# Boba vs Zapia (slim)

> Zapia scores 17.3 (F) to Boba's 10.3 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-zapia.md (~3,100 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-zapia.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-zapia
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13

Zapia scores 17.3 (F) on agent readiness against Boba's 10.3 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message.

- Boba: F 10.3, rank #1004 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/boba.min.md
- Zapia: F 17.3, rank #995 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/zapia.min.md
- Boba, good for Groups who want a free assistant inside a shared chat for planning, drafting and images. Also Free to start without a card.
- Zapia, good for Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking users who want an assistant over their mail, calendar, Drive and WhatsApp in an app. Ahead on Maintenance & community, 56 against 2; Transparency & trust, 59 against 39.

| Category | Boba | Zapia |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 15 | 15 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 0 | 0 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 3 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 2 | 56 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 39 | 59 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Boba | Zapia |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | humans& ai, inc. | Brainlogic AI S.A.S. |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | Closed service under Boba's Terms of Service (humans& ai, inc., last updated 5 October 2026). | Closed service under Zapia's terms and conditions (Brainlogic AI SAS). No date was found on the terms. |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-12 |