.com Demand API | LetsFG | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Booking.com | LetsFG | | Hosted endpoint | `https://demandapi-sandbox.booking.com/3.2` | `https://letsfg.co/developers/api/v1` | | Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | | Auth | API key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Your plan | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | none | MIT | | Tools exposed | none | 24 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | no | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.LetsFG/letsfg` | | Last release | none | 2026-09-14 | | Popularity | none | 2.1k stars, 157 npm/wk, 260 PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 1.5/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Booking.com Demand API.** Search, look and book plus order management on Booking.com's accommodation inventory. Managed Affiliate Partner status required; no self-serve key. **LetsFG.** Hosted MCP with OAuth 2.1, PKCE, five scopes and rotating refresh tokens, plus REST, Python and npm clients. Tickets are bought by a LetsFG booking agent after the hold, 4 to 11 minutes per the docs, and bookings can pause with questions. ## Before you call either ### Booking.com Demand API 1. Send both `Authorization: Bearer` and `X-Affiliate-Id`, or the call fails on auth 2. Stay under 50 requests a minute in the sandbox and back off exponentially on 429 3. Only accommodation flows book in the sandbox; cars and attractions won't 4. Store the key at creation, it's never shown again 5. Use filters and pagination on search to keep payloads small ### LetsFG 1. Start on `/v1/sandbox/` with no key; the booking states, questions and timings match production 2. After `book_flight`, poll `get_flight_booking` every 20 to 30 seconds and answer questions before `expires_at_ms`; an unanswered price change fails the booking and releases the hold 3. Honour `retry_after_seconds` on a 429. Over MCP the limit is 10 searches per 10 minutes and 100 a day, and early retries lengthen the pause 4. Fetch results with `get_flight_results` and the `search_id` rather than searching again, which spends allowance 5. Send the same `idempotency_key` when retrying a booking after a timeout 6. Treat a 410 as a retired route and read the replacement path in its body ## Other comparisons with Booking.com Demand API or LetsFG - [Booking.com Demand API vs Duffel Flights and Stays API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/booking-demand-api-vs-duffel.md) - [Booking.com Demand API vs Expedia Group Rapid API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/booking-demand-api-vs-expedia-rapid.md) - [Booking.com Demand API vs Hotelbeds Hotel Booking API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/booking-demand-api-vs-hotelbeds.md) - [Booking.com Demand API vs LiteAPI (Nuitee Connect)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/booking-demand-api-vs-liteapi.md) - [Expedia Group Rapid API vs LetsFG](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/expedia-rapid-vs-letsfg.md) - [Hotelbeds Hotel Booking API vs LetsFG](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hotelbeds-vs-letsfg.md) - [Duffel Flights and Stays API vs LetsFG](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/duffel-vs-letsfg.md) - [FlightClaw vs LetsFG](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flightclaw-vs-letsfg.md) - [LetsFG vs LiteAPI (Nuitee Connect)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letsfg-vs-liteapi.md) - [Booking.com Demand API vs FlightClaw](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/booking-demand-api-vs-flightclaw.md)