{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "blockrun-ai", "name": "BlockRun.AI", "vendor": "BlockRun, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://blockrun.ai", "kind": "mcp", "category": "inference", "summary": "Model and API gateway with an OpenAI-compatible interface, MCP support and per-request stablecoin payments through x402.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/blockrun-ai", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/blockrun-ai.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/blockrun-ai.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/blockrun-ai.json", "dns": "blockrun-ai.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/BlockRunAI/blockrun-llm", "license": "MIT", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "blockrun-llm" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@blockrun/llm" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@blockrun/mcp" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "Either an API key backed by prepaid card credit (user.blockrun.ai) or a non-custodial wallet signing x402 USDC payments (Base mainnet at https://blockrun.ai/api, Solana at https://sol.blockrun.ai/api, testnets available).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "Per-token LLM pricing by model, billed at zero platform margin since 2026-08-08, plus a flat $0.001 network fee per wallet call on Base (the account rail and the Solana gateway charge no fee). Pay-per-call GPT-6 quotes scale the output share with reasoning effort since 2026-10-10. Web search $0.08 flat per call since 2026-09-29; images, video and data endpoints priced per call; seven free models per the site's menu on 1 November. Decisions is free with an API key on api.blockrun.ai and isn't sold over x402. Failed calls (400, 402, 429, 5xx) aren't charged. x402 in USDC on Base, Solana or Arc (https://blockrun.ai/docs/resources/changelog; https://blockrun.ai/docs/api-reference/errors; https://github.com/BlockRunAI/blockrun-mcp).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "yes", "evidence": "Core business model: x402 v2 micropayments in USDC (ERC-20 on Base mainnet, SPL on Solana) per request; the '~$0.002/call' figure could NOT be verified for LLM inference, which is per-token; $0.002 appears only for trading-market/stock data endpoints (https://github.com/BlockRunAI/blockrun-llm; https://github.com/BlockRunAI/awesome-blockrun)", "endpoints": [ { "url": "https://blockrun.ai/api/v1/chat/completions", "priceUsd": null, "network": "eip155:8453" } ] }, "toolCount": 19, "popularity": { "githubStars": 5, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": 679, "asOf": "2026-09-26" }, "docsUrl": "https://github.com/BlockRunAI/awesome-blockrun", "llmsTxt": "https://blockrun.ai/llms.txt", "openapi": "https://blockrun.ai/api/openapi", "registryName": "io.github.BlockRunAI/blockrun-mcp", "capabilities": [ "inference.llm", "web.search", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "x402", "inference", "openai-compatible" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-28", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 78.9, "grade": "A", "agentReady": true, "rank": 14, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1350, "categoryRank": 2, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 88, "maintenance": 85, "payments": 100, "reliability": 65, "schema": 90, "security": 61, "transparency": 73 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-01" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "x402 v2 on its own gateway lets an agent create a wallet and pay per call in USDC on Base, Solana or Arc with no sign-up, and every MCP tool carries a safety annotation. Since 21 October 2026 prompts sent through the Base and Arc gateways are stored with no fixed expiry, and the status page keeps no incident history.", "bestFor": "Agents that must start and pay with no human sign-up, and builders testing x402 against a real inference gateway.", "strengths": [ "x402 v2 on its own gateway, USDC on Base, Solana and Arc, with no account needed", "Every one of the 19 MCP tools carries readOnlyHint or destructiveHint, trades need `confirm:true`, and a read-only Polymarket tool is separate", "`--profile` cuts the tool definitions from 14,416 tokens to as few as 2,155", "400, 402, 429 and 5xx responses aren't charged, and payment settles only after a successful upstream response", "40 registry releases between 3 August and 28 October 2026, with a detailed changelog" ], "weaknesses": [ "Since 21 October 2026 prompts and completions sent through the Base, Arc and API gateways are stored with no fixed expiry", "The status page shows live checks only and keeps no incident history, and the terms commit to no uptime", "Models are removed on the day, with no notice period, and the terms let providers withdraw a model at any time", "No subprocessor list, data locations or prompt-injection guidance", "The wallet key controls the whole balance and sits in a local file or environment variable" ], "agentNotes": [ "Fund a dedicated wallet with a small USDC balance. The balance is the spending cap", "Use the Solana gateway when prompts must not be stored. Base and Arc keep request content with no fixed expiry", "Start the server with `--profile` for the job (chat, research, media or trading) to cut the tool definitions", "Set `BLOCKRUN_CONFIRM_SPEND=on` to approve each paid call. It's off by default", "Call `blockrun_models` before hard-coding a model name, since models are removed without notice" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 2, "avgRating": 3.5, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "A", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 78.9 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 88, "maintenance": 85, "payments": 100, "reliability": 65, "schema": 90, "security": 61, "transparency": 63 }, "provenanceScore": 82, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-01", "maintenance": "2026-11-01", "payments": "2026-11-01", "reliability": "2026-11-01", "schema": "2026-11-01", "security": "2026-11-01", "transparency": "2026-11-01" }, "last": "2026-11-01", "lastMoved": "2026-11-01", "oldest": "2026-11-01", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "claudeCode": "claude mcp add blockrun -- npx -y @blockrun/mcp", "config": { "mcpServers": { "blockrun": { "args": [ "-y", "@blockrun/mcp" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "BLOCKRUN_WALLET_KEY": "${BLOCKRUN_WALLET_KEY}" } } } }, "x402": "curl -s -i https://blockrun.ai/api/v1/chat/completions -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{\"model\":\"\u003cmodel\u003e\",\"messages\":[{\"role\":\"user\",\"content\":\"hi\"}]}'\n# 402 Payment Required -\u003e PAYMENT-REQUIRED header -\u003e retry with PAYMENT-SIGNATURE" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/inference.llm", "tool": "https://letme.dev/blockrun-ai" }, "area": "models", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "BlockRun, Inc.", "domain": "blockrun.ai", "domainRegistered": "2025-10-06", "domainNote": "The terms and privacy policy, both updated 2026-10-21, name BlockRun, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as contracting party and data controller. No founders or street address are published. The domain was registered on 2025-10-06. The status page is self-hosted and keeps no incident history. security.txt, read on 1 November 2026, has an email contact, a policy link and an Expires date of 2027-11-01.", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "https://blockrun.ai/terms", "privacy": "https://blockrun.ai/privacy", "statusPage": "https://blockrun.ai/status", "changelog": "https://blockrun.ai/docs/resources/changelog", "securityTxt": "valid", "checked": "2026-11-01", "score": 82 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/blockrun-ai.json", "live": { "slug": "blockrun-ai", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://blockrun.ai/status", "indicator": "unknown", "summary": "no machine-readable status found", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T23:55:08.626145506Z" }, "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "BlockRunAI/blockrun-llm", "version": "v1.21.3", "released": "2026-10-27", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:03:16.146922114Z" }, { "registry": "mcp-registry", "name": "io.github.BlockRunAI/blockrun-mcp", "version": "0.55.3", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T17:11:44.552009456Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@blockrun/llm", "version": "3.26.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:03:13.934404843Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@blockrun/mcp", "version": "0.55.4", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:03:14.807140528Z" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "blockrun-llm", "version": "1.21.3", "released": "2026-10-27", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:03:13.694723113Z" } ], "githubStars": 5, "npmWeekly": 2128, "pypiWeekly": 441, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://blockrun.ai/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "valid", "expires": "2027-11-04T15:54:44.012Z", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:43.818620672Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://blockrun.ai/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:22:13.275860881Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "blockrun.ai", "registered": "2025-10-06", "source": "https://rdap.identitydigital.services/rdap/domain/blockrun.ai", "checkedAt": "2026-11-01T14:22:13.538847185Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://blockrun.ai/changelog", "kind": "changelog", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-10-01T13:11:21.906696649Z", "changedAt": "2026-09-30T13:09:43.712367412Z", "fingerprint": "658ca7fbc8ce" }, { "url": "https://blockrun.ai/docs/resources/changelog", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T08:15:45.154924039Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-04T08:15:45.154924039Z", "fingerprint": "ef66e5bf0f48" }, { "url": "https://blockrun.ai/privacy", "kind": "privacy", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T08:15:47.884913832Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-04T08:15:47.884913832Z", "fingerprint": "2599b4fbd469" }, { "url": "https://blockrun.ai/terms", "kind": "terms", "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T08:15:49.47875826Z", "changedAt": "2026-11-04T08:15:49.47875826Z", "fingerprint": "8d6098f13c87" } ], "github": { "repo": "blockrunai/blockrun-llm", "checkedAt": "2026-11-02T08:35:58.65218286Z", "stars": 5, "archived": false, "issuesEnabled": true, "pushedAt": "2026-10-27T15:57:32Z", "openIssues": 0, "openPRs": 0, "issuesOpened90d": 2, "issuesClosed90d": 2, "prsMerged90d": 46, "ci": { "branch": "main", "runs": 50, "success": 48, "failure": 2, "other": 0, "latest": "success", "latestAt": "2026-10-27T06:44:13Z" }, "replies": { "sampled": 6, "unanswered": 0, "medianDays": 0.4 } }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T23:55:08.626145506Z" } }, "answer": "BlockRun.AI scores 78.9 (A) on agent readiness against SWE-2 Flash's 36.4 (F), and leads in every scored category.", "b": { "slug": "swe-2-flash", "name": "SWE-2 Flash", "vendor": "Cognition AI, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://cognition.com/blog/swe-2-flash", "kind": "model", "category": "inference", "summary": "SWE-2 Flash is Cognition's small, fast coding model, mid-trained and reinforcement-trained from Thinking Machines' Inkling-Small (276B total, 12B active parameters). It runs inside Devin Desktop and Devin CLI, with no model API of its own and no public weights.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/swe-2-flash", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/swe-2-flash.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/swe-2-flash.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/swe-2-flash.json", "dns": "swe-2-flash.grade.anchorterminal.com", "license": "Proprietary model, used through Devin Desktop and Devin CLI under Cognition's Platform Terms of Service. The weights are not public; Cognition says it is building a programme to share them with industry partners and researchers", "transports": [], "packages": [], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "No model API or key of its own. A person signs in to Devin Desktop, or runs `devin auth login` for Devin CLI, through a browser (enterprise users through their identity provider). The CLI then keeps an API token in credentials.toml that by default is persistent and does not expire, and the docs warn that anyone with the file can authenticate as that user. Enterprise admins choose which models a team may use with a model allowlist.", "pricing": "freemium", "pricingNotes": "Free in Devin Desktop and Devin CLI through 30 November 2026, per the launch post. Afterwards it is billed against the plan's daily and weekly quota, then extra usage at API pricing. The post says one-fifth the price of SWE-2, whose list price is $3.00 input, $0.30 cached input and $15.00 output per million tokens, but no SWE-2 Flash figure is published: the docs' cost table loads in the browser and the models pages don't list it yet (checked 2026-11-04). Plans are Free $0, Pro $20 a month, Max $200 a month and Teams $80 a month plus $40 per full seat. The docs say Free tier users only have SWE-1.6, so whether Free reaches SWE-2 Flash is unconfirmed.", "priceSummary": "Freemium", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No model endpoint to pay. No x402, MPP or L402 on the Devin pricing page, the Devin Desktop models page or the launch post (checked 2026-11-04).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-04" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.devin.ai/desktop/models", "llmsTxt": "https://docs.devin.ai/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "inference.llm" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "model", "closed-source", "coding", "moe", "cli", "desktop-app", "llms-txt", "status-page", "soc2", "iso27001", "sla", "freemium", "new" ], "lastRelease": "2026-11-04", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 36.4, "grade": "F", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1243, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1350, "categoryRank": 33, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 10, "maintenance": 53, "payments": 20, "reliability": 50, "schema": 29, "security": 53, "transparency": 64 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-11-04" }, "negative": -2, "negativeNotes": [ "The launch post says 'On leading evals, SWE-2 Flash outperforms all American open-weight models'. The post's own table, a first-hand source, gives Meta's Muse Spark Open (American, open weights, released 15 October 2026) 54.0 on SWE-Atlas QA against SWE-2 Flash's 50.0, and Meta's own figure for Muse Spark Open is 58. A 'surpasses' claim a first-hand source shows false is a deduction of 2 (research/new-2026-11-04-ripple-swe2/NEWLIST.md, rule 4). The case against: SWE-2 Flash leads every other row it shares with the American open-weight models in the table, and DeepSWE 1.1 is 60.1 to 60.0, so 'on leading evals' can be read as overall. Proposed for the founder to confirm at landing, as xiaomi-ocr-0's was" ], "verdict": "A new small coding model from Cognition that anyone can try free in Devin Desktop and Devin CLI until 30 November 2026, with strong vendor-reported coding scores. It has no model API, no published per-token price, context length or model card, and no public weights, so an agent can reach it only by driving Devin's own CLI.", "bestFor": "People already using Devin Desktop or Devin CLI who want a cheaper, faster model for routine coding work such as automations, reviews and small changes, while it is free in November 2026.", "strengths": [ "Free in Devin Desktop and Devin CLI through 30 November 2026, and selectable per run with `devin --model` or `/model`", "Cognition reports large gains over its base model, Terminal-Bench 4.0 from 0.9 to 20.0 and FrontierCode 2.0 from 3.2 to 24.0, with the full benchmark table in the post", "Runs inside Devin CLI's sandbox, permissions and hooks, and enterprise admins can allow or block it per team", "Cognition holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and publishes an SLA for contracts that include one", "Status page with a Desktop Agent component, and in the 90 days to 4 November no incident names Desktop or the CLI, only a scheduled extension marketplace maintenance on 7 August" ], "weaknesses": [ "No model API, OpenAPI entry or model card. The Devin API's session agents list SWE-2 but not SWE-2 Flash", "No per-token price, context length, output limit or reasoning settings published for it, and the docs' models pages don't list it yet", "The weights are withheld for now, with a partner and researcher programme promised but not yet described", "Customer data may be used for model training by default on self-serve plans, with the opt-out on paid plans only", "The CLI's login token is persistent and doesn't expire by default, and no rate limit figures or retry guidance are published" ], "agentNotes": [ "There is no endpoint to call. Run Devin CLI single-turn with `devin -p` and pick the model with `--model`; the SWE-2 Flash model ID isn't documented yet, so check `/model` in the CLI first", "Don't rely on the short name `swe`. The docs say it resolves to the latest model in the family, which may be SWE-2 rather than SWE-2 Flash", "Plan for billing to start on 1 December 2026. The free period covers Devin Desktop and CLI only, not Devin cloud sessions", "Treat Cognition's benchmark figures as the vendor's. No independent result for SWE-2 Flash was found", "Keep `credentials.toml` private. The token in it doesn't expire by default and carries the signed-in user's access" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "F", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 36.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 10, "maintenance": 53, "payments": 20, "reliability": 50, "schema": 29, "security": 53, "transparency": 56 }, "provenanceScore": 72, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-04", "maintenance": "2026-11-04", "payments": "2026-11-04", "reliability": "2026-11-04", "schema": "2026-11-04", "security": "2026-11-04", "transparency": "2026-11-04" }, "last": "2026-11-04", "oldest": "2026-11-04", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "Install Devin CLI or Devin Desktop from https://devin.ai/download, sign in with `devin auth login`, then choose SWE-2 Flash with `/model`" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/inference.llm", "tool": "https://letme.dev/swe-2-flash" }, "area": "models", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Cognition AI, Inc.", "domain": "cognition.com", "domainRegistered": "", "domainNote": "Not looked up: RDAP isn't requested under the 1 November 2026 rules. The product runs on devin.ai, registered 2022-12-06 per the devin listing's RDAP check of 8 October 2026.", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://cognition.com/legal/platform-terms-of-service", "privacy": "https://cognition.com/legal/privacy-policy", "statusPage": "https://www.devinstatus.com", "changelog": "https://docs.devin.ai/release-notes/overview", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-04", "notes": [ "The launch post is on cognition.com, signed by the Cognition Team, and the Devin docs, pricing page and status page link the same company. The platform terms (30 June 2026) name Cognition AI, Inc.", "The website terms of use (13 May 2024) and platform terms were read for automated-access limits and have none. cognition.com's robots.txt disallows only /downloads/, devin.ai's only /top-secret and /assets/downloads/, docs.devin.ai's /cdn-cgi/ and /_next/ (with Content-Signal ai-input=yes), and www.devinstatus.com's /api/ and /embed/.", "security.txt is none per the devin listing's 8 October check, not re-read. The docs give a security address for vulnerability reports.", "No SWE-2 Flash entry in the Devin release notes, whose newest is 2 November 2026." ], "score": 72 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/swe-2-flash.json", "live": { "slug": "swe-2-flash", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://www.devinstatus.com", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-11-05T01:27:53.220664573Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-05T01:27:53.220664573Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 80, "category": "payments", "leads": "blockrun-ai", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "x402 v2 on its own gateway, USDC on Base and Solana, and since MCP 0.55.0 (28 October) on Circle's Arc through arc.blockrun.ai (40). Per-token prices per model published without a login, plus a flat $0.001 fee per wallet call on Base (20). Seven free models per the status page's menu, no card or sign-up, and a wallet costs nothing to create (20). An agent can create its own wallet and pay per request with no human sign-up (20). 40 + 20 + 20 + 20 = 100.", "b": "Published rubric. No payment protocol (0). Plan prices are public, but no per-token price for SWE-2 Flash is on a readable page; the docs' cost table loads in the browser and the post gives only 'one-fifth the price' of SWE-2 (10). Free through 30 November 2026 on Devin Desktop and CLI, but the docs say Free tier users only have SWE-1.6, so whether the Free plan reaches it, and without a card, isn't confirmed; the in-between value used on the devin listing (10). A person signs in through a browser (0). 0 + 10 + 10 + 0 = 20." }, "scores": { "a": 100, "b": 20 } }, { "by": 78, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "blockrun-ai", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "MCP reading. 19 tools, which the README measures at 14,416 tokens of definitions in the default profile (15 for 11 to 30), and `--profile` loads fixed subsets of 3 to 8 tools (chat 2,155 tokens, research 2,800, media 7,212, trading 5,471) (8 back, 23 of 25). Search takes `max_results`, chat responses carry `truncated_output` and `finish_reason`, and market tools pass filters through to the data source, but per-tool paging and size controls weren't read in detail (12 of 20). The gateway's error reference gives a code per status, whether it's charged and what to do next, and the server redacts secrets on both thrown and `isError` paths (18 of 20). Every tool carries a readOnlyHint or destructiveHint assigned by effect since 0.33.0, with a test that fails on an unannotated tool. Payment settles only after a successful upstream response, and since 0.54.2 a withdrawal that may have moved money is never signed twice (20). Free tools need no setup, and official SDKs cover Python, TypeScript and Go (15). 23 + 12 + 18 + 20 + 15 = 88.", "b": "Model reading (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs). Tool use is Devin's harness, not something a caller configures; no context length, output limit or cache price is published for SWE-2 Flash (5 of 25). No documented output-size or reasoning controls for this model; SWE-2's effort levels aren't stated for Flash (0 of 20). No model-level error documentation (0 of 20). No idempotency or retry guidance (0 of 20). One flag or picker selects it and `devin -p` runs a single turn and prints to stdout, but there is no SDK or direct endpoint (5 of 15). 5 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 10." }, "scores": { "a": 88, "b": 10 } }, { "by": 61, "category": "schema", "leads": "blockrun-ai", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "MCP reading. All 19 tools take zod input schemas, which the MCP SDK turns into JSON Schema, per the 1 October read of the source (25, was 10 for the gateway's OpenAPI document, which robots.txt still keeps our reader out of under /api/). llms.txt served at blockrun.ai/llms.txt (10). The tool descriptions state purpose and order of use, such as 'discover markets ... with blockrun_markets first' and 'Run action:\"setup\" FIRST', per the 1 October check (15 of 20). Enums and numeric bounds, but seven fields across six tools take a free-form `z.any()` JSON body, per the 1 October check (10 of 15). The docs have an error reference with codes per status and recovery steps, and the README has examples for each client (15). A dated gateway changelog, last entry 25 October 2026, and a CHANGELOG.md in the MCP repository through 0.55.0 (15). 25 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 15 + 15 = 90.", "b": "Model reading. No model API, so no OpenAPI entry; the Devin v3 OpenAPI file lists SWE-2 agents only, and no model card was found (0). docs.devin.ai serves llms.txt and Markdown copies of every page (10). The launch post says what it is for (automations, code review, feature development, documentation) and the CLI docs say when to pick a SWE model, but the models pages don't list SWE-2 Flash yet (6 of 20). No documented model ID, reasoning settings, context or output limits to type (0 of 15). The CLI pages show `--model` and `/model` examples, with no model-specific errors (3 of 15). Named, dated model versions on Cognition's blog and public release notes, but no release note for SWE-2 Flash yet; the newest is 2 November (10 of 15). 0 + 10 + 6 + 0 + 3 + 10 = 29." }, "scores": { "a": 90, "b": 29 } }, { "by": 32, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "blockrun-ai", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "MCP reading. @blockrun/mcp 0.55.0 published to the official MCP registry on 28 October 2026, and a gateway changelog entry on 25 October (30). 40 registry versions from 0.35.0 on 3 August to 0.55.0 (20). Issue replies couldn't be read, as GitHub's issue pages answered 403; the changelog credits numbered reports fixed within releases (10 of 25). Listed in the official MCP registry as io.github.BlockRunAI/blockrun-mcp, a GitHub-verified namespace, active, with 0.55.0 marked latest (15). CI on Node 20.19 and 22 with typecheck and tests on every pull request, and a Renovate configuration in the repository (10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 10 = 85.", "b": "Model reading. Released 4 November 2026 (30). Churn and notice in place of release counts: SWE-1.6, SWE-1.7, SWE-1.7 Lightning, SWE-2 (10 September) and now SWE-2 Flash in a few months, with no model deprecation notice period found and short names that move to the newest model (10 of 20). Public release notes and a support address, no public tracker (10 of 25). No official SDK for the model (0 of 15). The docs are kept current but don't yet cover this model (3 of 10). 30 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 3 = 53." }, "scores": { "a": 85, "b": 53 } }, { "by": 15, "category": "reliability", "leads": "blockrun-ai", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Read with the local-software lines, as the listing's kind is `mcp` and the owner runs the server over stdio, though every paid call lands on BlockRun's gateway (the reading assymetrix-mcp and copilot-studio-mcp get). The 1 October check read it as a router. Installs from the official npm package `@blockrun/mcp` with Node 20.19 or later stated in `engines` (20). The CI workflow runs typecheck, build and tests on Node 20.19 and 22 on every push and pull request, with a required gate job. Run results weren't readable, as GitHub's pages answered 403 (20 of 25). Open issues couldn't be read. The changelog names numbered reports fixed in releases, such as #176 and #177 in 0.54.3 and 0.54.4 (10 of 25). Semver numbering with breaking changes marked BREAKING in CHANGELOG.md and shipped as minor bumps, as its own entries say (15). Version 0.55.0, pre-1.0 (0). 20 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 0 = 65. For the gateway behind it, blockrun.ai/status still shows live checks of the Base and Solana gateways and says \"None recorded on this page yet\" under incident history, the terms still say \"We do not commit to any particular uptime\", and free models are limited to 30 requests a minute and 300 an hour per IP with 429s carrying Retry-After.", "b": "Model reading, for the surface it runs on, Devin Desktop and Devin CLI. Status page at www.devinstatus.com (Atlassian Statuspage) with Desktop Agent and Desktop Tab components besides the cloud ones, read on 4 November 2026 (20). The history feed for the 90 days from 6 August lists 'Devin unavailable' for 20 minutes on 13 August with no component named, read as across the board and a major as on the devin listing; Devin Cloud unavailable on 13 August and the web app down on 24 September name cloud surfaces this model doesn't use; the rest are degraded-performance incidents (new sessions on 3 September, 'multiple services' on 17 September, Ask Devin on 26 October, automation triggers on 4 November) and session queuing on 10 and 11 August, read as minor and a scheduled Devin Desktop extension marketplace upgrade on 7 August, read as maintenance. One major (10). No rate limit figures for the model or the CLI; usage is a daily and weekly quota with no numbers (0). No 429, backoff or retry guidance for this surface (0). Cognition publishes an SLA (25 February 2026) with uptime and response times that applies when included in an order form, read as a contractual SLA on Enterprise, as on other listings (10). The launch post makes it available today with no preview or beta label (10). 20 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 50." }, "scores": { "a": 65, "b": 50 } }, { "by": 9, "category": "transparency", "leads": "blockrun-ai", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "The editorial half. The MCP server and SDKs are MIT and the gateway is closed. The listing is graded as the MCP server, so 30 as assymetrix-mcp got for an MIT server in front of a closed API (was 15 under the router reading). The terms and privacy policy, both last updated 21 October 2026, now name the same entity, BlockRun, Inc., as contracting party and data controller. The privacy policy now says prompts, completions and tool calls to blockrun.ai, arc.blockrun.ai, nano.blockrun.ai and api.blockrun.ai are stored with the paying wallet or account and kept \"until we delete it; it has no fixed expiry\", usage records and connection metadata for 13 months, while the Solana gateway keeps no request content. The 1 October policy said prompts weren't stored past the request and metadata was kept 30 days. The documents agree with each other, but content has no retention period and no subprocessors are named (18 of 30, was 20). No deprecation policy, and the terms say a provider may withdraw a model at any time. Removals are dated in the changelog, such as Gemma 4 31B delisted on 2 October, the same day (5 of 20). Upstream providers are named and Google Analytics is disclosed with its cookies and retention. Data locations aren't stated, and whether the MCP server sends telemetry wasn't read (10 of 20). 30 + 18 + 5 + 10 = 63.", "b": "Editorial half. Closed model under Cognition's platform terms; the weights aren't public and the sharing programme isn't described yet (15). Terms, privacy policy, security page and DPA agree, with training on self-serve data by default and no retention periods, as read for the devin listing (18). The API versioning policy covers API endpoints, not models, and no model deprecation notice was found (5 of 20). Sub-processors listed with purpose and country, per the devin listing's 8 October check (18). 15 + 18 + 5 + 18 = 56." }, "scores": { "a": 73, "b": 64 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "MCP server", "b": "Model API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "BlockRun, Inc.", "b": "Cognition AI, Inc.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "stdio", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "OAuth or key", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Freemium", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "MIT", "b": "Proprietary model, used through Devin Desktop and Devin CLI under Cognition's Platform Terms of Service. The weights are not public; Cognition says it is building a programme to share them with industry partners and researchers", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "19", "b": "none", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "yes", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "io.github.BlockRunAI/blockrun-mcp", "b": "not listed", "name": "MCP registry" }, { "a": "2026-10-28", "b": "2026-11-04", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "2026-09-02", "b": "2026-06-30", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "2026-09-02", "b": "2026-03-09", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes, with an opt-out", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "not found in the text", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "5 stars, 679 PyPI/wk", "b": "none", "name": "Popularity" }, { "a": "3.5/5 (2)", "b": "none", "name": "Agent reviews" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "BlockRun.AI scores 78.9 (A) on agent readiness against SWE-2 Flash's 36.4 (F), and leads in every scored category.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, BlockRun.AI or SWE-2 Flash?" }, { "answer": "Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. An agent can also pay BlockRun.AI per call over x402, with no account.", "question": "Do BlockRun.AI and SWE-2 Flash need an API key?" }, { "answer": "BlockRun.AI runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for SWE-2 Flash.", "question": "Can an agent call BlockRun.AI and SWE-2 Flash without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 65 against 50", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 90 against 29", "Agent ergonomics, 88 against 10", "Security \u0026 auth, 61 against 53", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 100 against 20", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 85 against 53", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 73 against 64" ], "also": [ "Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better", "An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account", "Runs on your own machine" ], "goodFor": "Agents that must start and pay with no human sign-up, and builders testing x402 against a real inference gateway.", "slug": "blockrun-ai", "watchFor": "Since 21 October 2026 prompts and completions sent through the Base, Arc and API gateways are stored with no fixed expiry" }, { "aheadOn": null, "also": null, "goodFor": "People already using Devin Desktop or Devin CLI who want a cheaper, faster model for routine coding work such as automations, reviews and small changes, while it is free in November 2026.", "slug": "swe-2-flash", "watchFor": "No model API, OpenAPI entry or model card. The Devin API's session agents list SWE-2 but not SWE-2 Flash" } ], "history": { "blockrun-ai": [ { "causes": [ "terms", "correction" ], "date": "2026-11-01", "delta": 6.4, "from": 72.5, "fromGrade": "BB", "to": 78.9, "toGrade": "A" }, { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-28", "delta": 0.1, "from": 72.4, "fromGrade": "BB", "to": 72.5, "toGrade": "BB" }, { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-08", "delta": -0.1, "from": 72.5, "fromGrade": "BB", "to": 72.4, "toGrade": "BB" } ], "swe-2-flash": null }, "job": { "capability": "inference.llm", "name": "LLM inference" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-blockrun-ai.json", "title": "Claude API vs BlockRun.AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-blockrun-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Claude API vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-blockrun-ai.json", "title": "Antseed vs BlockRun.AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-blockrun-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Antseed vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cerebras-inference.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Cerebras Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cerebras-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cloudflare-ai-gateway.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Cloudflare AI Gateway", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cloudflare-ai-gateway" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cloudflare-workers-ai.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Cloudflare Workers AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cloudflare-workers-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cohere-chat.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Cohere Chat API (Command models)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cohere-chat" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-deepinfra.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs DeepInfra", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-deepinfra" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-deepseek-api.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs DeepSeek API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-deepseek-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-elorian-glimpse.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Glimpse", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-elorian-glimpse" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-fireworks-inference.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Fireworks AI Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-fireworks-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-gemini-api.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Gemini Developer API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-gemini-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-groq.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs GroqCloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-groq" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-jais-3.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Jais 3", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-jais-3" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-meta-model-api.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Meta Model API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-meta-model-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-minimax-api.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs MiniMax API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-minimax-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-mistral-api.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Mistral AI API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-mistral-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-muse-spark-open.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Muse Spark Open", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-muse-spark-open" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-novita-ai.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Novita AI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-novita-ai" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-openai-api.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs OpenAI API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-openai-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-openrouter.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs OpenRouter", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-openrouter" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-prism-inference.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Prism Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-prism-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-ramp-router.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Router.com (Ramp Router)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-ramp-router" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-reflection-beam.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Beam 1.0", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-reflection-beam" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-routerplus.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs RouterPlus", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-routerplus" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-sambanova.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs SambaCloud", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-sambanova" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-siliconflow.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs SiliconFlow", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-siliconflow" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-simplismart.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Simplismart", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-simplismart" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-stepfun-api.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs StepFun API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-stepfun-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-tencent-tokenhub.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-tencent-tokenhub" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-together-inference.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Together AI Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-together-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.json", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs Vercel AI Gateway", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-vercel-ai-gateway" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Cerebras Inference vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Cloudflare AI Gateway vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Cloudflare Workers AI vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "DeepInfra vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "DeepSeek API vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Glimpse vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Fireworks AI Inference vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Gemini Developer API vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "GroqCloud vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jais-3-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Jais 3 vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jais-3-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/meta-model-api-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Meta Model API vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/meta-model-api-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-api-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "MiniMax API vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-api-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-api-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Mistral AI API vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-api-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-spark-open-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Muse Spark Open vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-spark-open-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/novita-ai-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Novita AI vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/novita-ai-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-api-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "OpenAI API vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-api-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openrouter-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "OpenRouter vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openrouter-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Prism Inference vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ramp-router-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Router.com (Ramp Router) vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ramp-router-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Beam 1.0 vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/routerplus-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "RouterPlus vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/routerplus-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sambanova-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "SambaCloud vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sambanova-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/siliconflow-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "SiliconFlow vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/siliconflow-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/simplismart-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "Simplismart vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/simplismart-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/stepfun-api-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "title": "StepFun API vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/stepfun-api-vs-swe-2-flash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/swe-2-flash-vs-tencent-tokenhub.json", "title": "SWE-2 Flash vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/swe-2-flash-vs-tencent-tokenhub" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/swe-2-flash-vs-together-inference.json", "title": "SWE-2 Flash vs Together AI Inference", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/swe-2-flash-vs-together-inference" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/swe-2-flash-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.json", "title": "SWE-2 Flash vs Vercel AI Gateway", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/swe-2-flash-vs-vercel-ai-gateway" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "blockrun-ai": 65, "by": 15, "edge": "blockrun-ai", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "swe-2-flash": 50, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "blockrun-ai": 90, "by": 61, "edge": "blockrun-ai", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "swe-2-flash": 29, "weight": 13 }, { "blockrun-ai": 88, "by": 78, "edge": "blockrun-ai", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "swe-2-flash": 10, "weight": 13 }, { "blockrun-ai": 61, "by": 8, "edge": "blockrun-ai", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "swe-2-flash": 53, "weight": 14 }, { "blockrun-ai": 100, "by": 80, "edge": "blockrun-ai", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "swe-2-flash": 20, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "blockrun-ai": 85, "by": 32, "edge": "blockrun-ai", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "swe-2-flash": 53, "weight": 7 }, { "blockrun-ai": 73, "by": 9, "edge": "blockrun-ai", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "swe-2-flash": 64, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "BlockRun.AI scores 78.9 (A) on agent readiness against SWE-2 Flash's 36.4 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do llm inference. BlockRun.AI accepts x402. SWE-2 Flash doesn't.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "blockrun-ai": "x402 v2 on its own gateway lets an agent create a wallet and pay per call in USDC on Base, Solana or Arc with no sign-up, and every MCP tool carries a safety annotation. Since 21 October 2026 prompts sent through the Base and Arc gateways are stored with no fixed expiry, and the status page keeps no incident history.", "swe-2-flash": "A new small coding model from Cognition that anyone can try free in Devin Desktop and Devin CLI until 30 November 2026, with strong vendor-reported coding scores. It has no model API, no published per-token price, context length or model card, and no public weights, so an agent can reach it only by driving Devin's own CLI." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-swe-2-flash", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-swe-2-flash.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-swe-2-flash.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-swe-2-flash.min.md" }, "markdown": "BlockRun.AI scores 78.9 (A) on agent readiness against SWE-2 Flash's 36.4 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do llm inference. BlockRun.AI accepts x402. SWE-2 Flash doesn't.\n\n- BlockRun.AI: grade A, 78.9/100, rank #14 of 1350. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/blockrun-ai.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/blockrun-ai.json\n- SWE-2 Flash: grade F, 36.4/100, rank #1243 of 1350. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/swe-2-flash.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/swe-2-flash.json\n- Best model APIs and inference for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/inference/index.md\n- All 562 models comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/inference/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### BlockRun.AI (A)\n\nGood for: Agents that must start and pay with no human sign-up, and builders testing x402 against a real inference gateway.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 65 against 50\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 90 against 29\n- Agent ergonomics, 88 against 10\n- Security \u0026 auth, 61 against 53\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 100 against 20\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 85 against 53\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 73 against 64\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better\n- An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account\n- Runs on your own machine\n\nWatch for: Since 21 October 2026 prompts and completions sent through the Base, Arc and API gateways are stored with no fixed expiry\n\n### SWE-2 Flash (F)\n\nGood for: People already using Devin Desktop or Devin CLI who want a cheaper, faster model for routine coding work such as automations, reviews and small changes, while it is free in November 2026.\n\nWatch for: No model API, OpenAPI entry or model card. The Devin API's session agents list SWE-2 but not SWE-2 Flash\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: BlockRun.AI +80\n\n- BlockRun.AI (100): x402 v2 on its own gateway, USDC on Base and Solana, and since MCP 0.55.0 (28 October) on Circle's Arc through arc.blockrun.ai (40). Per-token prices per model published without a login, plus a flat $0.001 fee per wallet call on Base (20). Seven free models per the status page's menu, no card or sign-up, and a wallet costs nothing to create (20). An agent can create its own wallet and pay per request with no human sign-up (20). 40 + 20 + 20 + 20 = 100.\n- SWE-2 Flash (20): Published rubric. No payment protocol (0). Plan prices are public, but no per-token price for SWE-2 Flash is on a readable page; the docs' cost table loads in the browser and the post gives only 'one-fifth the price' of SWE-2 (10). Free through 30 November 2026 on Devin Desktop and CLI, but the docs say Free tier users only have SWE-1.6, so whether the Free plan reaches it, and without a card, isn't confirmed; the in-between value used on the devin listing (10). A person signs in through a browser (0). 0 + 10 + 10 + 0 = 20.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: BlockRun.AI +78\n\n- BlockRun.AI (88): MCP reading. 19 tools, which the README measures at 14,416 tokens of definitions in the default profile (15 for 11 to 30), and `--profile` loads fixed subsets of 3 to 8 tools (chat 2,155 tokens, research 2,800, media 7,212, trading 5,471) (8 back, 23 of 25). Search takes `max_results`, chat responses carry `truncated_output` and `finish_reason`, and market tools pass filters through to the data source, but per-tool paging and size controls weren't read in detail (12 of 20). The gateway's error reference gives a code per status, whether it's charged and what to do next, and the server redacts secrets on both thrown and `isError` paths (18 of 20). Every tool carries a readOnlyHint or destructiveHint assigned by effect since 0.33.0, with a test that fails on an unannotated tool. Payment settles only after a successful upstream response, and since 0.54.2 a withdrawal that may have moved money is never signed twice (20). Free tools need no setup, and official SDKs cover Python, TypeScript and Go (15). 23 + 12 + 18 + 20 + 15 = 88.\n- SWE-2 Flash (10): Model reading (tool use, structured output, caching, context, batch, SDKs). Tool use is Devin's harness, not something a caller configures; no context length, output limit or cache price is published for SWE-2 Flash (5 of 25). No documented output-size or reasoning controls for this model; SWE-2's effort levels aren't stated for Flash (0 of 20). No model-level error documentation (0 of 20). No idempotency or retry guidance (0 of 20). One flag or picker selects it and `devin -p` runs a single turn and prints to stdout, but there is no SDK or direct endpoint (5 of 15). 5 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 10.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: BlockRun.AI +61\n\n- BlockRun.AI (90): MCP reading. All 19 tools take zod input schemas, which the MCP SDK turns into JSON Schema, per the 1 October read of the source (25, was 10 for the gateway's OpenAPI document, which robots.txt still keeps our reader out of under /api/). llms.txt served at blockrun.ai/llms.txt (10). The tool descriptions state purpose and order of use, such as 'discover markets ... with blockrun_markets first' and 'Run action:\"setup\" FIRST', per the 1 October check (15 of 20). Enums and numeric bounds, but seven fields across six tools take a free-form `z.any()` JSON body, per the 1 October check (10 of 15). The docs have an error reference with codes per status and recovery steps, and the README has examples for each client (15). A dated gateway changelog, last entry 25 October 2026, and a CHANGELOG.md in the MCP repository through 0.55.0 (15). 25 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 15 + 15 = 90.\n- SWE-2 Flash (29): Model reading. No model API, so no OpenAPI entry; the Devin v3 OpenAPI file lists SWE-2 agents only, and no model card was found (0). docs.devin.ai serves llms.txt and Markdown copies of every page (10). The launch post says what it is for (automations, code review, feature development, documentation) and the CLI docs say when to pick a SWE model, but the models pages don't list SWE-2 Flash yet (6 of 20). No documented model ID, reasoning settings, context or output limits to type (0 of 15). The CLI pages show `--model` and `/model` examples, with no model-specific errors (3 of 15). Named, dated model versions on Cognition's blog and public release notes, but no release note for SWE-2 Flash yet; the newest is 2 November (10 of 15). 0 + 10 + 6 + 0 + 3 + 10 = 29.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: BlockRun.AI +32\n\n- BlockRun.AI (85): MCP reading. @blockrun/mcp 0.55.0 published to the official MCP registry on 28 October 2026, and a gateway changelog entry on 25 October (30). 40 registry versions from 0.35.0 on 3 August to 0.55.0 (20). Issue replies couldn't be read, as GitHub's issue pages answered 403; the changelog credits numbered reports fixed within releases (10 of 25). Listed in the official MCP registry as io.github.BlockRunAI/blockrun-mcp, a GitHub-verified namespace, active, with 0.55.0 marked latest (15). CI on Node 20.19 and 22 with typecheck and tests on every pull request, and a Renovate configuration in the repository (10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 10 = 85.\n- SWE-2 Flash (53): Model reading. Released 4 November 2026 (30). Churn and notice in place of release counts: SWE-1.6, SWE-1.7, SWE-1.7 Lightning, SWE-2 (10 September) and now SWE-2 Flash in a few months, with no model deprecation notice period found and short names that move to the newest model (10 of 20). Public release notes and a support address, no public tracker (10 of 25). No official SDK for the model (0 of 15). The docs are kept current but don't yet cover this model (3 of 10). 30 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 3 = 53.\n\n### Reliability: BlockRun.AI +15\n\n- BlockRun.AI (65): Read with the local-software lines, as the listing's kind is `mcp` and the owner runs the server over stdio, though every paid call lands on BlockRun's gateway (the reading assymetrix-mcp and copilot-studio-mcp get). The 1 October check read it as a router. Installs from the official npm package `@blockrun/mcp` with Node 20.19 or later stated in `engines` (20). The CI workflow runs typecheck, build and tests on Node 20.19 and 22 on every push and pull request, with a required gate job. Run results weren't readable, as GitHub's pages answered 403 (20 of 25). Open issues couldn't be read. The changelog names numbered reports fixed in releases, such as #176 and #177 in 0.54.3 and 0.54.4 (10 of 25). Semver numbering with breaking changes marked BREAKING in CHANGELOG.md and shipped as minor bumps, as its own entries say (15). Version 0.55.0, pre-1.0 (0). 20 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 0 = 65. For the gateway behind it, blockrun.ai/status still shows live checks of the Base and Solana gateways and says \"None recorded on this page yet\" under incident history, the terms still say \"We do not commit to any particular uptime\", and free models are limited to 30 requests a minute and 300 an hour per IP with 429s carrying Retry-After.\n- SWE-2 Flash (50): Model reading, for the surface it runs on, Devin Desktop and Devin CLI. Status page at www.devinstatus.com (Atlassian Statuspage) with Desktop Agent and Desktop Tab components besides the cloud ones, read on 4 November 2026 (20). The history feed for the 90 days from 6 August lists 'Devin unavailable' for 20 minutes on 13 August with no component named, read as across the board and a major as on the devin listing; Devin Cloud unavailable on 13 August and the web app down on 24 September name cloud surfaces this model doesn't use; the rest are degraded-performance incidents (new sessions on 3 September, 'multiple services' on 17 September, Ask Devin on 26 October, automation triggers on 4 November) and session queuing on 10 and 11 August, read as minor and a scheduled Devin Desktop extension marketplace upgrade on 7 August, read as maintenance. One major (10). No rate limit figures for the model or the CLI; usage is a daily and weekly quota with no numbers (0). No 429, backoff or retry guidance for this surface (0). Cognition publishes an SLA (25 February 2026) with uptime and response times that applies when included in an order form, read as a contractual SLA on Enterprise, as on other listings (10). The launch post makes it available today with no preview or beta label (10). 20 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 50.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: BlockRun.AI +9\n\n- BlockRun.AI (73): The editorial half. The MCP server and SDKs are MIT and the gateway is closed. The listing is graded as the MCP server, so 30 as assymetrix-mcp got for an MIT server in front of a closed API (was 15 under the router reading). The terms and privacy policy, both last updated 21 October 2026, now name the same entity, BlockRun, Inc., as contracting party and data controller. The privacy policy now says prompts, completions and tool calls to blockrun.ai, arc.blockrun.ai, nano.blockrun.ai and api.blockrun.ai are stored with the paying wallet or account and kept \"until we delete it; it has no fixed expiry\", usage records and connection metadata for 13 months, while the Solana gateway keeps no request content. The 1 October policy said prompts weren't stored past the request and metadata was kept 30 days. The documents agree with each other, but content has no retention period and no subprocessors are named (18 of 30, was 20). No deprecation policy, and the terms say a provider may withdraw a model at any time. Removals are dated in the changelog, such as Gemma 4 31B delisted on 2 October, the same day (5 of 20). Upstream providers are named and Google Analytics is disclosed with its cookies and retention. Data locations aren't stated, and whether the MCP server sends telemetry wasn't read (10 of 20). 30 + 18 + 5 + 10 = 63.\n- SWE-2 Flash (64): Editorial half. Closed model under Cognition's platform terms; the weights aren't public and the sharing programme isn't described yet (15). Terms, privacy policy, security page and DPA agree, with training on self-serve data by default and no retention periods, as read for the devin listing (18). The API versioning policy covers API endpoints, not models, and no model deprecation notice was found (5 of 20). Sub-processors listed with purpose and country, per the devin listing's 8 October check (18). 15 + 18 + 5 + 18 = 56.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | BlockRun.AI | SWE-2 Flash | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 65 | 50 | BlockRun.AI +15 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 90 | 29 | BlockRun.AI +61 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 88 | 10 | BlockRun.AI +78 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 61 | 53 | BlockRun.AI +8 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 100 | 20 | BlockRun.AI +80 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 85 | 53 | BlockRun.AI +32 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 73 | 64 | BlockRun.AI +9 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |\n| **Total** | | **78.9 · A** | **36.4 · F** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | BlockRun.AI | SWE-2 Flash |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | MCP server | Model API |\n| Vendor | BlockRun, Inc. | Cognition AI, Inc. |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | stdio | |\n| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |\n| x402 | yes | no |\n| Licence | MIT | Proprietary model, used through Devin Desktop and Devin CLI under Cognition's Platform Terms of Service. The weights are not public; Cognition says it is building a programme to share them with industry partners and researchers |\n| Tools exposed | 19 | none |\n| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |\n| llms.txt | yes | yes |\n| MCP registry | `io.github.BlockRunAI/blockrun-mcp` | not listed |\n| Last release | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-04 |\n| Terms last updated | 2026-09-02 | 2026-06-30 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-02 | 2026-03-09 |\n| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |\n| Popularity | 5 stars, 679 PyPI/wk | none |\n| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none |\n\n## How the scores have moved\n\n### BlockRun.AI\n\n- +6.4 on 1 November 2026 (BB to A): terms, correction\n- +0.1 on 28 October 2026: checklist\n- -0.1 on 8 October 2026: checklist\n\n### SWE-2 Flash\n\nNo score change since it was listed.\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**BlockRun.AI.** x402 v2 on its own gateway lets an agent create a wallet and pay per call in USDC on Base, Solana or Arc with no sign-up, and every MCP tool carries a safety annotation. Since 21 October 2026 prompts sent through the Base and Arc gateways are stored with no fixed expiry, and the status page keeps no incident history.\n\n**SWE-2 Flash.** A new small coding model from Cognition that anyone can try free in Devin Desktop and Devin CLI until 30 November 2026, with strong vendor-reported coding scores. It has no model API, no published per-token price, context length or model card, and no public weights, so an agent can reach it only by driving Devin's own CLI.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### BlockRun.AI\n\n1. Fund a dedicated wallet with a small USDC balance. The balance is the spending cap\n2. Use the Solana gateway when prompts must not be stored. Base and Arc keep request content with no fixed expiry\n3. Start the server with `--profile` for the job (chat, research, media or trading) to cut the tool definitions\n4. Set `BLOCKRUN_CONFIRM_SPEND=on` to approve each paid call. It's off by default\n5. Call `blockrun_models` before hard-coding a model name, since models are removed without notice\n\n### SWE-2 Flash\n\n1. There is no endpoint to call. Run Devin CLI single-turn with `devin -p` and pick the model with `--model`; the SWE-2 Flash model ID isn't documented yet, so check `/model` in the CLI first\n2. Don't rely on the short name `swe`. The docs say it resolves to the latest model in the family, which may be SWE-2 rather than SWE-2 Flash\n3. Plan for billing to start on 1 December 2026. The free period covers Devin Desktop and CLI only, not Devin cloud sessions\n4. Treat Cognition's benchmark figures as the vendor's. No independent result for SWE-2 Flash was found\n5. Keep `credentials.toml` private. The token in it doesn't expire by default and carries the signed-in user's access\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, BlockRun.AI or SWE-2 Flash?\n\nBlockRun.AI scores 78.9 (A) on agent readiness against SWE-2 Flash's 36.4 (F), and leads in every scored category.\n\n### Do BlockRun.AI and SWE-2 Flash need an API key?\n\nBoth take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. An agent can also pay BlockRun.AI per call over x402, with no account.\n\n### Can an agent call BlockRun.AI and SWE-2 Flash without installing anything?\n\nBlockRun.AI runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. No hosted endpoint is listed for SWE-2 Flash.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-swe-2-flash.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-swe-2-flash.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"blockrun-ai\", \"b\": \"swe-2-flash\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare blockrun-ai swe-2-flash`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/blockrun-ai.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/swe-2-flash.json\n\n## Other comparisons with BlockRun.AI or SWE-2 Flash\n\n- [Claude API vs BlockRun.AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-blockrun-ai.md)\n- [Claude API vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/anthropic-api-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Antseed vs BlockRun.AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-blockrun-ai.md)\n- [Antseed vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antseed-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Cerebras Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cerebras-inference.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Cloudflare AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cloudflare-ai-gateway.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Cloudflare Workers AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cloudflare-workers-ai.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Cohere Chat API (Command models)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-cohere-chat.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs DeepInfra](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-deepinfra.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs DeepSeek API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-deepseek-api.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Glimpse](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-elorian-glimpse.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Fireworks AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-fireworks-inference.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Gemini Developer API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-gemini-api.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs GroqCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-groq.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Jais 3](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-jais-3.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Meta Model API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-meta-model-api.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs MiniMax API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-minimax-api.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Mistral AI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-mistral-api.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Muse Spark Open](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-muse-spark-open.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-nemotron-3-5-super-vl.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Novita AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-novita-ai.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs OpenAI API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-openai-api.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs OpenRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-openrouter.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Prism Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-prism-inference.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Router.com (Ramp Router)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-ramp-router.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Beam 1.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-reflection-beam.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs RouterPlus](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-routerplus.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs SambaCloud](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-sambanova.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs SiliconFlow](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-siliconflow.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Simplismart](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-simplismart.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs StepFun API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-stepfun-api.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Together AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-together-inference.md)\n- [BlockRun.AI vs Vercel AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.md)\n- [Cerebras Inference vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cerebras-inference-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Cloudflare AI Gateway vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-ai-gateway-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Cloudflare Workers AI vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-workers-ai-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-chat-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [DeepInfra vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepinfra-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [DeepSeek API vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-api-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Glimpse vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/elorian-glimpse-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Fireworks AI Inference vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fireworks-inference-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Gemini Developer API vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-api-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [GroqCloud vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/groq-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Jais 3 vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jais-3-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Meta Model API vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/meta-model-api-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [MiniMax API vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-api-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Mistral AI API vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-api-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Muse Spark Open vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-spark-open-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nemotron-3-5-super-vl-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Novita AI vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/novita-ai-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [OpenAI API vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-api-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [OpenRouter vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openrouter-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Prism Inference vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/prism-inference-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Router.com (Ramp Router) vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ramp-router-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Beam 1.0 vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/reflection-beam-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [RouterPlus vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/routerplus-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [SambaCloud vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/sambanova-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [SiliconFlow vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/siliconflow-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [Simplismart vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/simplismart-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [StepFun API vs SWE-2 Flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/stepfun-api-vs-swe-2-flash.md)\n- [SWE-2 Flash vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/swe-2-flash-vs-tencent-tokenhub.md)\n- [SWE-2 Flash vs Together AI Inference](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/swe-2-flash-vs-together-inference.md)\n- [SWE-2 Flash vs Vercel AI Gateway](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/swe-2-flash-vs-vercel-ai-gateway.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-05", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "BlockRun.AI vs SWE-2 Flash", "url": "" } ], "description": "BlockRun.AI scores 78.9 (A) to SWE-2 Flash's 36.4 (F) for llm inference. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "BlockRun.AI A 78.9", "SWE-2 Flash F 36.4", "scores" ], "h1": "BlockRun.AI vs SWE-2 Flash", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-swe-2-flash", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "BlockRun.AI vs SWE-2 Flash for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-04", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/blockrun-ai-vs-swe-2-flash" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 6300, "slim": 3330 }, "version": 1 }