{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "bitstamp", "name": "Bitstamp API", "vendor": "Bitstamp Ltd.", "vendorUrl": "https://www.bitstamp.net", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bitstamp's HTTP API v2 for spot and derivatives trading, balances, deposits and withdrawals, with WebSocket and FIX feeds and a sandbox at sandbox.bitstamp.net. Bitstamp is a Robinhood company since June 2025.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitstamp.json", "dns": "bitstamp.grade.anchorterminal.com", "license": "Proprietary hosted API under Bitstamp's terms of use, which our reader couldn't load", "transports": [], "packages": [], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key and secret made in the Bitstamp account after a browser signup, sent as `X-Auth: BITSTAMP {key}` with an HMAC-SHA256 `X-Auth-Signature` over the verb, host, path, query, nonce, timestamp and body, a 36-character single-use nonce and a timestamp within 150 seconds. Keys carry per-endpoint permissions (error API0003 names a missing permission) and an IP allow-list (API0002), and `X-Auth-Subaccount-Id` targets a sub-account. `POST /api/v2/revoke_all_api_keys/` is a kill switch for every key. Responses carry an `X-Server-Auth-Signature` to verify (https://www.bitstamp.net/api/, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API itself costs nothing. Trading fees are maker and taker by 30-day volume per the API's fees endpoints, but the fee schedule page at bitstamp.net/fee-schedule/ draws its table by script and loaded empty for our reader, so the rates are unchecked. Commercial use of exchange data needs a Data License Agreement through partners@bitstamp.net. The sandbox at sandbox.bitstamp.net needs no money (https://www.bitstamp.net/api/, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API documentation (checked 2026-11-03). Fees are taken from the account; onboarding is a browser signup.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.bitstamp.net/api/", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "api-key", "sandbox", "status-page", "usage-priced", "eu", "uk" ], "lastRelease": "2026-08-28", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50.4, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1002, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 18, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 58, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 20, "reliability": 63, "schema": 51, "security": 60, "transparency": 53 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Bitstamp documents its v2 API on one static page with numeric rate limits, per-endpoint key permissions, an IP allow-list, a kill switch and a sandbox. There is no official MCP server, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the fee schedule, terms, privacy policy and country list render by script and could not be read.", "bestFor": "An agent that needs a long-running regulated spot venue in the EU, UK and US with a sandbox and per-endpoint key permissions, and can do its own signing.", "strengths": [ "Rate limits with numbers (400 requests a second, 10,000 per 10 minutes) and named error codes for client and market limits", "Keys carry per-endpoint permissions and an IP allow-list, and one call revokes every key on the account", "A sandbox at sandbox.bitstamp.net with the same v2 paths, plus order-data endpoints to recover gaps after a dropped WebSocket", "A dated API changelog from 2023 to 28 August 2026 and a Statuspage feed with per-market incidents", "Signed responses (`X-Server-Auth-Signature`) let a client verify what the server returned" ], "weaknesses": [ "No official MCP server, SDK, llms.txt or OpenAPI file; the registry's Bitstamp servers are third parties proxying public market data", "Duplicate client order ids are allowed since November 2023, so a retried order can execute twice", "The fee schedule, terms of use, privacy policy, about page and FAQ load empty without a browser, so fees, retention and the bot clauses are unchecked", "A 3-hour withdrawal failure across 14 networks on 21 August 2026 and a 39-minute halt of all markets on 5 August 2026", "security.txt expired on 12 July 2026, and no SLA was found" ], "agentNotes": [ "Mint a key with only the endpoint permissions the task needs and an IP allow-list; keep `revoke_all_api_keys` in reach as a kill switch", "Treat `client_order_id` as a label, not a guard. On a timeout (500.016) fetch the order by client id before resending, because duplicates are accepted", "Use a fresh 36-character nonce and a timestamp within 150 seconds of server time on every request, or expect API0004 and API0017", "Stay under 400 requests a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes; 400.002 and 400.067 mean back off, and open-orders answers are cached for 10 seconds", "Start on sandbox.bitstamp.net with the same paths, and read the fee schedule in a browser before quoting costs, since it is unreadable to a plain fetch" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 58, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 20, "reliability": 63, "schema": 51, "security": 60, "transparency": 16 }, "provenanceScore": 90, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "http": "curl https://www.bitstamp.net/api/v2/ticker/btcusd/" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bitstamp" }, "area": "payments", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Bitstamp Ltd.", "domain": "bitstamp.net", "domainRegistered": "2011-07-04", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bitstamp.net/terms-of-use/", "privacy": "https://www.bitstamp.net/privacy-policy/", "statusPage": "https://status.bitstamp.net", "changelog": "https://www.bitstamp.net/api/", "securityTxt": "expired", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Bitstamp Ltd. is named in Robinhood's newsroom post of 2 June 2025 on closing the acquisition; the terms of use and privacy policy pages loaded empty for our reader, so the entities they name are unconfirmed.", "RDAP gives bitstamp.net a registration date of 4 July 2011.", "https://www.bitstamp.net/.well-known/security.txt names HackerOne's Robinhood programme as Contact and Policy and expired on 12 July 2026.", "www.bitstamp.net/robots.txt allows /api/ itself and disallows /api/*, /account/, /trade/ and others; only /api/ was read under it. status.bitstamp.net disallows /api/ and /embed/, so the history feed was read. support.bitstamp.net did not resolve.", "The API changelog is a section of the API documentation page; there is no separate changelog URL." ], "score": 90 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.json", "live": { "slug": "bitstamp", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.bitstamp.net", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T20:04:41.953848408Z" }, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bitstamp.net/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "expired", "expires": "2026-07-12T11:59:00.000Z", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:31.314157297Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:04:41.953848408Z" } }, "answer": "Bitstamp API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.4 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and maintenance \u0026 community.", "b": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "name": "Hyperliquid", "vendor": "Hyperliquid Labs", "vendorUrl": "https://hyperliquid.xyz", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Hyperliquid is a perpetuals and spot exchange whose order book runs on its own chain. Agents trade through the REST info and exchange endpoints and WebSocket at api.hyperliquid.xyz, signing with a wallet key or an approved API wallet.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json", "dns": "hyperliquid.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/hyperliquid-dex/hyperliquid-python-sdk", "license": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "pypi", "name": "hyperliquid-python-sdk" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "No API keys. Every exchange action is a signed message from an EVM wallet; info requests need no signature. A master account approves API wallets (agent wallets) with `approveAgent`, optionally named and with an expiry, which can only sign on its behalf and cannot query data. L1 actions (orders, cancels, margin settings) and user-signed actions (USDC and spot sends, withdrawals, approvals) use two different EIP-712 schemes, and the docs recommend an SDK for signing. Nonces are per signer, must sit within two days behind and one day ahead of block time, and sub-accounts signed by one API wallet share its nonce set (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api/nonces-and-api-wallets.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API has no charge. Base-tier fees are 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals and 0.070% taker and 0.040% maker on spot, assessed on rolling 14-day volume, falling to 0.024% taker and 0% maker above $7 billion, with maker rebates to -0.003% for large maker share and staking discounts of 5% to 40%. Withdrawals to the bridge cost $1; an activation gas fee applies to a first order. `reserveRequestWeight` buys extra rate limit at 0.0005 USDC a request (https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/trading/fees.md, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.04% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API docs (checked 2026-11-03). Accounts are funded by depositing USDC on Arbitrum or other bridged chains; several third-party MCP servers in the registry sell Hyperliquid data by x402, none of them Hyperliquid's.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 0, "popularity": { "githubStars": 1873, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": 167497, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/for-developers/api", "llmsTxt": "https://hyperliquid.gitbook.io/hyperliquid-docs/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.market-data", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto", "wallet.onchain" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "closed-source", "llms-txt", "python", "rust", "sandbox", "usage-priced", "no-key", "no-status-page", "bug-bounty", "rest" ], "lastRelease": "2026-06-04", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1018, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 19, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 26 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.", "bestFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "strengths": [ "API wallets approved by the master account can only sign trading actions; withdrawals and external transfers need the user's own key", "Numeric rate limits per IP and per address, with weights per request type and a paid `reserveRequestWeight` top-up", "Fees published per tier from 0.045% taker and 0.015% maker on perpetuals, with maker rebates and staking discounts", "A testnet at api.hyperliquid-testnet.xyz with the same API and a faucet of 1,000 mock USDC for addresses that have deposited on mainnet", "Client order IDs (`cloid`), `expiresAfter`, `noop` and a `scheduleCancel` dead man's switch for safe retries" ], "weaknesses": [ "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402", "No OpenAPI file, no changelog, no API versioning and no status page found", "The terms of use and privacy policy at app.hyperliquid.xyz draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403, so the restricted jurisdictions are unchecked", "Order errors are message strings without codes, and the docs give no 429 or Retry-After guidance beyond one request every 10 seconds when limited", "The official Python SDK is marked Alpha, last released 4 June 2026, with 112 open issues" ], "agentNotes": [ "Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address", "Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"", "Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch", "Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data", "Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 39, "payments": 55, "reliability": 40, "schema": 42, "security": 64, "transparency": 20 }, "provenanceScore": 32, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "pip install hyperliquid-python-sdk", "http": "curl -X POST https://api.hyperliquid.xyz/info -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{\"type\":\"l2Book\",\"coin\":\"BTC\"}'" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.derivatives", "tool": "https://letme.dev/hyperliquid" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Perpetuals taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.045, "note": "0.045% of notional; maker 0.015%" }, { "item": "Spot taker fee, tier 0", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.07, "note": "0.070% of notional; maker 0.040%" }, { "item": "Bridge withdrawal", "unit": "tx", "usd": 1, "note": "$1 per withdrawal to the bridge contract" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "", "domain": "hyperliquid.xyz", "domainRegistered": "2022-10-15", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "unknown", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "No legal entity found on a readable page. The docs name Hyperliquid Labs (self-funded) and the Hyper Foundation (bug bounty); app.hyperliquid.xyz/terms and hyperfoundation.org draw by script and hyperliquid.xyz/terms answered 403.", "RDAP gives hyperliquid.xyz a registration date of 15 October 2022, registrar Squarespace Domains.", "No status page found; status.hyperliquid.xyz did not resolve and the docs link none. No changelog; the docs have no dated release notes.", "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt answered 403, so security.txt is unknown. The docs' bug bounty page gives bugbounty@hyperfoundation.org.", "hyperliquid.gitbook.io/robots.txt allows everything with Content-Signal ai-input=yes; hyperliquid.xyz/robots.txt allows everything." ], "score": 32 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.json", "live": { "slug": "hyperliquid", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://hyperliquid.xyz/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "unknown", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:05.956872316Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 35, "category": "payments", "leads": "hyperliquid", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule page loaded empty, the API's fee endpoints need a key, and no rate could be read, so fees are scored as not published (0, unchecked). The API is free, public endpoints need no key and the sandbox needs no money (20). A person must sign up in a browser with identity checks and mint the key (0). 0 + 0 + 20 + 0 = 20.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55." }, "scores": { "a": 20, "b": 55 } }, { "by": 27, "category": "transparency", "leads": "bitstamp", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "The editorial half. A closed service whose terms of use loaded empty for our reader, so the licence and clauses are unknown (8 of 30). The privacy policy loaded empty, so retention and data handling are unchecked (0 of 30). A 410.001 code marks deprecated endpoints and the changelog records replacements such as `trading-pairs-info` by `markets`, with no notice period stated (8 of 20). Subprocessors and data locations are in the unread privacy policy (0). 8 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 16.", "b": "The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20." }, "scores": { "a": 53, "b": 26 } }, { "by": 23, "category": "reliability", "leads": "bitstamp", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Read with the hosted lines on the HTTP API v2 at www.bitstamp.net/api/v2/. status.bitstamp.net is a Statuspage site with component history (20). Its feed for 5 August to 3 November 2026 has 17 entries, among them withdrawals failing on 14 networks for about 3 hours on 21 August, database maintenance with login failures and intermittent trading interruptions for about 1 hour 44 minutes on 23 September, a 39-minute halt of all markets on 5 August, and delistings and single-asset suspensions. One major (10). Rate limits with numbers, 400 a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes (15). Limit errors are named (400.002, 400.067, 400.068) but there is no Retry-After or backoff guidance, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the only retry guidance is to check the order after a 500.016 timeout (8 of 15). No SLA found (0). Generally available (10). 20 + 10 + 15 + 8 + 0 + 10 = 63.", "b": "Read with the hosted lines on the REST API at api.hyperliquid.xyz, the surface an agent calls; the chain behind it is noted under details. No status page found in the docs, on hyperliquid.xyz or at status.hyperliquid.xyz, which did not resolve (0). No readable history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers per IP, per address and per WebSocket connection (15). When limited, an address gets one request every 10 seconds; no 429 shape or Retry-After is documented, but `cloid`, per-signer nonces, `expiresAfter` and `noop` make retries safe (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Mainnet is generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 40." }, "scores": { "a": 63, "b": 40 } }, { "by": 12, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "hyperliquid", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Graded on the REST API. Order book grouping and transaction time windows size responses, but there is no field selection and no MCP surface (15 of 25). Offset, limit, since and sort on transaction history, `until_id` windows on order-data replay (14 of 20). `response_code` and `response_explanation` name the failure, such as 400.009 insufficient balance, 403.004 trading blocked and 500.025 insufficient liquidity (16 of 20). No idempotency, since `client_order_id` duplicates are allowed since November 2023 and the docs say only to check the order id after a timeout; the kill switch limits damage (8 of 20). Few required parameters, but no official SDK in any language (5 of 15). 15 + 14 + 16 + 8 + 5 = 58.", "b": "An API, read for response sizing. Time-range calls return at most 500 blocks of data, fills and historical orders cap at 2,000 items, candles at 5,000, l2Book at 20 levels a side (18 of 25). Cursor-by-timestamp pagination on fills and funding, filtering by coin or dex, no field selection (14 of 20). Order errors are documented strings per order, one batch-level error rejects a batch, and `orderStatus` answers `unknownOid`; no codes and no rate-limit error shape (12 of 20). `cloid`, per-signer nonces within a time window, `expiresAfter`, `noop` to burn a nonce and `scheduleCancel` as a dead man's switch (18 of 20). Few required fields, but signing needs msgpack field order, two EIP-712 schemes and lowercase addresses, and the official SDKs are Python (Alpha) and Rust only (8 of 15). Total 70." }, "scores": { "a": 58, "b": 70 } }, { "by": 11, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "hyperliquid", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a closed service. The last dated API change is 28 August 2026, 67 days before the check (20). Only one dated entry in the last 90 days, after 1 July and 12 June (0). No public repository or issue tracker, support pages did not load and support.bitstamp.net did not resolve; a changelog exists (8 of 25). No official SDKs and no MCP registry presence of Bitstamp's own (0). No package to assess (0). 20 + 0 + 8 + 0 + 0 = 28.", "b": "Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39." }, "scores": { "a": 28, "b": 39 } }, { "by": 9, "category": "schema", "leads": "bitstamp", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract was found on the API page or elsewhere (0). No llms.txt or Markdown docs (0). The single documentation page describes each endpoint's purpose and parameters, with notes such as the 10-second cache on open orders and the Travel Rule fields, but not when to use one endpoint over another (14 of 20). Parameters are typed with enumerations (margin mode CROSS or ISOLATED, margin multiplier 1 to 25, order types) and required fields marked (11 of 15). Signing examples in Python, Java and C++, and error families with numbered codes and explanations (13 of 15). Version v2 in the path and header, a dated changelog from 7 April 2023 to 28 August 2026, and a 410.001 code for deprecated endpoints, with no stated notice period (13 of 15). 0 + 0 + 14 + 11 + 13 + 13 = 51.", "b": "No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (`a`, `b`, `p`, `s`, `r`, `t`, `c`) with numbers as strings, enums such as `tif` Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as `userDexAbstraction` are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42." }, "scores": { "a": 51, "b": 42 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Bitstamp Ltd.", "b": "Hyperliquid Labs", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Proprietary hosted API under Bitstamp's terms of use, which our reader couldn't load", "b": "The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "none", "b": "0", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-08-28", "b": "2026-06-04", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "no document linked", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "none", "b": "1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Bitstamp API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.4 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and maintenance \u0026 community.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Bitstamp API or Hyperliquid?" }, { "answer": "Bitstamp API needs an API key. Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.", "question": "Do Bitstamp API and Hyperliquid need an API key?" }, { "answer": "No hosted endpoint is listed for Bitstamp API. No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid.", "question": "Can an agent call Bitstamp API and Hyperliquid without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 63 against 40", "Schema \u0026 documentation, 51 against 42", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 53 against 26" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "An agent that needs a long-running regulated spot venue in the EU, UK and US with a sandbox and per-endpoint key permissions, and can do its own signing.", "slug": "bitstamp", "watchFor": "No official MCP server, SDK, llms.txt or OpenAPI file; the registry's Bitstamp servers are third parties proxying public market data" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Agent ergonomics, 70 against 58", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 20", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 39 against 28" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.", "slug": "hyperliquid", "watchFor": "No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.market-data", "name": "Exchange market data" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitget vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bybit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gate vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Binance API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Deribit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "dYdX vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.json", "title": "Hyperliquid vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "bitstamp": 63, "by": 23, "edge": "bitstamp", "hyperliquid": 40, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitstamp": 51, "by": 9, "edge": "bitstamp", "hyperliquid": 42, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "bitstamp": 58, "by": 12, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 70, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "bitstamp": 60, "by": 4, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 64, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "bitstamp": 20, "by": 35, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 55, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitstamp": 28, "by": 11, "edge": "hyperliquid", "hyperliquid": 39, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "bitstamp": 53, "by": 27, "edge": "bitstamp", "hyperliquid": 26, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Bitstamp API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.4 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and maintenance \u0026 community. Both do exchange market data.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "bitstamp": "Bitstamp documents its v2 API on one static page with numeric rate limits, per-endpoint key permissions, an IP allow-list, a kill switch and a sandbox. There is no official MCP server, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the fee schedule, terms, privacy policy and country list render by script and could not be read.", "hyperliquid": "Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.min.md" }, "markdown": "Bitstamp API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.4 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and maintenance \u0026 community. Both do exchange market data.\n\n- Bitstamp API: grade D, 50.4/100, rank #1002 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitstamp.json\n- Hyperliquid: grade D, 50/100, rank #1018 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hyperliquid.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Bitstamp API (D)\n\nGood for: An agent that needs a long-running regulated spot venue in the EU, UK and US with a sandbox and per-endpoint key permissions, and can do its own signing.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 63 against 40\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 51 against 42\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 53 against 26\n\nWatch for: No official MCP server, SDK, llms.txt or OpenAPI file; the registry's Bitstamp servers are third parties proxying public market data\n\n### Hyperliquid (D)\n\nGood for: An agent trading perpetuals or spot on chain from its own wallet with no account, or acting for a master account through an approved API wallet.\n\nAhead on:\n- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 58\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 55 against 20\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 39 against 28\n\nWatch for: No official MCP server; the 23 registry entries are all third parties, several selling data by x402\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Hyperliquid +35\n\n- Bitstamp API (20): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule page loaded empty, the API's fee endpoints need a key, and no rate could be read, so fees are scored as not published (0, unchecked). The API is free, public endpoints need no key and the sandbox needs no money (20). A person must sign up in a browser with identity checks and mint the key (0). 0 + 0 + 20 + 0 = 20.\n- Hyperliquid (55): No machine payment protocol (0). Fees published per tier without login (20). No card anywhere; public info endpoints are free and the testnet faucet gives 1,000 mock USDC, though only to an address that has deposited on mainnet (15 of 20). No signup; an agent with a funded EVM wallet deposits USDC on a bridged chain and trades, subject to the unread terms (20). Total 55.\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Bitstamp API +27\n\n- Bitstamp API (53): The editorial half. A closed service whose terms of use loaded empty for our reader, so the licence and clauses are unknown (8 of 30). The privacy policy loaded empty, so retention and data handling are unchecked (0 of 30). A 410.001 code marks deprecated endpoints and the changelog records replacements such as `trading-pairs-info` by `markets`, with no notice period stated (8 of 20). Subprocessors and data locations are in the unread privacy policy (0). 8 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 16.\n- Hyperliquid (26): The editorial half. The SDKs are MIT and the node repository Apache-2.0 with a Dockerfile around a binary; the API servers and front end are closed and the terms were unreadable (12 of 30). No privacy policy read and nothing in the docs on data handling (0 of 30). Deprecated actions are marked in the docs without dates or a policy (8 of 20). No subprocessors or data locations (0 of 20). Total 20.\n\n### Reliability: Bitstamp API +23\n\n- Bitstamp API (63): Read with the hosted lines on the HTTP API v2 at www.bitstamp.net/api/v2/. status.bitstamp.net is a Statuspage site with component history (20). Its feed for 5 August to 3 November 2026 has 17 entries, among them withdrawals failing on 14 networks for about 3 hours on 21 August, database maintenance with login failures and intermittent trading interruptions for about 1 hour 44 minutes on 23 September, a 39-minute halt of all markets on 5 August, and delistings and single-asset suspensions. One major (10). Rate limits with numbers, 400 a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes (15). Limit errors are named (400.002, 400.067, 400.068) but there is no Retry-After or backoff guidance, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the only retry guidance is to check the order after a 500.016 timeout (8 of 15). No SLA found (0). Generally available (10). 20 + 10 + 15 + 8 + 0 + 10 = 63.\n- Hyperliquid (40): Read with the hosted lines on the REST API at api.hyperliquid.xyz, the surface an agent calls; the chain behind it is noted under details. No status page found in the docs, on hyperliquid.xyz or at status.hyperliquid.xyz, which did not resolve (0). No readable history (5). Rate limits documented with numbers per IP, per address and per WebSocket connection (15). When limited, an address gets one request every 10 seconds; no 429 shape or Retry-After is documented, but `cloid`, per-signer nonces, `expiresAfter` and `noop` make retries safe (10 of 15). No SLA (0). Mainnet is generally available (10). 0 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 = 40.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Hyperliquid +12\n\n- Bitstamp API (58): Graded on the REST API. Order book grouping and transaction time windows size responses, but there is no field selection and no MCP surface (15 of 25). Offset, limit, since and sort on transaction history, `until_id` windows on order-data replay (14 of 20). `response_code` and `response_explanation` name the failure, such as 400.009 insufficient balance, 403.004 trading blocked and 500.025 insufficient liquidity (16 of 20). No idempotency, since `client_order_id` duplicates are allowed since November 2023 and the docs say only to check the order id after a timeout; the kill switch limits damage (8 of 20). Few required parameters, but no official SDK in any language (5 of 15). 15 + 14 + 16 + 8 + 5 = 58.\n- Hyperliquid (70): An API, read for response sizing. Time-range calls return at most 500 blocks of data, fills and historical orders cap at 2,000 items, candles at 5,000, l2Book at 20 levels a side (18 of 25). Cursor-by-timestamp pagination on fills and funding, filtering by coin or dex, no field selection (14 of 20). Order errors are documented strings per order, one batch-level error rejects a batch, and `orderStatus` answers `unknownOid`; no codes and no rate-limit error shape (12 of 20). `cloid`, per-signer nonces within a time window, `expiresAfter`, `noop` to burn a nonce and `scheduleCancel` as a dead man's switch (18 of 20). Few required fields, but signing needs msgpack field order, two EIP-712 schemes and lowercase addresses, and the official SDKs are Python (Alpha) and Rust only (8 of 15). Total 70.\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Hyperliquid +11\n\n- Bitstamp API (28): Read as a closed service. The last dated API change is 28 August 2026, 67 days before the check (20). Only one dated entry in the last 90 days, after 1 July and 12 June (0). No public repository or issue tracker, support pages did not load and support.bitstamp.net did not resolve; a changelog exists (8 of 25). No official SDKs and no MCP registry presence of Bitstamp's own (0). No package to assess (0). 20 + 0 + 8 + 0 + 0 = 28.\n- Hyperliquid (39): Read as a closed hosted service with open SDKs. The API has no dated changelog, so the last dated change is the Python SDK's 0.24.0 on 4 June 2026, 152 days before this check; the node repository was pushed on 10 August 2026 and the docs describe newer actions (HIP-4 outcome markets, borrow and lend) without dates. Judgement call (10 of 30). No three dated releases in 90 days (0). Support through Discord and the docs' FAQ, 112 open issues on the SDK whose replies couldn't be read (8 of 25). Official Python and Rust SDKs, the Rust one last pushed 21 October 2025; no MCP registry entry (15). CI on Python 3.9 and 3.13 with Poetry, Dependabot badge, a lock file (6 of 10). Total 39.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Bitstamp API +9\n\n- Bitstamp API (51): No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract was found on the API page or elsewhere (0). No llms.txt or Markdown docs (0). The single documentation page describes each endpoint's purpose and parameters, with notes such as the 10-second cache on open orders and the Travel Rule fields, but not when to use one endpoint over another (14 of 20). Parameters are typed with enumerations (margin mode CROSS or ISOLATED, margin multiplier 1 to 25, order types) and required fields marked (11 of 15). Signing examples in Python, Java and C++, and error families with numbered codes and explanations (13 of 15). Version v2 in the path and header, a dated changelog from 7 April 2023 to 28 August 2026, and a 410.001 code for deprecated endpoints, with no stated notice period (13 of 15). 0 + 0 + 14 + 11 + 13 + 13 = 51.\n- Hyperliquid (42): No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract; request and response shapes are tables and JSON examples in the docs (0 of 25). llms.txt and a Markdown twin of every page by appending .md (10). Each info type and exchange action has a short description of what it does, and the signing page lists common mistakes, but little says when to use one call over another (12 of 20). Fields are one-letter keys (`a`, `b`, `p`, `s`, `r`, `t`, `c`) with numbers as strings, enums such as `tif` Alo, Ioc or Gtc, and required fields marked in tables (9 of 15). An example for every call and a list of order and cancel error strings, with no HTTP error table (11 of 15). No API version, no changelog and no dated release notes; deprecated actions such as `userDexAbstraction` are marked in place (0 of 15). Total 42.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Bitstamp API | Hyperliquid | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 63 | 40 | Bitstamp API +23 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 51 | 42 | Bitstamp API +9 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 58 | 70 | Hyperliquid +12 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 60 | 64 | Hyperliquid +4 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 20 | 55 | Hyperliquid +35 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 28 | 39 | Hyperliquid +11 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 53 | 26 | Bitstamp API +27 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **50.4 · D** | **50 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Bitstamp API | Hyperliquid |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Bitstamp Ltd. | Hyperliquid Labs |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | | |\n| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary hosted API under Bitstamp's terms of use, which our reader couldn't load | The exchange runs on the Hyperliquid chain (HyperCore), whose node is distributed as a binary under an Apache-2.0 repository; the Python and Rust SDKs are MIT. The API servers and front end are closed |\n| Tools exposed | none | 0 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-08-28 | 2026-06-04 |\n| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |\n| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Popularity | none | 1.9k stars, 167k PyPI/wk |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Bitstamp API.** Bitstamp documents its v2 API on one static page with numeric rate limits, per-endpoint key permissions, an IP allow-list, a kill switch and a sandbox. There is no official MCP server, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the fee schedule, terms, privacy policy and country list render by script and could not be read.\n\n**Hyperliquid.** Hyperliquid's API needs no signup or key, an approved API wallet can trade but not withdraw, fees and rate limits are published with numbers, and a testnet mirrors mainnet. There is no official MCP server, OpenAPI file, status page, changelog or readable terms, and signing uses two schemes the docs say to leave to an SDK.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Bitstamp API\n\n1. Mint a key with only the endpoint permissions the task needs and an IP allow-list; keep `revoke_all_api_keys` in reach as a kill switch\n2. Treat `client_order_id` as a label, not a guard. On a timeout (500.016) fetch the order by client id before resending, because duplicates are accepted\n3. Use a fresh 36-character nonce and a timestamp within 150 seconds of server time on every request, or expect API0004 and API0017\n4. Stay under 400 requests a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes; 400.002 and 400.067 mean back off, and open-orders answers are cached for 10 seconds\n5. Start on sandbox.bitstamp.net with the same paths, and read the fee schedule in a browser before quoting costs, since it is unreadable to a plain fetch\n\n### Hyperliquid\n\n1. Generate a fresh API wallet, approve it with `approveAgent` with a name and expiry, sign with it, and query with the master address, never the agent address\n2. Use the Python SDK's `sign_l1_action` and `sign_user_signed_action`; mixing the two, field order in msgpack or an uppercase address gives \"User or API Wallet ... does not exist\"\n3. Set a `cloid` on every order and read the per-order `statuses` array; one batch-level error rejects the whole batch\n4. Budget address limits by volume (one action per 1 USDC traded after 10,000); batch orders to lower IP weight, and use WebSocket for data\n5. Arm `scheduleCancel` before unattended trading so open orders are cancelled if the agent stops\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Bitstamp API or Hyperliquid?\n\nBitstamp API and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 50.4 (D) and 50 (D). Hyperliquid leads on agent ergonomics, payments \u0026 pricing and maintenance \u0026 community.\n\n### Do Bitstamp API and Hyperliquid need an API key?\n\nBitstamp API needs an API key. Hyperliquid takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.\n\n### Can an agent call Bitstamp API and Hyperliquid without installing anything?\n\nNo hosted endpoint is listed for Bitstamp API. No hosted endpoint is listed for Hyperliquid.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"bitstamp\", \"b\": \"hyperliquid\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare bitstamp hyperliquid`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitstamp.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/hyperliquid.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Bitstamp API or Hyperliquid\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bybit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Crypto.com Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-com-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gate vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gate-io-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Gemini Exchange API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-exchange-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [HTX trading API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/htx-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Binance API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase Advanced Trade API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-advanced-trade-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents) vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coinbase-mcp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Deribit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deribit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [dYdX vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dydx-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Hyperliquid vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hyperliquid-vs-okx.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "" } ], "description": "Bitstamp and Hyperliquid score within a point of each other for exchange market data, 50.4 and 50 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Bitstamp API D 50.4", "Hyperliquid D 50", "scores" ], "h1": "Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Bitstamp vs Hyperliquid for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-03", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4900, "slim": 2580 }, "version": 1 }