# Boba vs OpenInstinct (slim) > OpenInstinct scores 21.8 (F) to Boba's 10.3 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-openinstinct.md (~3,350 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-openinstinct.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-openinstinct - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13 OpenInstinct scores 21.8 (F) on agent readiness against Boba's 10.3 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message. - Boba: F 10.3, rank #1004 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/boba.min.md - OpenInstinct: F 21.8, rank #988 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openinstinct.min.md - Boba, good for Groups who want a free assistant inside a shared chat for planning, drafting and images. Also Free to start without a card. - OpenInstinct, good for Developers comfortable running their own iMessage assistant on Vercel with a browser agent and Link wallet. Ahead on Reliability, 33 against 15; Payments & pricing, 50 against 30; Maintenance & community, 66 against 2; Transparency & trust, 59 against 39. Also Open source. | Category | Boba | OpenInstinct | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 15 | 33 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 0 | 0 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 | | Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 0 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 50 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 2 | 66 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 39 | 59 | | Fact (where they differ) | Boba | OpenInstinct | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | humans& ai, inc. | Merit Systems, Inc. | | Licence | Closed service under Boba's Terms of Service (humans& ai, inc., last updated 5 October 2026). | MIT (Copyright 2026 Merit Systems, Inc.). | | Last release | none | 2026-10-05 |