# Boba vs Brea (slim)

> Brea scores 12.9 (F) to Boba's 10.3 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-brea.md (~3,050 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-brea.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/boba-vs-brea
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13

Brea scores 12.9 (F) on agent readiness against Boba's 10.3 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Boba leads on payments & pricing. Both do assistants reached by message.

- Boba: F 10.3, rank #1004 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/boba.min.md
- Brea: F 12.9, rank #1001 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/brea.min.md
- Boba, good for Groups who want a free assistant inside a shared chat for planning, drafting and images. Ahead on Payments & pricing, 30 against 20.
- Brea, good for An iPhone user who wants an assistant across many apps and websites with per-action approval. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 10 against 0; Security & auth, 7 against 0; Transparency & trust, 48 against 39.

| Category | Boba | Brea |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 15 | 15 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 0 | 10 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 7 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 2 | 4 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 39 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Boba | Brea |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | humans& ai, inc. | Brea AI LLC |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | Closed service under Boba's Terms of Service (humans& ai, inc., last updated 5 October 2026). | Closed service under Brea's terms (Brea AI LLC, last updated 2 July 2026). |
| llms.txt | no | yes |