# Boba vs Tab (slim) > Tab and Boba score within a point of each other for assistants reached by message, 10.7 and 10.3 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-tab-bot.md (~3,100 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-tab-bot.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-tab-bot - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13 Tab and Boba score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 10.7 (F) and 10.3 (F). Boba leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do assistants reached by message. - Boba: F 10.3, rank #1004 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/boba.min.md - Tab: F 10.7, rank #1003 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tab-bot.min.md - Boba, good for Groups who want a free assistant inside a shared chat for planning, drafting and images. Ahead on Reliability, 15 against 5; Payments & pricing, 30 against 0. Also Free to start without a card. - Tab, good for A person who wants a texting assistant that browses, calls and buys with tight checkout controls. Ahead on Maintenance & community, 58 against 2; Transparency & trust, 45 against 39. | Category | Boba | Tab | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 15 | 5 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 0 | 0 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 | | Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 4 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 0 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 2 | 58 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 39 | 45 | | Fact (where they differ) | Boba | Tab | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | humans& ai, inc. | Terrasoft, Inc. | | Pricing | Free | Paid | | Licence | Closed service under Boba's Terms of Service (humans& ai, inc., last updated 5 October 2026). | Closed service under Tab's Terms of Use (Terrasoft, Inc., effective 2 September 2026). |