{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "bitstamp", "name": "Bitstamp API", "vendor": "Bitstamp Ltd.", "vendorUrl": "https://www.bitstamp.net", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bitstamp's HTTP API v2 for spot and derivatives trading, balances, deposits and withdrawals, with WebSocket and FIX feeds and a sandbox at sandbox.bitstamp.net. Bitstamp is a Robinhood company since June 2025.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitstamp.json", "dns": "bitstamp.grade.anchorterminal.com", "license": "Proprietary hosted API under Bitstamp's terms of use, which our reader couldn't load", "transports": [], "packages": [], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key and secret made in the Bitstamp account after a browser signup, sent as `X-Auth: BITSTAMP {key}` with an HMAC-SHA256 `X-Auth-Signature` over the verb, host, path, query, nonce, timestamp and body, a 36-character single-use nonce and a timestamp within 150 seconds. Keys carry per-endpoint permissions (error API0003 names a missing permission) and an IP allow-list (API0002), and `X-Auth-Subaccount-Id` targets a sub-account. `POST /api/v2/revoke_all_api_keys/` is a kill switch for every key. Responses carry an `X-Server-Auth-Signature` to verify (https://www.bitstamp.net/api/, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API itself costs nothing. Trading fees are maker and taker by 30-day volume per the API's fees endpoints, but the fee schedule page at bitstamp.net/fee-schedule/ draws its table by script and loaded empty for our reader, so the rates are unchecked. Commercial use of exchange data needs a Data License Agreement through partners@bitstamp.net. The sandbox at sandbox.bitstamp.net needs no money (https://www.bitstamp.net/api/, checked 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "Pay per use", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the API documentation (checked 2026-11-03). Fees are taken from the account; onboarding is a browser signup.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://www.bitstamp.net/api/", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "official", "hosted", "api-key", "sandbox", "status-page", "usage-priced", "eu", "uk" ], "lastRelease": "2026-08-28", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 50.4, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 1002, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 18, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 58, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 20, "reliability": 63, "schema": 51, "security": 60, "transparency": 53 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Bitstamp documents its v2 API on one static page with numeric rate limits, per-endpoint key permissions, an IP allow-list, a kill switch and a sandbox. There is no official MCP server, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the fee schedule, terms, privacy policy and country list render by script and could not be read.", "bestFor": "An agent that needs a long-running regulated spot venue in the EU, UK and US with a sandbox and per-endpoint key permissions, and can do its own signing.", "strengths": [ "Rate limits with numbers (400 requests a second, 10,000 per 10 minutes) and named error codes for client and market limits", "Keys carry per-endpoint permissions and an IP allow-list, and one call revokes every key on the account", "A sandbox at sandbox.bitstamp.net with the same v2 paths, plus order-data endpoints to recover gaps after a dropped WebSocket", "A dated API changelog from 2023 to 28 August 2026 and a Statuspage feed with per-market incidents", "Signed responses (`X-Server-Auth-Signature`) let a client verify what the server returned" ], "weaknesses": [ "No official MCP server, SDK, llms.txt or OpenAPI file; the registry's Bitstamp servers are third parties proxying public market data", "Duplicate client order ids are allowed since November 2023, so a retried order can execute twice", "The fee schedule, terms of use, privacy policy, about page and FAQ load empty without a browser, so fees, retention and the bot clauses are unchecked", "A 3-hour withdrawal failure across 14 networks on 21 August 2026 and a 39-minute halt of all markets on 5 August 2026", "security.txt expired on 12 July 2026, and no SLA was found" ], "agentNotes": [ "Mint a key with only the endpoint permissions the task needs and an IP allow-list; keep `revoke_all_api_keys` in reach as a kill switch", "Treat `client_order_id` as a label, not a guard. On a timeout (500.016) fetch the order by client id before resending, because duplicates are accepted", "Use a fresh 36-character nonce and a timestamp within 150 seconds of server time on every request, or expect API0004 and API0017", "Stay under 400 requests a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes; 400.002 and 400.067 mean back off, and open-orders answers are cached for 10 seconds", "Start on sandbox.bitstamp.net with the same paths, and read the fee schedule in a browser before quoting costs, since it is unreadable to a plain fetch" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 50.4 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 58, "maintenance": 28, "payments": 20, "reliability": 63, "schema": 51, "security": 60, "transparency": 16 }, "provenanceScore": 90, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "http": "curl https://www.bitstamp.net/api/v2/ticker/btcusd/" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bitstamp" }, "area": "payments", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Bitstamp Ltd.", "domain": "bitstamp.net", "domainRegistered": "2011-07-04", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bitstamp.net/terms-of-use/", "privacy": "https://www.bitstamp.net/privacy-policy/", "statusPage": "https://status.bitstamp.net", "changelog": "https://www.bitstamp.net/api/", "securityTxt": "expired", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "Bitstamp Ltd. is named in Robinhood's newsroom post of 2 June 2025 on closing the acquisition; the terms of use and privacy policy pages loaded empty for our reader, so the entities they name are unconfirmed.", "RDAP gives bitstamp.net a registration date of 4 July 2011.", "https://www.bitstamp.net/.well-known/security.txt names HackerOne's Robinhood programme as Contact and Policy and expired on 12 July 2026.", "www.bitstamp.net/robots.txt allows /api/ itself and disallows /api/*, /account/, /trade/ and others; only /api/ was read under it. status.bitstamp.net disallows /api/ and /embed/, so the history feed was read. support.bitstamp.net did not resolve.", "The API changelog is a section of the API documentation page; there is no separate changelog URL." ], "score": 90 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.json", "live": { "slug": "bitstamp", "vendorStatus": { "page": "https://status.bitstamp.net", "indicator": "none", "summary": "All Systems Operational", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T20:04:41.953848408Z" }, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bitstamp.net/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "expired", "expires": "2026-07-12T11:59:00.000Z", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:53:31.314157297Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:04:41.953848408Z" } }, "answer": "Bybit scores 57.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability.", "b": { "slug": "bybit", "name": "Bybit", "vendor": "Bybit", "vendorUrl": "https://www.bybit.com", "kind": "http-api", "category": "crypto-exchanges", "summary": "Bybit is a centralised crypto exchange for spot, perpetual and futures contracts, options and earn products, reached through its V5 REST and WebSocket API, a FIX order-entry gateway and an official stdio MCP server published from its GitHub organisation.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bybit", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bybit.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bybit.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bybit.json", "dns": "bybit.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/bybit-exchange/trading-mcp", "transports": [ "stdio" ], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "bybit-official-trading-server" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "pybit" } ], "auth": "api-key", "authNotes": "API key minted on the API management page after a browser sign-up and identity verification, signed per request with HMAC-SHA256 (system-generated secret) or RSA-SHA256 (self-generated key pair) in the X-BAPI-API-KEY, X-BAPI-TIMESTAMP, X-BAPI-SIGN and X-BAPI-RECV-WINDOW headers. Permissions are granted per group (ContractTrade, Spot, Wallet with a separate Withdraw value, Options, Derivatives, Exchange, Earn, Affiliate, BlockTrade) with a readOnly flag, and keys can be bound to IP addresses. A key with no IP binding expires 90 days after creation and can be extended on the management page with email and 2FA codes. Keys for testnet come from testnet.bybit.com and keys for demo trading from the production account in demo mode (https://bybit-exchange.github.io/docs/v5/user/apikey-info and https://bybit-exchange.github.io/docs/faq, checked 2026-11-03).", "pricing": "usage", "pricingNotes": "The API and the MCP server cost nothing; trades carry Bybit's fees. At VIP 0 the spot fee is 0.1 per cent maker and taker, perpetual and futures contracts 0.02 per cent maker and 0.055 per cent taker, options 0.02 per cent maker and 0.03 per cent taker, with lower tiers by 30-day volume or asset balance and a note that rates vary by region. Fiat pairs, the Adventure Zone, xStocks and pre-market perpetuals have their own tables (https://www.bybit.com/en/help-center/article/Trading-Fee-Structure, last updated 2 September 2026, read 2026-11-03).", "priceSummary": "0.1% fee", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the V5 docs, the MCP server's README or source, or the fee schedule (checked 2026-11-03). Trading fees are taken from the account balance.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": 398, "popularity": { "githubStars": 43, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-03" }, "docsUrl": "https://bybit-exchange.github.io/docs/v5/intro", "capabilities": [ "exchange.market-data", "exchange.spot-trading", "exchange.derivatives", "exchange.balances", "exchange.transfers", "exchange.staking", "market.crypto" ], "tags": [ "hosted", "closed-source", "api-key", "usage-priced", "sandbox", "no-status-page", "mcp", "official", "python", "typescript", "go", "java", "dotnet" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-30", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 57.3, "grade": "C", "agentReady": false, "rank": 745, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1349, "categoryRank": 11, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 66, "maintenance": 66, "payments": 40, "reliability": 45, "schema": 73, "security": 60, "transparency": 51 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-03" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "Bybit publishes per-endpoint rate limits, a demo environment, scoped keys with a read-only flag and IP binding, and an official stdio MCP server whose 398 tools carry read-only and destructive annotations. There is no status page, no OpenAPI file, no SLA, the MCP server has no toolsets, and the global terms and privacy pages are drawn by script.", "bestFor": "An agent trading spot, perpetuals, futures and options in a person's Bybit account outside the excluded jurisdictions, with a demo environment to rehearse on.", "strengths": [ "Official MCP server from Bybit's GitHub organisation with 398 generated tools, each annotated readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and openWorldHint, and market data tools that need no key", "Rate limits published per endpoint and per UID with limit, remaining and reset headers on every response, and a documented 403 ban rule for the IP limit", "API keys scoped by product group with a read-only flag, a separate Withdraw permission, IP binding and a 90-day expiry for unbound keys", "Demo trading at api-demo.bybit.com with self-served demo funds, plus a testnet with its own keys", "VIP 0 fees published without login, 0.1 per cent spot and 0.02 per cent maker and 0.055 per cent taker on contracts" ], "weaknesses": [ "No status page, incident history or SLA was found; the terms say the API is not guaranteed to be available", "No OpenAPI or llms.txt for the V5 API, and the MCP server exposes all 398 tools with no toolset, module or read-only switch", "Not in the official MCP registry; the hosted `bybit` entry there is a third party's server, not Bybit's", "The global terms, privacy policy and about pages on bybit.com render by script and were not read; the terms read are the UAE-regulated entity's PDF", "Changelog entries change response shapes and remove fields without a notice period, such as the Asset Overview restructure of 18 August 2026" ], "agentNotes": [ "Create a key with only the permission groups the task needs, set readOnly for research keys, leave Withdraw off and bind an IP, or the key expires after 90 days", "Send a unique orderLinkId on every order and reuse it when amending or cancelling, since create-order is asynchronous and confirmed over WebSocket", "Read X-Bapi-Limit-Status before bursts and wait until X-Bapi-Limit-Reset-Timestamp on retCode 10006; on HTTP 403 stop all sessions for at least 10 minutes", "Test on api-demo.bybit.com with a demo key from the production account, not on testnet demo mode, which the docs call meaningless", "Run the MCP server with BYBIT_TESTNET=true first, and only in a client that shows a per-call approval, because the server has no read-only mode of its own" ], "metrics": { "kind": "remote", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "C", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 57.3 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 66, "maintenance": 66, "payments": 40, "reliability": 45, "schema": 73, "security": 60, "transparency": 27 }, "provenanceScore": 75, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-03", "maintenance": "2026-11-03", "payments": "2026-11-03", "reliability": "2026-11-03", "schema": "2026-11-03", "security": "2026-11-03", "transparency": "2026-11-03" }, "last": "2026-11-03", "oldest": "2026-11-03", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npm install -g bybit-official-trading-server", "http": "curl https://api.bybit.com/v5/market/tickers?category=spot\u0026symbol=BTCUSDT", "claudeCode": "claude mcp add bybit -- npx -y bybit-official-trading-server@latest", "config": { "mcpServers": { "bybit": { "args": [ "-y", "bybit-official-trading-server@latest" ], "command": "npx", "env": { "BYBIT_API_KEY": "YOUR_API_KEY", "BYBIT_API_SECRET": "YOUR_API_SECRET", "BYBIT_TESTNET": "true" } } } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/exchange.market-data", "tool": "https://letme.dev/bybit" }, "area": "payments", "unitPrices": [ { "item": "Spot trade, VIP 0 maker or taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.1, "note": "crypto-crypto pairs" }, { "item": "Perpetual or futures trade, VIP 0 taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.055, "note": "maker 0.02 per cent" }, { "item": "Options trade, VIP 0 taker", "unit": "pct", "usd": 0.03, "note": "maker 0.02 per cent" } ], "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Bybit Virtual Asset Platform Operator L.L.C. S.P.C", "domain": "bybit.com", "domainRegistered": "1999-08-05", "endpointOnVendorDomain": true, "terms": "https://www.bybit.com/en/terms-service", "privacy": "https://www.bybit.com/en/privacy-policy", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://bybit-exchange.github.io/docs/changelog/v5", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-03", "notes": [ "www.bybit.com answers WebFetch with a timeout; its robots.txt (read with curl) allows the help centre, legal and static paths and disallows query-string URLs and x-api endpoints. The terms and privacy pages render by script, so the terms read are the PDF at /common-static/compliance/legal/BYBIT/b2e1c94c53ee5e12e165919de919337e.pdf (Bybit Virtual Asset Platform Operator L.L.C. S.P.C, last updated 23 January 2026, English and Welsh law, SIAC arbitration). The privacy policy was not read.", "RDAP gives bybit.com a registration date of 5 August 1999 (CSC Corporate Domains), earlier than the company, so the domain was bought.", "https://www.bybit.com/.well-known/security.txt answers 404. bybit-exchange.github.io has no robots.txt and no security.txt.", "No status page found; status.bybit.com does not resolve, the docs link none, and a search found only third-party monitors.", "The V5 changelog is dated by day; the MCP server's versions are on npm. The P2P service terms on bybit.com name Bybit Technology Limited as the company." ], "score": 75 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bybit.json", "live": { "slug": "bybit", "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "bybit-exchange/trading-mcp", "version": "2.1.26", "released": "2026-10-30", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:04:41.294958912Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "bybit-official-trading-server", "version": "2.1.26", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:04:40.287082189Z" }, { "registry": "pypi", "name": "pybit", "version": "5.17.0", "released": "2026-07-14", "seenAt": "2026-11-04T20:04:41.10004853Z" } ], "githubStars": 43, "npmWeekly": 1294, "pypiWeekly": 97932, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://bybit.com/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-04T15:54:01.70982249Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-04T20:04:41.294958912Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 38, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "bybit", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "Read as a closed service. The last dated API change is 28 August 2026, 67 days before the check (20). Only one dated entry in the last 90 days, after 1 July and 12 June (0). No public repository or issue tracker, support pages did not load and support.bitstamp.net did not resolve; a changelog exists (8 of 25). No official SDKs and no MCP registry presence of Bitstamp's own (0). No package to assess (0). 20 + 0 + 8 + 0 + 0 = 28.", "b": "Read as a hosted service with an open-source MCP server. The MCP package shipped 2.1.26 on 30 October 2026 and the V5 changelog's latest entry is 29 October (30). 31 npm versions since 16 April 2026, 11 of them in the last 90 days, and 24 changelog entries in the same window (20). The trading-mcp repository has 4 open issues and 18 forks; whether issues get answers was not checked, and the API has no public forum we could read (10 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry (0). The package has four dependencies, no install scripts, a publish workflow and no test workflow (6 of 10). 66." }, "scores": { "a": 28, "b": 66 } }, { "by": 22, "category": "schema", "leads": "bybit", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract was found on the API page or elsewhere (0). No llms.txt or Markdown docs (0). The single documentation page describes each endpoint's purpose and parameters, with notes such as the 10-second cache on open orders and the Travel Rule fields, but not when to use one endpoint over another (14 of 20). Parameters are typed with enumerations (margin mode CROSS or ISOLATED, margin multiplier 1 to 25, order types) and required fields marked (11 of 15). Signing examples in Python, Java and C++, and error families with numbered codes and explanations (13 of 15). Version v2 in the path and header, a dated changelog from 7 April 2023 to 28 August 2026, and a 410.001 code for deprecated endpoints, with no stated notice period (13 of 15). 0 + 0 + 14 + 11 + 13 + 13 = 51.", "b": "No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract for the REST API; the MCP server's 398 tools have zod schemas turned into JSON Schema, so the contract exists for the MCP surface only (12 of 25). No llms.txt; the docs are a public Docusaurus repository (bybit-exchange/docs) whose MDX source an agent can read (5 of 10). The MCP tool descriptions state purpose, rules and an agent hint per tool, and the API reference gives one page per endpoint (15 of 20). Parameters are typed with enums such as category and orderType and required flags (12 of 15). Request and response examples on each endpoint page and an error code page of about 750 codes with text (14 of 15). A dated changelog with 24 entries in the last 90 days, versioned V3 to V5 (15). 73." }, "scores": { "a": 51, "b": 73 } }, { "by": 20, "category": "payments", "leads": "bybit", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "reasons": { "a": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule page loaded empty, the API's fee endpoints need a key, and no rate could be read, so fees are scored as not published (0, unchecked). The API is free, public endpoints need no key and the sandbox needs no money (20). A person must sign up in a browser with identity checks and mint the key (0). 0 + 0 + 20 + 0 = 20.", "b": "No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule is public without login, with VIP 0 maker and taker rates per product and the tier criteria (20). Reading market data needs no key and the demo environment costs nothing, no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person must register, pass identity verification and mint the key in a browser (0). 40." }, "scores": { "a": 20, "b": 40 } }, { "by": 18, "category": "reliability", "leads": "bitstamp", "name": "Reliability", "reasons": { "a": "Read with the hosted lines on the HTTP API v2 at www.bitstamp.net/api/v2/. status.bitstamp.net is a Statuspage site with component history (20). Its feed for 5 August to 3 November 2026 has 17 entries, among them withdrawals failing on 14 networks for about 3 hours on 21 August, database maintenance with login failures and intermittent trading interruptions for about 1 hour 44 minutes on 23 September, a 39-minute halt of all markets on 5 August, and delistings and single-asset suspensions. One major (10). Rate limits with numbers, 400 a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes (15). Limit errors are named (400.002, 400.067, 400.068) but there is no Retry-After or backoff guidance, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the only retry guidance is to check the order after a 500.016 timeout (8 of 15). No SLA found (0). Generally available (10). 20 + 10 + 15 + 8 + 0 + 10 = 63.", "b": "Graded with the hosted lines on the V5 API at api.bybit.com. No status page found (status.bybit.com does not resolve, the docs link none), so 0 for the page and 5 for no readable history. Rate limits are published per endpoint and per UID with numbers, plus a 600 per 5 second IP limit (15). Every response carries X-Bapi-Limit, X-Bapi-Limit-Status and X-Bapi-Limit-Reset-Timestamp, retCode 10006 and HTTP 403 are documented with a wait rule, and orders take a unique orderLinkId that amend and cancel accept (15). No SLA (0). V5 is the current production API, not a beta (10). 45." }, "scores": { "a": 63, "b": 45 } }, { "by": 8, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "bybit", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Graded on the REST API. Order book grouping and transaction time windows size responses, but there is no field selection and no MCP surface (15 of 25). Offset, limit, since and sort on transaction history, `until_id` windows on order-data replay (14 of 20). `response_code` and `response_explanation` name the failure, such as 400.009 insufficient balance, 403.004 trading blocked and 500.025 insufficient liquidity (16 of 20). No idempotency, since `client_order_id` duplicates are allowed since November 2023 and the docs say only to check the order id after a timeout; the kill switch limits damage (8 of 20). Few required parameters, but no official SDK in any language (5 of 15). 15 + 14 + 16 + 8 + 5 = 58.", "b": "Read for the API with the MCP server beside it. The MCP server has 398 tools in one list with no toolset, module or read-only switch (5 of 25, nothing added back). V5 reads take limit and cursor and category filters (15 of 20). retCode and retMsg on every response with a code list an agent can branch on, though create-order answers before the order is final and the docs say to confirm over WebSocket (14 of 20). orderLinkId makes order retries safe and every MCP tool carries readOnlyHint and destructiveHint (17 of 20). Five required fields on an order, official SDKs in Python, Go, Java and .NET (15). 66." }, "scores": { "a": 58, "b": 66 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "HTTP API", "b": "HTTP API", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "Bitstamp Ltd.", "b": "Bybit", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "", "b": "stdio", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "API key", "b": "API key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Pay per use", "b": "Pay per use", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Proprietary hosted API under Bitstamp's terms of use, which our reader couldn't load", "b": "none", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "none", "b": "398", "name": "Tools exposed" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-08-28", "b": "2026-10-30", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "couldn't be read", "b": "couldn't be read", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "none", "b": "43 stars", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Bybit scores 57.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Bitstamp API or Bybit?" }, { "answer": "Both need an API key.", "question": "Do Bitstamp API and Bybit need an API key?" }, { "answer": "No hosted endpoint is listed for Bitstamp API. Bybit runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.", "question": "Can an agent call Bitstamp API and Bybit without installing anything?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": [ "Reliability, 63 against 45" ], "also": null, "goodFor": "An agent that needs a long-running regulated spot venue in the EU, UK and US with a sandbox and per-endpoint key permissions, and can do its own signing.", "slug": "bitstamp", "watchFor": "No official MCP server, SDK, llms.txt or OpenAPI file; the registry's Bitstamp servers are third parties proxying public market data" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 73 against 51", "Agent ergonomics, 66 against 58", "Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 20", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 66 against 28" ], "also": [ "Runs on your own machine" ], "goodFor": "An agent trading spot, perpetuals, futures and options in a person's Bybit account outside the excluded jurisdictions, with a demo environment to rehearse on.", "slug": "bybit", "watchFor": "No status page, incident history or SLA was found; the terms say the API is not guaranteed to be available" } ], "history": null, "job": { "capability": "exchange.market-data", "name": "Exchange market data" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bitfinex API vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bitget vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Bithumb Open API vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bitstamp API vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.json", "title": "Bybit vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-coinbase-mcp.json", "title": "Bybit vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-coinbase-mcp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-crypto-com-exchange.json", "title": "Bybit vs Crypto.com Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-crypto-com-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-deribit.json", "title": "Bybit vs Deribit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-deribit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-dydx.json", "title": "Bybit vs dYdX", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-dydx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-gate-io.json", "title": "Bybit vs Gate", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-gate-io" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-gemini-exchange.json", "title": "Bybit vs Gemini Exchange API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-gemini-exchange" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-htx.json", "title": "Bybit vs HTX trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-htx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.json", "title": "Bybit vs Hyperliquid", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-kraken.json", "title": "Bybit vs Kraken API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-kraken" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-kucoin.json", "title": "Bybit vs KuCoin", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-kucoin" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-mexc.json", "title": "Bybit vs MEXC API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-mexc" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-okx.json", "title": "Bybit vs OKX API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-okx" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-uniswap.json", "title": "Bybit vs Uniswap Trading API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-uniswap" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-upbit.json", "title": "Bybit vs Upbit Open API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-upbit" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bitstamp API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bybit.json", "title": "Binance API vs Bybit", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bybit" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "bitstamp": 63, "by": 18, "bybit": 45, "edge": "bitstamp", "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitstamp": 51, "by": 22, "bybit": 73, "edge": "bybit", "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "weight": 13 }, { "bitstamp": 58, "by": 8, "bybit": 66, "edge": "bybit", "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "weight": 13 }, { "bitstamp": 60, "by": 0, "bybit": 60, "edge": "", "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "weight": 14 }, { "bitstamp": 20, "by": 20, "bybit": 40, "edge": "bybit", "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "bitstamp": 28, "by": 38, "bybit": 66, "edge": "bybit", "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "weight": 7 }, { "bitstamp": 53, "by": 2, "bybit": 51, "edge": "bitstamp", "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Bybit scores 57.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability. Both do exchange market data.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "bitstamp": "Bitstamp documents its v2 API on one static page with numeric rate limits, per-endpoint key permissions, an IP allow-list, a kill switch and a sandbox. There is no official MCP server, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the fee schedule, terms, privacy policy and country list render by script and could not be read.", "bybit": "Bybit publishes per-endpoint rate limits, a demo environment, scoped keys with a read-only flag and IP binding, and an official stdio MCP server whose 398 tools carry read-only and destructive annotations. There is no status page, no OpenAPI file, no SLA, the MCP server has no toolsets, and the global terms and privacy pages are drawn by script." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit.min.md" }, "markdown": "Bybit scores 57.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability. Both do exchange market data.\n\n- Bitstamp API: grade D, 50.4/100, rank #1002 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bitstamp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitstamp.json\n- Bybit: grade C, 57.3/100, rank #745 of 1349. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/bybit.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bybit.json\n- Best crypto exchange APIs and MCP servers for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n- All 210 exchanges comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crypto-exchanges/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Bitstamp API (D)\n\nGood for: An agent that needs a long-running regulated spot venue in the EU, UK and US with a sandbox and per-endpoint key permissions, and can do its own signing.\n\nAhead on:\n- Reliability, 63 against 45\n\nWatch for: No official MCP server, SDK, llms.txt or OpenAPI file; the registry's Bitstamp servers are third parties proxying public market data\n\n### Bybit (C)\n\nGood for: An agent trading spot, perpetuals, futures and options in a person's Bybit account outside the excluded jurisdictions, with a demo environment to rehearse on.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 73 against 51\n- Agent ergonomics, 66 against 58\n- Payments \u0026 pricing, 40 against 20\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 66 against 28\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Runs on your own machine\n\nWatch for: No status page, incident history or SLA was found; the terms say the API is not guaranteed to be available\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Bybit +38\n\n- Bitstamp API (28): Read as a closed service. The last dated API change is 28 August 2026, 67 days before the check (20). Only one dated entry in the last 90 days, after 1 July and 12 June (0). No public repository or issue tracker, support pages did not load and support.bitstamp.net did not resolve; a changelog exists (8 of 25). No official SDKs and no MCP registry presence of Bitstamp's own (0). No package to assess (0). 20 + 0 + 8 + 0 + 0 = 28.\n- Bybit (66): Read as a hosted service with an open-source MCP server. The MCP package shipped 2.1.26 on 30 October 2026 and the V5 changelog's latest entry is 29 October (30). 31 npm versions since 16 April 2026, 11 of them in the last 90 days, and 24 changelog entries in the same window (20). The trading-mcp repository has 4 open issues and 18 forks; whether issues get answers was not checked, and the API has no public forum we could read (10 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry (0). The package has four dependencies, no install scripts, a publish workflow and no test workflow (6 of 10). 66.\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Bybit +22\n\n- Bitstamp API (51): No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract was found on the API page or elsewhere (0). No llms.txt or Markdown docs (0). The single documentation page describes each endpoint's purpose and parameters, with notes such as the 10-second cache on open orders and the Travel Rule fields, but not when to use one endpoint over another (14 of 20). Parameters are typed with enumerations (margin mode CROSS or ISOLATED, margin multiplier 1 to 25, order types) and required fields marked (11 of 15). Signing examples in Python, Java and C++, and error families with numbered codes and explanations (13 of 15). Version v2 in the path and header, a dated changelog from 7 April 2023 to 28 August 2026, and a 410.001 code for deprecated endpoints, with no stated notice period (13 of 15). 0 + 0 + 14 + 11 + 13 + 13 = 51.\n- Bybit (73): No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract for the REST API; the MCP server's 398 tools have zod schemas turned into JSON Schema, so the contract exists for the MCP surface only (12 of 25). No llms.txt; the docs are a public Docusaurus repository (bybit-exchange/docs) whose MDX source an agent can read (5 of 10). The MCP tool descriptions state purpose, rules and an agent hint per tool, and the API reference gives one page per endpoint (15 of 20). Parameters are typed with enums such as category and orderType and required flags (12 of 15). Request and response examples on each endpoint page and an error code page of about 750 codes with text (14 of 15). A dated changelog with 24 entries in the last 90 days, versioned V3 to V5 (15). 73.\n\n### Payments \u0026 pricing: Bybit +20\n\n- Bitstamp API (20): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule page loaded empty, the API's fee endpoints need a key, and no rate could be read, so fees are scored as not published (0, unchecked). The API is free, public endpoints need no key and the sandbox needs no money (20). A person must sign up in a browser with identity checks and mint the key (0). 0 + 0 + 20 + 0 = 20.\n- Bybit (40): No machine payment protocol (0). The fee schedule is public without login, with VIP 0 maker and taker rates per product and the tier criteria (20). Reading market data needs no key and the demo environment costs nothing, no card is asked for at sign-up (20). A person must register, pass identity verification and mint the key in a browser (0). 40.\n\n### Reliability: Bitstamp API +18\n\n- Bitstamp API (63): Read with the hosted lines on the HTTP API v2 at www.bitstamp.net/api/v2/. status.bitstamp.net is a Statuspage site with component history (20). Its feed for 5 August to 3 November 2026 has 17 entries, among them withdrawals failing on 14 networks for about 3 hours on 21 August, database maintenance with login failures and intermittent trading interruptions for about 1 hour 44 minutes on 23 September, a 39-minute halt of all markets on 5 August, and delistings and single-asset suspensions. One major (10). Rate limits with numbers, 400 a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes (15). Limit errors are named (400.002, 400.067, 400.068) but there is no Retry-After or backoff guidance, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the only retry guidance is to check the order after a 500.016 timeout (8 of 15). No SLA found (0). Generally available (10). 20 + 10 + 15 + 8 + 0 + 10 = 63.\n- Bybit (45): Graded with the hosted lines on the V5 API at api.bybit.com. No status page found (status.bybit.com does not resolve, the docs link none), so 0 for the page and 5 for no readable history. Rate limits are published per endpoint and per UID with numbers, plus a 600 per 5 second IP limit (15). Every response carries X-Bapi-Limit, X-Bapi-Limit-Status and X-Bapi-Limit-Reset-Timestamp, retCode 10006 and HTTP 403 are documented with a wait rule, and orders take a unique orderLinkId that amend and cancel accept (15). No SLA (0). V5 is the current production API, not a beta (10). 45.\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Bybit +8\n\n- Bitstamp API (58): Graded on the REST API. Order book grouping and transaction time windows size responses, but there is no field selection and no MCP surface (15 of 25). Offset, limit, since and sort on transaction history, `until_id` windows on order-data replay (14 of 20). `response_code` and `response_explanation` name the failure, such as 400.009 insufficient balance, 403.004 trading blocked and 500.025 insufficient liquidity (16 of 20). No idempotency, since `client_order_id` duplicates are allowed since November 2023 and the docs say only to check the order id after a timeout; the kill switch limits damage (8 of 20). Few required parameters, but no official SDK in any language (5 of 15). 15 + 14 + 16 + 8 + 5 = 58.\n- Bybit (66): Read for the API with the MCP server beside it. The MCP server has 398 tools in one list with no toolset, module or read-only switch (5 of 25, nothing added back). V5 reads take limit and cursor and category filters (15 of 20). retCode and retMsg on every response with a code list an agent can branch on, though create-order answers before the order is final and the docs say to confirm over WebSocket (14 of 20). orderLinkId makes order retries safe and every MCP tool carries readOnlyHint and destructiveHint (17 of 20). Five required fields on an order, official SDKs in Python, Go, Java and .NET (15). 66.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Bitstamp API | Bybit | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 63 | 45 | Bitstamp API +18 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 51 | 73 | Bybit +22 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 58 | 66 | Bybit +8 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 60 | 60 | even |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 20 | 40 | Bybit +20 |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 28 | 66 | Bybit +38 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 53 | 51 | Bitstamp API +2 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |\n| **Total** | | **50.4 · D** | **57.3 · C** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Bitstamp API | Bybit |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |\n| Vendor | Bitstamp Ltd. | Bybit |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | | stdio |\n| Auth | API key | API key |\n| Pricing | Pay per use | Pay per use |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Proprietary hosted API under Bitstamp's terms of use, which our reader couldn't load | none |\n| Tools exposed | none | 398 |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |\n| llms.txt | no | no |\n| Last release | 2026-08-28 | 2026-10-30 |\n| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |\n| Popularity | none | 43 stars |\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Bitstamp API.** Bitstamp documents its v2 API on one static page with numeric rate limits, per-endpoint key permissions, an IP allow-list, a kill switch and a sandbox. There is no official MCP server, duplicate client order ids are allowed, and the fee schedule, terms, privacy policy and country list render by script and could not be read.\n\n**Bybit.** Bybit publishes per-endpoint rate limits, a demo environment, scoped keys with a read-only flag and IP binding, and an official stdio MCP server whose 398 tools carry read-only and destructive annotations. There is no status page, no OpenAPI file, no SLA, the MCP server has no toolsets, and the global terms and privacy pages are drawn by script.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Bitstamp API\n\n1. Mint a key with only the endpoint permissions the task needs and an IP allow-list; keep `revoke_all_api_keys` in reach as a kill switch\n2. Treat `client_order_id` as a label, not a guard. On a timeout (500.016) fetch the order by client id before resending, because duplicates are accepted\n3. Use a fresh 36-character nonce and a timestamp within 150 seconds of server time on every request, or expect API0004 and API0017\n4. Stay under 400 requests a second and 10,000 per 10 minutes; 400.002 and 400.067 mean back off, and open-orders answers are cached for 10 seconds\n5. Start on sandbox.bitstamp.net with the same paths, and read the fee schedule in a browser before quoting costs, since it is unreadable to a plain fetch\n\n### Bybit\n\n1. Create a key with only the permission groups the task needs, set readOnly for research keys, leave Withdraw off and bind an IP, or the key expires after 90 days\n2. Send a unique orderLinkId on every order and reuse it when amending or cancelling, since create-order is asynchronous and confirmed over WebSocket\n3. Read X-Bapi-Limit-Status before bursts and wait until X-Bapi-Limit-Reset-Timestamp on retCode 10006; on HTTP 403 stop all sessions for at least 10 minutes\n4. Test on api-demo.bybit.com with a demo key from the production account, not on testnet demo mode, which the docs call meaningless\n5. Run the MCP server with BYBIT_TESTNET=true first, and only in a client that shows a per-call approval, because the server has no read-only mode of its own\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Bitstamp API or Bybit?\n\nBybit scores 57.3 (C) on agent readiness against Bitstamp API's 50.4 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Bitstamp API leads on reliability.\n\n### Do Bitstamp API and Bybit need an API key?\n\nBoth need an API key.\n\n### Can an agent call Bitstamp API and Bybit without installing anything?\n\nNo hosted endpoint is listed for Bitstamp API. Bybit runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"bitstamp\", \"b\": \"bybit\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare bitstamp bybit`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bitstamp.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/bybit.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Bitstamp API or Bybit\n\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitfinex API vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitfinex-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bitget vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitget-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Bithumb Open API vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bithumb-vs-bybit.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bitstamp API vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Bybit vs Coinbase Advanced Trade API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-coinbase-advanced-trade.md)\n- [Bybit vs Coinbase MCP server (Coinbase for Agents)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-coinbase-mcp.md)\n- [Bybit vs Crypto.com Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-crypto-com-exchange.md)\n- [Bybit vs Deribit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-deribit.md)\n- [Bybit vs dYdX](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-dydx.md)\n- [Bybit vs Gate](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-gate-io.md)\n- [Bybit vs Gemini Exchange API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-gemini-exchange.md)\n- [Bybit vs HTX trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-htx.md)\n- [Bybit vs Hyperliquid](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-hyperliquid.md)\n- [Bybit vs Kraken API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-kraken.md)\n- [Bybit vs KuCoin](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-kucoin.md)\n- [Bybit vs MEXC API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-mexc.md)\n- [Bybit vs OKX API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-okx.md)\n- [Bybit vs Uniswap Trading API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-uniswap.md)\n- [Bybit vs Upbit Open API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bybit-vs-upbit.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bitstamp API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bitstamp.md)\n- [Binance API vs Bybit](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/binance-vs-bybit.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-04", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Bitstamp API vs Bybit", "url": "" } ], "description": "Bybit scores 57.3 (C) to Bitstamp's 50.4 (D) for exchange market data. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Bitstamp API D 50.4", "Bybit C 57.3", "scores" ], "h1": "Bitstamp API vs Bybit", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Bitstamp vs Bybit for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-03", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/bitstamp-vs-bybit" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 4400, "slim": 2130 }, "version": 1 }